Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AN > EA07255
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 48(2)

Methane emissions from anaerobic ponds on a piggery and a dairy farm in New Zealand

R. Craggs A B , J. Park A and S. Heubeck A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd (NIWA), PO Box 11-115, Hamilton, New Zealand.

B Corresponding author. Email: r.craggs@niwa.co.nz

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(2) 142-146 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07255
Submitted: 7 August 2007  Accepted: 5 December 2007   Published: 2 January 2008

Abstract

Over 1000 anaerobic ponds are used in the treatment of wastewater from farms and industry in New Zealand. These anaerobic ponds were typically designed as wastewater solids holding ponds rather than for treatment of the wastewater. However, visual observation of these uncovered ponds indicates year-round anaerobic digestion and release of biogas to the atmosphere. The release of biogas may be associated with odour nuisance, contributes to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and is a waste of potentially useful energy. The aim of this study was to measure the seasonal variation in quantity and quality of biogas produced by an anaerobic pond at a piggery (8000 pigs) and a dairy farm (700 cows). Biogas was captured on the surface of each anaerobic pond using a floating 25 m2 polypropylene cover. Biogas production was continually monitored and composition was analysed monthly. Annual average biogas (methane) production rates from the piggery and dairy farm anaerobic ponds were 0.84 (0.62) m3/m2.day and 0.032 (0.026) m3/m2.day, respectively. Average CH4 content of the piggery and dairy farm biogas was high (74% and 82%, respectively) due to partial scrubbing of CO2 within the pond water. The average daily volume of methane gas that could potentially be captured by completely covering the surface of the piggery and dairy farm anaerobic ponds was calculated as ~550 m3/day and ~45 m3/day, respectively (assuming that the areal methane production rate was uniform across the pond surface). Conversion of this methane to electricity would generate 1650 kWh/day and 135 kWh/day, respectively (with potentially 1.5 times these values co-generated as heat) and reduce GHG emissions by 8.27 t CO2 equivalents/day and 0.68 t CO2 equivalents/day, respectively. These preliminary results suggest that conventional anaerobic ponds in New Zealand may release considerable amounts of methane and could be a more significant point source of GHG emissions than previously estimated. Further studies of pond GHG emissions are required to accurately assess the contribution of wastewater treatment ponds to New Zealand’s total GHG emissions.

Additional keywords: anaerobic pond, biogas, energy recovery, GHG emissions, methane.


References


APHA (1998) ‘Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater.’ (American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation: Washington DC)

ASAE (1985) ‘Design of anaerobic lagoons for animal wastes management. American public practice EP403.’ (American Society of Agricultural Engineers: St Josepth, MI)

Bart CL , Hegg RO (1984) ‘Poultry lagoon odour correlations. Paper 84–4088.’ (American Society of Agricultural Engineers: St Joseph, MI)

Burke DA (2001) ‘Dairy waste anaerobic digestion handbook: options for recovering beneficial products from dairy manure.’ (Environmental Energy Company: Olympia, WA)

Cobb SA , Hill DT (1990) Maximum specific methane productivity of animal wastes and the effect of non-steady-state conditions on anaerobic fermenters. In ‘Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on agricultural and food processing wastes’. pp. 115–123. (American Society of Agricultural Engineers: St Joseph, MI)

Craggs RJ, Tanner CC, Sukias JPS, Davies-Colley RJ (2003) Dairy farm wastewater treatment by an advanced pond system (APS). Water Science and Technology 48, 291–297.
|  CAS | PubMed |
open url image1

Cullimore DR, Maule A, Mansuy N (1985) Ambient temperature methanogenesis for pig manure waste lagoons: thermal gradient incubator studies. Agricultural Wastes 6, 175–191. open url image1

Green FB, Lundquist TJ, Oswald WJ (1995) Methane fermentation, submerged gas collection, and the fate of carbon in advanced integrated wastewater pond system. Water Science and Technology 31(12), 55–67.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Hill DJ, Kayhanian M (1985) Methane from settled and filtered flushed dairy wastes. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 28, 865–869. open url image1

Hill DT (1984) Methane productivity of the major animal types. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 27(2), 530–534.
|  CAS |
open url image1

Humenik FJ , Overcash MR (1976) Design criteria for swine waste treatment system. USEPA Report 600/2–76–233. 291 pp.

IPCC (1996) ‘Revised guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Reference Manual. Vol. 3.’ (IPCC: Switzerland)

NZDEC (2006) ‘Managing dairy farm effluent.’ Dairying and the Environment Committee. (Dairy InSight: Palmerston North, New Zealand)

NZMfE (2006) ‘New Zealand’s greenhouse gas inventory 1990–2004, national inventory report and common reporting format.’ (Ministry for the Environment: Wellington, New Zealand)

Safley LM, Westerman PW (1988) Biogas production from anaerobic lagoon. Biological Wastes 23, 181–193.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Safley LM, Westerman PW (1992) Performance of a low temperature lagoon digester. Bioresource Technology 41, 167–175.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Stevens MA , Schulte DD (1977) Low temperature anaerobic digestion of swine manure. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Presented at the North Central Region ASAE Meeting, St Joseph, MI, USA. 19. NCR paper 77–1013.