Energy-carbon footprint, productivity, and profitability of fodder-based cropping patterns under different nutrient management options in north-west India
Malu Ram Yadav A B , Magan Singh A , Rakesh Kumar
A , Biswaranjan Behera C D * , Dinesh Kumar E , Rajendra Kumar Yadav F , Md Basit Raza G , Milan Kumar Lal H , Rajesh Kumar Meena A , Govind Makarana I , Kirttiranjan Baral J , Kaushik Kumar Panigrahi K and Sanatan Pradhan C
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
Abstract
Intercropping of cereal–legume forages with integrated nutrient management could be an effective agronomic strategy to increase forage biomass production and economic returns. However, the energy-carbon footprints of the management strategies are of utmost importance in the present era of climate-conscious agriculture.
To identify the best possible combinations of fodder-based cropping patterns and nutrient management with higher yield and profitability with lower energy-carbon footprints.
This field study was carried out with four fodder-based cropping patterns under different nutrient management options in a split-plot design.
The maize (Zea mays) + cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) (1:1)–oats (Avena sativa) under 75% recommended fertiliser dose with zinc, plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and farmyard manure significantly increased system productivity and profitability and saved fertiliser by 25% compared to the same with 100% recommended dose only. In comparison to maize–oats, this combination showed lower energy and carbon footprints, but higher system productivity and profitability. The system yield and net returns of this combination were significantly higher than those of cowpea–oats cropping pattern, despite having a higher energy-carbon footprint.
The 1:1 cereal–legume intercropping-based cropping pattern maize + cowpea (1:1)–oats under 75% recommended dose of N, P2O5, K2O with zinc, plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and FYM could be the most productive, profitable fodder-based cropping pattern with lower energy-carbon footprints in north-west India.
The study identified the most profitable combination of fodder-based cropping patterns and nutrient management with low energy and carbon footprints in north-west India, which could be a component of climate-smart agriculture in similar agro-climates of the globe.
Keywords: carbon emissions, cropping patterns, diversification, energy, fodder, greenhouse gas, integrated nutrient management, oats.
References
Aggarwal PK, Joshi PK, Ingram JSI, Gupta RK (2004) Adapting food systems of the Indo-Gangetic Plains to global environmental change: key information needs to improve policy formulation. Environmental Science & Policy 7(6), 487-498.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Basavalingaiah K, Ramesha YM, Paramesh V, Rajanna GA, Jat SL, Dhar Misra S, Gaddi AK, Girisha HC, Yogesh GS, Raveesha S, Roopa TK, Shashidhar KS, Kumar B, El-Ansary DO, Elansary HO (2020) Energy budgeting, data envelopment analysis and greenhouse gas emission from rice production system: a case study from puddled transplanted rice and direct-seeded rice system of Karnataka, India. Sustainability 12(16), 6439.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bedoussac L, Journet E-P, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Naudin C, Corre-Hellou G, Jensen ES, Prieur L, Justes E (2015) Ecological principles underlying the increase of productivity achieved by cereal-grain legume intercrops in organic farming. a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 35, 911-935.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Behera B, Das TK, Rathi N (2019) Carry-over effect of brown manuring supplemented with nitrogen on productivity and profitability in succeeding wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 89(4), 708-713.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Behera B, Das TK, Raj R, Ghosh S, Raza MB, Sen S (2021) Microbial consortia for sustaining productivity of non-legume crops: prospects and challenges. Agricultural Research 10, 1-14.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Bhattacharyya R, Kundu S, Prakash V, Gupta HS (2008) Sustainability under combined application of mineral and organic fertilizers in a rainfed soybean–wheat system of the Indian Himalayas. European Journal of Agronomy 28(1), 33-46.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Biernat L, Taube F, Loges R, Kluß C, Reinsch T (2020) Nitrous oxide emissions and methane uptake from organic and conventionally managed arable crop rotations on farms in Northwest Germany. Sustainability 12(8), 3240.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Chaudhary VP, Gangwar B, Pandey DK (2006) Auditing of energy use and output of different cropping systems in India. Agricultural Engineering International: The CIGR EJournal 8, 1-13.
| Google Scholar |
Choudhary M, Rana KS, Bana RS, Ghasal PC, Choudhary GL, Jakhar P, Verma RK (2017) Energy budgeting and carbon footprint of pearl millet – mustard cropping system under conventional and conservation agriculture in rainfed semi-arid agro-ecosystem. Energy 141, 1052-1058.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Dass S, Kumar A, Jat SL, Parihar CM, Singh AK, Chikkappa GK, Jat ML (2012) Maize holds potential for diversification and livelihood security. Indian Journal of Agronomy 57, 32-37.
| Google Scholar |
Devasenapathy P, Senthilkumar G, Shanmugam PM (2009) Energy management in crop production. Indian Journal of Agronomy 54(1), 80-90.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Dwivedi BS, Shukla AK, Singh VK, Yadav RL (2003) Improving nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiencies through inclusion of forage cowpea in the rice–wheat systems in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Field Crops Research 84(3), 399-418.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ghorbani R, Mondani F, Amirmoradi S, Feizi H, Khorramdel S, Teimouri M, Sanjani S, Anvarkhah S, Aghel H (2011) A case study of energy use and economical analysis of irrigated and dryland wheat production systems. Applied Energy 88(1), 283-288.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ghosh PK, Palsaniya DR, Srinivasan R (2016) Forage research in India: issues and strategies. Agricultural Research Journal 53(1), 1-12.
| Google Scholar |
Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P, Jensen ES (2003) The comparison of nitrogen use and leaching in sole cropped versus intercropped pea and barley. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 65, 289-300.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Jankowski KJ, Dubis B, Budzyński WS, Bórawski P, Bułkowska K (2016) Energy efficiency of crops grown for biogas production in a large-scale farm in Poland. Energy 109, 277-286.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Khosruzzaman S, Asgar MA, Rahman KMR, Akbar S (2010) Energy intensity and productivity in relation to agriculture-Bangladesh perspective. Journal of Bangladesh Academy of Sciences 34(1), 59-70.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lal R (2004) Carbon emission from farm operations. Environment International 30(7), 981-990.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Lal B, Gautam P, Nayak AK, Panda BB, Bihari P, Tripathi R, Shahid M, Guru PK, Chatterjee D, Kumar U, Meena BP (2019) Energy and carbon budgeting of tillage for environmentally clean and resilient soil health of rice-maize cropping system. Journal of Cleaner Production 226, 815-830.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Lithourgidis AS, Vlachostergios DN, Dordas CA, Damalas CA (2011) Dry matter yield, nitrogen content, and competition in pea–cereal intercropping systems. European Journal of Agronomy 34(4), 287-294.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Ma BL, Liang BC, Biswas DK, Morrison MJ, McLaughlin NB (2012) The carbon footprint of maize production as affected by nitrogen fertilizer and maize-legume rotations. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 94, 15-31.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Majhi PK, Raza B, Behera PP, Singh SK, Shiv A, Mogali SC, Bhoi TK, Patra B, Behera B (2022) Future-proofing plants against climate change: a path to ensure sustainable food systems. In ‘Biodiversity, functional ecosystems and sustainable food production’. (Ed. CM Galanakis) pp. 73–116. (Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland)
Meena OP, Sammauria R, Gupta AK, Gupta KC, Behera B, Saxena R, Yadav MR, Singh P, Meena RK, Raza MB, Anil AS, Lal MK (2022) Energy-carbon footprint vis-à-vis system productivity and profitability of diversified crop rotations in semi-arid plains of North-West India. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 22, 2026-2041.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Mihov M, Antonova G, Masheva S, Yankova V (2012) Energy assessment of conventional and organic production of head cabbage. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 18, 320-324.
| Google Scholar |
Nasar J, Khan W, Khan MZ, Gitari HI, Gbolayori JF, Moussa AA, Mandozai A, Rizwan N, Anwari G, Maroof SM (2021) Photosynthetic activities and photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency of maize crop under different planting patterns and nitrogen fertilization. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 21, 2274-2284.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Nassiri SM, Singh S (2009) Study on energy use efficiency for paddy crop using data envelopment analysis (DEA) technique. Applied Energy 86(7–8), 1320-1325.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pal DK, Bhattacharyya T, Srivastava P, Chandran P, Ray SK (2009) Soils of the Indo-Gangetic Plains: their historical perspective and management. Current Science 96(9), 1193-1202.
| Google Scholar |
Pandey D, Agrawal M (2014) Carbon footprint estimation in the agriculture sector. In ‘Assessment of carbon footprint in different industrial sectors, Vol. 1’. (Ed. S Muthu) pp. 25–47. (Springer) 10.1007/978-981-4560-41-2_2
Parihar CM, Bhakar RN, Rana KS, Jat ML, Singh AK, Jat SL, Parihar MD, Sharma S (2013) Energy scenario, carbon efficiency, nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics of pearlmillet-mustard system under diverse nutrient and tillage management practices. African Journal of Agricultural Research 8(10), 903-915.
