Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparative kernel growth and yield components of two- and six-row barley (Hordeum vulgare) under terminal drought simulated by defoliation

Dejan Dodig A F , Vesna Kandić https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1999-2030 A , Miroslav Zorić B , Emilija Nikolić-Đorić C , Ana Nikolić A , Beba Mutavdžić C , Dragan Perović D and Gordana Šurlan-Momirović E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Maize Research Institute Zemun Polje, Slobodana Bajića 1, 11185 Belgrade, Serbia.

B Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Maksima Gorkog 30, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.

C University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Agriculture, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 8, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.

D Julius Kühn-Institut, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Erwin-Baur-Straße 27, 06484 Quedlinburg, Germany.

E University of Belgrade, Faculty of Agriculture, Nemanjina 6, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia.

F Corresponding author. Email: dejanza@yahoo.com

Crop and Pasture Science 69(12) 1215-1224 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP18336
Submitted: 11 December 2017  Accepted: 14 October 2018   Published: 13 December 2018

Abstract

Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) is often grown in sites with low rainfall and high temperature during grain filling. Because spike architecture is one of basic footprints of barley domestication, the importance of spikes in adaptation to different environments or abiotic stresses can be hypothesised. In order to compare different barley spike types in terms of kernel growth and yield components, we tested 15 two-row and 10 six-row winter genotypes in eight environments where terminal drought was simulated by defoliation at 7 days after heading (7 DAH). Control plants were grown intact. On average, two-row genotypes outyielded six-row genotypes by 17% under control conditions and 33% under simulated late drought. Observations of kernel dry weights from 7 DAH through to harvest maturity at 5-day intervals were regressed onto a measure of thermal time. After preliminary evaluation of four nonlinear (S-shaped) models for kernel dry-weight accumulation, the ordinary logistic model was deemed the most appropriate in most cases and was finally applied to all plant-growth curves. Four parameters were estimated from the logistic model. Whereas two earliness estimators (inflection point and thermal time needed to reach maximum kernel weight) were similar for the two barley types, maximum kernel weight (Ymax) and mean rate of kernel growth (RG) were higher (P < 0.05) in two-row than in six-row barleys. Differences in Ymax and RG among six-row barley genotypes were greater between control and defoliation treatments than between years, whereas among two-row barley genotypes, differences between years were greater, suggesting better stability of six-row types and better drought tolerance of two-row types in the tested barley set.

Additional keywords: abiotic stress, food security, grain filling, grain yield, resilience.


References

Alqudah AM, Schnurbusch T (2014) Awn primordium to tipping is the most decisive developmental phase for spikelet survival in barley. Functional Plant Biology 41, 424–436.
Awn primordium to tipping is the most decisive developmental phase for spikelet survival in barley.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Alqudah AM, Schnurbusch T (2015) Barley leaf area and leaf growth rates are maximized during the pre-anthesis phase. Agronomy 5, 107–129.
Barley leaf area and leaf growth rates are maximized during the pre-anthesis phase.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Alqudah AM, Koppolu R, Wolde GM, Graner A, Schnurbusch T (2016) The genetic architecture of barley plant stature. Frontiers in Genetics 7, 117
The genetic architecture of barley plant stature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Archontoulis SV, Miguez FE (2015) Nonlinear regression models and applications in agricultural research. Agronomy Journal 107, 786–798.
Nonlinear regression models and applications in agricultural research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Arisnabarreta S, Miralles DJ (2006a) Yield responsiveness in two‐ and six‐rowed barley grown in contrasting nitrogen environments. Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science 192, 178–185.
Yield responsiveness in two‐ and six‐rowed barley grown in contrasting nitrogen environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Arisnabarreta S, Miralles DJ (2006b) Floret development and grain setting in near isogenic two- and six-rowed barley lines (Hordeum vulgare L.). Field Crops Research 96, 466–476.
Floret development and grain setting in near isogenic two- and six-rowed barley lines (Hordeum vulgare L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Arisnabarreta S, Miralles DJ (2008) Critical period for grain number establishment of near isogenic lines of two- and six-rowed barley. Field Crops Research 107, 196–202.
Critical period for grain number establishment of near isogenic lines of two- and six-rowed barley.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Badr A, Sch KMR, Rabey HE, Effgen S, Ibrahim HH, Pozzi C, Rohde W, Salamini F (2000) On the origin and domestication history of barley (Hordeum vulgare). Molecular Biology and Evolution 17, 499–510.
On the origin and domestication history of barley (Hordeum vulgare).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bates DM, Watts DG (2007) ‘Nonlinear regression analysis and its applications.’ Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. (John Wiley and Sons: New York)

Bauer A, Black AL, Frank AB, Vasey EH (1992) Agronomic characteristics of spring barley in the Northern Great Plains. Bulletin No. 523. North Dakota State University Agricultural Experiment Station, Fargo, ND, USA.

Bensemane L, Bouzerzour H, Benmahammed A, Mimouni H (2011) Assessment of the phenotypic variation within two- and six-rowed barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) breeding lines grown under semi-arid conditions. Advances in Environmental Biology 5, 1454–1460.

Bewley JD, Black M (1994) ‘Seeds: physiology of development and germination.’ (Plenum Press: New York)

Blum A, Poiarkova H, Golan G, Mayer J (1983a) Chemical desiccation of wheat plants as a simulator of post-anthesis stress. I. Effects on translocation and kernel growth. Field Crops Research 6, 51–58.
Chemical desiccation of wheat plants as a simulator of post-anthesis stress. I. Effects on translocation and kernel growth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Blum A, Mayer J, Golan G (1983b) Chemical desiccation of wheat plants as a simulator of a post-anthesis stress. II. Relations to drought stress. Field Crops Research 6, 149–155.
Chemical desiccation of wheat plants as a simulator of a post-anthesis stress. II. Relations to drought stress.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Blum A, Shpiler L, Golan G, Mayer J, Sinmena B (1991) Mass selection of wheat for grain filling without transient photosynthesis. Euphytica 54, 111–116.
Mass selection of wheat for grain filling without transient photosynthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brdar MD, Kraljević-Balalić MM, Kobiljski BD (2008) The parameters of grain filling and yield components in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum). Central European Journal of Biology 3, 75–82.

Briggs DE (1978) ‘Barley.’ (Chapman and Hall: London)

Curtis EM, Leigh A, Rayburg S (2012) Relationships among leaf traits of Australian arid zone plants: alternative modes of thermal protection. Australian Journal of Botany 60, 471–483.
Relationships among leaf traits of Australian arid zone plants: alternative modes of thermal protection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dodig D, Savić J, Kandić V, Zorić M, Vucelić Radović B, Popović A, Quarrie S (2016) Responses of wheat plants under post-anthesis stress induced by defoliation: I. Contribution of agro-physiological traits to grain yield. Experimental Agriculture 52, 203–223.
Responses of wheat plants under post-anthesis stress induced by defoliation: I. Contribution of agro-physiological traits to grain yield.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dodig D, Rančić D, Vucelić Radović B, Zorić M, Savić J, Kandić V, Pećinar I, Stanojević S, Šešlija A, Vassilev D, Pekić-Quarrie S (2017) Response of wheat plants under post-anthesis stress induced by defoliation: II. Contribution of peduncle morpho-anatomical traits and carbon reserves to grain yield. The Journal of Agricultural Science 155, 475–493.
Response of wheat plants under post-anthesis stress induced by defoliation: II. Contribution of peduncle morpho-anatomical traits and carbon reserves to grain yield.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gambín BL, Borrás L, Otegui ME (2008) Kernel weight dependence upon plant growth at different grain-filling stages in maize and sorghum. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 280–290.
Kernel weight dependence upon plant growth at different grain-filling stages in maize and sorghum.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

García del Moral LF, Garcia del Moral MB, Molina-Cano L, Slafer GA (2003) Yield stability and development in two- and six-rowed winter barleys under Mediterranean conditions. Field Crops Research 81, 109–119.
Yield stability and development in two- and six-rowed winter barleys under Mediterranean conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gebhardt DJ, Rasmusson DC, Fulcher RG (1993) Kernel morphology and malting quality variation in lateral and central kernels of six-row barley. Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists 51, 145–148.
Kernel morphology and malting quality variation in lateral and central kernels of six-row barley.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

González A, Isaura M, Luis A (2007) Response of barley genotypes to terminal soil moisture stress: phenology, growth, and yield. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 29–37.
Response of barley genotypes to terminal soil moisture stress: phenology, growth, and yield.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

González A, Isaura M, Luis A (2008) Yield and osmotic adjustment capacity of barley under terminal water-stress conditions. Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science 194, 81–91.
Yield and osmotic adjustment capacity of barley under terminal water-stress conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Haddadin MF (2015) Assessment of drought tolerant barley varieties under water stress. International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 5, 131–137.

Hatfield JL, Prueger JH (2015) Temperature extremes: effect on plant growth and development. Weather and Climate Extremes 10, 4–10.
Temperature extremes: effect on plant growth and development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ho KM, Jui PY (1989) Duration and rate of kernel filling in barley. Cereal Research Communications 17, 69–76.

Kandić V, Dodig D, Zorić M, Nikolić A, Momirović GŠ, Aleksić G, Đurić N (2018) Grain filling parameters of two- and six-rowed barley genotypes in terminal drought conditions. Italian Journal of Agrometeorology 23, 5–14.

Kolodinska-Brantestam A, von Bothmer R, Rashal I, Gullord M, Martynov S, Weibull J (2008) Variation of agronomic traits in Nordic and Baltic spring barley. In ‘Proceedings 10th International Barley Genetics Symposium’. 5–10 April 2008, Alexandria. (Eds S Cecarelly, S Grando) pp. 39–45. (ICARDA)

Komatsuda T, Pourkheirandish M, He C, Azhaguvel P, Kanamori H, Perovic D, Stein N, Graner A, Wicker T, Tagiri A, Lundqvist U, Fujimura T, Matsuoka M, Yano M (2007) Six-rowed barley originated from a mutation in a homeodomain-leucine zipper I-class homeobox gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 1424–1429.
Six-rowed barley originated from a mutation in a homeodomain-leucine zipper I-class homeobox gene.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kordenaeej A (2008) Mapping QTLs for yield and yield components under drought stress in bread wheat. PhD Thesis, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.

Le Gouis J (1993) Grain filling and shoot growth of 2-row and 6-row winter barley varieties. Agronomie 13, 545–552.
Grain filling and shoot growth of 2-row and 6-row winter barley varieties.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Liller CB, Neuhaus R, von Korff M, Koornneef M, van Esse W (2015) Mutations in barley row type genes have pleiotropic effects on shoot branching. PLoS One 10, e0140246
Mutations in barley row type genes have pleiotropic effects on shoot branching.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Meade KA, Cooper M, Beavis WD (2013) Modeling biomass accumulation in maize kernels. Field Crops Research 151, 92–100.
Modeling biomass accumulation in maize kernels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Neumann K, Klukas C, Friedel S, Rischbeck P, Chen D, Entzian A, Stein N, Graner A, Kilian B (2015) Dissecting spatiotemporal biomass accumulation in barley under different water regimes using high-throughput image analysis. Plant, Cell & Environment 38, 1980–1996.
Dissecting spatiotemporal biomass accumulation in barley under different water regimes using high-throughput image analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nicolas ME, Turner NC (1993) Use of chemical desiccants and senescing agents to select wheat lines maintaining stable grain yield during post-anthesis stress. Field Crops Research 31, 155–171.
Use of chemical desiccants and senescing agents to select wheat lines maintaining stable grain yield during post-anthesis stress.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Panik MJ (2014) ‘Growth curve modeling: theory and applications.’ (John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA)

Pepler S, Gooding M, Ellis R (2006) Modelling simultaneously water content and dry matter dynamics of wheat grains. Field Crops Research 95, 49–63.
Modelling simultaneously water content and dry matter dynamics of wheat grains.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

R Development Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/ (accessed 10 May 2017).

Ratkowsky DA (1983) ‘Nonlinear regression modeling. A unified practical approach.’ (Marcel Dekker: New York)

Regan KL, Whan BR, Turner NC (1993) Evaluation of chemical desiccation as a selection technique for drought resistance in a dryland wheat breeding program. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44, 1683–1691.
Evaluation of chemical desiccation as a selection technique for drought resistance in a dryland wheat breeding program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ritz C, Streibig JC (2005) Bioassay analysis using R. Journal of Statistical Software 12, 1–22.
Bioassay analysis using R.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Royo C, Blanco R (1999) Growth analysis of five spring and five winter triticale genotypes. Agronomy Journal 91, 305–311.
Growth analysis of five spring and five winter triticale genotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Royo C, Villegas D, Rharrabti Y, Blanco R, Martos V, García del Moral LF (2006) Grain growth and yield formation of durum wheat grown at contrasting latitudes and water regimes in a Mediterranean environment. Cereal Research Communications 34, 1021–1028.
Grain growth and yield formation of durum wheat grown at contrasting latitudes and water regimes in a Mediterranean environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Saini HS, Westgate ME (1999) Reproductive development in grain crops during drought. Advances in Agronomy 68, 59–96.
Reproductive development in grain crops during drought.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Samarah NH, Alqudah AM, Amayreh JA, McAndrews GM (2009) The effect of late-terminal drought stress on yield components of four barley cultivars. Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science 195, 427–441.
The effect of late-terminal drought stress on yield components of four barley cultivars.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Santiveri F, Royo C, Romagosa I (2002) Patterns of grain filling of spring and winter hexaploid triticale. European Journal of Agronomy 16, 219–230.
Patterns of grain filling of spring and winter hexaploid triticale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Seber GAF, Wild CJ (1989) ‘Nonlinear regression.’ (John Wiley & Sons: New York)

Tiwari V (2010) Growth and production of barley. In ‘Soils, plant growth and crop production’. (Ed. WH Verheye) pp. 267–297. (EOLSS Publishers: Paris)

Villegas D, Aparicio N, Blanco R, Royo C (2001) Biomass accumulation and main stem elongation of durum wheat grown under Mediterranean conditions. Annals of Botany 88, 617–627.
Biomass accumulation and main stem elongation of durum wheat grown under Mediterranean conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Xiangxiang W, Quanjiu W, Jun F, Lijun S, Xinlei S (2014) Logistic model analysis of winter wheat growth on China’s Loess Plateau. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 94, 1471–1479.
Logistic model analysis of winter wheat growth on China’s Loess Plateau.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.
A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |