Does increasing plant population density alter sugar yield in high stalk-sugar maize hybrids?
B. L. Ma A B , Z. M. Zheng A and M. J. Morrison A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Ottawa Research and Development Centre (ORDC), Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1A 0C6.
B Corresponding author. Email: baoluo.ma@agr.gc.ca
Crop and Pasture Science 68(1) 1-10 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP16393
Submitted: 30 July 2016 Accepted: 19 December 2016 Published: 12 January 2017
Abstract
Escalating demands for food and green energy have renewed interest in the dual-purpose use of maize (Zea mays L.) for a biofuel and high-energy forage crop. Recently, maize hybrids with high stalk-sugar (sugarcorn) have been developed. It is important to determine how agronomic practices, for example altering plant population density (PPD), affect stalk-sugar yields of these newly developed hybrids and to advance knowledge required for producing sugarcorn as a dual-purpose bioenergy–high energy silage crop in short-season regions unable to grow sugarcane. A field experiment was conducted for 3 years to assess the effect of PPD on stalk-sugar accumulation, dry matter production, silage and sucrose yields of sugarcorn compared with two commercial silage hybrids. Targeted PPD ranged from 75 000 to 150 000 plants ha–1 in increments of 25 000 plants ha–1. We found that increasing PPD from 75 000 to 125 000 plants ha–1 increased stalk sugar concentrations by up to 25% in some of the sugarcorn hybrids, with minimum change in the conventional check hybrids. The sugarcorn hybrid CO348 × C103 had the highest stalk sugar concentration (128 g kg–1) and sucrose yield of up to 3.8 Mg ha–1 at the targeted PPD of 125 000 (or actual 118 000 ± 7000) plants ha–1. By contrast, the check silage hybrids produced at most 2.0 Mg ha–1 of sucrose yield with much lower stalk sugar concentrations (53–65 g kg–1). Sugarcorn hybrids had generally lower grain yield with greater plant barrenness (the failure of a plant to produce a normal ear) and severer head smut infestation than the conventional silage hybrids. Our results suggest that as a silage crop, the current recommended PPD of 75 000–85 000 plants ha–1 for commercial silage maize production in the region is likely suitable for sugarcorn, and a higher PPD is required if sugarcorn hybrids are designated as a biofuel crop or for dual-purpose use.
Additional keywords: corn silage, stalk sugar concentration, sucrose yield.
References
Begna SH, Hamilton RI, Dwyer LM, Stewart DW, Smith DL (1997) Effects of population density and planting pattern on the yield and yield components of leafy reduced-stature maize in a short-season area. Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science 179, 9–17.| Effects of population density and planting pattern on the yield and yield components of leafy reduced-stature maize in a short-season area.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Blackshaw GN (1912) The sugar content of maize stalks. South African Journal of Science 9, 42–48.
Blanco M, Blanco JL, Veiguinha AS (1957) Obtaining sugar-fodder hybrids of maize for the dual purpose of grain and fodder, and a comparative study of their industrial, agricultural, and economic value. Genetica Iberica 9, 1–101.
Boomsma CR, Santini JB, Tollenaar M, Vyn TJ (2009) Maize morphophysiological responses to intense crowding and low nitrogen availability: An analysis and review. Agronomy Journal 101, 1426–1452.
| Maize morphophysiological responses to intense crowding and low nitrogen availability: An analysis and review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhsV2jtLvM&md5=52482df63d216843caab8b3508bb3604CAS |
Clay SA, Clay DE, Horvath D, Pullis J, Carlson CG, Hansen S, Reicks G (2009) Corn (Zea mays) responses to competition: Growth alteration vs. limiting factor. Agronomy Journal 101, 1522–1529.
| Corn (Zea mays) responses to competition: Growth alteration vs. limiting factor.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhsV2jtLjL&md5=689ab6b8252e4783f78a1ff8ae3787d6CAS |
Cusicanqui JA, Lauer JG (1999) Plant density and hybrid influence on corn forage yield and quality. Agronomy Journal 91, 911–915.
| Plant density and hybrid influence on corn forage yield and quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
D’Ayala VF, Paterniani E, de Oliveira ER (1980) Evaluation of sugar content in corn stalks (Zea mays L.) for alcohol production. Maydica 25, 185–187.
de Vries SC, Van de Ven GWJ, van Ittersum MK, Giller KE (2010) Resource use efficiency and environmental performance of nine major biofuels crops, processed by first generation conversion techniques. Biomass and Bioenergy 34, 588–601.
| Resource use efficiency and environmental performance of nine major biofuels crops, processed by first generation conversion techniques.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXltF2gsLg%3D&md5=24398c35806834d0cad402ff391a5b3dCAS |
Egli DB (2015) Is there a role for sink size in understanding maize population-yield relationships? Agronomy Journal 55, 2453–2462.
Goldemberg J (2007) Ethanol for a sustainable energy future. Science 315, 808–810.
| Ethanol for a sustainable energy future.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhsVShsrY%3D&md5=c393a8c55e0d2f39cf76e80d6841db7cCAS |
Hume DJ, Campbell DK (1972) Accumulation and translocation of soluble solids in corn stalks. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 52, 363–368.
| Accumulation and translocation of soluble solids in corn stalks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaE38XktlWmtLc%3D&md5=dfbe9d00108efc6e97e782338a59e15fCAS |
Lee EA, Tollenaar M (2007) Physiological basis of successful breeding strategies for maize grain yield. Crop Science 47, S202–S215.
| Physiological basis of successful breeding strategies for maize grain yield.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Leshem Y, Wermke M (1981) Effect of plant density and remove of ears on the quality and quantity of forage maize in a temperate climate. Grass and Forage Science 36, 147–153.
| Effect of plant density and remove of ears on the quality and quantity of forage maize in a temperate climate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Li J, Xie RZ, Wang KR, Ming B, Guo YQ, Zhang GQ, Li SK (2015) Variations in maize dry matter, harvest index, and grain yield with plant density. Agronomy Journal 107, 829–834.
| Variations in maize dry matter, harvest index, and grain yield with plant density.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ma BL, Dwyer LM (2012) Changes in kernel characteristics during grain filling in silage-specific and dual-purpose corn hybrids. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 92, 427–439.
| Changes in kernel characteristics during grain filling in silage-specific and dual-purpose corn hybrids.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ma BL, Subedi KD, Stewart DW, Dwyer LM (2006) Dry matter accumulation and silage moisture changes after silking in leafy and dual-purpose corn hybrids. Agronomy Journal 98, 922–929.
| Dry matter accumulation and silage moisture changes after silking in leafy and dual-purpose corn hybrids.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nayigihugu V, Hess BW, Brokaw L, Koch DW, Flake JW (2003) Potential of high-sugar corn as a fall and winter forage resource for grazing beef cattle. The Professional Animal Scientist 19, 410–415.
| Potential of high-sugar corn as a fall and winter forage resource for grazing beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Perry TW, Caldwell DW (1969) Comparative nutritive value of silage made from high-sugar male sterile hybrid corn and regular starchy corn. Journal of Dairy Science 52, 1119–1121.
| Comparative nutritive value of silage made from high-sugar male sterile hybrid corn and regular starchy corn.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reid LM, Morrison MJ, Zhu X, Jindal KK, Ma BL (2015) High stalk sugar corn: A potential biofuel crop for Canada. Agronomy Journal 107, 475–485.
| High stalk sugar corn: A potential biofuel crop for Canada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Roth GW (2003) Experience with leafy hybrids in Pennsylvania for silage production. In ‘Proceedings Northeast Corn Improvement Conference’. 13–14 February 2003. Ottawa, ON. pp. 49–54. (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada)
SAS Institute Inc (2010) ‘SAS/STAT Software. Release 9.2.’ (SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA)
Sims R, Hastings A, Schlamadinger B (2006) Energy crops: current status and future prospects. Global Change Biology 12, 2054–2076.
| Energy crops: current status and future prospects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Singleton WR (1948) Sucrose in the stalks of maize inbreds. Science 107, 174
| Sucrose in the stalks of maize inbreds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3czotFWqtg%3D%3D&md5=f2fbfce13bc102b4041560be02098d82CAS |
Somerville C, Youngs H, Taylor C, Davis SC, Long SP (2010) Feedstocks for lignocellulosic biofuels. Science 329, 790–792.
| Feedstocks for lignocellulosic biofuels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXpvV2iurc%3D&md5=2b4fb90de9f5272ebfb315d0e9eef736CAS |
Stake PE, Owens MJ, Schingoethe DJ, Voelker HH (1973) Comparative feeding value of high-sugar male sterile and regular dent corn silages. Journal of Dairy Science 56, 1439–1444.
| Comparative feeding value of high-sugar male sterile and regular dent corn silages.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stewart DW, Costa C, Dwyer LM, Smith DL, Hamilton RI, Ma BL (2003) Canopy structure, light interception, and photosynthesis in maize. Agronomy Journal 95, 1465–1474.
| Canopy structure, light interception, and photosynthesis in maize.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Subedi KD, Ma BL (2005) Ear position, leaf area and contribution of individual leaves to grain yield in conventional and leafy maize hybrids. Crop Science 45, 2246–2257.
| Ear position, leaf area and contribution of individual leaves to grain yield in conventional and leafy maize hybrids.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Subedi KD, Ma BL, Smith DL (2006) Response of a leaf and non-leaf maize hybrid to population densities and fertilizer nitrogen levels. Crop Science 46, 1860–1869.
| Response of a leaf and non-leaf maize hybrid to population densities and fertilizer nitrogen levels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tollenaar M (1989) Genetic improvement in grain yield of commercial maize hybrids grown in Ontario from 1959 to 1988. Crop Science 29, 1365–1371.
| Genetic improvement in grain yield of commercial maize hybrids grown in Ontario from 1959 to 1988.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tollenaar M, Daynard TB (1982) Effect of source–sink ratio on dry matter accumulation and leaf senescence of maize. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 62, 855–860.
| Effect of source–sink ratio on dry matter accumulation and leaf senescence of maize.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Van Roekel RJ, Coulter JA (2011) Agronomic responses of corn to planting date and plant density. Agronomy Journal 103, 1414–1422.
| Agronomic responses of corn to planting date and plant density.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
White WG, Vincent ML, Moose SP, Below FE (2012) The sugar, biomass and biofuel potential of temperate by tropical maize hybrids. Global Change Biology. Bioenergy 4, 496–508.
| The sugar, biomass and biofuel potential of temperate by tropical maize hybrids.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhsFWrsbfF&md5=cce0770ea3e92a422c79fee73b6dff4aCAS |
Widstrom NW, Bagby MO, Palmer DM, Black LT, Carr ME (1984) Relative stalk sugar yields among maize populations, cultivars, and hybrids. Crop Science 24, 913–915.
| Relative stalk sugar yields among maize populations, cultivars, and hybrids.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wortmann CS, Liska AJ, Ferguson RB, Lyon DJ, Klein RN, Dweikat I (2010) Dryland performance of sweet sorghum and grain crops for biofuel in Nebraska. Agronomy Journal 102, 319–326.
| Dryland performance of sweet sorghum and grain crops for biofuel in Nebraska.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhvFSkurc%3D&md5=117d0bd4f219dea381abbc6674e2ba86CAS |
