Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AN > EA06031
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 47(3)

Adoption of environmental assurance in pastoral industry supply chains – market failure and beyond

L. I. Pahl
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Queensland, PO Box 102, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia. Email: lester.pahl@dpi.qld.gov.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47(3) 233-244 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA06031
Submitted: 11 January 2006  Accepted: 26 July 2006   Published: 12 February 2007

Abstract

This paper describes adoption rates of environmental assurance within meat and wool supply chains, and discusses this in terms of market interest and demand for certified ‘environmentally friendly’ products, based on phone surveys and personal interviews with pastoral producers, meat and wool processors, wholesalers and retailers, and domestic consumers. Members of meat and wool supply chains, particularly pastoral producers, are both aware of and interested in implementing various forms of environmental assurance, but significant costs combined with few private benefits have resulted in low adoption rates. The main reason for the lack of benefits is that the end user (the consumer) does not value environmental assurance and is not willing to pay for it. For this reason, global food and fibre supply chains, which compete to supply consumers with safe and quality food at the lowest price, resist public pressure to implement environmental assurance. This market failure is further exacerbated by highly variable environmental and social production standards required of primary producers in different countries, and the disparate levels of government support provided to them. Given that it is the Australian general public and not markets that demand environmental benefits from agriculture, the Australian government has a mandate to use public funds to counter this market failure. A national farm environmental policy should utilise a range of financial incentives to reward farmers for delivering general public good environmental outcomes, with these specified and verified through a national environmental assurance scheme.


Acknowledgements

I gratefully acknowledge the funding provided for this research by Rural Industries and Research and Development Corporation, Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries Queensland and CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems. A great deal of thanks is extended to people who contributed to this research at various times: ACNielsen, MarketSense, Roslyn Sharp, Wendy Mort, Kerry Miles, Guy Newell, Peter Twyford-Jones and Katrina Warman. I also thank Anna Ridley for providing encouragement and guidance while this paper was being written, and for her constructive criticism of several drafts.


References


Anon.  (1997) ‘Consumers and the environment: can consumers save the planet?’ (National Consumer Council: London)

Anon.  (1999a) ISO 14024: 1999(E). Environmental labels and declarations – type 1 environmental labelling – principles and procedures. International Organization for Standardization. Switzerland. Available at http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=23145&ICS1=13&ICS2=20&ICS3=50&scopelist= (verified 25 October 2006)

Anon.  (1999b) Profiting from green consumerism in Germany. Opportunities for developing countries in three sectors: leather and footwear, textiles and clothing, and furniture. United Nations Publication E.98-II-D-17. Available at http://r0.unctad.org/trade_env/test1/publications/germany1.pdf (verified 6 December 2006)

Anon.  (2003) Industries, land use and water quality in the Great Barrier Reef catchment. Productivity Commission. Available at www.pc.gov.au/study/gbr/finalreport/gbr.pdf (verified 25 October 2006)

Anon.  (2005) Farm management systems framework. Queensland Farmers Federation, Brisbane Queensland. Available at http://www.qff.org.au/ my_documents/my_files/Z5F_QFF_FMS_Framework_for_web.pdf (verified 27 November 2006)

Backshall P (2000) ‘Environmental accreditation system: market analysis project.’ (Agriculture Western Australia: South Perth)

Banney S (2002) Environmental management systems: cattle industry pilot. Final Report. Meat and Livestock Australia, Sydney.

Bougherara D, Grolleau G (2004) Can ecolabelling mitigate market failure? An analysis applied to agro-food products. In ‘Ecolabels and the greening of the food market. Conference proceedings’. pp. 111–119. (Eds G Friedman, D Friedman) Available at http://nutrition.tufts.edu/conferences/ecolabels/ (verified 25 October 2006)

Brah N, Schelleman F (2000) Green purchasing in the field of agri-food. Available at http://epe.be/programmes/egpn/epeagric.html (verified 25 October 2006)

Carruthers G (2005) Adoption of environmental management systems in agriculture: an analysis of 40 case studies. A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Barton, ACT. Publication number 05/032. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Barton, ACT.

Carruthers G, Tinning G (1999) Environmental management systems in agriculture. Proceedings of a national workshop. May 1999. A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. RIRDC Publication No. 99/94. Available at http://www.rirdc.gov.au/reports/Ras/99_94.pdf (verified 27 November 2006)

Carruthers G, Smith Grubb J, Graves B (2005) Business benefits of EMS implementation. In ‘Proceedings of the 4th National EMS in Agriculture Conference’. (Eds A Ridley, E Seymour) (Department of Primary Industries Victoria: Rutherglen)

Cary J, Bhaskaran S, Polonsky M (2004) Green marketing and EMS: assessing potential consumer influence on EMS development in fresh food chains. A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. Available at http://www.rirdc.gov.au/reports/EFM/04-175.pdf (verified 25 October 2006)

Chang H (2002) Breaking the mould: an institutionalist political economy alternative to the neo-liberal theory of the market and the state. Cambridge Journal of Economics 26, 539–559.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (verified 25 October 2006)

Granatstein D (2001) Alternative markets for fruit: organic and IFP. Available at http://organic.tfrec.wsu.edu/OrganicIFP/Marketing/AltMarket.PDF (verified 25 October 2006)

Hediger W, Lehmann B (2003) Multifunctional agriculture and the preservation of environmental benefits. In ‘25th International Conference of Agricultural Economists’. Available at http://www.iaae-agecon.org/conf/durban_papers/papers/096.pdf (verified 25 October 2006)

MacNamara K, Pahl L (Eds) (2004) EcoRange: market-oriented environmental assurance for rangeland pastoral industries. 3. Australian consumer survey. EcoRange Project report. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra. Available at http://www.rirdc.gov.au/fullreports/ (verified 25 October 2006)

McCoy S, Parlevliet G (2000) Export market potential for clean and organic agricultural products. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Publication No. 00/76. RIRDC Project No. DAW-85A.

Mech T, Young M (2001) VEMAs: designing voluntary environmental management arrangements to improve natural resource management in agriculture and allied rural industries. A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. Available at www.rirdc.gov.au/reports/Ras/CSL-15A.pdf (verified 25 October 2006)

Pahl L (2003) EcoRange: market-oriented environmental assurance for rangeland pastoral industries. 3. Australian rangeland grazier survey. EcoRange Project report. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra. Available at http://www.rirdc.gov.au/reports/Ras/03-130sum.html (verified 25 October 2006)

Pahl L (2004) EcoRange: market-oriented environmental certification for rangeland pastoral industries. 2. A review of on-farm standards. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra. Available at http://www.rirdc.gov.au/fullreports/ (verified 25 October 2006)

Pahl LI, Sharp R (2007) Stakeholder expectations for environmental assurance in agriculture: lessons from the pastoral industry. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 260–272.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (verified 25 October 2006)

Sallur NM, Weier LZ, Pahl LI, Holmes SB, Yeoman SC (2007) EMS in the pastoral industries of western Queensland: from customisation to implementation. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 284–293.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (verified 27 November 2006)

Toyne P, Cowell C, Mech T (2004) Marketing agricultural sustainability: driving environmental improvement with marketplace benefits from environmental labelling. A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. Available at http://www.rirdc.gov.au/reports/Ras/04-050.pdf (verified 25 October 2006)

Twyford-Jones P, Pahl L, Miles K, Newell G, MacNamara K (2005) EcoRange: market-oriented environmental assurance for rangeland pastoral industries. 6. Market research report. EcoRange Project report, Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra. Available at http://www.rirdc.gov.au/fullreports/ (verified 25 October 2006)