Effect of heifer frame size on their subsequent reproductive performance and preweaning performance of their calves
G. J. Taylor A D , F. J. C. Swanepoel B , E. C. Webb C and A. Stroebel BA School of Natural Resource Management, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Private Bag X6531, George 6530, South Africa.
B School for Sustainable Agriculture, University of the Free State, PO Box 399, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa.
C Department of Animal and Wildlife Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa.
D Corresponding author. Email: glen.taylor@nmmu.ac.za
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(7) 945-949 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA08060
Submitted: 25 January 2008 Accepted: 4 April 2008 Published: 20 June 2008
Abstract
The effects of heifer frame size on subsequent performance and the preweaning growth of calves were evaluated using records collected from the Waterburg Estates at Otjiwarongo, Namibia. Based on hip height at 18 months of age, heifers were assigned to three different frame size groups: small (<124 cm), medium (124 to 135 cm), or large (>135 cm). Calving rate (CR), calving date (CD), postnatal calf survival rate (CSR), reproductive efficiency (Sandex), weaning rate (WR), birthweight (BW), weaning weight (WT) and preweaning average daily gain (ADG) were collected from first (n = 830), second (n = 623) and third and greater parity (n = 571) cows. Frame size of heifers significantly influenced (P < 0.001) CR in second and third and greater parity. The postnatal CSR was similar for all frame size and parity groups. WR of large frame size, second-parity cows was less (P < 0.001) than that of small and medium frame size animals. Birthweights of calves born to large frame size animals were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than the small and medium frame size animals. Small frame size animals, as first parity cows, had calves with lower (P < 0.05) WT than those weaned by medium and larger frame size animals. In first parity cows, calves of large frame size had greater ADG (P < 0.05), but in second parity cows the calves from medium frame size (P < 0.05) out performed those of small and large frame size, while calves from third and greater parity cows of medium and larger frame size had greater (P < 0.05) ADG than cows with a small frame size. Male calves were heavier (P < 0.05) at birth, at weaning and grew faster (ADG) than their female counterparts. Due to the later calving dates (P < 0.05), the reproductive efficiency (Sandex) of large frame size at second and third and greater parity groups was lower (P < 0.001). Therefore, selecting cattle for the extensive hot and dry climatic regions of Southern Africa, the recommended cow frame size should be a medium frame.
Buttram ST, Willham RL
(1989) Size and management effects on reproduction in first-, second- and third-parity beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 67, 2191–2196.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
Du Plessis I,
Hoffman LC, Calitz FJ
(2005) Influence of reproduction traits and pre-weaning growth rate on herd efficiency of different beef breed types in an arid sub-tropical environment. South African Journal of Animal Science 35, 89–98.
Fordyce G, Cooper NJ
(1995) An evaluation of visual assessment for fertility in Brahman cross cows using the Bonsma technique. Theriogenology 43, 495–507.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
PubMed |
Lishman AW,
Lyle AD,
Smith VW, Botha WA
(1984) Conception rate of beef cows and growth of suckling calves as influenced by date of calving and supplementary feeding. South African Journal of Animal Science 14, 10–17.
Morris CA, Wilton JW
(1977) The influence of body size on the economic efficiency of cows: a review. Animal Breeding Abstracts 45, 139–153.
Vargas CA,
Olson TA,
Chase CC,
Hammond AC, Elzo MA
(1999) Influence of frame size and body condition score on performance of Brahman cattle. Journal of Animal Science 77, 3140–3149.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
