Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Understanding growth and development of three short-season grain legumes for improved adaptation in semi-arid Eastern Kenya

A. Sennhenn A D , D. M. G. Njarui B , B. L. Maass A and A. M. Whitbread A C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Tropical Plant Production and Agricultural Systems Modelling, Georg-August University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

B Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organisation (KALRO), Katumani, Kenya.

C Innovations Systems in the Drylands, International Crop Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Telengana, India.

D Corresponding author. Email: asennhe@gwdg.de

Crop and Pasture Science 68(5) 442-456 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP16416
Submitted: 15 June 2016  Accepted: 22 May 2017   Published: 26 June 2017

Abstract

Short-season grain legumes play an important role in smallholder farming systems as source of food and to improve soil fertility through nitrogen fixation. However, it is not clearly understood how these diverse legumes contribute to the resilience of such systems in semi-arid environments. We describe the growth, development and resource-use efficiency (focusing on radiation, RUE) of three promising short-season grain legumes: common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) and lablab (Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet). Two field experiments were conducted during the short rains of 2012–13 and 2013–14 in Eastern Kenya. In the first experiment, the legumes were grown at three plant densities (low, medium, high); in the second experiment, they were subjected to three water regimes (rainfed, partly irrigated, fully irrigated). Phenological development was monitored and biomass accumulation, leaf area index and fractional radiation interception were measured repeatedly during growth; grain yield was measured at maturity. Harvest index and RUE were calculated from these data. Common bean had the shortest growing period (70 days), the most compact growth habit and relatively high RUE but limited grain yield (1000–1900 kg ha–1), thereby proving more suitable for cultivation in areas with restricted cropping windows or in intercropping systems. Cowpea had a longer growing period (90 days) and a spreading growth habit leading to high light interception and outstanding grain yields under optimal conditions (1400–3050 kg ha–1). Lablab showed stable RUE values (0.76–0.92 g MJ–1), was relatively unaffected by limited water availability and had a comparatively long growing period (100 days). Lablab grain yields of ~1200–2350 kg ha–1 were obtained across all water regimes, indicating a high potential to cushion climatic variability. Planting density strongly influenced the production success of cowpea and lablab, with high plant densities leading to vigorous growth habit with low podset establishment. Such information on temporal and spatial differences in growth, development and resource-use efficiency is highly valuable for crop-modelling applications and for designing more resilient farming systems with short-season grain legumes.

Additional keywords: climate-smart agriculture, phenology, plant physiology, resource-use efficiency.


References

Abberton M (2010) Enhancing the role of legumes: potential and obstacles. In ‘Grassland carbon sequestration: management, policy and economics’. Integrated Crop Management Vol. 11. pp. 177–187. (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome)

Acosta-Gallegos J, White W (1995) Phenological plasticity as an adaptation by common bean to rainfed environments. Crop Science 35, 199–204.
Phenological plasticity as an adaptation by common bean to rainfed environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ayaz S, McKenzie B, McNeil DL, Hill GD (2004a) Light interception and utilization of four grain legumes sown at different plant populations and depths. The Journal of Agricultural Science 142, 297–308.
Light interception and utilization of four grain legumes sown at different plant populations and depths.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ayaz S, McKenzie B, Hill GD, McNeil DL, Hill GD (2004b) Variability in yield of four grain legume species in a subhumid temperate environment I. Yields and harvest index. The Journal of Agricultural Science 142, 9–19.
Variability in yield of four grain legume species in a subhumid temperate environment I. Yields and harvest index.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Beebe S (2012) Common bean breeding in the tropics. Plant Breeding Reviews 36, 357–426.

Black C, Ong C (2000) Utilisation of light and water in tropical agriculture. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 104, 25–47.
Utilisation of light and water in tropical agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Boko M, Niang I, Nyong A, Vogel C, Githeko A, Medany M, Osman-Elasha B, Tabo R, Yanda P (2007) Africa. In ‘Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability’. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (Eds ML Parry, OF Canziani, JP Palutikof, PJ van der Linden, CE Hanson) pp. 433–467. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Challinor A, Wheeler T, Garforth C, Craufurd P, Kassam A (2007) Assessing the vulnerability of food crop systems in Africa to climate change. Climatic Change 83, 381–399.
Assessing the vulnerability of food crop systems in Africa to climate change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cooper PJM, Dimes J, Rao KPC, Shapiro B, Shiferaw B, Twomlow S (2008) Coping better with current climatic variability in the rain-fed farming systems of sub-Saharan Africa: An essential first step in adapting to future climate change? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 126, 24–35.
Coping better with current climatic variability in the rain-fed farming systems of sub-Saharan Africa: An essential first step in adapting to future climate change?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cooper P, Rao KPC, Singh P, Dimes J, Traore PS, Rao K, Dixit P, Twomlow SJ (2009) Farming with current and future climate risk: advancing a ‘Hypothesis of Hope’ for rainfed agriculture in the semi-arid tropics. Journal of SAT Agricultural Research 7, 1–19.

Craufurd PQ, Wheeler TR (1999) Effect of drought and plant density on radiation interception, radiation-use efficiency and partitioning of dry matter to seeds in cowpea. Experimental Agriculture 35, 309–325.
Effect of drought and plant density on radiation interception, radiation-use efficiency and partitioning of dry matter to seeds in cowpea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dalgleish NP, Foale MA (1998) ‘Soil matters: monitoring soil water and nutrients in dryland farming systems.’ (Agricultural Production Systems Research Unit: Toowoomba, Qld)

Daryanto S, Wang L, Jacinthe PA (2015) Global synthesis of drought effects on food legume production. PLoS One 10, e0127401
Global synthesis of drought effects on food legume production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dingkuhn M, Johnson DE, Sow A, Audebert AY (1999) Relationships between upland rice canopy characteristics and weed competitiveness. Field Crops Research 61, 79–95.
Relationships between upland rice canopy characteristics and weed competitiveness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dube E, Fanadzo M (2013) Maximizing yield benefits from dual-purpose cowpea. Food Science 5, 769–779.
Maximizing yield benefits from dual-purpose cowpea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

FAOSTAT (2014) Food and agriculture data. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Available at: http://faostat3.fao.org/ (accessed 22 November 2014).

Foyer CH, Lam H-M, Nguyen HT, Siddique KHM, Varshney RK, Colmer TD, Cowling W, Bramley H, Mori TA, Hodgson JM, Cooper JW, Miller AJ, Kunert K, Vorster J, Cullis C, Ozga JA, Wahlqvist ML, Liang Y, Shou H, Shi K, Yu J, Fodor N, Kaiser BN, Wong F-L, Valliyodan B, Considine MJ (2016) Neglecting legumes has compromised human health and sustainable food production. Nature Plants 2, 16112
Neglecting legumes has compromised human health and sustainable food production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Graham PH, Vance CP (2003) Legumes: importance and constraints to greater use. Update on legume utilization. Plant Physiology 131, 872–877.
Legumes: importance and constraints to greater use. Update on legume utilization.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXisFemtb4%3D&md5=e55adb3a841ee66f3ad42c42e3150af0CAS |

Hall AE (2004) Comparative ecophysiology of cowpea, common bean, and peanut. In ‘Physiology and biotechnology integration for plant breeding’. (Eds TN Henry, B Abraham) pp. 271–385. (Marcel Dekker: New York)

Hay RKM (1995) Harvest index: a review of its use in plant breeding and crop physiology. Annals of Applied Biology 126, 197–216.
Harvest index: a review of its use in plant breeding and crop physiology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hill JO, Robertson MJ, Pengelly BC, Whitbread AM, Hall CA (2006) Simulation modelling of lablab (Lablab purpureus) pastures in northern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 389–401.
Simulation modelling of lablab (Lablab purpureus) pastures in northern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Horwitz W, Latimer G (2005) ‘Official methods of analysis.’ 18th edn. Vol. 45, pp. 75–76. (Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Gaithersburg, MD, USA)

Huyghe C (1998) Genetics and genetic modification of plant architecture in grain legumes: a review. Agronomie 18, 383–411.

Jaetzold R, Schmidt H, Hornetz B, Shisanya C (2006) ‘Farm management handbook of Kenya—Eastern Province.’ 2nd edn (Ministry of Agriculture, Kenya/Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit: Nairobi, Kenya)

Jeuffroy MH, Ney B (1997) Crop physiology and productivity. Field Crops Research 53, 3–16.
Crop physiology and productivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jones AL (1999) ‘Phaseolus bean: Post-harvest operations.’ Post-harvest compendium. (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome)

Jones CA, Kiniry JR (1986) ‘CERES-Maize: A simulation model of maize growth and development.’ (Texas A&M University Press: College Station, TX, USA)

KARI (2006) ‘Variety characteristics and production guidelines of traditional food crops.’ (Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Katumani Research Centre: Nairobi, Kenya)

Keating BA, Siambi MN, Wafula BM (1992) The impact of climate variability on cropping research in semi-arid Eastern Kenya between 1955 and 1985. In ‘A search for strategies for sustainable dryland cropping in semi-arid eastern Kenya’. ACIAR Proceedings No. 41. (Ed. ME Probert) pp. 16–25. (ACIAR: Canberra, ACT)

Keating BA, Carberry PS, Hammer GL, Probert ME, Robertson MJ, Holzworth D, Huth NI, Hargreaves JNG, Meinke H, Hochman Z, McLean G, Verburg K, Snow V, Dimes JP, Silburn M, Wang E, Brown S, Bristow KL, Asseng S, Chapman S, McCown RL, Freebairn DM, Smith CJ (2003) An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 267–288.
An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Loss SP, Siddique KHM (1994) Morphological and physiological traits associated with wheat yield increases in Mediterranean environments. Advances in Agronomy 52, 229–276.
Morphological and physiological traits associated with wheat yield increases in Mediterranean environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2cXksFertrs%3D&md5=fc044232cbc4f1da64d43265115e5112CAS |

Maass BL, Knox MR, Venkatesha SC, Angessa TT, Ramme S, Pengelly BC (2010) Lablab purpureus—A crop lost for Africa? Tropical Plant Biology 3, 123–135.
Lablab purpureus—A crop lost for Africa?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Maundu PM, Ngugi GW, Kabuye CHS (1999) ‘Traditional food plants of Kenya.’ (National Museums of Kenya, English Press: Nairobi, Kenya)

Meek DW, Hatfield JL, Howell TA, Idso SB, Reginato RJ (1984) A generalized relationship between photosynthetically active radiation and solar radiation. Agronomy Journal 76, 939–945.
A generalized relationship between photosynthetically active radiation and solar radiation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Monteith JL (1977) Climate. In ‘Ecophysiology of tropical crops’. (Eds P de T Alvim, TT Kozlowski) pp. 1–27. (Academic Press: London)

Muchow RC (1985) An analysis of the effect of water-deficits on grain legumes grown in a semi-arid tropical environment in terms of radiation interception and its efficiency of use. Field Crops Research 11, 309–323.
An analysis of the effect of water-deficits on grain legumes grown in a semi-arid tropical environment in terms of radiation interception and its efficiency of use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Muchow RC, Robertson MJ, Pengelly BC (1993) Radiation use efficiency of soybean, mungbean and cowpea under different environmental conditions. Field Crops Research 32, 1–16.
Radiation use efficiency of soybean, mungbean and cowpea under different environmental conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Muhammad L, Mwabu D, Mulwa R, Mwangi W, Langyintuo A, La Rovere R (2010) ‘Characterization of maize producing households in Machakos and Makueni Districts in Kenya.’ (Kenya Agricultural Research Institute/CIMMYT: Nairobi, Kenya)

Njarui DMG, Keating BA, Jones RK, Beattie WM (2004) Evaluation of forage legumes in the semi-arid region of Eastern Kenya. 2: Persistence and dry matter production of selected forage legumes. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems 4, 57–68.

Ojiem JO, Vanlauwe B, Ridder N, Giller KE (2007) Niche-based assessment of contributions of legumes to the nitrogen economy of Western Kenya smallholder farms. Plant and Soil 292, 119–135.
Niche-based assessment of contributions of legumes to the nitrogen economy of Western Kenya smallholder farms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjtlCju70%3D&md5=a17d671018d4d9d913e83492d26bbdbbCAS |

Onduru D, de Jager A, Gachini G, Diop J-M (2001) ‘Exploring new pathways for innovative soil fertility management in Kenya.’ Managing Africa’s Soils. IIED Drylands Programme. (International Institute for Environment and Development: London)

Pastenes C, Porter V, Baginsky C, Horton P, González J (2004) Paraheliotropism can protect water-stressed bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants against photoinhibition. Journal of Plant Physiology 161, 1315–1323.
Paraheliotropism can protect water-stressed bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants against photoinhibition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhsVCjsrg%3D&md5=4abcf2716bf915362293525d2529517bCAS |

Pengelly BC, Blamey FPC, Muchow RC (1999) Radiation interception and the accumulation of biomass and nitrogen by soybean and three tropical annual forage legumes. Field Crops Research 63, 99–112.
Radiation interception and the accumulation of biomass and nitrogen by soybean and three tropical annual forage legumes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

R Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available at: www.R-project.org/

Rao KPC, Okwach GE (2005) Enhancing productivity of water under variable climate. In ‘Proceedings of the East Africa Integrated River Basin Management Conference’. 7–9 March 2005 Sokione University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania. pp. 2–9. (International Water Management Institute: Colombo, Sri Lanka)

Robertson MJ, Carberry PS, Huth NI, Turpin JE, Probert ME, Poulton PL, Bell M, Wright GC, Yeates SJ, Brinsmead RB (2002) Simulation of growth and development of diverse legume species in APSIM. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 429–446.
Simulation of growth and development of diverse legume species in APSIM.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sinclair TR, Ludlow MM (1986) Influence of soil water supply on the plant water balance of four tropical grain legumes. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 13, 329–341.
Influence of soil water supply on the plant water balance of four tropical grain legumes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sinclair TR, Muchow RC (1999) Radiation use efficiency. Advances in Agronomy 65, 215–265.
Radiation use efficiency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Slingo JM, Challinor AJ, Hoskins BJ, Wheeler TR (2005) Introduction: food crops in a changing climate. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360, 1983–1989.
Introduction: food crops in a changing climate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Soltani A, Robertson MJ, Rahemi-Karizaki A, Poorreza J, Zarei H (2006) Modelling biomass accumulation and partitioning in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science 192, 379–389.
Modelling biomass accumulation and partitioning in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stern NH (2007) ‘The economics of climate change: the Stern review.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Subbarao GV, Johansen C, Slinkard AE, Nageswara Rao RC, Saxena NP, Chauhan YS, Lawn RJ (1995) Strategies for improving drought resistance in grain legumes. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 14, 469–523.
Strategies for improving drought resistance in grain legumes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Szeicz G (1974) Solar radiation in crop canopies. Journal of Applied Ecology 11, 1117–1156.
Solar radiation in crop canopies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tesfaye K, Walker S, Tsubo M (2006) Radiation interception and radiation use efficiency of three grain legumes under water deficit conditions in a semi-arid environment. European Journal of Agronomy 25, 60–70.
Radiation interception and radiation use efficiency of three grain legumes under water deficit conditions in a semi-arid environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thomson BD, Siddique KHM (1997) Grain legume species in low rainfall Mediterranean-type environments II. Canopy development, radiation interception, and dry-matter production. Field Crops Research 54, 189–199.
Grain legume species in low rainfall Mediterranean-type environments II. Canopy development, radiation interception, and dry-matter production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thornton PK, Jones PG, Ericksen PJ, Challinor AJ (2011) Agriculture and food systems in sub-Saharan Africa in a 4°C+ world. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 369, 117–136.
Agriculture and food systems in sub-Saharan Africa in a 4°C+ world.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Turner NC, Wright GC, Siddique KHM (2001) Adaptation of grain legumes (pulses) to water-limited environments. Advances in Agronomy 71, 193–231.
Adaptation of grain legumes (pulses) to water-limited environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Turpin JE, Robertson MJ, Hillcoat NS, Herridge DF (2002) Fababean (Vicia faba) in Australia’s northern grains belt: canopy development, biomass, and nitrogen accumulation and partitioning. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 227–237.
Fababean (Vicia faba) in Australia’s northern grains belt: canopy development, biomass, and nitrogen accumulation and partitioning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Turpin JE, Robertson MJ, Haire C, Bellotti WD, Moore AD, Rose I (2003) Simulating fababean development, growth, and yield in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 39–52.
Simulating fababean development, growth, and yield in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Uarrota VG (2010) Response of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) to water stress and phosphorus fertilization. Journal of Agronomy 9, 87–91.
Response of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) to water stress and phosphorus fertilization.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Unkovich M, Baldock J, Forbes M (2010) Variability in harvest index of grain crops and potential significance for carbon accounting: examples from Australian agriculture. Advances in Agronomy 105, 173–219.
Variability in harvest index of grain crops and potential significance for carbon accounting: examples from Australian agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van de Steeg J, Herrero M, Kinyangi J, Thornton PK, Rao KPC, Stern R, Cooper P (2009) ‘The influence of climate variability and climate change on the agricultural sector in East and Central Africa: sensitizing the ASARECA strategic plan to climate change.’ (International Livestock Research Institute: Nairobi, Kenya)

Vance CP, Graham PH, Allan DL (2000) Biological nitrogen fixation. Phosphorus: a critical future need. In ‘Nitrogen fixation: from molecules to crop productivity’. (Eds FO Pedrosa, M Hungria, MG Yates, WE Newton) pp. 506–514. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)

Watiki JM, Fukai S, Banda JA, Keating BA (1993) Radiation interception and growth of maize/cowpea intercrop as affected by maize plant density and cowpea cultivar. Field Crops Research 35, 123–133.
Radiation interception and growth of maize/cowpea intercrop as affected by maize plant density and cowpea cultivar.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Whitbread AM, Robertson M, Carberry P, Dimes J (2010) How farming systems simulation can aid the development of more sustainable smallholder farming systems in Southern Africa. European Journal of Agronomy 32, 51–58.
How farming systems simulation can aid the development of more sustainable smallholder farming systems in Southern Africa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Whitbread AM, Ayisi K, Mabapa P, Odhiambo JJO, Maluleke N, Pengelly BC (2011) Evaluating Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet germplasm to identify short-season accessions suitable for crop and livestock farming systems in southern Africa. African Journal of Range & Forage Science 28, 21–28.
Evaluating Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet germplasm to identify short-season accessions suitable for crop and livestock farming systems in southern Africa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |