Direct responses in breeding values to selection of ostriches for liveweight and reproduction
S. W. P. Cloete A B F , Z. Brand A C , K. L. Bunter D and I. A. Malecki EA Department of Animal Sciences, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa.
B Institute for Animal Production, Elsenburg, Private Bag X1, Elsenburg 7607, South Africa.
C Institute for Animal Production, Oudtshoorn, PO Box 351, Oudtshoorn 6620, South Africa.
D Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
E School of Animal Biology MO92, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Science, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
F Corresponding author. Email: schalkc@elsenburg.com
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(10) 1314-1319 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA08124
Submitted: 11 April 2008 Accepted: 2 August 2008 Published: 11 September 2008
Abstract
Estimates of genetic parameters and genetic trends for reproductive traits and for liveweight at the commencement of breeding were obtained using data from a pair-mated ostrich flock located at Oudtshoorn in South Africa. Heritability estimates were 0.17–0.18 for egg production, 0.15–0.17 for chick production and 0.35–0.37 for liveweight. Female permanent environmental effects amounted to 0.11–0.17 for egg production, 0.14–0.19 for chick production and 0.30–0.31 for liveweight. Service sire exerted significant effects only on egg production (0.03–0.08) and chick production (0.05–0.10). Genetic correlations of reproductive traits with liveweight were not different from zero. Initial selection in the flock was based on reproduction, in the sense that replacements were descended from the females with the highest uncorrected number of chicks produced during their season of hatch (Chick Production line). Animals that were hatched during the period from 1996 to 2006 were used to establish two more populations. The heaviest birds at ~16 months of age were used as replacements in the line selected for liveweight (Liveweight line). Birds selected for the Control line were of average uncorrected liveweight at ~16 months, and were descended from females that produced an average number of chicks in their season of hatch. Overall, the Liveweight line had higher breeding values than the Control line for the period from 1996 to 2006. The response seemed to be associated with screening from the larger population on breeding values for liveweight, as no cumulative genetic gains were evident since 1996. Breeding values for chick production in the Chick Production line were increased by 3.1% per year from 1990 to 2006. Regressions of individual breeding values in the Control line on the year of hatch indicated no genetic change in either liveweight or chick production. Genetic change in particularly reproduction thus seems feasible in commercial ostriches.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the South African Department of Trade and Industry for partial funding of the work through their THRIP program, as well as all those involved in the maintenance and recording of the research flock at the Oudtshoorn Research Farm.
Banks RG
(2005) Challenges with investing in genetic improvement for the Australian extensive livestock industries. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1033–1039.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brand Z,
Brand TS, Brown CR
(2003) The effect of energy and protein levels on production in breeding female ostriches. British Poultry Science 44, 598–606.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Bunter KL, Cloete SWP
(2004) Genetic parameters for egg-, chick- and live-weight traits recorded in farmed ostriches (Struthio camelus). Livestock Production Science 91, 9–22.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bunter KL,
Cloete SWP,
Van Schalkwyk SJ, Graser H-U
(2001) Factors affecting reproduction in farmed ostriches. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 14, 43–46.
Cloete SWP,
Bunter KL,
Brand Z, Lambrechts H
(2004 ) (Co)variances for reproduction, egg weight and chick weight in ostriches. South African Journal of Animal Science 34(Suppl. 2), 17–19.
Cloete SWP,
Bunter KL, Brand Z
(2005a) Genetic parameters for reproduction in ostriches. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 16, 132–155.
Cloete SWP,
Bunter KL,
Lambrechts H,
Brand Z,
Swart D, Greyling JPC
(2006) Variance components for liveweight, body measurements and reproductive traits of pair-mated ostrich females. British Poultry Science 47, 147–158.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Cloete SWP,
Engelbrecht A,
Olivier JJ, Bunter KL
(2008) Deriving a preliminary breeding objective for commercial ostriches: an overview. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 1247–1256.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Van Schalkwyk SJ,
Cloete SWP, De Kock JA
(1996) Repeatability and phenotypic correlations for liveweight and reproduction in commercial ostrich breeding pairs. British Poultry Science 37, 953–962.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Van Schalkwyk SJ,
Cloete SWP,
Brown CR, Brand Z
(2000) Hatching success of ostrich eggs in relation to setting, turning and angle of rotation. British Poultry Science 41, 46–52.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |