Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AN > EA08058
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 48(7)

Benefits obtained from cattle by smallholder farmers: a case study of Limpopo Province, South Africa

A. Stroebel A C , F. J. C. Swanepoel A , N. D. Nthakheni A , A. E. Nesamvuni A and G. Taylor B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centre for Sustainable Agriculture, University of the Free State, PO Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa.

B Department of Agricultural Management, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Private Bag x6531, George 6530, South Africa.

C Corresponding author. Email: stroebea.rd@ufs.ac.za

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(7) 825-828 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA08058
Submitted: 25 January 2008  Accepted: 29 March 2008   Published: 20 June 2008

Abstract

A survey of livestock production systems was conducted in the Vhembe District, located between 22°85′ latitude and 30°71′ longitude in the Limpopo Province of South Africa. The objective of the study was to investigate the benefits obtained from, and key functions of, cattle production, as well as related breeding objectives in smallholder livestock production in the Limpopo Province of South Africa. Data were collected by means of a general survey questionnaire and a participatory rural appraisal (PRA) exercise. The results indicate that almost 60% of farmers own < 10 cattle. Female animals constituted the largest component of the herd (55.02%). Although the bull : cow ratio was extremely high (1 : 3.7), the calving rate was low at 35.60%, with an extremely high herd mortality of 15.70% and a low off-take of 8.70%. In a pairwise ranking, the benefits obtained from cattle by smallholder livestock farmers are as follows: selling and meat consumption (4), wealth, status and savings (3), socio-cultural activities (2) and draught power (1). The ‘cattle complex’, where cattle are kept for prestige and status, is still appropriate, but cattle also make significant contributions in respect to selling and meat consumption, and arable inputs such as draft and fertiliser. It is concluded that benefits obtained from cattle form the basis of decision-making by smallholder cattle owners with respect to livestock production.


References


Bayer W , von Lossau A , Feldmann A (2001) Smallholders and community-based management of animal genetic resources. In ‘Proceedings of the workshop ‘Community based management of animal genetic resources’, Mbabane, Swaziland’. Available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/006/Y3970E/y3970e02.htm#bm02.1 [Verified 11 April 2008]

Bebe BO, Udo HMJ, Rowlands GJ, Thorpe W (2003) Smallholder dairy systems in the Kenya highlands: cattle population dynamics under increasing intensification. Livestock Production Science 82, 211–221.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | [Verified 11 April 2008]

Owen E , Smith T , Steele MA , Anderson S , Duncan AJ , Herrero M , Leaver JD , Reynolds CK , Richards JI , Ku-Vera JC (Eds) (2004) ‘Responding to the livestock revolution – the role of globalisation and implications of poverty alleviation.’ (Nottingham University Press: Nottingham, UK)

SPSS (2000) ‘SPSS Users guide.’ (SPSS: Chicago, IL)

Stroebel A (2004) Socio-economic complexities of smallholder resource-poor ruminant livestock production systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. PhD thesis. University of the Free State, Bloemfontein.

Swanepoel FJC, Stroebel A, Nesamvuni AE (2002) Key functions of smallholder farming systems: a South African case study. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Production 24, 237–240. open url image1

Tapson DR (1991) The overstocking and off-take controversy re-examined for the case of Kwazulu. Pastoral network paper 31a. Overseas Development Institute, London.

Wilson T , Pearson A , Bradbear N , Jayasuriya A , Luswai H , Mtenga L , Richards S , Smith R (2005) Livestock products – valuable and more valuable. In ‘Livestock and wealth creation’. (Eds E Owen, A Katalyi, N Jayasuriya, T Smith) pp. 109–126. (Nottingham University Press: Nottingham, UK)