Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > AN > EA05314
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 46(7)

Development of a remote method for the recording of cattle weights under field conditions

E. Charmley A B C , T. L. Gowan A and J. L. Duynisveld A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Crops and Livestock Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Nappan, Nova Scotia, B0L 1C0, Canada.

B Current address: CSIRO Livestock Industries, JM Rendel Laboratory, PO Box 5545, Rockhampton, Qld 4702, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: ed.charmley@csiro.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46(7) 831-835 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05314
Submitted: 8 November 2005  Accepted: 5 April 2006   Published: 8 June 2006

Abstract

Remote weighing of cattle is advantageous because it is less labour-intensive and less invasive for the animal than conventional methods. An automated system was built using ‘off the shelf’ technology which allowed for cattle to be weighed automatically on pasture when accessing the device. Data collected over a 70-day grazing period was compared with data collected at 2-week intervals by transferring cattle to a centralised weighing facility. Liveweights recorded using the remote system were some 20 kg higher than those measured conventionally. However the daily rate of change was similar for conventional and remote weighing methods, being 1.25 v. 1.20 kg/day, respectively (P = 0.48). This study demonstrated that remote weighting of cattle on pasture is feasible and gives satisfactory results compared with conventional methods. This relatively simple method relies on technologies currently available to the cattle industry and could readily be adapted to a range of commercial situations.

Additional keywords: cattle, pasture, radiofrequency identification, weight gain.


Acknowledgments

The authors wish to J. Bacon, R. McIvor, J. Smith, P. Smith, M. Stiles, B. Trueman and M. Wheaton for their technical assistance.


References


Cockwill CL, McAllister TA, Olson ME, Milligam DN, Ralston BJ, Huisma C, Hand RK (2000) Individual intake of mineral and milase supplements by cows, heifers and calves. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 80, 681–690. open url image1

McAllister TA, Gibb DJ, Kemp RA, Huisma ME, Olson ME, Milligan D, Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS (2000) Electronic identification: Applications in beef production and research. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 80, 381–392. open url image1

National Research Council (1996) ‘Nutrient requirements of beef cattle.’ 7th edn. (National Academy Press: Washington DC)

Peiper UM, Edan Y, Devir S, Barak M, Maltz E (1993) Automatic weighing of dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 56, 13–24.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Ralston BJ, Olson ME, Garossino KC, McAllister TA, Milligan DN, Genswein BMA (2005) Individual intake of free-choice creep feed by suckling calves on range. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 85, 401–404. open url image1

Rowe JB (2003) Nutritional management of the Australian sheep flock. In ‘Recent advances in animal production in Australia’. pp. 23–31. (University of New England: Armidale)