Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

What is limiting canola yield in southern New South Wales? A diagnosis of causal factors

Shaun N. Lisson A D , John A. Kirkegaard B , Michael J. Robertson C and Alec Zwart B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 54, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia.

B CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

C CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, PMB 5, PO Wembley, WA 6913, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: shaun.lisson@csiro.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47(12) 1435-1445 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07041
Submitted: 5 February 2007  Accepted: 24 August 2007   Published: 16 November 2007

Abstract

During the 1990s there was considerable evidence from grower surveys and other regional statistics to suggest that canola (Brassica napus) yields were declining in the medium and high rainfall areas of southern New South Wales (NSW). A paddock survey was conducted across three regions of southern NSW over three consecutive seasons (2003–05) to explore the importance of disease and other possible causes of low productivity. Under-performing paddocks were identified by comparing measured paddock yields with simulated potential yields. The causes of the resultant yield gaps were identified by analysis of the survey results with growers and consultants and from insights provided by the simulation analysis. Seasonal water supply and emergence date accounted for around 70% of the variation in yield across the survey, although no dependence on these variables was evident in 2005 as a result of high spring rainfall. A majority (95) of the 132 paddocks surveyed yielded to within 20% of the simulated potential yield. Disease, while significant in some paddocks, was limited by the dry seasons, there was no evidence for widespread micronutrient deficiencies and most crops were adequately supplied with nitrogen. There was no single cause of under-performance and the impact of those causes varied across regions and seasons. Subsoil constraints (seven paddocks) and late season water stress (six paddocks) were the most common factors associated with under-performance, while five paddocks had inexplicable yield gaps. Restrictions to taproot growth were widespread, especially in the southern region where around 60% of paddocks had significantly restricted taproots in all seasons (>3 on a 0–5 scale). Survey paddocks in which significant root restriction was found were between 10 and 50% below potential yield. Subsequent soil profile analysis identified a range of possible subsoil constraints including high soil strength, sodic or saline subsoils or subsurface acidity and further research is warranted to determine their impact on canola productivity in the region.

Additional keywords: APSIM, blackleg, compaction, sclerotinia.


Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Peter Hamblin (Agritech), Kirrily Condon (FarmLink), Geoff Pitson, Greg Condon, Chris Duff and John Sykes for data collection, compilation and interpretation; the farmers who collaborated in this study; and the Grains Research and Development Corporation and Grain Growers Australia for funding the project. Assistance in soil and plant sampling was provided by John Graham, Geoff Howe, Susie Sprague and the staff at CSIRO Ginninderra Experimental Station.


References


Angus JF, van Herwaarden AF, Fischer RA, Howe GN, Heenan DP (1998) The source of mineral nitrogen for cereals in south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 511–522.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | [Verified 24 October 2007]

Reuter DJ, Robinson JB (1986) ‘Plant analysis: an interpretation manual.’ (Inkata Press: Sydney) 218 pp.

Sadras V, Baldock J, Roget D, Rodriguez D (2003) Measuring and modelling yield and water budget components of wheat crops in course-textured soils with chemical constraints. Field Crops Research 84, 241–260.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Scott BJ, Fleming MR, Conyers MK, Chan KY, Knight PG (2003) Lime improves emergence of canola on an acidic, hardsetting soil. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43, 155–161.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Slattery WJ, Coventry DR (1993) Response of wheat, triticale, barley and canola to lime on four soil types in north-eastern Victoria. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 33, 609–618.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Steppuhn H, Raney JP (2005) Emergence, height and yield of canola and barley grown in saline root zones. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 85, 815–827. open url image1