Towards remote sensing of sediment thickness and depth to bedrock in shallow seawater using airborne TEM*
Julian Vrbancich 1 3 Peter K. Fullagar 21 DSTO Maritime Operations Division, PO Box 44, Pyrmont NSW 2009, Australia.
2 Fullagar Geophysics Pty Ltd, 1 Swann Rd, Taringa QLD 4068, Australia.
3 Corresponding author. Email: julian.vrbancich@dsto.defence.gov.au
Exploration Geophysics 38(1) 77-88 https://doi.org/10.1071/EG07006
Submitted: 14 July 2006 Accepted: 12 September 2006 Published: 5 April 2007
Abstract
Following a successful bathymetric mapping demonstration in a previous study, the potential of airborne EM for seafloor characterisation has been investigated. The sediment thickness inferred from 1D inversion of helicopter-borne time-domain electromagnetic (TEM) data has been compared with estimates based on marine seismic studies. Generally, the two estimates of sediment thickness, and hence depth to resistive bedrock, were in reasonable agreement when the seawater was ~20 m deep and the sediment was less than ~40 m thick. Inversion of noisy synthetic data showed that recovered models closely resemble the true models, even when the starting model is dissimilar to the true model, in keeping with the uniqueness theorem for EM soundings. The standard deviations associated with shallow seawater depths inferred from noisy synthetic data are about ± 5% of depth, comparable with the errors of approximately ± 1 m arising during inversion of real data. The corresponding uncertainty in depth-to-bedrock estimates, based on synthetic data inversion, is of order of ± 10%. The mean inverted depths of both seawater and sediment inferred from noisy synthetic data are accurate to ~1 m, illustrating the improvement in accuracy resulting from stacking. It is concluded that a carefully calibrated airborne TEM system has potential for surveying sediment thickness and bedrock topography, and for characterising seafloor resistivity in shallow coastal waters.
Key words: AEM, bathymetry, depth to bedrock, sediment thickness.
Acknowledgment
We are grateful to the reviewers for their constructive comments.
Albani, A. D., Tayton, J. W., Rickwood, P. C., Gordon, A. D., and Hoffman, J. G., 1988, Cainozoic morphology of the inner continental shelf near Sydney, NSW Journal and Proceedings. Royal Society of New South Wales 121, 11–28.
Christensen, A., 2003, Calibration of Honeysuckle Creek conductivity depth imaging Preview 106, 27–30.
Jackson, P. D., Taylor Smith, D., and Stanford, P. N., 1978, Resistivity-porosity-particle shape relationships for marine sands Geophysics 43, 1250–1268.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
![](../../media/share/OpenURL_Image.gif)
Ley-Cooper, Y., and Macnae, J., 2004, Model consistent amplitude rescaling to correct amplitude calibration problems in HEM data Exploration Geophysics 35, 277–282.
![](../../media/share/OpenURL_Image.gif)
Ley-Cooper, Y., Macnae, J., Robb, T., and Vrbancich, J., 2006, Identification of calibration errors in helicopter electromagnetic data through transform to the altitude-corrected phase-amplitude domain Geophysics 71, G27–G34.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
![](../../media/share/OpenURL_Image.gif)
Parker, R. L., and McNutt, M. K., 1980, Statistics for the one-norm misfit error Journal of Geophysical Research 85, 4429–4430.
![](../../media/share/OpenURL_Image.gif)
Vrbancich, J., and Fullagar, P. K., 2004, Towards seawater depth determination using the helicopter HoistEM system Exploration Geophysics 35, 292–296.
![](../../media/share/OpenURL_Image.gif)
Vrbancich, J., and Fullagar, P. K., 2006, Improved seawater depth determination using corrected helicopter time domain electromagnetic data Geophysical Prospecting 55,in press
![](../../media/share/OpenURL_Image.gif)
* Presented at the 18th ASEG Geophysical Conference and Exhibition (AESC 2006), July 2006.