Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
REVIEW

Impacts of windbreak shelter on crop and livestock production

T. P. Baker A , M. T. Moroni B , D. S. Mendham C , R. Smith B and M. A. Hunt A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A ARC Centre for Forest Value & School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay, Tas. 7001, Australia.

B Private Forests Tasmania, 30 Patrick Street, Hobart, Tas. 7000, Australia.

C CSIRO Land and Water, 15 College Road, Sandy Bay, Tas. 7001, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: tpbaker@utas.edu.au

Crop and Pasture Science 69(8) 785-796 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP17242
Submitted: 11 July 2017  Accepted: 23 June 2018   Published: 23 July 2018

Abstract

Agroforestry (the integration of trees into agricultural landscapes) has been promoted, in Australia and elsewhere, as a way to increase farm productivity by providing a wide range of benefits. Despite this, adoption of agroforestry in Australian agricultural systems remains low. To implement agroforestry, farmers must be convinced the benefits of including trees outweigh the costs. This review evaluates the available quantitative data on shelter benefits with emphasis on Australian conditions, identifies key research gaps and determines if there is sufficient knowledge to make accurate predictions about impacts on farm productivity.

Availability of quantitative data on windbreak shelter benefits was examined in five key areas; water use and evaporation, crop/pasture production, livestock mortality, livestock productivity and the capacity to model impacts of windbreaks on crop/livestock systems. Good quantitative data exists for many areas, particularly for changes in environmental conditions following tree establishment, however there were many gaps in key areas. Importantly, the ability to predict crop growth under spatially and temporally variable environmental conditions and the impact of windbreaks on livestock productivity is not yet able to be meaningfully quantified. Thus modelling the profitability of windbreaks is difficult and existing models require additional quantitative data to validate and improve them.

Additional keywords: agroforestry, farming systems, forestry, land management, tree-pasture interaction.


References

Abel N, Baxter J, Campbell A, Cleugh HA, Fargher J, Lambeck R, Prinsley RT, Prosser M, Reid R, Revell G, Schmidt C, Stirzaker RJ (1997) ‘Design principles for farm forestry: a guide to assist farmers to decide where to place trees and farm plantations on farms.’ (RIRDC: Barton, ACT)

ABS (2017) ‘Land management and farming in Australia.’ (Australian Bureau of Statistics: Canberra, ACT)

Ainsworth JAW, Moe SR, Skarpe C (2012) Pasture shade and farm management effects on cow productivity in the tropics. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 155, 105–110.
Pasture shade and farm management effects on cow productivity in the tropics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Alexander G, Lynch JJ (1976) Phalaris windbreaks for shorn and fleeced lambing ewes. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 11, 161–164.

Alexander G, Lynch JJ, Mottershead B, Donnelly J (1980) Reduction in lamb mortality due to grass wind-breaks: results of a 5 year study. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 13, 329–332.

Ali MH, Talukder MSU (2008) Increasing water productivity in crop production – A synthesis. Agricultural Water Management 95, 1201–1213.
Increasing water productivity in crop production – A synthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Baker TP, Jordan GJ, Baker SC (2016) Microclimate edge effects in a recently harvested forest: Do remnant forest patches create the same impact as large forest areas? Forest Ecology and Management 365, 128–136.
Microclimate edge effects in a recently harvested forest: Do remnant forest patches create the same impact as large forest areas?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bennell MR, Verbyla AP (2008) Quantifying the response of crops to shelter in the agricultural regions of South Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 950–957.
Quantifying the response of crops to shelter in the agricultural regions of South Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bennett JM, Cattle SR (2014) Adoption of soil health improvement strategies by Australian farmers: II. Impediments and incentives. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 20, 107–131.
Adoption of soil health improvement strategies by Australian farmers: II. Impediments and incentives.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bicknell D (1991) The role of trees in providing shelter and controlling erosion in the dry temperate and semi-arid southern agricultural areas of Western Australia. In ‘Proceedings of a National Conference on the Role of Trees in Sustainable Agriculture’. Albury, NSW. pp. 21–39. (National Agroforestry Working Group in conjunction with Bureau of Rural Resources, Dept of Primary Industries and Energy: Canberra, ACT)

Bird R (1990) Sheltering the farm – an economic assessment of trees. Rural Quarterly 3, 12–13.

Bird PR (1998) Tree windbreaks and shelter benefits to pasture in temperate grazing systems. Agroforestry Systems 41, 35–54.
Tree windbreaks and shelter benefits to pasture in temperate grazing systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bird PR (2003) Sustainable systems of dairy production – a review of water quality, biodiversity, soil salinity, farm forestry, shade/shelter and productivity issues, and the likely impact of these revegetation of dairy farms. Department of Primary Industries, Hamilton, Victoria.

Bird PR, Lynch JJ, Obst JM (1984) Effect of shelter on plant and animal production. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 15, 270–273.

Bird PR, Bicknell D, Bulman PA, Burke SJA, Leys JF, Parker JN, Van Der Sommen FJ, Voller P (1992) The role of shelter in Australia for protecting soils, plants and livestock. Agroforestry Systems 20, 59–86.
The role of shelter in Australia for protecting soils, plants and livestock.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bird P, Jackson T, Kearney G, Williams K (2002a) Effect of two tree windbreaks on adjacent pastures in south-western Victoria, Australia. Animal Production Science 42, 809–830.
Effect of two tree windbreaks on adjacent pastures in south-western Victoria, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bird P, Jackson T, Williams K (2002b) Effect of synthetic windbreaks on pasture growth in south-western Victoria, Australia. Animal Production Science 42, 831–839.
Effect of synthetic windbreaks on pasture growth in south-western Victoria, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brandle JR, Hodges L, Zhou XH (2004) Windbreaks in North American agricultural systems. Agroforestry Systems 61, 65–78.
Windbreaks in North American agricultural systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brooksbank K, Veneklaas EJ, White DA, Carter JL (2011) Water availability determines hydrological impact of tree belts in dryland cropping systems. Agricultural Water Management 100, 76–83.
Water availability determines hydrological impact of tree belts in dryland cropping systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Broster JC, Robertson SM, Dehaan RL, King BJ, Friend MA (2012) Evaluating seasonal risk and the potential for windspeed reductions to reduce chill index at six locations using GrassGro. Animal Production Science 52, 921–928.
Evaluating seasonal risk and the potential for windspeed reductions to reduce chill index at six locations using GrassGro.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Burke S (1991) The effect of shelterbelts on crop yields at Rutherglen, Victoria. In ‘The role of trees in sustainable agriculture. Proceedings of National Conference’. Albury, NSW. pp. 88–99. (National Agroforestry Working Group in conjunction with the Bureau of Rural Resources, Department of Primary Industries and Energy: Canberra, ACT)

Campi P, Palumbo AD, Mastrorilli M (2012) Evapotranspiration estimation of crops protected by windbreak in a Mediterranean region. Agricultural Water Management 104, 153–162.
Evapotranspiration estimation of crops protected by windbreak in a Mediterranean region.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Carberry PS, Meinke H, Poulton PL, Hargreaves JNG, Snell AJ, Sudmeyer RA (2002) Modelling crop growth and yield under the environmental changes induced by windbreaks. 2. Simulation of potential benefits at selected sites in Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 887–900.
Modelling crop growth and yield under the environmental changes induced by windbreaks. 2. Simulation of potential benefits at selected sites in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Caton JS, Olson BE (2016) Energetics of grazing cattle: Impacts of activity and climate. Journal of Animal Science 94, 74–83.
Energetics of grazing cattle: Impacts of activity and climate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chavasse CGR (1982) Management of shelterbelts for wood products. New Zealand Journal of Forestry 27, 189–206.

Cleugh HA (1998) Effects of windbreaks on airflow, microclimates and crop yields. Agroforestry Systems 41, 55–84.
Effects of windbreaks on airflow, microclimates and crop yields.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cleugh HA (2002a) Field measurements of windbreak effects on airflow, turbulent exchanges and microclimates. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 665–677.
Field measurements of windbreak effects on airflow, turbulent exchanges and microclimates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cleugh HA (2002b) Parameterising the impact of shelter on crop microclimates and evaporation fluxes. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 859–874.
Parameterising the impact of shelter on crop microclimates and evaporation fluxes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cleugh H, Hughes D (2002) Impact of shelter on crop microclimates: a synthesis of results from wind tunnel and field experiments. Animal Production Science 42, 679–701.
Impact of shelter on crop microclimates: a synthesis of results from wind tunnel and field experiments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cleugh HA, Miller JM, Böhm M (1998) Direct mechanical effects of wind on crops. Agroforestry Systems 41, 85–112.
Direct mechanical effects of wind on crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cleugh HA, Prinsley R, Bird PR, Brooks S, Carberry P, Crawford M, Jackson TT, Meinke H, Mylius SJ, Nuberg IK, Sudmeyer RA, Wright AJ (2002) The Australian National Windbreaks Program: an overview and summary of results. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 649–664.
The Australian National Windbreaks Program: an overview and summary of results.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Collier RJ, Dahl GE, VanBaale MJ (2006) Major Advances Associated with Environmental Effects on Dairy Cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 1244–1253.
Major Advances Associated with Environmental Effects on Dairy Cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

De Koning C, Milthorpe PL (2008) ‘Integrating forage shrubs: their potential in mixed-farming enterprises in low rainfall regions.’ (Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation: Kingston, ACT)

De Vries T, Cochrane T, Galtier A (2010) Saving irrigation water by accounting for windbreaks. University of Canterbury, Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Donaghy P, Bray S, Gowen R, Rolfe J, Stephens M, Hoffmann M, Stunzer A (2010) The bioeconomic potential for agroforestry in Australia’s northern grazing systems. Small-scale Forestry 9, 463–484.
The bioeconomic potential for agroforestry in Australia’s northern grazing systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Easterling WE, Hays CJ, Easterling MM, Brandle JR (1997) Modelling the effect of shelterbelts on maize productivity under climate change: An application of the EPIC model. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 61, 163–176.
Modelling the effect of shelterbelts on maize productivity under climate change: An application of the EPIC model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Easterling DR, Meehl GA, Parmesan C, Changnon SA, Karl TR, Mearns LO (2000) Climate extremes: Observations, modeling, and impacts. Science 289, 2068–2074.
Climate extremes: Observations, modeling, and impacts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Egan J, McLaughlin J, Thompson R, McIntyre J (1972) The importance of shelter in reducing neonatal lamb deaths. Animal Production Science 12, 470–472.
The importance of shelter in reducing neonatal lamb deaths.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Felsot AS, Unsworth JB, Linders JBHJ, Roberts G, Rautman D, Harris C, Carazo E (2011) Agrochemical spray drift; assessment and mitigation—A review. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part. B, Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes 46, 1–23.
Agrochemical spray drift; assessment and mitigation—A review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fisher MW (2007) Shelter and welfare of pastoral animals in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 347–359.
Shelter and welfare of pastoral animals in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

George SJ, Harper RJ, Hobbs RJ, Tibbett M (2012) A sustainable agricultural landscape for Australia: A review of interlacing carbon sequestration, biodiversity and salinity management in agroforestry systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 163, 28–36.
A sustainable agricultural landscape for Australia: A review of interlacing carbon sequestration, biodiversity and salinity management in agroforestry systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gregory NG (1995) The role of shelterbelts in protecting livestock: A review. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 38, 423–450.
The role of shelterbelts in protecting livestock: A review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hall D, Sudmeyer R, McLernon C, Short R (2002) Characterisation of a windbreak system on the south coast of Western Australia. 3. Soil water and hydrology. Animal Production Science 42, 729–738.
Characterisation of a windbreak system on the south coast of Western Australia. 3. Soil water and hydrology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hawke M, Tombleson J (1993) Production and interaction of pastures and shelterbelts in the central North Island. In ‘Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association’. Masterton, NZ. pp. 193–197.

Hinch GN, Brien F (2014) Lamb survival in Australian flocks: a review. Animal Production Science 54, 656–666.
Lamb survival in Australian flocks: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Holmes CW, Christensen R, McLean NA, Lockyer J (1978) Effects of winter weather on the growth rate and heat production of dairy cattle. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 21, 549–556.
Effects of winter weather on the growth rate and heat production of dairy cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Huth NI, Carberry PS, Poulton PL, Brennan LE, Keating BA (2003) A framework for simulating agroforestry options for the low rainfall areas of Australia using APSIM. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 171–185.
A framework for simulating agroforestry options for the low rainfall areas of Australia using APSIM.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jones H, Sudmeyer R (2002) Economic assessment of windbreaks on the south-eastern coast of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 751–761.
Economic assessment of windbreaks on the south-eastern coast of Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jose S (2009) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agroforestry Systems 76, 1–10.
Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kilaka EK (2015) ‘The effects of windbreaks on the effectiveness of sprinkler irrigation systems.’ (University of Canterbury: Christchurch, New Zealand)

Koh I, Kim S, Lee D (2010) Effects of bibosoop plantation on wind speed, humidity, and evaporation in a traditional agricultural landscape of Korea: Field measurements and modeling. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 135, 294–303.
Effects of bibosoop plantation on wind speed, humidity, and evaporation in a traditional agricultural landscape of Korea: Field measurements and modeling.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kort J (1988) Benefits of windbreaks to field and forage crops. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 22–23, 165–190.
Benefits of windbreaks to field and forage crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Loane B (1991) FARMTREE: a model for determining the economics of agroforestry in Victoria, Australia. Agricultural Systems and Information Technology Newsletter 3, 15–16.

Luedeling E, Smethurst PJ, Baudron F, Bayala J, Huth NI, van Noordwijk M, Ong CK, Mulia R, Lusiana B, Muthuri C (2016) Field-scale modeling of tree–crop interactions: Challenges and development needs. Agricultural Systems 142, 51–69.
Field-scale modeling of tree–crop interactions: Challenges and development needs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lynch J, Alexander G (1976) The effect of gramineous windbreaks on behaviour and lamb mortality among shorn and unshorn Merino sheep during lambing. Applied Animal Ethology 2, 305–325.
The effect of gramineous windbreaks on behaviour and lamb mortality among shorn and unshorn Merino sheep during lambing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lynch J, Alexander G (1977) Sheltering behaviour of lambing Merino sheep in relation to grass hedges and artificial windbreaks. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 691–701.
Sheltering behaviour of lambing Merino sheep in relation to grass hedges and artificial windbreaks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lynch J, Donnelly J (1980) Changes in pasture and animal production resulting from the use of windbreaks. Crop & Pasture Science 31, 967–979.
Changes in pasture and animal production resulting from the use of windbreaks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lynch J, Elwin R, Mottershead B (1980a) The influence of artificial windbreaks on loss of soil water from a continuously grazed pasture during a dry period. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 20, 170–174.
The influence of artificial windbreaks on loss of soil water from a continuously grazed pasture during a dry period.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lynch JJ, Mottershead BE, Alexander G (1980b) Sheltering behaviour and lamb mortality amongst shorn Merino ewes lambing in paddocks with a restricted area of shelter or no shelter. Applied Animal Ethology 6, 163–174.
Sheltering behaviour and lamb mortality amongst shorn Merino ewes lambing in paddocks with a restricted area of shelter or no shelter.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mader T, Dahlquist J, Gaughan J (1997) Wind protection effects and airflow patterns in outside feedlots. Journal of Animal Science 75, 26–36.
Wind protection effects and airflow patterns in outside feedlots.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mayus M, Van Keulen H, Stroosnijder L (1998) A model of tree-crop competition for windbreak systems in the Sahel: description and evaluation. Agroforestry Systems 43, 183–201.
A model of tree-crop competition for windbreak systems in the Sahel: description and evaluation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McArthur AJ (1991) Forestry and shelter for livestock. Forest Ecology and Management 45, 93–107.
Forestry and shelter for livestock.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McHenry M (2013) How farming and forestry converge: enhancing the interface between agricultural production, and tree biomass/bioenergy systems to improve farm-scale productivity in Western Australia. In ‘Bioenergy systems, biological sources and environmental impact’. (Ed. MC Allard) pp. 95–110. (Nova Science Publishers: Hauppauge, New York)

McIlvain E, Shoop M (1971) Shade for improving cattle gains and rangeland use (El Uso de Sombreadores para Mejorar las Ganancias de Novillas y Pastoreo de Animales). Journal of Range Management 24, 181–184.
Shade for improving cattle gains and rangeland use (El Uso de Sombreadores para Mejorar las Ganancias de Novillas y Pastoreo de Animales).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Meinke H, Carberry P, Cleugh H, Poulton P, Hargreaves J (2002) Modelling crop growth and yield under the environmental changes induced by windbreaks 1. Model development and validation. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 875–885.
Modelling crop growth and yield under the environmental changes induced by windbreaks 1. Model development and validation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Messing I, Åfors M, Rådkvist K, Lewan E (1998) Influence of shelterbelt type on potential evaporation in an arid environment. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation 12, 123–138.

Miller GR (1968) Some responses of hill ewes and lambs to artificial shelter. Animal Production 10, 59–66.
Some responses of hill ewes and lambs to artificial shelter.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nuberg IK (1998) Effect of shelter on temperate crops: a review to define research for Australian conditions. Agroforestry Systems 41, 3–34.
Effect of shelter on temperate crops: a review to define research for Australian conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nuberg IK, Bennell MR (2009) Trees protecting dryland crops and soil. In ‘Agroforestry for natural resource management’. (Eds IK Nuberg, B George, R Reid) pp. 69–86. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Nuberg IK, Mylius SJ (2002) Effect of shelter on the yield and water use of wheat. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 773–780.
Effect of shelter on the yield and water use of wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nuberg IK, Mylius SJ, Edwards JM, Davey C (2002) Windbreak research in a South Australian cropping system. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 781–795.
Windbreak research in a South Australian cropping system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Oliver YM, Lefroy EC, Stirzaker R, Davies CL (2005) Deep-drainage control and yield: the trade-off between trees and crops in agroforestry systems in the medium to low rainfall areas of Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 1011–1026.
Deep-drainage control and yield: the trade-off between trees and crops in agroforestry systems in the medium to low rainfall areas of Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Olson BE, Wallander RT (2002) Influence of winter weather and shelter on activity patterns of beef cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 82, 491–501.
Influence of winter weather and shelter on activity patterns of beef cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Olson BE, Wallander RT, Paterson JA (2000) Do windbreaks minimize stress on cattle grazing foothill winter range? Canadian Journal of Animal Science 80, 265–272.
Do windbreaks minimize stress on cattle grazing foothill winter range?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pannell DJ, Marshall GR, Barr N, Curtis A, Vanclay F, Wilkinson R (2006) Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1407–1424.
Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Patabendige D, Lefroy EC (1992) Fodder trees and shrubs for high rainfall areas of south Western Australia. Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, Perth.

Peri PL, Bloomberg M (2002) Windbreaks in southern Patagonia, Argentina: A review of research on growth models, windspeed reduction, and effects on crops. Agroforestry Systems 56, 129–144.
Windbreaks in southern Patagonia, Argentina: A review of research on growth models, windspeed reduction, and effects on crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Place F, Ajayi OC, Torquebiau E, Detlefsen G, Gauthier M, Buttoud G (2012) Improved policies for facilitating the adoption of agroforestry. In ‘Agroforestry for biodiversity and ecosystem services – Science and practice’. (Ed. M Kaonga) pp. 113–128. (InTech Rijeka: Croatia)

Pollard JC (1999) Shelter benefits for lamb survival in southern New Zealand. I. Postal survey of farmers’ opinion. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 42, 165–170.
Shelter benefits for lamb survival in southern New Zealand. I. Postal survey of farmers’ opinion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pollard JC (2006) Shelter for lambing sheep in New Zealand: A review. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 395–404.
Shelter for lambing sheep in New Zealand: A review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pollard JC, Littlejohn RP (1999) Shelter for lambing in southern New Zealand. II. Sheltering behaviour and effects on productivity. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 42, 171–177.
Shelter for lambing in southern New Zealand. II. Sheltering behaviour and effects on productivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Polyakov M, Pannell DJ, Pandit R, Tapsuwan S, Park G (2015) Capitalized amenity value of native vegetation in a multifunctional rural landscape. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 97, 299–314.
Capitalized amenity value of native vegetation in a multifunctional rural landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Race D, Curtis A (1997) Socio-economic considerations for regional farm forestry development. Australian Forestry 60, 233–239.
Socio-economic considerations for regional farm forestry development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Race D, Curtis A (2007) Adoption of farm forestry in Victoria: linking policy with practice. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 14, 166–178.
Adoption of farm forestry in Victoria: linking policy with practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Radcliffe J (1985) Shelterbelt increases dryland pasture growth in Canterbury. In ‘Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association’. Whangarei, New Zealand. pp. 51–56.

Robertson SM, Friend MA, Broster JC, King BJ (2011) Survival of twin lambs is increased with shrub belts. Animal Production Science 51, 925–938.
Survival of twin lambs is increased with shrub belts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rosenberg NJ (1966) Microclimate, air mixing and physiological regulation of transpiration as influenced by wind shelter in an irrigated bean field. Agricultural Meteorology 3, 197–224.
Microclimate, air mixing and physiological regulation of transpiration as influenced by wind shelter in an irrigated bean field.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stanley J, Clouston B, Baker R (2006) Understanding land manger constraints to the adoption of changed practices or technological innovations: Literature review. Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW.

Stewart H (2009) Victorian farm forestry inventory scoping study. Farm Forest Growers Victoria Inc., Mansfield, Victoria.

Stewart, A, Reid, R, (2006) Ten percent multipurpose tree cover for every farm: A low risk, high opportunity first step. Overstory 177.

Stirzaker RJ, Lefroy EC, Ellis TW (2002) An index for quantifying the trade-off between drainage and productivity in tree-crop mixtures. Agricultural Water Management 53, 187–199.
An index for quantifying the trade-off between drainage and productivity in tree-crop mixtures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sturrock JW (1981) Shelter boosts crop yield by 35 per cent: also prevents lodging. New Zealand Journal of Agriculture 143, 18–19.

Sudmeyer R, Flugge F (2005) The economics of managing tree-crop competition in windbreak and alley systems. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1403–1414.
The economics of managing tree-crop competition in windbreak and alley systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sudmeyer RA, Scott PR (2002) Characterisation of a windbreak system on the south coast of Western Australia. 2. Crop growth. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 717–727.
Characterisation of a windbreak system on the south coast of Western Australia. 2. Crop growth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sudmeyer RA, Speijers J (2007) Influence of windbreak orientation, shade and rainfall interception on wheat and lupin growth in the absence of below-ground competition. Agroforestry Systems 71, 201–214.
Influence of windbreak orientation, shade and rainfall interception on wheat and lupin growth in the absence of below-ground competition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sudmeyer RA, Adams MA, Eastham J, Scott PR, Hawkins W, Rowland IC (2002a) Broadacre crop yield in the lee of windbreaks in the medium and low rainfall areas of south-western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 739–750.
Broadacre crop yield in the lee of windbreaks in the medium and low rainfall areas of south-western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sudmeyer RA, Hall D, Eastham J, Adams MA (2002b) The tree-crop interface: the effect of root pruning in south-western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 763–772.
The tree-crop interface: the effect of root pruning in south-western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sudmeyer RA, Daniels T, Jones H, Huxtable D (2012) The extent and cost of mallee–crop competition in unharvested carbon sequestration and harvested mallee biomass agroforestry systems. Crop & Pasture Science 63, 555–569.
The extent and cost of mallee–crop competition in unharvested carbon sequestration and harvested mallee biomass agroforestry systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sun D, Dickinson GR (1994) A case study of shelterbelt effect on potato (Solanum tuberosum) yield on the Atherton Tablelands in tropical north Australia. Agroforestry Systems 25, 141–151.
A case study of shelterbelt effect on potato (Solanum tuberosum) yield on the Atherton Tablelands in tropical north Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Taylor DB, Schneider DA, Brown WY, Price IR, Trotter MG, Lamb DW, Hinch GN (2011) GPS observation of shelter utilisation by Merino ewes. Animal Production Science 51, 724–737.
GPS observation of shelter utilisation by Merino ewes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tucker CB, Coetzee JF, Stookey JM, Thomson DU, Grandin T, Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS (2015) Beef cattle welfare in the USA: identification of priorities for future research. Animal Health Research Reviews 16, 107–124.
Beef cattle welfare in the USA: identification of priorities for future research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ucar T, Hall FR (2001) Windbreaks as a pesticide drift mitigation strategy: a review. Pest Management Science 57, 663–675.
Windbreaks as a pesticide drift mitigation strategy: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

White DA, Dunin FX, Turner NC, Ward BH, Galbraith JH (2002) Water use by contour-planted belts of trees comprised of four Eucalyptus species. Agricultural Water Management 53, 133–152.
Water use by contour-planted belts of trees comprised of four Eucalyptus species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Woodall GS, Ward BH (2002) Soil water relations, crop production and root pruning of a belt of trees. Agricultural Water Management 53, 153–169.
Soil water relations, crop production and root pruning of a belt of trees.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wratten SD, Gillespie M, Decourtye A, Mader E, Desneux N (2012) Pollinator habitat enhancement: Benefits to other ecosystem services. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 159, 112–122.
Pollinator habitat enhancement: Benefits to other ecosystem services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Young A (1989) ‘Agroforestry for soil conservation.’ (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)

Young JM, Saul G, Behrendt R, Byrne F, McCaskill M, Kearney GA, Thompson AN (2014) The economic benefits of providing shelter to reduce the mortality of twin lambs in South-Western Victoria. Animal Production Science 54, 773–782.
The economic benefits of providing shelter to reduce the mortality of twin lambs in South-Western Victoria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhang W, Ricketts TH, Kremen C, Carney K, Swinton SM (2007) Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecological Economics 64, 253–260.
Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zheng X, Zhu J, Xing Z (2016) Assessment of the effects of shelterbelts on crop yields at the regional scale in Northeast China. Agricultural Systems 143, 49–60.
Assessment of the effects of shelterbelts on crop yields at the regional scale in Northeast China.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zomer RJ, Trabucco A, Coe R, Place F (2009) ‘Trees on farm: Analysis of global extent and geographical patterns of agroforestry.’ (World Agroforestry Centre: Nairobi, Kenya)