Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AN > EA07117
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 48(4)

An environmental weed risk assessment model for Australian forage improvement programs

Lynley M. Stone A C D E , Margaret Byrne A C and John G. Virtue B D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Environment and Conservation, Science Division, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Bentley, WA 6984, Australia.

B Department of Water Land and Biodiversity Conservation, GPO Box 2834, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.

C Cooperative Research Centre for Plant-based Management of Dryland Salinity, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia.

D Cooperative Research Centre for Australian Weed Management, Urrbrae, SA 5064, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: lynley.stone@dec.wa.gov.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(4) 568-574 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07117
Submitted: 24 April 2007  Accepted: 16 October 2007   Published: 7 March 2008

Abstract

Many plant species with agronomic potential have been introduced for livestock forage and have subsequently become weeds of natural ecosystems, or ‘environmental weeds’. Stringent border quarantine procedures introduced by Australia in 1997 ensure few high weed risk species are now imported into the country; however, there are no protocols for assessing and managing weed risk in use on a national scale ‘post-border’ (i.e. once a plant species is in the country). Environmental weed risk management in forage improvement programs aims to minimise the risk that new species and cultivar introductions will be invasive in natural ecosystems. We describe an environmental weed risk assessment (EWRA) model specifically aimed at assessing the weed potential of exotic and native forage species. The EWRA model predicts and ranks species for weed risk by assessing invasiveness, impacts and potential distribution. Assessments are based on published evidence, experimental observations and intuitive responses from experienced pasture researchers, in collaboration with weed experts. This model specifically addresses the need for environmental weed risk management in forage improvement programs.

Additional keywords: environmental weeds, weed risk management.


Acknowledgements

We thank many researchers in the CRC for Plant-based Management of Dryland Salinity and the CRC for Australian Weed Management for their assistance in developing the EWRA model. The assistance of GIS staff at the Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation is acknowledged. We also thank three anonymous referees for their assistance in improving the original manuscript.


References


Anon.  (1991) Digital atlas of Australian soils. Available at http://www.daff.gov.au/brs/data-tools/daas-download [Verified 13 February 2008]

Anon.  (2001) National vegetation information system. Available at http://www.environment.gov.au/erin/nvis/data-products.html [Verified 4 January 2008]

Anon.  (2005) Report arising from a forum on pasture plant evaluation and release in Queensland: issues and solutions. Queensland Government Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Brisbane.

Anon.  (2006) ‘HB 294–2006 national post-border weed risk management protocol.’ (CRC Australian Weed Management Adelaide, and Standards Australia and New Zealand: Sydney)

Armitage G (2006) Australian commodity statistics 2006 – value of Australian agricultural exports. Available at http://www.abareconomics.com/publications_html/acs/acs_06/acs_06.html [Verified 4 January 2008]

Barry S (2006) ‘CLIMATE.’ Beta version, June 2006. (Bureau of Rural Sciences: Canberra)

Bennett SJ, Virtue JG (2004) Salinity mitigation versus weed risks – can conflicts of interest in introducing new plants be resolved? Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 1141–1156.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Brown L, Barry S, Cunningham D, Bomford M (2006) Current practice in applying CLIMATE for weed risk assessment in Australia. In ‘15th Australian weeds conference. Managing weeds in a changing climate, Adelaide, Australia’. (Eds C Preston, JH Watts, ND Crossman) pp. 703–706. (Weed Management Society of South Australia Inc.: Adelaide)

Cook GD, Dias L (2006) Turner Review No. 12. It was no accident: deliberate plant introductions by Australian government agencies during the 20th century. Australian Journal of Botany 54, 601–625.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Coutts-Smith A, Downey P (2006) ‘Impact of weeds on threatened biodiversity in New South Wales. Technical Series no. 11.’ (Co-operative Research Centre for Australian Weed Management: Adelaide)

Dear BS, Ewing MA (2008) The search for new pasture plants to achieve more sustainable production systems in southern Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 387–396. open url image1

Emms J, Virtue J (2005) TMS 2.5 duty of care – trial weediness survey/audit. Final Report to Australian Wool Innovation.

Ewing MA (2004) New trees and pastures – when, where and likely role in farming systems. In ‘Salinity solutions. Working with science and society. Bendigo, Victoria’. (Eds A Ridley, P Feikema, S Bennett, MJ Rogers, R Wilkinson, J Hirth) (CD-ROM) (CRC for Plant-Based Management of Dryland Salinity: Perth)

Groves RH (2001) Can Australian native plants be weeds? Plant Protection Quarterly 16, 114–117. open url image1

Groves RH, Hosking JR, Batianoff GN, Cooke DA, Cowie ID et al (2003) ‘Weed categories for natural and agricultural ecosystem management.’ (Bureau of Rural Sciences: Canberra)

Johnson IM (1986) Plant invasion windows: a time-based classification of invasion potential. Biological Reviews 61, 369–394.
| Crossref |
open url image1

Kriticos DJ, Randall RP (2001) A comparison of systems to analyse potential weed distributions. In ‘Weed risk assessment’. (Eds RH Groves, FD Panetta, JG Virtue) pp. 61–79. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Lefroy EC, Flugge F, Avery A, Hume I (2005) Potential of current perennial plant-based farming systems to deliver salinity management outcomes and improve prospects for native biodiversity: a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 1357–1367. open url image1

Lonsdale WM (1994) Inviting trouble: introduced pasture species in northern Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology 19, 345–354.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Pheloung P (1996) ‘CLIMATE: a system to predict the distribution of an organism based on climate preferences.’ (Agriculture Western Australia: Perth)

Randall RP (2006) The Australian exotic species database, a CRC for Australian Weed Management project. In ‘Proceedings of the 15th Australian weeds conference, Adelaide’. (Eds C Preston, JH Watts, ND Crossman) pp. 715–718. (Weed Management Society of South Australia: Adelaide)

Reichard S (2001) The search for patterns that enable prediction of invasion. In ‘Weed risk assessment’. (Eds RH Groves, FD Panetta, JG Virtue) pp. 10–19. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Richardson FJ, Richardson RG, Shepherd RCH (2006) ‘Weeds of the south-east. An identification guide for Australia.’ (R.G. and F.J. Richardson: Meredith, Vic.)

Rogers MJ, Craig AD, Munns RE, Colmer TD, Nichols PGH , et al. (2005) The potential for developing fodder plants for the salt-affected areas of southern and eastern Australia: an overview. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 301–329.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Virtue J (2004) SA weed risk management guide – July 2004. Animal and Plant Control Commission, Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation, Adelaide.

Virtue JG, Bennett SJ, Randall RP (2004) Plant introductions in Australia: how can we resolve ‘weedy’ conflicts of interest? In ‘14th Australian weeds conference papers and proceedings, Wagga Wagga’. (Eds BM Sindel, SB Johnson) pp. 42–48. (Weed Society of New South Wales: Sydney)

Wallace KJ (2006) A decision framework for natural resource management: a case study using plant introductions. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1397–1405.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Walton C (2005) Assessment of pests in Queensland. Unpublished report to the Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Brisbane.

Weiss J, Hunt T, Steel J (2006) ‘Review of noxious weeds in Victoria, assessment data for Phase 3a and historical data for Phases 1 & 2.’ (Department of Primary Industries: Frankston, Vic.)