Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Prospects to utilise intercrops and crop variety mixtures in mechanised, rain-fed, temperate cropping systems

Andrew L. Fletcher A D , John A. Kirkegaard B , Mark B. Peoples B , Michael J. Robertson A , Jeremy Whish C and Antony D. Swan B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO Agriculture and Food, PMB 5 Wembley, WA 6913, Australia.

B CSIRO Agriculture, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

C CSIRO Agriculture, PO Box 102, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: Andrew.Fletcher@csiro.au

Crop and Pasture Science 67(12) 1252-1267 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP16211
Submitted: 10 June 2016  Accepted: 13 October 2016   Published: 7 December 2016

Abstract

Despite the potential productivity benefits, intercrops are not widely used in modern, mechanised grain cropping systems such as those practised in Australia, due to the additional labour required and the added complexity of management (e.g. harvesting and handling of mixed grain). In this review we investigate this dilemma using a two-dimensional matrix to categorise and evaluate intercropping systems. The first dimension describes the acquisition and use of resources in complementary or facilitative interactions that can improve resource use efficiency. The outcome of this resource use is often quantified using the land equivalent ratio (LER). This is a measure of the relative land area required as monocultures to produce the same yields as achieved by an intercrop. Thus, an LER greater than 1 indicates a benefit of the intercrop mixture. The second dimension describes the benefits to a farming system arising not only from the productivity benefits relating to increased LER, but from other often unaccounted benefits related to improved product quality, rotational benefits within the cropping system, or to reduced business risks. We contend that a successful intercrop must have elements in both dimensions. To date most intercropping research has considered only one of these two possible dimensions.

Intercrops in large, mechanised, rain-fed farming systems can comprise those of annual legumes with non-legume crops to improve N nutrition, or other species combinations that improve water use through hydraulic redistribution (the process whereby a deep-rooted plant extracts water from deep in the soil profile and releases a small proportion of this into the upper layers of the soil at night), or alter disease, pest or weed interactions. Combinations of varieties within cereal varieties were also considered. For our focus region in the southern Australian wheatbelt, we found few investigations that adequately dealt with the systems implications of intercrops on weeds, diseases and risk mitigation. The three main intercrop groups to date were (1) ‘peaola’ (canola-field pea intercrops) where 70% of intercrops (n = 34) had a 50% productivity increase over the monocultures, (2) cereal-grain legume intercrops (n = 22) where 64% showed increases in crop productivity compared with monocultures and (3) mixtures of cereal varieties (n = 113) where there was no evidence of a productivity increase compared with the single varieties.

Our review suggests that intercropping may have a role in large rain-fed grain cropping systems, based on the biophysical benefits revealed in the studies to date. However, future research to develop viable intercrop options should identify and quantify the genotypic differences within crop species for adaptation to intercropping, the long-term rotational benefits associated with intercrops, and the yield variability and complexity-productivity trade-offs in order to provide more confidence for grower adoption. Farming systems models will be central to many of these investigations but are likely to require significant improvement to capture important processes in intercrops (e.g. competition for water, nutrients and light).

Additional keywords: farming systems, intercrop, mixtures.


References

Abbott DC, Burdon JJ, Brown AHD, Read BJ, Bittisnich D (2000) The incidence of barley scald in cultivar mixtures. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 355–360.
The incidence of barley scald in cultivar mixtures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Andersen M, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P, Jensen E (2005) Biomass production, symbiotic nitrogen fixation and inorganic N use in dual and tri-component annual intercrops. Plant and Soil 266, 273–287.
Biomass production, symbiotic nitrogen fixation and inorganic N use in dual and tri-component annual intercrops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Angus JF, Kirkegaard JA, Hunt JR, Ryan MH, Ohlander L, Peoples MB (2015) Break crops and rotations for wheat. Crop &Pasture Science 66, 523–552.
Break crops and rotations for wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barillot R, Combes D, Pineau S, Huynh P, Escobar-gutiérrez AJ (2014a) Comparison of the morphogenesis of three genotypes of pea (Pisum sativum) grown in pure stands and wheat-based intercrops. AoB Plants 6, plu006
Comparison of the morphogenesis of three genotypes of pea (Pisum sativum) grown in pure stands and wheat-based intercrops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barillot R, Escobar-Gutiérrez AJ, Fournier C, Huynh P, Combes D (2014b) Assessing the effects of architectural variations on light partitioning within virtual wheat–pea mixtures. Annals of Botany 114, 725–737.
Assessing the effects of architectural variations on light partitioning within virtual wheat–pea mixtures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Barraclough S, Martin LD (2001) Chemical broadleaf weed management in Peaola. Crop updates. Northam, WA.

Bedoussac L, Justes E (2011) A comparison of commonly used indices for evaluating species interactions and intercrop efficiency: application to durum wheat–winter pea intercrops. Field Crops Research 124, 25–36.
A comparison of commonly used indices for evaluating species interactions and intercrop efficiency: application to durum wheat–winter pea intercrops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bedoussac L, Journet E-P, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Naudin C, Corre-Hellou G, Jensen E, Prieur L, Justes E (2015) Ecological principles underlying the increase of productivity achieved by cereal-grain legume intercrops in organic farming. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 35, 911–935.
Ecological principles underlying the increase of productivity achieved by cereal-grain legume intercrops in organic farming. A review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bell LW, Moore AD, Kirkegaard JA (2014) Evolution in crop–livestock integration systems that improve farm productivity and environmental performance in Australia. European Journal of Agronomy 57, 10–20.
Evolution in crop–livestock integration systems that improve farm productivity and environmental performance in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bennet M (2009) Peola at Minnipa in 2009. In ‘Eyre Peninsula farming systems 2009 summary’. (Eds N Scholz, A Cook, R Latta, N Wilhelm, M Bennet, C Paterson, D Brace, A McNeill, M Chirgwin) pp. 60–62.

Bennett AJ, Bending GD, Chandler D, Hilton S, Mills P (2012) Meeting the demand for crop production: the challenge of yield decline in crops grown in short rotations. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 87, 52–71.
Meeting the demand for crop production: the challenge of yield decline in crops grown in short rotations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Betencourt E, Duputel M, Colomb B, Desclaux D, Hinsinger P (2012) Intercropping promotes the ability of durum wheat and chickpea to increase rhizosphere phosphorus availability in a low P soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 46, 181–190.
Intercropping promotes the ability of durum wheat and chickpea to increase rhizosphere phosphorus availability in a low P soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XosFCmtA%3D%3D&md5=4e5977004ad729714e4a905db5e84559CAS |

Boer R, Campbell L, Fletcher D (1993) Characteristics of frost in a major wheat-growing region of Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44, 1731–1743.
Characteristics of frost in a major wheat-growing region of Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Boudreau MA (2013) Diseases in intercropping systems. Annual Review of Phytopathology 51, 499–519.
Diseases in intercropping systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhsFOhtrnM&md5=b8c0136f78d91324642bd3b7217eb7a1CAS |

Brooker RW, Bennett AE, Cong W-F, Daniell TJ, George TS, Hallett PD, Hawes C, Iannetta PPM, Jones HG, Karley AJ, Li L, McKenzie BM, Pakeman RJ, Paterson E, Schöb C, Shen J, Squire G, Watson CA, Zhang C, Zhang F, Zhang J, White PJ (2015) Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology. New Phytologist 206, 107–117.
Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Burgess SSO (2011) Can hydraulic redistribution put bread on our table? Plant and Soil 341, 25–29.
Can hydraulic redistribution put bread on our table?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXjt1Wjtbs%3D&md5=8e5a9a6abb12beab5fd1403c13c04aaaCAS |

Caldwell MM, Richards JH (1989) Hydraulic lift: water efflux from upper roots improves effectiveness of water uptake by deep roots. Oecologia 79, 1–5.
Hydraulic lift: water efflux from upper roots improves effectiveness of water uptake by deep roots.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Calviño PA, Sadras VO, Andrade FH (2003) Development, growth and yield of late-sown soybean in the southern Pampas. European Journal of Agronomy 19, 265–275.
Development, growth and yield of late-sown soybean in the southern Pampas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Carr PM, Gardner JJ, Schatz BG, Zwinger SW, Guldan SJ (1995) Grain yield and weed biomass of a wheat-lentil intercrop. Agronomy Journal 87, 574–579.
Grain yield and weed biomass of a wheat-lentil intercrop.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Caviglia OP, Sadras VO, Andrade FH (2004) Intensification of agriculture in the south-eastern Pampas I. Capture and efficiency in the use of water and radiation in double-cropped wheat-soybean. Field Crops Research 87, 117–129.
Intensification of agriculture in the south-eastern Pampas I. Capture and efficiency in the use of water and radiation in double-cropped wheat-soybean.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Caviglia OP, Sadras VO, Andrade FH (2011) Yield and quality of wheat and soybean in sole- and double-cropping. Agronomy Journal 103, 1081–1089.
Yield and quality of wheat and soybean in sole- and double-cropping.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chai Q, Qin A, Gan Y, Yu A (2014) Higher yield and lower carbon emission by intercropping maize with rape, pea, and wheat in arid irrigation areas. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 34, 535–543.
Higher yield and lower carbon emission by intercropping maize with rape, pea, and wheat in arid irrigation areas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXls1OnsLY%3D&md5=a11dd9c392a7b9b882eb4457f67dd363CAS |

Chalk PM, Peoples MB, McNeill AM, Boddey RM, Unkovich MJ, Gardener MJ, Silva CF, Chen D (2014) Methodologies for estimating nitrogen transfer between legumes and companion species in agro-ecosystems: a review of 15N-enriched techniques. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 73, 10–21.
Methodologies for estimating nitrogen transfer between legumes and companion species in agro-ecosystems: a review of 15N-enriched techniques.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXmvVWms7Y%3D&md5=6dba086dc4f477ae6062a4022559e672CAS |

Chateil C, Goldringer I, Tarallo L, Kerbiriou C, Le Viol I, Ponge J-F, Salmon S, Gachet S, Porcher E (2013) Crop genetic diversity benefits farmland biodiversity in cultivated fields. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 171, 25–32.
Crop genetic diversity benefits farmland biodiversity in cultivated fields.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chen C, Lawes R, Fletcher A, Oliver Y, Robertson M, Bell M, Wang E (2016) How well can APSIM simulate nitrogen uptake and nitrogen fixation of legume crops? Field Crops Research 187, 35–48.
How well can APSIM simulate nitrogen uptake and nitrogen fixation of legume crops?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Corre-Hellou G, Dibet A, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Crozat Y, Gooding M, Ambus P, Dahlmann C, von Fragstein P, Pristeri A, Monti M, Jensen ES (2011) The competitive ability of pea–barley intercrops against weeds and the interactions with crop productivity and soil N availability. Field Crops Research 122, 264–272.
The competitive ability of pea–barley intercrops against weeds and the interactions with crop productivity and soil N availability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Davidson J, Jones D, Christian K (1990) Winter feed production and grain yield in mixtures of spring and winter wheats. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 41, 1–18.
Winter feed production and grain yield in mixtures of spring and winter wheats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Davis JHC, Woolley JN (1993) Genotypic requirement for intercropping. Field Crops Research 34, 407–430.
Genotypic requirement for intercropping.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Davis AS, Hill JD, Chase CA, Johanns AM, Liebman M (2012) Increasing cropping system diversity balances productivity, profitability and environmental health. PLoS One 7, e47149
Increasing cropping system diversity balances productivity, profitability and environmental health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhsFOkurjP&md5=bc58076bc0b645b7ee7d387425394852CAS |

Dordas CA, Vlachostergios DN, Lithourgidis AS (2012) Growth dynamics and agronomic-economic benefits of pea–oat and pea–barley intercrops. Crop & Pasture Science 63, 45–52.
Growth dynamics and agronomic-economic benefits of pea–oat and pea–barley intercrops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ehrmann J, Ritz K (2014) Plant: soil interactions in temperate multi-cropping production systems. Plant and Soil 376, 1–29.
Plant: soil interactions in temperate multi-cropping production systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhslaqsLvK&md5=c406d7a7c95cae2739b778b387d8a319CAS |

Fan F, Zhang F, Song Y, Sun J, Bao X, Guo T, Li L (2006) Nitrogen fixation of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) interacting with a non-legume in two contrasting intercropping systems. Plant and Soil 283, 275–286.
Nitrogen fixation of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) interacting with a non-legume in two contrasting intercropping systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XpvVGgt7o%3D&md5=542b1c372fe3d17ff0b676a1729321acCAS |

Fang Y, Xu B, Liu L, Gu Y, Liu Q, Turner NC, Li FM (2014) Does a mixture of old and modern winter wheat cultivars increase yield and water use efficiency in water-limited environments? Field Crops Research 156, 12–21.
Does a mixture of old and modern winter wheat cultivars increase yield and water use efficiency in water-limited environments?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Finckh MR, Gacek ES, Goyeau H, Lannou C, Merz U, Mundt CC, Munk L, Nadziak J, Newton AC, de Vallavieille-Pope C, Wolfe MS (2000) Cereal variety and species mixtures in practice, with emphasis on disease resistance. Agronomie 20, 813–837.
Cereal variety and species mixtures in practice, with emphasis on disease resistance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fletcher AL, Robertson MJ, Abrecht DG, Sharma DL, Holzworth DP (2015) Dry sowing increases farm level wheat yields but not production risks in a Mediterranean environment. Agricultural Systems 136, 114–124.
Dry sowing increases farm level wheat yields but not production risks in a Mediterranean environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Francis CA (1989) Biological efficiencies in multiple-cropping systems. Advances in Agronomy 42, 1–42.
Biological efficiencies in multiple-cropping systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Franco JG, King SR, Masabni JG, Volder A (2015) Plant functional diversity improves short-term yields in a low-input intercropping system. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 203, 1–10.
Plant functional diversity improves short-term yields in a low-input intercropping system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fukai S (1993) Intercropping – bases of productivity. Field Crops Research 34, 239–245.
Intercropping – bases of productivity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fukai S, Trenbath BR (1993) Processes determining intercrop productivity and yields of component crops. Field Crops Research 34, 247–271.
Processes determining intercrop productivity and yields of component crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gaba S, Lescourret F, Boudsocq S, Enjalbert J, Hinsinger P, Journet E-P, Navas M-L, Wery J, Louarn G, Malézieux E, Pelzer E, Prudent M, Ozier-Lafontaine H (2015) Multiple cropping systems as drivers for providing multiple ecosystem services: from concepts to design. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 35, 607–623.
Multiple cropping systems as drivers for providing multiple ecosystem services: from concepts to design.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gardner WK, Boundy KA (1983) The acquisition of phosphorus by Lupinus albus L. Plant and Soil 70, 391–402.
The acquisition of phosphorus by Lupinus albus L.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL3sXktVCltLg%3D&md5=e6bad4240a7a4bfe2e63fba19706d760CAS |

Ghaley B, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Høgh-Jensen H, Jensen ES (2005) Intercropping of wheat and pea as influenced by nitrogen fertilization. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 73, 201–212.
Intercropping of wheat and pea as influenced by nitrogen fertilization.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gigot C, Saint-Jean S, Huber L, Maumene C, Leconte M, Kerhornou B, de Vallavieille-Pope C (2013) Protective effects of a wheat cultivar mixture against splash-dispersed Septoria tritici blotch epidemics. Plant Pathology 62, 1011–1019.
Protective effects of a wheat cultivar mixture against splash-dispersed Septoria tritici blotch epidemics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gooding MJ, Kasaynova E, Ruske R, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Jensen ES, Dahlamann C, von Fragstein P, Dibet A, Corre-Hellou G, Crozat Y, Pristeri A, Romeo M, Monti M, Launay M (2007) Intercropping with pulses to concentrate nitrogen and sulphur in wheat. The Journal of Agricultural Science 145, 469–479.
Intercropping with pulses to concentrate nitrogen and sulphur in wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXpslGis78%3D&md5=7a84e780706a723ce1c3b4be6ee94c6eCAS |

Gronle A, Heß J, Böhm H (2015) Effect of intercropping normal-leafed or semi-leafless winter peas and triticale after shallow and deep ploughing on agronomic performance, grain quality and succeeding winter wheat yield. Field Crops Research 180, 80–89.
Effect of intercropping normal-leafed or semi-leafless winter peas and triticale after shallow and deep ploughing on agronomic performance, grain quality and succeeding winter wheat yield.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Jensen ES (2001) Evaluating pea and barley cultivars for complementarity in intercropping at different levels of soil N availability. Field Crops Research 72, 185–196.
Evaluating pea and barley cultivars for complementarity in intercropping at different levels of soil N availability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Jensen ES (2005) Facilitative root interactions in intercrops. Plant and Soil 274, 237–250.
Facilitative root interactions in intercrops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtVWiurfO&md5=5d9d9c16bf30b08a9e05bbf166e04360CAS |

Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P, Jensen ES (2001) Interspecific competition, N use and interference with weeds in pea–barley intercropping. Field Crops Research 70, 101–109.
Interspecific competition, N use and interference with weeds in pea–barley intercropping.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P, Jensen ES (2003) The comparison of nitrogen use and leaching in sole cropped versus intercropped pea and barley. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 65, 289–300.
The comparison of nitrogen use and leaching in sole cropped versus intercropped pea and barley.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXhs1Crtbw%3D&md5=5c5b60ca2d3dab97e6d927361dc0a19aCAS |

Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Gooding M, Ambus P, Corre-Hellou G, Crozat Y, Dahlmann C, Dibet A, Fragstein P, Pristeri A, Monti M, Jensen ES (2009a) Pea–barley intercropping and short-term subsequent crop effects across European organic cropping conditions. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 85, 141–155.
Pea–barley intercropping and short-term subsequent crop effects across European organic cropping conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Gooding M, Ambus P, Corre-Hellou G, Crozat Y, Dahlmann C, Dibet A, von Fragstein P, Pristeri A, Monti M, Jensen ES (2009b) Pea–barley intercropping for efficient symbiotic N2-fixation, soil N acquisition and use of other nutrients in European organic cropping systems. Field Crops Research 113, 64–71.
Pea–barley intercropping for efficient symbiotic N2-fixation, soil N acquisition and use of other nutrients in European organic cropping systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hinsinger P, Betencourt E, Bernard L, Brauman A, Plassard C, Shen JB, Tang XY, Zhang FS (2011) P for two, sharing a scarce resource: soil phosphorus acquisition in the rhizosphere of intercropped species. Plant Physiology 156, 1078–1086.
P for two, sharing a scarce resource: soil phosphorus acquisition in the rhizosphere of intercropped species.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXptFWlu7w%3D&md5=6606f04899e4200f150f8ad39e0517a3CAS |

Holzworth DP, Huth NI, deVoil PG, Zurcher EJ, Herrmann NI, McLean G, Chenu K, van Oosterom EJ, Snow V, Murphy C, Moore AD, Brown H, Whish JPM, Verrall S, Fainges J, Bell LW, Peake AS, Poulton PL, Hochman Z, Thorburn PJ, Gaydon DS, Dalgliesh NP, Rodriguez D, Cox H, Chapman S, Doherty A, Teixeira E, Sharp J, Cichota R, Vogeler I, Li FY, Wang E, Hammer GL, Robertson MJ, Dimes JP, Whitbread AM, Hunt J, van Rees H, McClelland T, Carberry PS, Hargreaves JNG, MacLeod N, McDonald C, Harsdorf J, Wedgwood S, Keating BA (2014) APSIM – Evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation. Environmental Modelling & Software 62, 327–350.
APSIM – Evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Huang C, Sun Z, Wang H, Luo Y, Ma Z (2012) Effects of wheat cultivar mixtures on stripe rust: a meta-analysis on field trials. Crop Protection 33, 52–58.
Effects of wheat cultivar mixtures on stripe rust: a meta-analysis on field trials.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Izaurralde RC, Juma NG, McGill WB (1990) Plant and nitrogen yield of barley-field pea intercrop in cryoboreal-subhumid Central Alberta. Agronomy Journal 82, 295–301.
Plant and nitrogen yield of barley-field pea intercrop in cryoboreal-subhumid Central Alberta.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jackson LF, Wennig RW (1997) Use of wheat cultivar blends to improve grain yield and quality and reduce disease and lodging. Field Crops Research 52, 261–269.
Use of wheat cultivar blends to improve grain yield and quality and reduce disease and lodging.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jacobs JL, Ward GN (2012) Effect of intercropping forage peas (Pisum sativum L.) with winter wheat (Tritium vulgare L.) or triticale (Triticale hexaploide Lart.) on DM yield, nutritive characteristics when harvested at different stages of growth. Animal Production Science 52, 949–958.
Effect of intercropping forage peas (Pisum sativum L.) with winter wheat (Tritium vulgare L.) or triticale (Triticale hexaploide Lart.) on DM yield, nutritive characteristics when harvested at different stages of growth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jahansooz MR, Yunusa IAM, Coventry DR, Palmer AR, Eamus D (2007) Radiation- and water-use associated with growth and yields of wheat and chickpea in sole and mixed crops. European Journal of Agronomy 26, 275–282.
Radiation- and water-use associated with growth and yields of wheat and chickpea in sole and mixed crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jensen E (1996) Grain yield, symbiotic N2 fixation and interspecific competition for inorganic N in pea-barley intercrops. Plant and Soil 182, 25–38.
Grain yield, symbiotic N2 fixation and interspecific competition for inorganic N in pea-barley intercrops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK28XmtVGrur4%3D&md5=743395253cfc18653a6bb72f9f93957eCAS |

Jensen ES, Peoples MB, Hauggaard-Nielsen H (2010) Faba bean in cropping systems. Field Crops Research 115, 203–216.
Faba bean in cropping systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Keating BA, Carberry PS (1993) Resource capture and use in intercropping: solar radiation. Field Crops Research 34, 273–301.
Resource capture and use in intercropping: solar radiation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kiær LP, Skovgaard IM, Østergård H (2009) Grain yield increase in cereal variety mixtures: a meta-analysis of field trials. Field Crops Research 114, 361–373.
Grain yield increase in cereal variety mixtures: a meta-analysis of field trials.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kiær LP, Skovgaard IM, Ostergard H (2012) Effects of inter-varietal diversity, biotic stresses and environmental productivity on grain yield of spring barley variety mixtures. Euphytica 185, 123–138.
Effects of inter-varietal diversity, biotic stresses and environmental productivity on grain yield of spring barley variety mixtures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kirkegaard JA, Ryan MH (2014) Magnitude and mechanisms of persistent crop sequence effects on wheat. Field Crops Research 164, 154–165.
Magnitude and mechanisms of persistent crop sequence effects on wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kirkegaard J, Christen O, Krupinsky J, Layzell D (2008) Break crop benefits in temperate wheat production. Field Crops Research 107, 185–195.
Break crop benefits in temperate wheat production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Knudsen MT, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Jornsgaard B, Jensen ES (2004) Comparison of interspecific competition and N use in pea–barley, faba bean–barley and lupin–barley intercrops grown at two temperate locations. The Journal of Agricultural Science 142, 617–627.
Comparison of interspecific competition and N use in pea–barley, faba bean–barley and lupin–barley intercrops grown at two temperate locations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lawes RA, Ward PR, Ferris D (2014) Pasture cropping with C-4 grasses in a barley-lupin rotation can increase production. Crop & Pasture Science 65, 1002–1015.
Pasture cropping with C-4 grasses in a barley-lupin rotation can increase production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Li Y-Y, Yu C-B, Cheng X, Li C-J, Sun J-H, Zhang F-S, Lambers H, Li L (2009) Intercropping alleviates the inhibitory effect of N fertilization on nodulation and symbiotic N2 fixation of faba bean. Plant and Soil 323, 295–308.
Intercropping alleviates the inhibitory effect of N fertilization on nodulation and symbiotic N2 fixation of faba bean.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXht1CmtLrE&md5=b723a89b5ddbfc1ade4ef2aae78466a1CAS |

Li N, Jia S-f, Wang X-n, Duan X-y, Zhou Y-l, Wang Z-h, Lu G-d (2012) The effect of wheat mixtures on the powdery mildew disease and some yield components. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 11, 611–620.
The effect of wheat mixtures on the powdery mildew disease and some yield components.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Li L, Tilman D, Lambers H, Zhang F-S (2014) Plant diversity and overyielding: insights from belowground facilitation of intercropping in agriculture. New Phytologist 203, 63–69.
Plant diversity and overyielding: insights from belowground facilitation of intercropping in agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lithourgidis AS, Vasilakoglou IB, Dhima KV, Dordas CA, Yiakoulaki MD (2006) Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crops Research 99, 106–113.
Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lithourgidis AS, Dordas CA, Damalas CA, Vlachostergios DN (2011) Annual intercrops: an alternative pathway for sustainable agriculture. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5, 396–410.

Llewellyn RS, D’Emden FH, Kuehne G (2012) Extensive use of no-tillage in grain growing regions of Australia. Field Crops Research 132, 204–212.
Extensive use of no-tillage in grain growing regions of Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Malézieux E, Crozat Y, Dupraz C, Laurans M, Makowski D, Ozier-Lafontaine H, Rapidel B, Tourdonnet S, Valantin-Morison M (2009) Mixing plant species in cropping systems: concepts, tools and models: a review. In ‘Sustainable agriculture’. (Eds E Lichtfouse, M Navarrete, P Debaeke, S Véronique, C Alberola) pp. 329–353. (Springer: Netherlands)

Malhi SS (2012) Improving crop yield, N uptake and economic returns by intercropping barley or canola with pea. Agricultural Sciences 3, 1023–1033.

Mariotti M, Masoni A, Ercoli L, Arduini I (2015) Nitrogen leaching and residual effect of barley/field bean intercropping. Plant, Soil and Environment 61, 60–65.
Nitrogen leaching and residual effect of barley/field bean intercropping.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXjvFGgtbk%3D&md5=96d422931996f97a114b466d28b24d01CAS |

Mead R, Willey RW (1980) The concept of a land equivalent ratio and advantages in yields from intercropping. Experimental Agriculture 16, 217–228.
The concept of a land equivalent ratio and advantages in yields from intercropping.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Monti M, Pellicanò A, Santonoceto C, Preiti G, Pristeri A (2016) Yield components and nitrogen use in cereal-pea intercrops in Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Research 196, 379–388.
Yield components and nitrogen use in cereal-pea intercrops in Mediterranean environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Monzon JP, Sadras VO, Abbate PA, Caviglia OP (2007) Modelling management strategies for wheat-soybean double crops in the south-eastern Pampas. Field Crops Research 101, 44–52.
Modelling management strategies for wheat-soybean double crops in the south-eastern Pampas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Morris RA, Garrity DP (1993a) Resource capture and utilization in intercropping: water. Field Crops Research 34, 303–317.
Resource capture and utilization in intercropping: water.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Morris RA, Garrity DP (1993b) Resource capture and utilization in intercropping; non-nitrogen nutrients. Field Crops Research 34, 319–334.
Resource capture and utilization in intercropping; non-nitrogen nutrients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Naudin C, Corre-Hellou G, Pineau S, Crozat Y, Jeuffroy M-H (2010) The effect of various dynamics of N availability on winter pea–wheat intercrops: crop growth, N partitioning and symbiotic N2 fixation. Field Crops Research 119, 2–11.
The effect of various dynamics of N availability on winter pea–wheat intercrops: crop growth, N partitioning and symbiotic N2 fixation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Naudin C, van der Werf HMG, Jeuffroy M-H, Corre-Hellou G (2014) Life cycle assessment applied to pea-wheat intercrops: a new method for handling the impacts of co-products. Journal of Cleaner Production 73, 80–87.
Life cycle assessment applied to pea-wheat intercrops: a new method for handling the impacts of co-products.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXit1KrtQ%3D%3D&md5=7d22bc77db63842db22185b1439003ffCAS |

Nelson AG, Pswarayi A, Quideau S, Frick B, Spaner D (2012) Yield and weed suppression of crop mixtures in organic and conventional systems of the Western Canadian Prairie. Agronomy Journal 104, 756–762.
Yield and weed suppression of crop mixtures in organic and conventional systems of the Western Canadian Prairie.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Neumann RB, Cardon ZG (2012) The magnitude of hydraulic redistribution by plant roots: a review and synthesis of empirical and modeling studies. New Phytologist 194, 337–352.
The magnitude of hydraulic redistribution by plant roots: a review and synthesis of empirical and modeling studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Newton AC, Ellis RP, Hackett CA, Guy DC (1997) The effect of component number on Rhynchosporium secalis infection and yield in mixtures of winter barley cultivars. Plant Pathology 46, 930–938.
The effect of component number on Rhynchosporium secalis infection and yield in mixtures of winter barley cultivars.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Newton AC, Begg GS, Swanston JS (2009) Deployment of diversity for enhanced crop function. Annals of Applied Biology 154, 309–322.
Deployment of diversity for enhanced crop function.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

O’Callaghan C, Johnston C (2012) Long, short and mid maturing variety shandy. Liebe Group. Available at: www.liebegroup.org.au/research-development-book/ (accessed 7 November 2016).

Ofori F, Stern WR (1987) Cereal–legume intercropping systems. Advances in Agronomy 41, 41–90.
Cereal–legume intercropping systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Osborne CA, Peoples MB, Janssen PH (2010) Detection of a reproducible, single-member shift in soil bacterial communities exposed to low levels of hydrogen. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76, 1471–1479.
Detection of a reproducible, single-member shift in soil bacterial communities exposed to low levels of hydrogen.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXjsFanu7g%3D&md5=436db91b50c7f9918f40ba4c956fa0bbCAS |

Paynter BH, Hills AL (2008) Mixing feed barley cultivars did not decrease leaf disease or increase grain yield. Australasian Plant Pathology 37, 626–636.
Mixing feed barley cultivars did not decrease leaf disease or increase grain yield.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pelzer E, Bazot M, Makowski D, Corre-Hellou G, Naudin C, Al Rifai M, Baranger E, Bedoussac L, Biarnes V, Boucheny P, Carrouee B, Dorvillez D, Foissy D, Gaillard B, Guichard L, Mansard M-C, Omon B, Prieur L, Yvergniaux M, Justes E, Jeuffroy M-H (2012) Pea–wheat intercrops in low-input conditions combine high economic performances and low environmental impacts. European Journal of Agronomy 40, 39–53.
Pea–wheat intercrops in low-input conditions combine high economic performances and low environmental impacts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pelzer E, Hombert N, Jeuffroy M-H, Makowski D (2014) Meta-analysis of the effect of nitrogen fertilization on annual cereal–legume intercrop production. Agronomy Journal 106, 1775–1786.
Meta-analysis of the effect of nitrogen fertilization on annual cereal–legume intercrop production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pelzer E, Bazot M, Guichard L, Jeuffroy M-H (2016) Crop management affects the performance of a winter pea–wheat intercrop. Agronomy Journal 108, 1089–1100.
Crop management affects the performance of a winter pea–wheat intercrop.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Peoples MB, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Jensen ES (2009) The potential environmental benefits and risks derived from legumes in rotations. In ‘Nitrogen fixation in crop production’. (Eds DW Emerich, H Krishnan) pp. 349–385. (American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI)

Podgórska-Lesiak M, Sobkowicz P (2013) Prevention of pea lodging by intercropping barley with peas at different nitrogen fertilization levels. Field Crops Research 149, 95–104.
Prevention of pea lodging by intercropping barley with peas at different nitrogen fertilization levels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Postma JA, Lynch JP (2012) Complementarity in root architecture for nutrient uptake in ancient maize/bean and maize/bean/squash polycultures. Annals of Botany 110, 521–534.
Complementarity in root architecture for nutrient uptake in ancient maize/bean and maize/bean/squash polycultures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhtVOjurbM&md5=6dead06a8727754f1c8584ac98ba778cCAS |

Pridham JC, Entz MH (2008) Intercropping spring wheat with cereal grains, legumes, and oilseeds fails to improve productivity under organic management. Agronomy Journal 100, 1436–1442.
Intercropping spring wheat with cereal grains, legumes, and oilseeds fails to improve productivity under organic management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rao MR, Willey RW (1980) Evaluation of yield stability in intercropping: studies on sorghum/pigeonpea. Experimental Agriculture 16, 105–116.
Evaluation of yield stability in intercropping: studies on sorghum/pigeonpea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Roberts-Craig P, Coventry D, Edwards JH (2013) Productivity advantage of crop-perennial pasture intercropping in southeastern Australia. Agronomy Journal 105, 1588–1596.
Productivity advantage of crop-perennial pasture intercropping in southeastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Robertson M, Kirkegaard J, Rebetzke G, Llewellyn R, Wark T (2016) Prospects for yield improvement in the Australian wheat industry: a perspective. Food and Energy Security 5, 107–122.
Prospects for yield improvement in the Australian wheat industry: a perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rottstock T, Joshi J, Kummer V, Fischer M (2014) Higher plant diversity promotes higher diversity of fungal pathogens, while it decreases pathogen infection per plant. Ecology 95, 1907–1917.
Higher plant diversity promotes higher diversity of fungal pathogens, while it decreases pathogen infection per plant.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Scalise A, Tortorella D, Pristeri A, Petrovicova B, Gelsomino A, Lindstrom K, Monti M (2015) Legume-barley intercropping stimulates soil N supply and crop yield in the succeeding durum wheat in a rotation under rainfed conditions. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 89, 150–161.
Legume-barley intercropping stimulates soil N supply and crop yield in the succeeding durum wheat in a rotation under rainfed conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXht1SgtLzL&md5=7a6a691f67a4194569ce8b1b5a417855CAS |

Sharma RC, Dubin HJ (1996) Effect of wheat cultivar mixtures on spot blotch (Bipolaris sorokiniana) and grain yield. Field Crops Research 48, 95–101.
Effect of wheat cultivar mixtures on spot blotch (Bipolaris sorokiniana) and grain yield.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sharma, DL, Peek, C, Riethmuller, G, Pasqual, G (2011) Building flexibility in cropping system through a variety shandying approach. GRDC Agribusiness Crop Updates, 2012 Burswood, WA. pp. 263–266.

Slattery RA, Ainsworth EA, Ort DR (2013) A meta-analysis of responses of canopy photosynthetic conversion efficiency to environmental factors reveals major causes of yield gap. Journal of Experimental Botany 64, 3723–3733.
A meta-analysis of responses of canopy photosynthetic conversion efficiency to environmental factors reveals major causes of yield gap.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXht1yrsr3J&md5=3b2561fac93461fec21b1d5c00f36a0fCAS |

Smith L (2014) Agronomy Geeks West – Ep.16: The Ins and Outs of Intercropping. Available at: www.realagriculture.com/2014/07/agronomy-geeks-west-ep-15-ins-outs-intercropping/ (accessed 7 November 2016).

Stern WR (1993) Nitrogen fixation and transfer in intercrop systems. Field Crops Research 34, 335–356.
Nitrogen fixation and transfer in intercrop systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Szumigalski AR, Van Acker RC (2006) Nitrogen yield and land use efficiency in annual sole crops and intercrops. Agronomy Journal 98, 1030–1040.
Nitrogen yield and land use efficiency in annual sole crops and intercrops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xot1ekt7k%3D&md5=5f40af3a49047e52462b79e1f5b9d560CAS |

Szumigalski AR, Van Acker RC (2008) Land equivalent ratios, light interception, and water use in annual intercrops in the presence or absence of in-crop herbicides. Agronomy Journal 100, 1145–1154.
Land equivalent ratios, light interception, and water use in annual intercrops in the presence or absence of in-crop herbicides.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tosti G, Guiducci M (2010) Durum wheat–faba bean temporary intercropping: effects on nitrogen supply and wheat quality. European Journal of Agronomy 33, 157–165.
Durum wheat–faba bean temporary intercropping: effects on nitrogen supply and wheat quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtVymtrvJ&md5=870715634c0b78913d97e930ca505380CAS |

Tosti G, Guiducci M, Boldrini A, Quaranta F, Melloni S, De Vita P, Li Destri Nicosia O (2007) Durum wheat-legume temporary intercrop – The effects on weed control, nitrogen supply and wheat quality. In ‘International Conference on Organic Agriculture and Food Security’. Rome, Italy, 3–5 May 2007. (Ed. T Moreau) pp. 83–85. (FAO: Rome)

Tosti G, Farneselli M, Benincasa P, Guiducci M (2016) Nitrogen fertilization strategies for organic wheat production: crop yield and nitrate leaching. Agronomy Journal 108,
Nitrogen fertilization strategies for organic wheat production: crop yield and nitrate leaching.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Trenbath BR (1993) Intercropping for the management of pests and diseases. Field Crops Research 34, 381–405.
Intercropping for the management of pests and diseases.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Van Rees H (2011) Reduce risk – Mix varieties at sowing. Available at: www.farmtrials.com.au/trial/14090 (accessed 7 November 2016).

Walton GH (1980) Mixed cropping for the production of feed rations. In ‘Pathways to productivity. Proceedings of the 1st Australian Agronomy Conference’. Lawes, Qld, April 1980. (Ed. IM Wood) pp. 269. (Australian Society of Agronomy: Lawes) Available at: www.regional.org.au/au/asa/1980/contributed/plant-management/s7-26.htm (accessed 7 November 2016)

Whitmore AP, Schröder JJ (2007) Intercropping reduces nitrate leaching from under field crops without loss of yield: a modelling study. European Journal of Agronomy 27, 81–88.
Intercropping reduces nitrate leaching from under field crops without loss of yield: a modelling study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXlvFSis7o%3D&md5=985a24711d301a99b6e3af6c30102121CAS |

Wolfe MS (1985) The current status and prospects of multiline cultivars and variety mixtures for disease resistance. Annual Review of Phytopathology 23, 251–273.
The current status and prospects of multiline cultivars and variety mixtures for disease resistance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wu K, Wu B (2014) Potential environmental benefits of intercropping annual with leguminous perennial crops in Chinese agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 188, 147–149.
Potential environmental benefits of intercropping annual with leguminous perennial crops in Chinese agriculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Xia H-Y, Wang Z-G, Zhao J-H, Sun J-H, Bao X-G, Christie P, Zhang F-S, Li L (2013) Contribution of interspecific interactions and phosphorus application to sustainable and productive intercropping systems. Field Crops Research 154, 53–64.
Contribution of interspecific interactions and phosphorus application to sustainable and productive intercropping systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Xue Y, Xia H, Christie P, Zhang Z, Li L, Tang C (2016) Crop acquisition of phosphorus, iron and zinc from soil in cereal/legume intercropping systems: a critical review. Annals of Botany 117, 363–377.
Crop acquisition of phosphorus, iron and zinc from soil in cereal/legume intercropping systems: a critical review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Yu Y, Stomph T-J, Makowski D, van der Werf W (2015) Temporal niche differentiation increases the land equivalent ratio of annual intercrops: a meta-analysis. Field Crops Research 184, 133–144.
Temporal niche differentiation increases the land equivalent ratio of annual intercrops: a meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Zhang F, Shen J, Li L, Liu X (2004) An overview of rhizosphere processes related with plant nutrition in major cropping systems in China. Plant and Soil 260, 89–99.
An overview of rhizosphere processes related with plant nutrition in major cropping systems in China.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXksFGls7g%3D&md5=593fbf03874a6c0159906ed5595bc32fCAS |