Using automated supplementation systems to meet growth targets for grazing sheep
M. K. Bowen A C D , P. M. Pepper B , J. L. Winkleman A , R. C. McPhie A and M. R. Winter AA Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, PO Box 519, Longreach, Qld 4730, Australia.
B Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Locked Mail Bag 4, Moorooka, Qld 4105, Australia.
C Present address: Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, PO Box 6014, Rockhampton Mail Centre, Qld 4702, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: maree.bowen@dpi.qld.gov.au
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(9) 1201-1209 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07412
Submitted: 17 December 2007 Accepted: 18 May 2008 Published: 7 August 2008
Abstract
Remote drafting technology now available for sheep allows targeted supplementation of individuals within a grazing flock. This paper reports results of three experiments. Experiment 1 examined the weight change of Merino wethers allowed access to either lupin grain or whole cottonseed 0, 1, 2 or 7 days/week for 6 weeks. Experiment 2 examined the weight change of Merino wethers allowed access to either lupins or a sorghum + cottonseed meal (CSM) supplement 0, 2, 4 or 7 days/week for 8 weeks. Experiment 3 investigated the relationship between five allocations of trough space at the supplement self-feeders (5–50 cm/sheep) and the weight change of Merino wethers allowed access to lupins 1 day/week for 8 weeks. In all experiments, the Merino wethers had free access as a single group to drinking water and low quality hay in a large group pen and were allowed access to supplement once per day on their scheduled days of access. No water was available in the areas containing supplement, but one-way flow gates allowed animals to return to the group pen in their own time.
There was a linear response in growth rate to increased frequency of access to lupins in Experiments 1 and 2, with each additional day of access increasing liveweight gain by 26 and 21 g/day, respectively. Similarly, the response to the sorghum + CSM supplement was linear, although significantly lower (P < 0.05), at 12 g/day. Providing access to whole cottonseed resulted in no significant change in growth rate compared with the control animals. In Experiment 3, decreasing trough space from 50 to 5 cm/sheep had no effect on sheep liveweight change.
It was concluded that the relationships developed here, for growth response to increased frequency of access to lupins or a sorghum + CSM supplement, could be used to indicate the most appropriate frequency of access to supplement, through a remote drafting unit, to achieve sheep weight change targets. Also, that a trough space of 5 cm/sheep appears adequate in this supplementation system.
Additional keywords: precision nutrition, rangeland.
Acknowledgements
These experiments were funded by the Australian Sheep Industry Cooperative Research Centre with in-kind contributions from the Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Queensland (DPI&F). We are grateful to Peter Martin, Adam Pytko and Madeleine Modina of the Health and Nutritional Biochemistry Laboratory of DPI&F for conducting laboratory analyses.
Beaty JL,
Cochran RC,
Lintzenich BA,
Vanzant ES,
Morrill JL,
Brandt RT, Johnson DE
(1994) Effect of frequency of supplementation and protein concentration in supplements on performance and digestion characteristics of beef cattle consuming low-quality forages. Journal of Animal Science 72, 2475–2486.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
Beeson WM,
Perry TW, Mohler M
(1957) Self-feeding free choice vs. self-feeding a complete mixture for fattening steers. Journal of Animal Science 16, 787–795.
Bird SH, Dicko M
(1987) Cottonseed supplements for sheep. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia 9, 80–88.
Bohnert DW,
Schauer CS, DelCurto T
(2002) Influence of rumen protein degradability and supplementation frequency on performance and nitrogen use in ruminants consuming low-quality forage: cow performance and efficiency of nitrogen use in wethers. Journal of Animal Science 80, 1629–1637.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
Bowen MK,
Pepper PM,
Patterson E,
McConnel I, Jordan D
(2007a) Growth and carcass characteristics of cast-for-age Merino ewes fed sorghum-based feedlot diets. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 1309–1316.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bowen MK,
Pepper PM,
Winkleman J, McConnel I
(2007b) Concentrates based on sorghum grain provide a basis for a finishing system for crossbred lambs. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 1317–1325.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Bowen MK,
Pepper PM,
Winkleman JL, Rowe JB
(2007c) Automated feeding systems for grazing sheep: how does frequency of access affect rate of weight change? Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia 16, 229–234.
Bowman JGP, Sowell BF
(1997) Delivery method and supplement consumption by grazing ruminants: a review. Journal of Animal Science 75, 543–550.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
Devendra C, Lewis D
(1974) The interaction between dietary lipids and fibre in the sheep. 2. Digestibility studies. Animal Production 48, 67–76..
Dixon RM, Hosking BJ
(1992) Nutritional value of grain legumes for ruminants. Nutrition Research Reviews 5, 19–43.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Dixon RM,
Smith DR, Lindsay JA
(1998) Whole white cottonseed or cottonseed meal as supplements for young steers fed low quality roughage. Animal Production in Australia 22, 338.
Easton EG,
Hocking Edwards JE, White CL
(1998) The effect of adding salt to a canola meal supplement on wool growth in weaner sheep. Animal Production in Australia 22, 257–260.
Farmer CG,
Cochran RC,
Simms DD,
Klevesahl EA,
Wickersham TA, Johnson DE
(2001) The effects of several supplementation frequencies on forage use and the performance of beef cattle consuming dormant tallgrass prairie forage. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2276–2285.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
Godfrey SI,
Rowe JB,
Speijers EJ, Toon W
(1993) Lupins, barley or barley plus virginiamycin as supplements for sheep at different feeding intervals. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 33, 135–140.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
CAS |
Hawthorne WA, Stacey RW
(1984) The influence of the quantity and frequency of feeding a lupin grain supplement to grazing lambs. Animal Production in Australia 15, 691.
Jordan DJ,
Hatcher S,
Lee GJ,
McConnel I,
Bowen MK,
Della Bosca AJ, Rowe JB
(2006) Nutritional management of reproductive efficiency. International Journal of Sheep and Wool Science 54, 35–41.
Riggs JK,
Colby RW, Sells LV
(1953) The effect of self-feeding salt-cottonseed meal mixtures to beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 12, 379–393.
Rooney LW, Pflugfelder RL
(1986) Factors affecting starch digestibility with special emphasis on sorghum and corn. Journal of Animal Science 63, 1607–1623.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
Rowe JB
(2004) Potential benefits of precision nutrition to increase reproductive efficiency under grazing conditions. Animal Production in Australia 25, 144–147.
Rowe JB, Masters DG
(2005) Precision nutrition for Merino ewes. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia 15, 221–228.
Schauer CS,
Lardy GP,
Slanger WD,
Bauer ML, Sedivec KK
(2004) Self-limiting supplements fed to cattle grazing native mixed-grass prairie in the northern Great Plains. Journal of Animal Science 82, 298–306.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
Simeone A,
Beretta V,
Rowe JB, Baldi F
(2003) Supplementing grazing beef cattle weekly or daily with whole maize grain. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia 14, 14A.
Sweeney RA
(1989) Generic combustion method for determination of crude protein in feeds. Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists 72, 770–774.
|
CAS |
PubMed |
Wood AG,
Bolam MJ,
Krebs GL, Andressen AR
(2000) Whole cottonseed as a supplement for weaner cattle offered Pangola grass hay. Animal Production in Australia 23, 409–412.