Intraspecific competition in oat varieties selected for grain yield and milling
Victor O. Sadras A B , M. Mahadevan A and Pamela K. Zwer A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A South Australian Research and Development Institute, Waite Campus, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: victor.sadras@sa.gov.au
Crop and Pasture Science 69(7) 673-680 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP18098
Submitted: 13 March 2018 Accepted: 14 June 2018 Published: 26 June 2018
Abstract
Oats likely emerged as part of the weedy grass assemblage in early wheat and barley crops. Some Avena species, such as A. fatua and A. sterilis, evolved into aggressive weeds, and the high interspecific competitive ability of cultivated oats (A. sativa) is valued agronomically to facilitate weed control in rotations. We tested the hypothesis, verified in many crops, that high yield of oats is related to low intraspecific competitive ability. Ten contemporary oat varieties, selected for grain yield and milling attributes, where grown in three environments. Response to competition was calculated as 100 × (Yb – Yc)/Yc, where Y is yield measured in border (b) and centre (c) rows. The same definition was used to calculate response to competition of yield components (biomass, harvest index, grain number, grain weight) and the components of grain number (panicle number and grains per panicle). Yield response to competition was affected by all three sources of variation, i.e. environment, variety and variety × environment interaction. The interaction demonstrates the plasticity of yield response to intraspecific competition; for example, the response to competition of variety Mortlock varied from 9% to 71% among environments. This plasticity in yield response to competition was partially related to variety-dependent responses to competition for biomass and harvest index, number of panicles and number of grains per panicle. We did not find the expected negative association between yield and variety-dependent response to competition. We discuss how this lack of correlation could relate to sampling issues, i.e. a limitation in the range of environments and varieties explored in this study, or reflect a legitimate feature of oat crops arising from early and contemporary selective pressures.
Additional keywords: interference, plasticity, phenotype, selection, yield.
References
Abbo S, Shtienberg D, Lichtenzveig J, Lev-Yadun S, Gopher A (2003) The chickpea, summer cropping, and a new model for pulse domestication in the ancient Near East. The Quarterly Review of Biology 78, 435–448.| The chickpea, summer cropping, and a new model for pulse domestication in the ancient Near East.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Angus JF, Grace PR (2017) Nitrogen balance in Australia and nitrogen use efficiency on Australian farms. Soil Research 55, 435–450.
| Nitrogen balance in Australia and nitrogen use efficiency on Australian farms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Aphalo PJ, Ballaré CL (1995) On the importance of information-acquiring systems in plant–plant interactions. Functional Ecology 9, 5–14.
| On the importance of information-acquiring systems in plant–plant interactions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Armengot L, Jose-Maria L, Chamorro L, Sans FX (2017) Avena sterilis and Lolium rigidum infestations hamper the recovery of diverse arable weed communities. Weed Research 57, 278–286.
| Avena sterilis and Lolium rigidum infestations hamper the recovery of diverse arable weed communities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Beckie HJ, Francis A, Hall LM (2012) The biology of Canadian weeds. 27. Avena fatua L. (updated). Canadian Journal of Plant Science 92, 1329–1357.
| The biology of Canadian weeds. 27. Avena fatua L. (updated).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bonaparte E, Brawn RI (1975) Effect of intraspecific competition on phenotypic plasticity of morphological and agronomic characters of 4 maize hybrids. Annals of Botany 39, 863–869.
| Effect of intraspecific competition on phenotypic plasticity of morphological and agronomic characters of 4 maize hybrids.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bradshaw AD (1965) Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Advances in Genetics 13, 115–155.
| Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brett MT (2004) When is a correlation between non-independent variables “spurious”? Oikos 105, 647–656.
| When is a correlation between non-independent variables “spurious”?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Campbell DR, Brody AK, Price MV, Waser NM, Aldridge G (2017) Is plant fitness proportional to seed set? An experiment and a spatial model. American Naturalist 190, 818–827.
| Is plant fitness proportional to seed set? An experiment and a spatial model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Castillejo-González IL, Pena-Barragan JM, Jurado-Exposito M, Mesas-Carrascosa FJ, Lopez-Granados F (2014) Evaluation of pixel- and object-based approaches for mapping wild oat (Avena sterilis) weed patches in wheat fields using Quick Bird imagery for site-specific management. European Journal of Agronomy 59, 57–66.
| Evaluation of pixel- and object-based approaches for mapping wild oat (Avena sterilis) weed patches in wheat fields using Quick Bird imagery for site-specific management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Chew P, Meade K, Hayes A, Harjes C, Bao Y, Beattie AD, Puddephat I, Gusmini G, Tanksley SD (2016) A study on the genetic relationships of Avena taxa and the origins of hexaploid oat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 129, 1405–1415.
| A study on the genetic relationships of Avena taxa and the origins of hexaploid oat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Denison RF (2009) Darwinian agriculture: real, imaginary and complex trade-offs as constraints and opportunities. In ‘Crop physiology: applications for genetic improvement and agronomy’. (Eds VO Sadras, DF Calderini) pp. 215–234. (Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA)
Denison RF (2012) ‘Darwinian agriculture: How understanding evolution can improve agriculture.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA)
DeWitt TJ, Scheiner SM (Eds) (2004) ‘Phenotypic plasticity. Functional and conceptual approaches.’ (Oxford University Press: New York)
Donald CM (1968) The breeding of crop ideotypes. Euphytica 17, 385–403.
| The breeding of crop ideotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Donald CM (1981) Competitive plants, communal plants, and yield in wheat crops. In ‘Wheat science—today and tomorrow’. (Eds LT Evans, WJ Peacock) pp. 223–247. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)
Donald CM, Hamblin J (1983a) The convergent evolution of annual seed crops in agriculture. Advances in Agronomy 36, 97–143.
| The convergent evolution of annual seed crops in agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Donald CM, Hamblin J (1983b) The convergent evolution of annual seed crops in agriculture. Advances in Agronomy 36, 97–143.
| The convergent evolution of annual seed crops in agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Evans LT (1993) ‘Crop evolution, adaptation and yield.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)
Fischer RA (1985) Number of kernels in wheat crops and the influence of solar radiation and temperature. Journal of Agriculture Science 105, 447–461.
| Number of kernels in wheat crops and the influence of solar radiation and temperature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Frey KJ (1965) Utility of hill plots in oat research. Euphytica 14, 196–203.
| Utility of hill plots in oat research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gillet F (2008) Plant competition. In ‘Encyclopaedia of ecology’. (Ed. SEJD Fath) pp. 2783–2793. (Academic Press: Oxford, UK)
Grant K, Kreyling J, Heilmeier H, Beierkuhnlein C, Jentsch A (2014) Extreme weather events and plant–plant interactions: shifts between competition and facilitation among grassland species in the face of drought and heavy rainfall. Ecological Research 29, 991–1001.
Hamblin J, Donald CM (1974) The relationships between plant form, competitive ability and grain yield in a barley cross. Euphytica 23, 535–542.
| The relationships between plant form, competitive ability and grain yield in a barley cross.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harper JL (1977) ‘The population biology of plants.’ (Academic Press: London)
Inderjit , Wardle DA, Karban R, Callaway RM (2011) The ecosystem and evolutionary contexts of allelopathy. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 26, 655–662.
| The ecosystem and evolutionary contexts of allelopathy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jellum MD, Brown CM, Seif RD (1963) Hill and row plot comparison for yield of oats. Crop Science 3, 194–196.
| Hill and row plot comparison for yield of oats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jennings PR, Aquino RC (1968) Studies on competition in rice. III. The mechanism of competition among phenotypes. Evolution 22, 529
| Studies on competition in rice. III. The mechanism of competition among phenotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jennings PR, Dejesus J (1968) Studies on competition in rice. I. Competition in mixtures of varieties. Evolution 22, 119
| Studies on competition in rice. I. Competition in mixtures of varieties.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jennings PR, Herrera RM (1968) Studies on competition in rice. II. Competition in segregating populations. Evolution 22, 332–336.
| Studies on competition in rice. II. Competition in segregating populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Khalifa MA, Qualset CO (1974) Intergenotypic competition between tall and dwarf wheats. 1. In mechanical mixtures. Crop Science 14, 795–799.
| Intergenotypic competition between tall and dwarf wheats. 1. In mechanical mixtures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Khan MA, Bradshaw AD (1976) Adaptation to heterogeneous environments. 2. Phenotypic plasticity in response to spacing in linum. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 27, 519–531.
| Adaptation to heterogeneous environments. 2. Phenotypic plasticity in response to spacing in linum.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lake L, Li Y, Casal JJ, Sadras VO (2016) Negative association between chickpea response to competition and crop yield: phenotypic and genetic analysis. Field Crops Research 196, 409–417.
| Negative association between chickpea response to competition and crop yield: phenotypic and genetic analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Leonard E (Ed.) (2016) ‘Producing quality oat hay.’ (Australian Exporters Company: Canberra, ACT)
López Pereira M, Sadras VO, Batista W, Casal JJ, Hall AJ (2017) Light-mediated self-organization of sunflower stands increases oil yield in the field. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114, 7975–7980.
| Light-mediated self-organization of sunflower stands increases oil yield in the field.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Mahadevan M, Calderini DF, Zwer PK, Sadras VO (2016) The critical period for yield determination in oat (Avena sativa L.). Field Crops Research 199, 109–116.
| The critical period for yield determination in oat (Avena sativa L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Marshall A, Cowan S, Edwards S, Griffiths I, Howarth C, Langdon T, White E (2013) Crops that feed the world 9. Oats—a cereal crop for human and livestock feed with industrial applications. Food Security 5, 13–33.
| Crops that feed the world 9. Oats—a cereal crop for human and livestock feed with industrial applications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Murphy JP, Hoffman LA (1992) The origin, history and production of oat. In ‘Oat science and technology’. (Eds HG Marshall, ME Sorrells) pp. 1–28. (ASA, CSSA: Madison, WI, USA)
Niklas KJ (1994) ‘Plant allometry: the scaling of form and process.’ (University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL)
Pedró A, Savin R, Slafer GA (2012) Crop productivity as related to single-plant traits at key phenological stages in durum wheat. Field Crops Research 138, 42–51.
| Crop productivity as related to single-plant traits at key phenological stages in durum wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reynolds MP, Acevedo E, Sayre KD, Fisher RA (1994) Yield potential in modern varieties: its association with a less competitive ideotype. Field Crops Research 37, 149–160.
| Yield potential in modern varieties: its association with a less competitive ideotype.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ross WM, Miller JD (1955) A comparison of hill and conventional yield tests using oats and spring barley. Agronomy Journal 47, 253–255.
| A comparison of hill and conventional yield tests using oats and spring barley.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sadras VO, Lawson C (2011) Genetic gain in yield and associated changes in phenotype, trait plasticity and competitive ability of South Australian wheat varieties released between 1958 and 2007. Crop & Pasture Science 62, 533–549.
| Genetic gain in yield and associated changes in phenotype, trait plasticity and competitive ability of South Australian wheat varieties released between 1958 and 2007.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sadras VO, Richards RA (2014) Improvement of crop yield in dry environments: benchmarks, levels of organisation and the role of nitrogen. Journal of Experimental Botany 65, 1981–1995.
| Improvement of crop yield in dry environments: benchmarks, levels of organisation and the role of nitrogen.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sadras VO, Trápani N, Pereyra VR, López Pereira M, Quiroz F, Mortarini M (2000) Intraspecific competition and fungal diseases as sources of variation in sunflower yield. Field Crops Research 67, 51–58.
| Intraspecific competition and fungal diseases as sources of variation in sunflower yield.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sadras VO, Mahadevan M, Zwer PK (2017) Oat phenotypes for drought adaptation and yield potential. Field Crops Research 212, 135–144.
| Oat phenotypes for drought adaptation and yield potential.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Schenk HJ (2006) Root competition: beyond resource depletion. Journal of Ecology 94, 725–739.
| Root competition: beyond resource depletion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Smith OD, Kleese RA, Stuthman DD (1970) Competition among oat varieties grown in hill plots. Crop Science 10, 381
| Competition among oat varieties grown in hill plots.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tidemann BD, Hall LM, Harker KN, Alexander BCS (2016) Identifying critical control points in the wild oat (Avena fatua) life cycle and the potential effects of harvest weed-seed control. Weed Science 64, 463–473.
| Identifying critical control points in the wild oat (Avena fatua) life cycle and the potential effects of harvest weed-seed control.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Trezzi MM, Vidal RA, Balbinot AA, Bittencourt HV, Souza A (2016) Allelopathy: driving mechanisms governing its activity in agriculture. Journal of Plant Interactions 11, 53–60.
| Allelopathy: driving mechanisms governing its activity in agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vandeleur RK, Gill GS (2004) The impact of plant breeding on the grain yield and competitive ability of wheat in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 855–861.
| The impact of plant breeding on the grain yield and competitive ability of wheat in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.
| A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zerner MC, Gill GS, Vandeleur RK (2008) Effect of height on the competitive ability of wheat with oats. Agronomy Journal 100, 1729–1734.
| Effect of height on the competitive ability of wheat with oats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zerner MC, Rebetzke GJ, Gill GS (2016) Genotypic stability of weed competitive ability for bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) genotypes in multiple environments. Crop & Pasture Science 67, 695–702.
| Genotypic stability of weed competitive ability for bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) genotypes in multiple environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
