Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of birthweight on survival in triplet-born lambs

P. C. H. Morel A C , S. T. Morris B and P. R. Kenyon B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Institute of Food Nutrition and Human Health, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

B Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

C Corresponding author. Email: p.c.morel@massey.ac.nz

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(7) 984-987 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07401
Submitted: 10 December 2007  Accepted: 20 March 2008   Published: 20 June 2008

Abstract

Lambing percentage is the main contributor to higher profit on New Zealand sheep farms and has increased from 98% in 1960 to 124% in 2006. As ewe litter size increases so does the proportion of triplet-born lambs and consequently preweaning mortality rate. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of birthweight (BWT) on survival in triplet-born lambs within and among litters.

Data from a total of 594 triplet crossbreed lambs born to mixed-age ewes was analysed. For the statistical analysis, the lambs were allocated according to their BWT, and within the litter were then allocated to three BWT groups (light, medium and heavy). The following parameters were calculated: total litter BWT (TBWT), percentage of TBWT for each lamb (PBWT = BWT/TBWT), coefficient of variation for BWT within litter and lamb average daily gain from birth to weaning.

The mortality rate for the light, medium and heavy lambs was 56, 40 and 28%, respectively, and consequently the lightest lamb in a litter was 3.2 times more likely to die than the heaviest lamb. In the light lamb group, as BWT increased mortality decreased (P = 0.006), for medium lambs BWT did not influence mortality (P = 0.88) and in the heavy group there was a trend of increased BWT associated with increased mortality (P = 0.10). The negative relationship between lamb mortality and PBWT was identical in the three BWT groups (P < 0.0001). The effect of BWT on lamb mortality became non-significant when PBWT was fitted in the same model. This means that, in triplet-born lambs, mortality is not influenced by the BWT of the lamb itself, but by the BWT of its littermates. It can be calculated that a 4-kg lamb has a 24% chance of surviving in a litter of 16 kg, a 60% chance in a litter of 12 kg and an 87% chance of surviving in a litter of 8 kg. It is concluded that reducing the variation in BWT within a litter, or specifically managing the lightest lamb at birth, will increase the competitive ability for survival of each lamb and, therefore, decrease overall mortality and further improve farm profitability.


References


Amer PR, Bodin L (2006) Quantitative genetic selection for twinning rate in ewes. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 66, 429–433. open url image1

Amer PR, McEwan JC, Dodds KG, Davis GH (1999) Economic values for ewe prolificacy and lamb survival in New Zealand sheep. Livestock Production Science 58, 75–90.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Clark JN , Rae AL (1976) ‘Sheeplan advisers manual.’ (Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries: New Zealand)

Dalton CD, Knight TW, Johnson DL (1980) Lamb survival in sheep breeds on New Zealand hill country. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 167–173. open url image1

de Nicolo G, Morris ST, Kenyon PR, Morel PCH (2008) A comparision of two lamb production systems in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research in press , open url image1

Dwyer CM, Morgan CA (2006) Maintenance of body temperature in the neonatal lamb: effect of breed, birth weight and litter size. Journal of Animal Science 84, 1093–1101.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Fogarty NM, Hall DG, Holst PJ (1992) The effect of nutrition in mid pregnancy and ewe liveweight changes on birth weight and management for lamb survival in highly fecund ewes. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 32, 1–10.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kenyon PR, Morel PCH, Morris ST (2004) Effect of liveweight and condition score of ewes at mating and shearing mid-pregnancy, on birthweights and growth rates of twin lambs to weaning. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 52(3), 145–149.
CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Kenyon PR, Revell DK, Morris ST (2006) Mid-pregnancy shearing can increase birthweight and survival to weaning of multiple-born lambs under commercial conditions. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 821–825.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kenyon PR, Stafford KJ, Jenkinson CMC, Morris ST, West DM (2007) The body composition and metabolic status of twin- and triplet-bearing ewes and their fetuses in late pregnancy. Livestock Science 107, 103–112.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kerslake JJ, Everett-Hinks JM, Campbell AW (2005) Lamb survival: new examination of an old problem. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 65, 13–18. open url image1

Morel PCH, Kenyon PR (2006) Sensitivity analysis of weaner lamb production in New Zealand. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 66, 377–381. open url image1

Morris ST, Kenyon PR (2004) The effect of litter size and sward height on ewe and lamb performance. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 275–286. open url image1

Sawalha RM, Conington J, Brotherstone S, Villanueva B (2007) Analyses of lamb survival of Scottish Blackface sheep. Animal 1, 151–157.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Scales GH, Burton RN, Moss RA (1986) Lamb mortality, birth weight and nutrition in late pregnancy. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 29, 75–82. open url image1

Stafford KJ, Kenyon PR, Morris ST, West DM (2007) The physical state and metabolism status of lambs of different birth rank soon after birth. Livestock Science 111, 10–15.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1