Register      Login
Exploration Geophysics Exploration Geophysics Society
Journal of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Blind deconvolution of seismic signals with non-white reflectivities

He-Zhen Wu 1 3 Li-Yun Fu 1 3 Xiao-Hong Meng 2 3
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

1 Institute of Geology and Geophysics of China Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China.

2 Key Laboratory of Geo-detection, Ministry of Education (China University of Geosciences, Beijing City 100083, China).

3 Corresponding authors. Emails: wuhezhen@sohu.com; lfu@mail.iggcas.ac.cn; mxh@cugb.edu.cn

Exploration Geophysics 38(4) 235-241 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG07029
Submitted: 18 July 2007  Accepted: 5 November 2007   Published: 6 December 2007

Abstract

Seismic deconvolution technology is important in seismic data processing. We propose a new blind deconvolution algorithm for simultaneous wavelet estimation and deconvolution of seismic data. Optimal seismic deconvolution can be achieved by the combined application of a non-white reflectivity model and the blind deconvolution method. We incorporate a scaled Gaussian noise (SGN) model of seismic reflection coefficients into the seismic blind deconvolution method. The SGN model has the property of scale invariance. We present a framework to generalise the conventional deconvolution procedure to handle reflection coefficients that do not follow the white-noise model. Reflection coefficients are assumed to have an autocorrelation function with a power spectrum roughly proportional to some power of frequency.

The seismic blind deconvolution method consists of three steps: (1) selection of initial reflectivities, (2) determination of the hyper parameters of the problem, and (3) an iterative procedure to solve the resulting equations until a tolerance criterion is satisfied. The alternative relaxation solution and pre-conditioned conjugate gradient algorithm are employed for practical numerical implementation. Seismic blind deconvolution not only can better realise the simultaneous evaluation of the seismic wavelet and the reflection coefficients, but also has advantages of stable algorithm and fast convergence. The test shows that the method is an effective tool of improving the resolution of seismic data that can effectively broaden the useful band of records.

Key words: seismic blind deconvolution, scaled Gaussian noise model, non-white reflectivities, alternative relaxation solution, pre-conditioned conjugate gradient method.


Acknowledgments

The support from The National High Technology Research and Development Program (863 Program) of China, Grant No. 2006AA06Z240 is acknowledged.


References

Canadas G. , 2002, A mathematical framework for blind deconvolution inverse problems. SEG International Exposition and 72nd Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, Utah, October 6–11.

Fu, L. Y.,, 2004, Joint inversion of seismic data for acoustic impedance: Geophysics 69, 994–1004.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Mandelbrot B. B. , 1983, The fractal geometry of nature. W. H. Freeman and Co.

Mendel, J. M., 1991, Tutorial on higher-order statistics (spectra) in signal processing and system theory: Theoretical results and some applications: Proceedings of the IEEE 79(3), 278–305.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Robinson E. A. , and Treitel S. 1980, Geophysical signal analysis. Prentice-Hall Inc.

Sacchi, M. D., and Ulrych, T. J., 1995, Improving resolution of radon operators using a model re-weighted least-squares procedure: Journal of Seismic Exploration 4, 315–328.
Sacchi M. D. , 1996, Statistical and transform methods in geophysical signal processing: Department of Physics University of Alberta, 96–108.

Saggaf, M. M., and Robinson, E. A., 2000, A unified framework for the deconvolution of traces of nonwhite reflectivity: Geophysics 65, 1660–1676.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Tribolet J. M., 1979, Seismic applications of homomorphic signal processing. Prentice-Hall Inc.

Walden, A. T., and Hosken, J. W., 1985, An investigation of the spectral properties of primary reflection coefficients: Geophysical Prospecting 33, 400–435.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |