Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Impact of genotype multiply environment interaction on response to selection in sugarcane

JK Bull, DM Hogarth and KE Basford

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 32(6) 731 - 737
Published: 1992

Abstract

The impact of genotype x environment interaction on the response to 3 methods of selection in sugarcane was assessed over 3 locations and 3 cropyears. The 3 selection methods considered were 2 previously used procedures, mass (individual) selection using a visual appraisal of clonal performance and family selection using selection rate, and a new procedure, family selection using a net merit grade (NMG) derived from weighing family plots. Within the 2 forms of family selection, light mass selection based on a visual appraisal of clonal performance was used to reject the poorest clones. The gains from selection, cdculated as the deviation in performance of the select groups from the performance of a group of randomly chosen clones, were assessed for each of these 3 methods. All 3 selection methods gave similar gains over the random group when averaged over all locations and crop-years. Family selection based on NMG is recommended for routine use as it is the least labour-intensive and most cost-effective. Genotype x environment interaction, on both a family and clonal basis, was large enough to affect the gains made from selection. These effects provided some support for location-specific selection. Furthermore, selections based on the results from the central experiment station produced relatively poor gains when assessed over all locations and crop-years. This indicates that the experiment station may be a poor location for centralised selection. The use of at least 1 other location may provide a buffer against infrequent environmental factors rendering worthless family or clonal discrimination at any particular location.

https://doi.org/10.1071/EA9920731

© CSIRO 1992

Committee on Publication Ethics


Export Citation Get Permission

View Dimensions