Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Impact of annual legume ‘break’ crops on the yield and quality of canola in comparison with the impact on yield of wheat

J. Evans A B , G. M. Murray A , G. Scott A , B. Orchard A , J. Brennan A , D. Lemerle A , A. Kaiser A and E. L. Armstrong A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A NSW Department of Primary Industries, EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, PMB, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: jeffrey.evans@dpi.nsw.gov.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46(11) 1489-1497 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05203
Submitted: 21 July 2005  Accepted: 14 March 2006   Published: 9 October 2006

Abstract

This study investigated the yield, oil and protein content of canola in response to alternative single-season legume crops, and compared the yield response with that of wheat. Two field trials were conducted in consecutive years at Wagga Wagga on the South West Slopes of New South Wales. The soil type was Red Kandasol. The legume treatments were field pea and vetch managed for silage production, vetch managed for green manure, a mixture of aerial seeding clovers (Berseem, Arrowleaf, Persian: 6 : 3 : 3) managed for silage, hay or green manure, and field pea and narrow-leaf lupin managed for grain. There was one wheat treatment managed for grain. In terms of growing season rainfall, the rainfall-use efficiency of canola was low and similar to that achieved on farms (5.1 kg/ha.mm rainfall). Yields of canola were less than potential water-limited yields and the canola equivalent wheat yields were less than comparative wheat yields. The constraint(s) on canola yield meant that nitrogen-limited yield potential was not reached, and in contrast to wheat in adjacent plots, there was no relationship between canola seed yield and soil mineral nitrogen available during seedling establishment of canola. However, relative to other legume treatments, antecedent crops of the clover mix depressed yield and total oil content, particularly in one year. It was concluded that under field conditions that constrained canola productivity to that similar to on-farm productivity, wheat may make more efficient use of legume nitrogen than canola. Were canola to be used as the response crop, antecedent legumes of vetch or pea, rather than aerial seeding clover, would give higher potential yield and total oil content of the canola.


Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank NSW Department of Primary Industries and the Grains Research and Development Corporation for financial and infrastructure support for this study. We also thank SeedCo South Australia for supplying the legume seed and A. Oates for soil physical data.


References


Almond JA, Dawkins TCK, Done CJ, Ivins JD (1984) Cultivations for winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Aspects of Applied Biology 6, 67–79. open url image1

Angus JF, Gault RR, Good AJ, Hart AB, Jones TD, Peoples MB (2000) Lucerne removal before a cropping phase. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 877–890.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Australian Oilseeds Federation (2004) ‘Technical and quality standards manual. Method AOF 4–3.3.’ (AOF: Sydney)

Burgess LW , Blackhouse D , Summerell BA , Swan LJ (2001) Crownrot of wheat. In ‘Fusarium’. (Eds BA Summerell, JF Leslie, D Blackhouse, WL Bryden, LW Burgess) pp. 271–294. (APS Press: St Paul, MN)

Chan KY, Oates A, Peoples MB, Dear BS, Swan AD, Hayes RC (2003) Agronomic consequences of tractor wheel compaction on a clay soil. Soil Tillage Research 89, 13–21.
Crossref |
open url image1

Cornish PS, Murray GM (1989) Low rainfall rarely limits wheat yields in southern New South Wales. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 29, 77–28.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Evans J, Scott G, Lemerle D, Kaiser A, Orchard B, Murray GM, Armstrong EL (2003a) Impact of legume ‘break’ crops on the residual amount and distribution of soil mineral nitrogen. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 763–776.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Evans J, Scott G, Lemerle D, Kaiser A, Orchard B, Murray GM, Armstrong EL (2003b) Impact of legume ‘break’ crops on the yield and grain quality of wheat and relationship with soil mineral N and crop N content. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 777–788.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Gilmour AR , Cullis BR , Welham SJ , Thompson R (1999) ASREML Reference manual. NSW Agriculture Biometrics Bulletin No. 3. NSW Agriculture, Orange, NSW.

Hesterman OB, Griffin TS, Williams PT, Harris GH, Christenson DR (1992) Forage legume–small grain intercrops: Nitrogen production and response of subsequent corn. Journal of Production Agriculture 5, 340–348. open url image1

Hocking PJ, Stapper M (2001a) Effects of sowing time and nitrogen fertiliser on canola and wheat, and nitrogen fertiliser on Indian mustard. 1. Dry matter production, grain yield, and yield components. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 623–634.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hocking PJ, Stapper M (2001b) Effects of sowing time and nitrogen fertiliser on canola and wheat, and nitrogen fertiliser on Indian mustard. II. Nitrogen concentrations, N accumulation, and N fertiliser use efficiency. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 635–644.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hocking PJ, Kirkegaard JA, Angus JF, Gibson AH, Koetz EA (1997a) Comparison of canola, Indian mustard and Linola in two contrasting environments. 1. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on dry-matter production, seed yield and seed quality. Field Crops Research 49, 107–125.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hocking PJ, Randall PJ, DeMarco D (1997b) The response of dryland canola to nitrogen fertilizer: partitioning and mobilization of dry matter and nitrogen, and nitrogen effects on yield components. Field Crops Research 54, 201–220.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Holland JF , Crocker GJ , Harden S , Sanson PT (2005) Deep moisture extraction by canola, mustard and wheat. In ‘14th Australian research assembly on brassicas’. (Ed. T Potter) pp. 129–130. (SARDI and PIRSA: Port Lincoln)

Isbell RF (1996) ‘The Australian soil classification.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Jackson GD (2000) Effects of nitrogen and sulfur on canola yield and nutrient uptake. Agronomy Journal 92, 644–649. open url image1

Mead A (2004) A survey of 2000 paddocks — key findings. In ‘Southern New South Wales grain research update’. pp 149–151. (Grains Research & Development Corporation: Wagga Wagga)

Murray GM, Heenan DP, Taylor AC (1991) The effect of rainfall and crop management on take-all and eyespot of wheat in the field. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 31, 645–651.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Robertson MJ , Kirkegaard JA (2005) Water use efficiency of dryland canola. In ‘14th Australian research assembly on brassicas’. (Ed. T Potter) pp. 116–120. (SARDI and PIRSA: Port Lincoln)

Shrethna A, Hesterman OB, Copeland LO, Squire JM, Fisk JW, Sheaffer CC (1999) Annual legumes as green manure and forage crops in winter canola (Brassica napus L.) rotations. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 79, 19–25. open url image1

Smith CJ, Wright GC, Woodroofe MR (1988) The effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on rapeseed (Brassica napus) production in south-eastern Australia. II. Nitrogen accumulation and oil yield. Irrigation Science 9, 15–25.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Steel RGD , Torrie JH (1960) ‘Principles and procedures of statistics.’ p. 409. (McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc.: New York)

Taylor AJ, Smith CJ, Wilson JB (1991) Effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on yield, oil content, nitrogen accumulation and water use of canola (Brassica napus L.). Fertilizer Research 29, 249–260.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1