Seismic refraction characteristics of the Elura ore body and regolith
Robert J WhiteleyCoffey Geotechnics Pty. Ltd., 8/12 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW 2066, Australia.
Email: bob_whiteley@coffey.com
Exploration Geophysics 38(4) 242-253 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG07026
Submitted: 20 April 2007 Accepted: 4 September 2007 Published: 6 December 2007
Abstract
Major exploration difficulties occur when the distinctive characteristics of ore targets are obscured or modified by physical property variations within the regolith. Improved exploration success in the highly variable Australian regolith requires greater understanding of this medium which can only be achieved with new or improved exploration technologies.
The Cobar District of New South Wales is one of the world’s most active mineral exploration regions with a variable regolith. This region has yielded substantial mineral wealth and the Elura ore body is one of the largest massive sulphide deposits to have entered the Cobar regolith. Previous pre-mining, shallow seismic refraction data over this ore body have been re-interpreted using visual interactive ray tracing and wavepath eikonal tomography. This improved interpretation approach has been integrated with the most recent geological knowledge, weathering history and the seismic properties of the shallow ore and host rocks to refine the seismic characteristics of the Elura ore body and regolith. The interpretations have confirmed the earlier qualitative interpretation that the Elura gossan and the altered ore zone form a local, low-velocity plug extending to a depth of ~100 m within the shallower, higher velocity weathered and fresh siltstone host rocks. The margins of this plug are well defined in the refraction interpretation as they form strong seismic wave diffraction sites at the base of the surrounding regolith. The base of this plug, representing the altered massive sulphide ore, also tends to have a lower seismic velocity than the fresh host rocks. Velocity information on the deeper gossan, supergene zone could not be obtained directly from the first-arrival seismic data as this region is laterally hidden. It is clear from this interpretation that the base of the regolith over the Elura ore body and margins are highly irregular and not well represented as a single continuous refractor as required by less sophisticated refraction interpretation approaches.
This case study shows that detailed seismic refraction, supported by improved interpretation techniques and petrophysical testing, provide detailed regolith information and have increased exploration potential for massive sulphide targets that enter or are close to the regolith.
Key words: Elura ore body, Cobar, seismic refraction, regolith, VIRT, WET.
Acknowledgments
The assistance of Dr Don Emerson is gratefully acknowledged. Dr Barry McMahon kindly provided copies of the analogue seismic records from the early seismic refraction survey with unpublished reports. I thank Dr Richard Bates, an anonymous reviewer and the editor for their efforts with the manuscript.
Birch, F., 1961, The velocity of compressional waves in rocks to 10 kilobars: Journal of Geophysical Research 65, 1083–1102.
Emerson, D. W., 1980a, The Geophysics of the Elura Ore body, Cobar New South Wales: Bulletin of Australia Exploration Geophysics 11, 143–347.
Emerson, D. W., and Mcnae, J., 2001, Further physical property data from the Archean regolith, Western Australia: Preview 92, 33–37.
Glen, R. A., 1982, The Ampitheatre Group, Cobar, New South Wales: preliminary results of new mapping and implications for new ore search: NSW Geol. Survey Quarterly Notes 49, 2–14.
Hawkins, L. V., 1961, The Reciprocal Method of routine seismic refraction investigations: Geophysics 26, 806–819.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lawrie, K. C., and Hinman, M. C., 1998, Cobar-style polymetallic Au-Cu—Ag-Pb-Zn deposits: AGSO Journal of Australian Geology & Geophysics 17, 169–187.
Qin, F., Luo, Y., Olsen, K., Cai, W., and Schuster, G. T., 1992, Finite-Difference Solution of the Eikonal Equation: Geophysics 57, 478–487.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Salisbury, M. H., Milkereit, B., and Bleeker, W., 1996, Seismic Imaging of Massive Sulphide deposits: Part I, Rock Properties: Economic Geology and the Bulletin of the Society of Economic Geologists 91, 821–827.
Schuster, G. T., and Quintus-Bosz, A., 1993, Wavepath eikonal traveltime inversion: Geophysics 58, 1314–1323.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Taylor, G. F., Wilmhurst, J. R., Togashi, Y., and Andrew, A. S., 1984, Geochemical and mineralogical haloes about the Elura Zn-Pb-Ag ore body, Western New South Wales: Journal of Geochemical Exploration 22, 265–290.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Whiteley, R. J., Hawkins, L. V., and Govett, G. J. S., 1984, The seismic, electrical and electrogeochemical character of the Mount Bulga ore body, NSW, Australia: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1984, 310–314.
Whiteley, R. J., 2004, Shallow seismic refraction interpretation with visual interactive ray trace (VIRT) modelling: Exploration Geophysics 35, 116–123.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Whiteley, R. J., and Eccleston, P. J., 2006, Comparison of shallow seismic refraction interpretation methods for regolith mapping: Exploration Geophysics 37, 285–292.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wyllie, M., Gregory, A., and Gardner, G., 1958, An experimental investigation of factors affecting elastic wave velocities in porous media: Geophysics 23, 459–493.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |