Optimal use of on-farm fibre diameter measurement and its impact on reproduction in commercial Merino flocks
M. J. Kelly A C , A. A. Swan A and K. D. Atkins BA Australian Sheep Industries Cooperative Research Centre, CSIRO Livestock Industries, FD McMaster Laboratory, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.
B Australian Sheep Industries Cooperative Research Centre, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: mattkell@uoguelph.ca
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47(5) 525-534 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA06222
Submitted: 2 December 2005 Accepted: 7 August 2006 Published: 13 April 2007
Abstract
The use of on-farm measurement of fibre diameter in clip preparation and selection was examined using a stochastic simulation. Commercial self-replacing Merino flocks were simulated, with each flock equivalent in stocking rate to a 2500-ewe flock with an average fibre diameter of 19 µm (with the same energy requirements as 4250 50-kg dry sheep). Returns from each selection and clip preparation strategy were based on a 5-year period from 1998 to 2003. The percentage of sales where it would have been profitable to utilise fibre diameter measurement in wool classing declined from 84% to less than 1% in 19- and 25-µm flocks, respectively. Clip preparation benefits reduced from AU$5.52 to $1.46 per dry sheep equivalent as the mean fibre diameter of the flock increased from 19 to 25 µm (under random selection). Selection on either fibre diameter or selection index (12% micron premium based on fibre diameter and fleece weight) was of benefit for 19- and 21-µm flocks, but not broader fibre diameter flocks. Flock reproductive performance was simulated at the individual animal level, based on the traits of fertility (ewes lambing per ewe joined), litter size (lambs born per ewe lambing) and lamb survival (lambs weaned per lamb born). These traits were simulated with genetic components, allowing the investigation of correlated responses in reproduction traits. Single-trait selection on fibre diameter did not significantly impact on reproduction traits but did reduce fibre diameter, fleece weight and bodyweight. There was a large variation in the returns from clip preparation, as the mean fibre diameter of the flock increased, and over selling periods, highlighting the importance of understanding the current market conditions and their relationship with the flock mean fibre diameter when considering the use of fibre diameter in clip preparation.
Acknowledgements
The Australian Sheep Industry Cooperative Research Centre funded this project. We would also like to thank Daniel Brown for providing fixed effect information from the Merino Genetic Services data.
Adams NR, Cronjé PB
(2003) A review of the biology linking fibre diameter with fleece weight, liveweight, and reproduction in Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 1–10.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Atkins KD, Semple SJ
(2003) The economic benefits of on-farm testing of fibre diameter in commercial Merino flocks: (1) objective clip preparation. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 51, 1–15.
Baxter P
(2001) On-farm classing of animals and fleeces with the OFDA2000. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 49, 133–155.
Behrendt R,
Konstantinov K,
Brien F,
Ferguson M, Gloag C
(2002) A comparison of estimates of mean fibre diameter, variation in fibre diameter and fibre curvature between OFDA2000 and conventional laboratory-based fibre testing. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 50, 780–786.
Coelli KA, Atkins KD
(2000) This analysis of a Merino ewe enterprise supports the economic merit of fine wool bloodlines. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 48, 277–284.
Ferguson MB,
Gloag CM,
Behrendt R, Brien FD
(2002) Building lines of wool based on OFDA2000 fibre diameter results. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 50, 787–791.
Fish VE,
Mahar TJ, Crook BJ
(2002) Sampling variation over a fleece for mean fibre diameter, standard deviation of fibre diameter and mean fibre curvature. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 50, 798–804.
Hansford KA,
Marler JW, McLachlan IM
(2002a) A comparison of the performance of on-farm OFDA2000 and in-store FLEECESCAN: sheep selection and fleece classing. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 50, 140–167.
Hansford KA,
Marler JW, McLachlan IM
(2002b) Using OFDA2000 and fleecescan to prepare lots for sale and sheep selection: a case study. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 50, 812–818.
Peterson AD, Gherardi SG
(2001) The ability of the OFDA2000 to measure fleeces and sale lots on-farm. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 49, 110–132.
Reverter A,
Brown D, Tier B
(2001) Parities: a software package to simulate number of individuals born for multiparous species. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding Genetics 14, 389–392.
Safari E,
Fogarty NM, Gilmour AR
(2005) A review of genetic parameter estimates for wool, growth, meat and reproduction traits in sheep. Livestock Production Science 92, 271–289.
| Crossref |
Stadler W, Gillies RI
(1994) A case study for the use of mid side samples to predict the mean fibre diameter of classed lines. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 42, 319–326.
Storn R
(1999) System design by constraint adaptation and differential evolution. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 3, 22–34.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vizard AL, Williams SH
(1993) A model to estimate the economic value of using individual fleece fibre diameter measurements to class wool. Agricultural Systems 41, 475–486.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