| Google Scholar |
Parihar CM, Yadav MR, Jat SL, Singh AK, Kumar B, Pradhan S, Chakraborty D, Jat ML, Jat RK, Saharawat YS, Yadav OP (2016) Long term effect of conservation agriculture in maize rotations on total organic carbon, physical and biological properties of a sandy loam soil in north-western Indo-Gangetic Plains. Soil and Tillage Research 161, 116-128.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Pooniya V, Shivay YS, Rana A, Nain L, Prasanna R (2012) Enhancing soil nutrient dynamics and productivity of Basmati rice through residue incorporation and zinc fertilization. European Journal of Agronomy 41, 28-37.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Prasad PVV, Satyanarayana V, Murthy VRK, Boote KJ (2002) Maximizing yields in rice–groundnut cropping sequence through integrated nutrient management. Field Crops Research 75(1), 9-21.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Saha R, Mishra VK, Majumdar B, Laxminarayana K, Ghosh PK (2010) Effect of integrated nutrient management on soil physical properties and crop productivity under a maize (Zea mays)–mustard (Brassica campestris) cropping sequence in acidic soils of Northeast India. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 41, 2187-2200.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Singh RJ, Ahlawat IPS (2015) Energy budgeting and carbon footprint of transgenic cotton–wheat production system through peanut intercropping and FYM addition. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 187, 282.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Singh KP, Prakash V, Srinivas K, Srivastva AK (2008) Effect of tillage management on energy-use efficiency and economics of soybean (Glycine max) based cropping systems under the rainfed conditions in North-West Himalayan Region. Soil and Tillage Research 100(1–2), 78-82.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Singh CM, Sharma PK, Kishor P, Mishra PK, Singh AP, Verma R, Raha P (2010) Impact of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield and nutrient uptake by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Asian Journal of Agricultural Research 5(1), 76-82.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Singh RJ, Ghosh BN, Sharma NK, Patra S, Dadhwal KS, Mishra PK (2016) Energy budgeting and emergy synthesis of rainfed maize–wheat rotation system with different soil amendment applications. Ecological Indicators 61, 753-765.
| Google Scholar |
Swaminathan C, Surya R, Subramanian E, Arunachalam P (2023) Challenges in pulses productivity and agronomic opportunities for enhancing growth and yield in blackgram: a review. Legume Research-An International Journal 46, 1-9.
| Google Scholar |
Tamta A, Kumar R, Ram H, Meena RK, Meena VK, Yadav MR, Subrahmanya DJ (2019) Productivity and profitability of legume-cereal forages under different planting ratio and nitrogen fertilization. Legume Research – An International Journal 42, 102-107.
| Google Scholar |
Toader MM, Lăzăroiu G (2014) Researches over the efficacy of the technologic process of cereal straw briquetting. UPB Scientific Bulletin, Series D 76, 239-244.
| Google Scholar |
Tubiello FN, Cóndor-Golec RD, Salvatore M, Piersante A, Federici S, Ferrara A, Rossi S, Flammini A, Cardenas P, Biancalani R, Jacobs H, Prasula P, Prosperi P (2015) Estimating greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture: a manual to address data requirements for developing Countries. In ‘Food and agriculture organization of the united nations’. p. 193. (Rome)
Van Groenigen JW, Velthof GL, Oenema O, Van Groenigen KJ, Van Kessel C (2010) Towards an agronomic assessment of N2O emissions: a case study for arable crops. European Journal of Soil Science 61(6), 903-913.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Venkatesh MS, Hazra KK, Ghosh PK, Khuswah BL, Ganeshamurthy AN, Ali M, Singh J, Mathur RS (2017) Long–term effect of crop rotation and nutrient management on soil–plant nutrient cycling and nutrient budgeting in Indo-Gangetic plains of India. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 63(4), 2007-2022.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wang H, Yang Y, Zhang X, Tian G (2015) Carbon footprint analysis for mechanization of maize production based on life cycle assessment: a case study in Jilin Province, China. Sustainability 7(11), 15772-15784.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
West TO, Marland G (2002) A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon flux in agriculture: comparing tillage practices in the United States. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 91(1–3), 217-232.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Wu W, Ma B (2015) Integrated nutrient management (INM) for sustaining crop productivity and reducing environmental impact: a review. Science of the Total Environment 512–513, 415-427.
| Crossref | Google Scholar | PubMed |
Yadav MR, Parihar CM, Jat SL, Singh AK, Kumar D, Pooniya V, Parihar MD, Saveipune D, Parmar H, Jat ML (2016) Effect of long-term tillage and diversified crop rotations on nutrient uptake, profitability and energetics of maize (Zea mays) in north-western India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 86(6), 743-749.
| Google Scholar |
Yadav MR, Kumar S, Behera B, Yadav VP, Khrub AS, Yadav LR, Gupta KC, Meena OP, Baloda AS, Raza MB, Panda RK, Lal MK (2023) Energy-carbon footprint, productivity and profitability of barley cultivars under contrasting tillage-residue managements in semi-arid plains of North-West India. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 23, 1109-1124.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Yilmaz I, Akcaoz H, Ozkan B (2005) An analysis of energy use and input costs for cotton production in Turkey. Renewable Energy 30(2), 145-155.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
Zhao X, Wang S, Xing G (2015) Maintaining rice yield and reducing N pollution by substituting winter legume for wheat in a heavily-fertilized rice-based cropping system of southeast China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 202, 79-89.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |
