Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The economics of managing tree–crop competition in windbreak and alley systems

R. Sudmeyer A C and F. Flugge B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Agriculture Western Australia, PMB 50, Esperance, WA 6450, Australia.

B CRC for Plant-based Management of Dryland Salinity, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: rsudmeyer@agric.wa.gov.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45(11) 1403-1414 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA04155
Submitted: 30 July 2004  Accepted: 3 December 2004   Published: 16 December 2005

Abstract

Re-introducing trees and shrubs into agricultural landscapes as agroforestry systems establishes a tension between long-term objectives, such as increasing shelter, water use, nature conservation and harvesting tree products, and the short-term objective of maximising crop and pasture profitability. This paper describes the growth of crops, pastures and trees at the tree–crop interface in agroforestry systems and the economic returns from alley farming and windbreak systems using various tree–crop competition management strategies in the Esperance region of Western Australia.

Severing lateral tree roots (root-pruning), harvesting mallees and allowing them to coppice, or thinning trees for sawlog regimes increased the yield of crops and pastures in the competition zone. In some instances, these increases were significant: root-pruning increased the annual return from crops grown in the competition zone of Pinus radiata by up to $548/km of the tree line at 1 site. Conversely, root-pruning reduced tree growth by 14–43% across all sites. Therefore, where trees provide benefits, such as shelter from damaging winds, the benefits of reduced tree–crop competition may not offset the consequent reduction in rate of tree growth. For mallee–crop alley systems on agriculturally productive soils, mallee growth rates must be high enough to compensate for crop losses in the competition zone. On less agriculturally productive soils, block-planting mallees may be more profitable than alley systems or crops without competition (sole-crops).

This research has shown that competition management strategies can be used to manipulate the relative productivity of trees, crops and pasture at the tree–agriculture interface. The use of these strategies will depend on the relative economic value of tree and crop products and the value placed on other tree benefits, such as shelter and reduced groundwater recharge.

Additional keywords: coppicing, oil mallees, root-pruning, tree–crop interactions.


Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Grains Research and Development Corporation for funding this research, Rob Johnstone, Ken deGrussa, the Lewis family, Ewin Stewart and Brendan Freeman for making trial sites available on their farms. Micheal O’Connell is thanked for his excellent advice and assistance with the economic analysis. We also thank Shirley Milne and Dimphia McGuigan, for their technical assistance, the staff of EDRS; particularly Colin Boyd and Noel Rennie for sowing and harvesting trial crops and David Hall, Don Cooper and Alan Herbert for their comments on the manuscript.


References


Abadi A, Lefroy E, Cooper D, Hean R, Davies C (2003) Profitability of medium to low rainfall agroforestry in the cropping zone. RIRDC/Land & Water Australia/FWPRDC Joint Venture Agroforestry Program. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra.

Abadi A, Cooper D (2003) A case study of the economics of alley farming with oil mallees in Western Australia using the Imagine framework. In ‘Proceedings of the 14th international farm management congress’. (CD ROM) (International Farm Management Association: Perth)

Anon.  (2002) Gross Margins Guide 2003 Western Australia. WA Department of Agriculture, Miscellaneous Publication 18/2002, Perth.

Burnage T (Ed.) (1996) ‘Esperance Regional Development Strategy for Farm Forestry.’ (South-East Forest Foundation: Esperance, WA)

Enecon (2001) Integrated Tree Processing of Mallee Eucalypts. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Publication No. 01/160, Canberra.

George R, McFarlane D, Nulsen RA (1997) Salinity threatens the viability of agriculture and ecosystems in Western Australia. Hydrogeology Journal 5, 6–21.
Crossref |
open url image1

George-Jaeggli B, Meinke H, Carberry PS, Maia AHN, Voller P (1998) Variations in wheat yields behind windbreaks in Southern Queensland — results from a survey. In ‘Proceedings of the 9th Australian agronomy conference’. (Eds DL Michalk and JE Pratley) p. 683. (The Australian Agronomy Society Inc.: Parkville, Vic.)

Hatton TJ, Nulsen RA (1999) Towards achieving functional ecosystem mimicry with respect to water cycling on southern Australian agriculture. Agroforestry Systems 45, 203–214.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Huth NI, Carberry PS, Poulton PL, Brennan LE, Keating BA (2002) A framework for simulating agroforestry options for the low rainfall areas of Australia using APSIM. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 171–185.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jones HK, Sudmeyer RA (2002) Economic assessment of windbreaks on the southeast coast of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 751–762.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Short R, McConnell C (2001) Extent and Impacts of Dryland Salinity. Resource Management Technical Report 202, WA Department of Agriculture, Perth.

Sudmeyer RA, Adams M, Eastham J, Scott PR, Hawkins W, Rowland I (2002a) Broad-acre crop yield in the lee of windbreaks in the medium and low rainfall areas of south-western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 739–750.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sudmeyer RA, Hall DJM, Eastham J, Adams M (2002b) The tree-crop interface: The effects of root-pruning in south-western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 763–772.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sudmeyer RA, Speijers J, Nicholas BD (2004) Root distribution of Pinus pinaster, P. radiata, Eucalyptus globulus and E. kochii and associated soil chemistry in agricultural land adjacent to tree lines. Tree Physiology 24, 1333–1345.
PubMed |
open url image1

Unkovich M, Blott K, Knight A, Mock I, Rab A, Portelli M (2003) Water use, competition, and crop production in low rainfall, alley farming systems of south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 751–762.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Woodall GS, Ward BH (2002) Soil water relations, crop production and root-pruning of a belt of trees. Agricultural Water Management 53, 153–169.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Zorzetto A, Chudleigh P (1999) Commercial Prospects for Low Rainfall Agroforestry. Rural Industries Research and Development Publication No. 99/152, Canberra.