Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Consequences of reproduction on the liveweight, fat depth, wool growth, and intake of grazing Merino ewes in the short and long term

GJ Lee and KD Atkins

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 35(2) 153 - 159
Published: 1995

Abstract

Effects of the current and previous year's reproductive performance on liveweight, fat depth, pasture intake, and wool growth were estimated in breeding Merino ewes in each of 2 years and in 4 seasons corresponding with stages of the annual reproductive cycle. Ewes bearing multiple lambs were heavier in early pregnancy (autumn, by 1.5 kg) and in late pregnancy (winter, by 2.5 kg) than single-bearing ewes, with both being heavier than nonpregnant (dry) ewes in winter (by 1.7-4.2 kg). Pregnancy had no effect on fat depth or intake in autumn or winter. Lactating ewes were leaner (by 1.0-1.7 mm), had lower liveweights (by 6.4-8.6 kg), and had substantially higher intakes [by 286-348 g digestible organic matter intake (DOMI)/day] than non-lactating ewes. From summer to winter, ewes that had previously reared a lamb, or lambs, to weaning weighed less, were leaner, and had higher intakes than ewes that were previously dry. Pregnant ewes grew significantly less clean wool and grew it less efficiently (g wool/kg DOMI) in autumn (7-9% less) and winter (11-18% less) than non-pregnant ewes. Similarly, lactating ewes grew less wool (by 23-30%) less efficiently than ewes not suckling, the effect being greater in ewes with multiple lambs. Post-weaning, however, ewes that had reared a lamb to weaning grew significantly more wool (by 6-15%) up to 4 months post-weaning, although efficiency of wool growth was still impaired. The effects of reproductive status on the fibre diameter of wool reflected those for wool growth. Effects of reproduction on productivity are long term and recovery may not be achieved before the next reproductive cycle.

https://doi.org/10.1071/EA9950153

© CSIRO 1995

Committee on Publication Ethics


Export Citation Get Permission

View Dimensions