Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Pasture yield and composition changes in a Central Queensland black speargrass (Heteropogon contortus) pasture in relation to grazing management options

D. M. Orr, W. H. Burrows, R. E. Hendricksen, R. L. Clem, M. T. Rutherford, M. J. Conway, D. J. Myles, P. V. Back and C. J. Paton

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41(4) 477 - 485
Published: 2001

Abstract

A grazing study commenced in 1988 at Calliope, Central Queensland, measured the effects of stocking rate, legume over-sowing and animal diet supplements/burning on pasture and animal production in a native black speargrass (Heteropogon contortus) pasture. This paper reflects on changes in yield and pasture composition between 1988 and 1996, during which time the seasonal rainfall was below average. At the pasture community scale, the highest stocking rate of 1 steer/2 ha reduced pasture yield but had little impact on pasture composition. The frequency of H. contortus showed no clear differences due to stocking rate although there was a slight overall trend for it to decline with time. The frequency of increaser species such asChloris divaricata was highest at the highest stocking rate. At the individual plant scale, the density of H. contortus plants declined at high stocking rate.

The proportion of the sown legume Stylosanthes scabra cv. Seca increased with time reaching a density of 15 plants/m 2 and contributing 33% to the total yield in the legume treatments. Burning has reduced the occurrence of H. contortus compared with that in unburnt native pasture and this may be due to the stocking rates being too high following the fire. These results indicate the stability of pasture composition across a 4-fold range of stocking rates from 1988 to 1996. This study needs to continue, at least through a period of above average rainfall, to determine further effects of stocking rate and pasture type on pasture composition.

https://doi.org/10.1071/EA00132

© CSIRO 2001

Committee on Publication Ethics


Export Citation Get Permission

View Dimensions