Honey produced from genetically modified canola (Brassica napus) nectar will not need to be labelled as a GM food under current Australian guidelines
M. Hornitzky A B and A. Ghalayini AA NSW Department of Primary Industries, Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: michael.hornitzky@dpi.nsw.gov.au
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46(8) 1101-1104 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA04205
Submitted: 29 September 2004 Accepted: 24 January 2005 Published: 5 July 2006
Abstract
Food or ingredients labelled as genetically modified (GM) contain either new genetic material or protein as a result of genetic modification. In Australia, a 1% threshold, below which labelling is not required, exists for the unintended presence of GM material in non-GM foods. The canola pollen content by dry weight in a range of canola honey samples from diverse geographical areas in Australia was determined to be 0.2 ± 0.12%, well below the 1% threshold. Two GM canola honey samples sourced from Canada contained 0.19 and 0.24% of canola pollen. This work indicates honey derived from GM canola crops will not need to be labelled as a GM food.
Additional keywords: Brassica napus, canola, honey, honey bees, pollen.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation for funding (Project No. DAN-218A). We also thank the beekeepers, Capilano Honey and Rob Manning for submitting honey samples and Idris Barchia for the statistical analysis.
Jones GF, Bryant VM
(2004) The use of ETOH for the dilution of honey. Grana 43, 174–182.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |