Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Does tillering affect the grain yield of maize (Zea mays)? A quantitative review

Diego Hernán Rotili https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4450-1870 A B C * , José Roberto Micheloud A D , Fernando Ross E , Leonor Gabriela Abeledo A B and Gustavo Ángel Maddonni A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Agronomía, Departamento de Producción Vegetal, Cátedra de Cerealicultura, Av. San Martín 4453, Buenos Aires C1417DSE, Argentina.

B Facultad de Agronomía, IFEVA, Universidad de Buenos Aires, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

C América Agroinnova, América, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

D PLEXAGRO, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

E Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Tres Arroyos, Argentina.

* Correspondence to: rotili@agro.uba.ar

Handling Editor: Shu Fukai

Crop & Pasture Science 75, CP24064 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP24064
Submitted: 15 March 2024  Accepted: 7 June 2024  Published: 27 June 2024

© 2024 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing

Abstract

Context

Tillering is generally considered counterproductive for grain yield in maize (Zea mays). However, recent research defies that idea and suggests that the effects of tillering on grain yield depend on the yield-environment.

Aims

To synthesise the impact of tillering on maize grain yield across a wide range of environments.

Methods

Literature regarding tillering in maize was assessed to create a multi-environment database of grain yield per unit area and per plant of side-by-side comparisons of grain yield of tillered versus de-tillered treatments. Regression analyses and mean comparisons were used to compare the performance of tillered and de-tillered crops.

Key results

The maximum plant density in the database was 7 plants m−2. Tillered crops out-yielded de-tillered crops irrespective of the de-tillered grain yield (y-intercept = 841 kg ha−1, P < 0.01 and slope = 1, P = 0.91). For the lower tercile of yield-environments (i.e. lower than 5269 kg ha−1), the frequency of lower yields on tillered crops was higher (all database = 0.21, Pampas = 0.5) than in the mid or high terciles (all database < 0.13, Pampas < 0.18). Across environments, individual plant yield was higher for tillered crops (42 g plant−1 or 16% difference), but that difference decreased as the de-tillered individual plant yield decreased turning into zero below 136 g plant−1.

Conclusions

Within the limitations of the data set, tillering was generally beneficial or indifferent for grain yield, but detrimental effects may be recorded in very low yield-environments.

Implications

Tillering does not condition maize yield across most environments.

Keywords: agricultural production, grain yield, maize, marginal environments, quantitative review, tillering, yield per plant, Zea mays L.

References

Blumenthal JM, Lyon DJ, Stroup WW (2003) Optimal plant population and nitrogen fertility for dryland corn in Western Nebraska. Agronomy Journal 95, 878-883.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Cagnola JI, Parco M, Rotili DH, Ploschuk EL, Curin F, Amas JI, Luque SF, Maddonni GÁ, Otegui ME, Casal JJ (2021) Artificial selection for grain yield has increased net CO2 exchange of the ear leaf in maize crops. Journal of Experimental Botany 72, 3902-3913.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |

Duvick DN (2005) Genetic progress in yield of United States maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica 50, 193-202.
| Google Scholar |

Earley EB, Seif RD, Bensley FA (1971) Relation of tillers to yield of dent corn, (Zea mays L.). Agronomy Journal 63, 472-474.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Egli DB (2023) Yield improvement and yield components: a comparison of corn and soybean. Crop Science 63, 1019-1029.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Erenstein O, Jaleta M, Sonder K, Mottaleb K, Prasanna BM (2022) Global maize production, consumption and trade: trends and R&D implications. Food Security 14, 1295-1319.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

FAOSTAT (2023) Food and agriculture organization of the united nations. Available at https://www.fao.org/faostat/en [Accessed January 2024]

Ferrante A, Eyre J, George-Jaeggli B, McLean J, Chenu K, deVoil P, McLean G, Rodriguez D (2015) Maize yield determination in the Northern Region: hybrid by environment by management interactions. Building productive, diverse and sustainable landscapes. In ‘Proceedings of the 17th ASA Conference’. 20–24 September 2015, Hobart, Australia.

Granatstein D (1986) Maize tillering investigations in Lesotho. Research Division Report RD-R-70. Farming Systems Research Project, Research Division, Ministry of Agriculture, Lesotho.

Grassini P, Specht J, Tollenaar M, Ciampitti IA, Cassman KG (2015) High-yield maize-soybean cropping systems in the U.S. Corn belt. In ‘Crop physiology – applications for genetic improvement and sgronomy’. 2nd edn. (Eds VO Sadras, DF Calderini) pp. 15–42. (Elsevier: Netherlands)

Kiesselbach TA (1950) Progressive development and seasonal variations of the corn crop. Nebraska Agricultural Experimental Station Research Bulletin 166.

King KA, Archontoulis SV, Baum ME, Edwards JW (2023) From a point to a range of optimum estimates for maize plant density and nitrogen rate recommendations. Agronomy Journal 116, 598-611.
| Google Scholar |

Lyon TL (1905) Experiments with corn. Nebraska Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin 91.

Maddonni GÁ, Otegui ME, Andrieu B, Chelle M, Casal JJ (2002) Maize leaves turn away from neighbours. Plant Physiology 130, 1181-1189.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Maddonni GA, Parco M, Rotili DH (2021) Manejo de la estructura del cultivo de maíz en ambientes marginales de la Argentina. Agronomía & Ambiente 41 (2).

Markham MY, Stoltenberg DE (2010) Corn morphology, mass, and grain yield as affected by early –season red: far-red light environments. Crop Science 50, 273-280.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Massigoge I, Ross F, Fernández JA, Echarte L, Ciampitti IA, Cerrudo A (2022) Contribution of tillers to maize yield stability at low plant density. Crop Science 62, 2451-2461.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Mejia Álvarez CA, Rotili DH, D’Andrea KE, Ciampitti IA, Abeledo LG, Maddonni GÁ (2024) Tillering and nitrogen economy of low-density maize crops. Field Crops Research 309, 109310.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Mylonas I, Sinapidou E, Remountakis E, Sistanis I, Pankou C, Ninou E, Papadopoulos I, Papathanasiou F, Lithourgidis A, Gekas F, Dordas C, Tzantarmas C, Kargiotidou A, Tokamani M, Sandaltzopoulos R, Tokatlidis IS (2020) Improved plant yield efficiency alleviates the erratic optimum density in maize. Agronomy Journal 112, 1690-1701.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Nielsen RL (2003) Tillers or “suckers” in corn: good or bad? Corny News Network, Purdue University. Available at https://www.agry.purdue.edu/ext/corn/news/articles.03/Tillers-0623.html [Accessed January 2024]

Parra G, Borrás L, Gambín BL (2020) Maize long-term genetic progress explains current dominance over sorghum in Argentina. European Journal of Agronomy 119, 126122.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Parra G, Borrás L, Gambín BL (2022) Crop attributes explaining current grain yield dominance of maize over sorghum. Field Crops Research 275, 108346.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rodriguez D, Roxburgh C, Farnsworth C, Ferrante A, Eyre J, Irvine-Brown S, McLean J, Bielich M (2017) Climate risk management in maize cropping systems. In ‘Achieving sustainable cultivation of maize – Volume 2: Cultivation techniques, pest and disease control’. (Ed. D Watson) pp. 227–245. (Burleigh Dodds: Cambridge, United Kingdom)

Rosenquist CE (1941) The effect of tillers in corn upon the development of the main stalk. Agronomy Journal 33, 915-917.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Ross F, Di Matteo J, Cerrudo A (2020) Maize prolificacy: a source of reproductive plasticity that contributes to yield stability when plant population varies in drought-prone environments. Field Crops Research 247, 107699.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rotili DH, Giorno A, Tognetti PM, Maddonni GA (2019) Expansion of maize production in a semi-arid region of Argentina: climatic and edaphic constraints and their implications on crop management. Agricultural Water Management 226, 105761.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rotili DH, de Voil P, Eyre J, Serafin L, Aisthorpe D, Maddonni GA, Rodriguez D (2020) Untangling genotype x management interactions in multi-environment on-farm experimentation. Field Crops Research 255, 107900.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rotili DH, Sadras VO, Abeledo LG, Ferreyra JM, Micheloud JR, Duarte G, Girón P, Ermácora M, Maddonni GÁ (2021a) Impacts of vegetative and reproductive plasticity associated with tillering in maize crops in low-yielding environments: a physiological framework. Field Crops Research 265, 108107.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rotili DH, Abeledo LG, deVoil P, Rodriguez D, Maddonni GA (2021b) Exploring the effect of tillers on the water economy, plant growth and kernel set of low-density maize crops. Agricultural Water Management 243, 106424.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rotili DH, Abeledo LG, Martínez Larrea S, Maddonni GA (2022) Grain yield and kernel setting of multiple-shoot and/or multiple-ear maize hybrids. Field Crops Research 279, 108471.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Sangoi L, Schmitt A, Saldanha A, Fiorentin CF, Pletsch AJ, Vieira J, Gattelli MA (2009) Grain yield of maize hybrids at two plant densities with and without tillers removal. Ciencia Rural 39, 325-331.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Sangoi L, Vargas VP, Schweitzer C, Ferreira da Silva PR, Schmitt A, Vargas VP, Trezzi Casa R, Arruda de Souza C (2011) Maize tillering, leaf area, and grain productivity under different spatial arrangement. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 46, 609-616.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Sangoi L, Schmitt A, Vieira J, Vargas VP, Girardi D, Zoldan SR (2012) Tiller removal does not increase maize grain yield, regardless of the sowing date. Ciencia Rural 42, 1354-1359.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Slafer GA, Savin R (2023) Comparative performance of barley and wheat across a wide range of yielding conditions. Does barley outyield wheat consistently in low-yielding conditions? European Journal of Agronomy 143, 126689.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Tetio-Kagho F, Gardner FP (1988) Responses of maize to plant population density. I. Canopy development, light relationships, and vegetative growth. Agronomy Journal 80, 930-935.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Thomison P (2017) Does tillering impact corn yield? C.O.R.N. Newsletter, Ohio State University Extension. Available at https://agcrops.osu.edu/newsletter/corn-newsletter/2017-24/does-tillering-impact-corn-yield [Verified January 2024]

Tokatlidis IS, Koutroubas SD (2004) A review of maize hybrids’ dependence on high plant populations and its implications for crop yield stability. Field Crops Research 88, 103-114.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Veenstra R, Messina C, Haag L, Vara Prasad PV, Ciampitti IA (2020) Tiller contributions to low-density corn biomass and yield. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports 6, 3.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Veenstra RL, Messina CD, Berning D, Haag LA, Carter P, Hefley TJ, Prasad PVV, Ciampitti IA (2021a) Effect of tillers on corn yield: exploring trait plasticity potential in unpredictable environments. Crop Science 61, 3660-3674.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Veenstra R, Messina CD, Berning D, Wallace S, Legleiter M, Haag L, Prasad PV, Ciampitti IA (2021b) Corn tiller contributions and ear development in low plant densities. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports 7, 4.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Veenstra RL, Hefley TJ, Berning D, Messina CD, Haag LA, Prasad PVV, Ciampitti IA (2023a) Predicting corn tiller development in restrictive environments can be achieved to enhance defensive management decision tools for producers. Frontiers in Plant Sciences 14, 1223961.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Veenstra RL, Messina CD, Berning D, Haag LA, Carter P, Hefley TJ, Prasad PVV, Ciampitti IA (2023b) Tiller biomass in low plant-density corn enhances transient C sink without direct harvest index detriment. Field Crops Research 292, 108804.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Vega CRC, Sadras VO, Andrade FH, Uhart SA (2000) Reproductive allometry in soybean, maize and sunflower. Annals of Botany 85, 461-468.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |