Mapping variability of pasture sward height, dry matter availability and disappearance during grazing
R. C. Dobos
A B E , F. A. P. Alvarenga A C , H. Bansi D , K. L. Austin A C , A. J. Donaldson A , R. T. Woodgate A and P. L. Greenwood A C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A NSW Department of Primary Industries, Livestock Industries Centre, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
B Precision Agriculture Research Group, School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
C CSIRO Agriculture and Food, FD McMaster Laboratory Chiswick, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia.
D School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
E Corresponding author. Email: robin.dobos@dpi.nsw.gov.au
Crop and Pasture Science 72(7) 551-564 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP20347
Submitted: 7 September 2020 Accepted: 29 April 2021 Published: 29 July 2021
Abstract
This study investigated whether geostatistical methods can be applied to severely drought-affected pastures to assess spatial variability in sward height (SH) and dry matter yield (DMY) and change in SH and DM in response to grazing. Geo-referenced SH data were collected using a rapid, non-destructive method (rapid pasture meter) and analysed by geostatistical methodology. Eight severely drought-affected paddocks (~1.25 ha) were grazed individually by two groups of 20 Angus heifers in two 28-day phases (P1 and P2) between 2 July and 29 August 2019. Pasture DMY was estimated from calibration equations developed for P1 and P2. Ordinary kriging was used to generate estimated surface forming maps with which to visualise the spatial variability. The degree of spatial dependence (dSD) was strongest for SH during P2 post-grazing (11%) and for DMY during P2 pre-grazing (6%). For change in SH, the dSD was 50% for P1 and 0% for P2. Disappearance of DMY dSD was 56% for P1 and 47% for P2. The range of spatial dependence (distance until variability stabilised) for both SH and DMY was lowest for P1 post-grazing (11 m), indicating that intensive sampling is required. The ranges of spatial dependence for the change in both SH and DMY were similar for P1 and P2. These results confirm that intensity of grazing by cattle is not random. Incorporation of this methodology into rapid, non-destructive pasture data collection devices would assist producers and their advisers in improving grazing management decisions. Further analysis with data from non-drought affected pastures is required to determine the robustness of this method.
Keywords: dry matter yield, geostatistics, ordinary kriging, spatial dependence, sward height, variogram.
References
Alvarenga FAP, Bansi H, Dobos RC, Austin KL, Donaldson AJ, Woodgate RT, Greenwood PL (2021) Performance of Angus weaner heifers varying in residual feed intake-feedlot estimated breeding values grazing severely drought-affected pasture. Animal Production Science 61, 337–343.| Performance of Angus weaner heifers varying in residual feed intake-feedlot estimated breeding values grazing severely drought-affected pasture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Awty I (2009) Taking the guess work out of feeding cows. In ‘Proceedings 13th Annual Symposium on Precision Agriculture in Australasia’. Armidale, NSW. (Eds MG Trotter, EB Garraway, DW Lamb) p. 73. (Precision Agriculture Research Group, The University of New England: Armidale, NSW)
Bailey DW (2005) Identification and creation of optimum habitat conditions for livestock. Rangeland Ecology and Management 58, 109–118.
| Identification and creation of optimum habitat conditions for livestock.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bailey DW, Lunt S, Lipka A, Thomas MG, Medrano JF, Cánovas A, Rincon G, Stephenson MB, Jensen D (2015) Genetic influences on cattle grazing distribution: association of genetic markers with terrain use in cattle. Rangeland Ecology and Management 68, 142–149.
| Genetic influences on cattle grazing distribution: association of genetic markers with terrain use in cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bivand R, Lewin-Koh N (2019) maptools: Tools for Handling Spatial Objects. R package version 0.9-9. R Foundation, Vienna. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=maptools (accessed 15 March 2020)
Bivand RS, Pebesma EJ, Gomez-Rubio V (2013) ‘Applied spatial data analysis with R.’ 2nd edn. (Springer: New York) https://asdar-book.org/
Bivand RS, Keitt T, Rowlingson B (2019) rgdal: Bindings for the ‘Geospatial’ Data Abstraction Library. R package version 1.4-8. R Foundation, Vienna. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rgdal (accessed 15 March 2020)
Cambardella CA, Mooman TB, Novak JM, Parkin TB, Karlen DL, Turv RF, Konopa AE (1994) Field scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58, 1501–1511.
| Field scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Campbell NA, Arnold GW (1973) The visual assessment of pasture yield. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 13, 263–267.
| The visual assessment of pasture yield.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Deepayan S (2008) ‘Lattice: multivariate data visualization with R.’ (Springer: New York)
Deepayan S, Andrews F (2019) latticeExtra: Extra graphical utilities based on Lattice. R package version 0.6-29. R Foundation, Vienna. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=latticeExtra (accessed 15 March 2020)
Dennis SJ, Taylor AI, O’Neill K, Clarke-Hill W, Dynes RA, Cox N, van Koten C, Jowett TWD (2015) Pasture yield mapping: why & how. Journal of New Zealand Grasslands 77, 41–46.
| Pasture yield mapping: why & how.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Earle DF, McGowan AA (1979) Evaluation and calibration of an automated rising plate meter for estimating dry matter yield of pasture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 19, 337–343.
| Evaluation and calibration of an automated rising plate meter for estimating dry matter yield of pasture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Edirisinghe A, Chapman GE, Louis JP (2001) A simplified method of retrieval of ground level reflectance of targets from airborne video imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing 22, 1127–1141.
| A simplified method of retrieval of ground level reflectance of targets from airborne video imagery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ehlert D, Hammen V, Adamek R (2003) On-line sensor pendulum-meter for determination of plant mass. Precision Agriculture 4, 139–148.
| On-line sensor pendulum-meter for determination of plant mass.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Frame J (1993) Herbage mass. In ‘Sward measurement handbook’. 2nd edn. (Eds A Davies, RD Baker, S Grant, AS Laidlaw) (British Grassland Society)
Goodchild M (1992) Geographical information science. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 6, 31–45.
| Geographical information science.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gräler B, Pebesma E, Heuvelink G (2016) Spatio-temporal interpolation using gstat. The R Journal 8, 204–218.
| Spatio-temporal interpolation using gstat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Greenwood PL, Paull DR, McNally J, Kalinowski T, Ebert D, Little B, Smith DV, Rahman A, Valencia P, Ingham AB, Bishop-Hurley GJ (2017) Use of sensor-determined behaviours to develop algorithms for pasture intake by individual grazing cattle. Crop & Pasture Science 68, 1091–1099.
| Use of sensor-determined behaviours to develop algorithms for pasture intake by individual grazing cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Handcock MS, Stein ML (1993) A Bayesian analysis of kriging. Technometrics 35, 403–410.
| A Bayesian analysis of kriging.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hiemstra PH, Pebesma EJ, Twenhofel CJW, Heuvelink GBM (2009) Real-time automatic interpolation of ambient gamma dose rates from the Dutch Radioactivity Monitoring Network. Computers & Geosciences 35, 1711–1721.
| Real-time automatic interpolation of ambient gamma dose rates from the Dutch Radioactivity Monitoring Network.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hijmans RJ (2020) raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling. R package version 3.0-12. R Foundation, Vienna. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster (accessed 15 March 2020)
Hill NS, Stuedemann JA, Ware GO, Petersen JC (1989) Pasture sampling requirement for near infrared reflectance spectroscopy estimates of botanical composition. Crop Science 29, 774–777.
| Pasture sampling requirement for near infrared reflectance spectroscopy estimates of botanical composition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hirata M, Ogura S, Furuse M (2011) Fine-scale spatial distribution of herbage mass, herbage consumption and fecal deposition by cattle in a pasture under intensive rotational grazing. Ecological Research 26, 289–299.
| Fine-scale spatial distribution of herbage mass, herbage consumption and fecal deposition by cattle in a pasture under intensive rotational grazing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hutchinson KJ, King KL, Wilkinson DR (1995) Effects of rainfall, moisture stress, and stocking rate on the persistence of white clover over 30 years. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 35, 1039–1047.
| Effects of rainfall, moisture stress, and stocking rate on the persistence of white clover over 30 years.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kayad AG, Al-Gaadi KA, Tola E, Madugundu R, Zeyada AM, Kalaitzidis C (2016) Assessing the spatial variability of alfalfa yield using satellite imagery and ground-based data. PLoS One 11, e0157166
| Assessing the spatial variability of alfalfa yield using satellite imagery and ground-based data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27611577PubMed |
Laca E (2009) New approaches and tools for grazing management. Rangeland Ecology and Management 62, 407–417.
| New approaches and tools for grazing management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Neuwirth E (2014) RColorBrewer: ColorBrewer palettes. R package version 1.1-2. R Foundation, Vienna. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RColorBrewer (accessed 15 March 2020)
Olea RA (1999) ‘Geostatistics for engineers and earth scientists.’ (Kluwer Academic Publishers)
Oliver MA (2013) Precision agriculture and geostatistics: how to manage agriculture more exactly. Significance 10, 17–22.
| Precision agriculture and geostatistics: how to manage agriculture more exactly.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Oliver MA, Webster R (2014) A tutorial guide to geostatistics: computing and modelling variograms and kriging. Catena 113, 56–69.
| A tutorial guide to geostatistics: computing and modelling variograms and kriging.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pariz CM, Carvalho MP, Chioderoli CA, Nakayama FT, Andreotti M, Montanari R (2011) Spatial variability of forage yield and soil physical attributes of a Brachiaria decumbens pasture in the Brazilian Cerrado. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 40, 2111–2120.
| Spatial variability of forage yield and soil physical attributes of a Brachiaria decumbens pasture in the Brazilian Cerrado.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pebesma EJ (2004) Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package. Computers & Geosciences 30, 683–691.
| Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pebesma EJ, Bivand RS (2005) Classes and methods for spatial data in R. R News 5, https://cran.r-project.org/doc/Rnews/
Robertson M, Isbister B, Maling I, Oliver Y, Wong M, Adams M, Bowden B, Tozer P (2007) Opportunities and constraints for managing within field spatial variability in Western Australian grain production. Field Crops Research 104, 60–67.
| Opportunities and constraints for managing within field spatial variability in Western Australian grain production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schafer BM (1980) A description of the soils of the CSIRO Pastoral Research Laboratory Property, Chiswick, Armidale, NSW. CSIRO Division of Animal Physiology, Animal Research Laboratories Technical Paper No. 8. pp. 1–33.
Schueller JK, Whitney JD, Wheaton TA, Miller WM, Turner AE (1999) Low-cost automatic yield mapping in hand-harvested citrus. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 23, 145–153.
| Low-cost automatic yield mapping in hand-harvested citrus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stafford JV, Ambler B, Lark RM, Catt J (1996) Mapping and interpreting the yield variation in cereal crops. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 14, 101–119.
| Mapping and interpreting the yield variation in cereal crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stein ML (1999) ‘Interpolation of spatial data: some theory for kriging.’ (Springer: New York)
Trotter MG, Lamb DW, Donald GE, Schneider DA (2010) Evaluating an active optical sensor for quantifying and mapping green herbage mass and growth in a perennial grass pasture. Crop & Pasture Science 61, 389–398.
| Evaluating an active optical sensor for quantifying and mapping green herbage mass and growth in a perennial grass pasture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vickery PJ, Bennet IL, Nicol GR (1980) An improved electronic capacitance meter for estimating herbage mass. Grass and Forage Science 35, 247–252.
| An improved electronic capacitance meter for estimating herbage mass.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yule IJ, Fulkerson WJ, Lawrence HG, Murray R (2006) Pasture measurement: the first step towards precision dairying. In ‘Proceedings 10th Annual Symposium on Precision Agriculture Research and Application in Australasia’. The Australian Technology Park, Sydney. p. 6. (Australian Centre for Precision Agriculture, University of Sydney: Sydney)
