Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Crop-sequence effects on productivity in a wheat-based cropping system at Wongan Hills, Western Australia

R. J. French A B E , R. S. Malik C and M. Seymour D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, PO Box 432, Merredin, WA 6415, Australia.

B Centre for Plant Genetics and Breeding, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

C Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, 10 Dore St, Katanning, WA 6317, Australia.

D Department of Agriculture and Food, PMB 50, Melijinup Road, Esperance, WA 6450, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: bob.french@agric.wa.gov.au

Crop and Pasture Science 66(6) 580-593 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP14262
Submitted: 10 September 2014  Accepted: 10 February 2015   Published: 29 May 2015

Abstract

Western Australian grain production is dominated by wheat, but growing wheat continually in unbroken sequences leads to increasing problems with soil nutrient depletion, root and leaf disease build-up, high weed burdens, and possibly other less well-defined production constraints. These can adversely affect both production and grain quality. Including breaks in the crop sequence in the form of break crops, pasture, or fallow can reduce these problems, but these breaks can be expensive to implement, in terms of both direct cost and forgone revenue. It is therefore critical to predict the response of subsequent wheat crops to a break in order to choose crop sequences rationally.

We conducted a 4-year experiment at Wongan Hills, Western Australia, evaluating how wheat productivity in a wheat-based cropping sequence is affected by including wheat, barley, lupins, triazine-tolerant and Roundup Ready® canola, oaten hay, volunteer pasture, serradella pasture, and chemical fallow. Wheat yield responded positively to fallow, lupins, oaten hay, volunteer pastures and serradella but not to barley or canola when compared with continuous wheat. Responses depended on seasonal conditions; in a dry year, a very large response occurred after fallow but not after lupin or serradella, whereas in a wetter year, there were large responses after these crops. Fallowing, cutting hay, crop-topping lupins, and spray-topping volunteer and serradella pasture all reduced seedset of annual ryegrass dramatically, and reduced weed competition was a major contributor to the observed break crop responses. Nitrogen fixation by lupins and serradella and water storage by fallow in a dry year were also important, but soilborne diseases did not contribute to wheat yield responses. Some yield responses persisted for at least 3 years, and the contribution of effects of weed competition to yield responses increased over this time. These results emphasise the importance of understanding which productivity constraints are present in a cropping system at a given time when deciding whether a break is necessary and which is the most appropriate break. The results also emphasise the importance of managing the wheat crop after a break to maximise the response and its longevity.


References

Anderson WK, Garlinge JR (Eds) (2000) ‘The wheat book: principles and practice.’ 2nd edn (Department of Agriculture, Western Australia: South Perth, W. Aust.)

Angus JF, Herwaarden AF, Howe GN (1991) Productivity and break crop effects of winter-growing oilseeds. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 31, 669–677.
Productivity and break crop effects of winter-growing oilseeds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Asseng S, Fillery IRP, Gregory PJ (1998) Wheat response to alternative crops on a duplex soil. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 38, 481–488.
Wheat response to alternative crops on a duplex soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chauvel B, Guillemin JP, Colbach N, Gasquez J (2001) Evaluation of cropping systems for management of herbicide-resistant populations of blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds.). Crop Protection 20, 127–137.
Evaluation of cropping systems for management of herbicide-resistant populations of blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cheam A, Lee S (2009) Inversion ploughing: Effects of long-term deep burial on weed seed reserves. In ‘Agribusiness Crop Updates’. 24–25 February 2009. (Department of Agriculture and Food, WA: South Perth, W. Aust.)

French RJ, Malik RS, Seymour M (2012) Sequence effects on cropping system productivity and profitability in two environments in Western Australia. In ‘Proceedings 16th Australian Agronomy Conference’. 14–18 October 2012, Armidale, NSW. (Ed. I Yunusa) (Australian Society of Agronomy/The Regional Institute: Gosford, NSW) Available at: www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2012/crop-production/8211_frenchrj.htms

Gabriel KR (1971) The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika 58, 453–467.
The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gbur EE, Stroup WW, McCarter KS, Durham S, Young LJ, Christman M, West M, Kramer M (2012) ‘Analysis of generalized linear mixed models in the agricultural and natural resources sciences.’ (American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA)

Gilmour AR, Thompson R, Cullis BR (1997) Accounting for natural and extraneous variation in the analysis of field experiments. Journal of Agricultural Biological & Environmental Statistics 2, 269–293.
Accounting for natural and extraneous variation in the analysis of field experiments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gregory PJ (1998) Alternative crops for duplex soils: growth and water use of some cereal, legume, and oilseed crops, and pastures. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 21–32.
Alternative crops for duplex soils: growth and water use of some cereal, legume, and oilseed crops, and pastures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Harries M, Anderson GC, Hüberli D (2015) Crop sequences in Western Australia: what are they and are they sustainable? Findings of a four-year survey. Crop & Pasture Science 66, 634–647.

Heenan DP, Taylor AC, Cullis BR, Lill WJ (1994) Long term effects of rotation, tillage and stubble management on wheat production in southern N.S.W. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 93–117.
Long term effects of rotation, tillage and stubble management on wheat production in southern N.S.W.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Isbell RF (2002) ‘The Australian Soil Classification.’ 2nd edn (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Kingwell RS, Pannell DJ (Eds) (1987) ‘MIDAS, a bioeconomic model of a dryland farm system.’ (Pudoc: Wageningen, The Netherlands)

Kingwell RS, Morrison DA, Bathgate AB (1992) The effects of climatic risk on dryland farm management. Agricultural Systems 39, 153–175.
The effects of climatic risk on dryland farm management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kirkegaard JA, Gardner PA, Angus JF, Koetz E (1994) Effect of Brassica break crops on the growth and yield of wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 529–545.
Effect of Brassica break crops on the growth and yield of wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kirkegaard JA, Hocking PJ, Angus JF, Howe GN, Gardner PA (1997) Comparison of canola, Indian mustard and Linola in two contrasting environments. II. Break-crop and nitrogen effects on subsequent wheat crops. Field Crops Research 52, 179–191.
Comparison of canola, Indian mustard and Linola in two contrasting environments. II. Break-crop and nitrogen effects on subsequent wheat crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kirkegaard JA, Howe GN, Pitson G (2001) Agronomic interactions between drought and crop sequence. In ‘Proceedings 10th Australian Agronomy Conference’. Hobart, Tas. (Eds B. Rowe, D. Donaghy, N. Mendham) (Australian Society of Agronomy/The Regional Institute: Gosford, NSW) Available at: www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2001/4/c/kirkegaard1.htm

Kirkegaard JA, Simpfendorfer S, Holland J, Bambach R, Moore KJ, Rebetzke GJ (2004) Effects of previous crops on crown rot and yield of durum and bread wheat in northern NSW. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 321–334.
Effects of previous crops on crown rot and yield of durum and bread wheat in northern NSW.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kirkegaard J, Christen O, Krupinsky J, Layzell D (2008) Break crop benefits in temperate wheat production. Field Crops Research 107, 185–195.
Break crop benefits in temperate wheat production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Krupinsky JM, Tanaka DL, Merrill SD, Liebig MA, Hanson JD (2006) Crop sequence effects of 10 crops in the northern Great Plains. Agricultural Systems 88, 227–254.
Crop sequence effects of 10 crops in the northern Great Plains.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Krupinsky JM, Tanaka DL, Merrill SD, Liebig MA, Hanson JD (2007) Crop sequence effects on leaf spot diseases of no-till wheat. Agronomy Journal 99, 912–920.
Crop sequence effects on leaf spot diseases of no-till wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lawes R, Renton M (2010) The Land Use Sequence Optimiser (LUSO): A theoretical framework for analysing crop sequences in response to nitrogen, disease and weed populations. Crop & Pasture Science 61, 835–843.
The Land Use Sequence Optimiser (LUSO): A theoretical framework for analysing crop sequences in response to nitrogen, disease and weed populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lawes RA, Gupta VVSR, Kirkegaard JA, Roget DK (2013) Evaluating the contribution of take-all control to the break-crop effect in wheat. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 563–572.
Evaluating the contribution of take-all control to the break-crop effect in wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Malik RS, Seymour M, French RJ, Kirkegaard JA, Lawes RA, Liebig MA (2015) Dynamic crop sequencing in Western Australian cropping systems. Crop & Pasture Science 66, 594–609.

McConnell G, O’Hare N (2013) Break crop economics for the Kwinana East RSCN. Report for GRDC. Planfarm, Wembley, W. Aust. Available at: www.gga.org.au/files/files/1233_Planfarm_GRDC_RSCN_Breakcrop_Economics_2013_Final.pdf

McDonald RC, Isbell RF (2009) Soil profile. In ‘Australian soil and land survey field handbook’. 3rd edn. pp. 147–204. (The National Committee on Soil and Terrain/CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Monjardino M, Pannell DJ, Powles SB (2004) The economic value of haying and green manuring in the integrated management of annual ryegrass and wild radish in a Western Australian farming system. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 1195–1203.
The economic value of haying and green manuring in the integrated management of annual ryegrass and wild radish in a Western Australian farming system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Newman P, Davies S (2009) Mouldboard plough—the answer to all of the problems with sandplain farming. Agribusiness Crop Updates, 24–25 February. Department of Agriculture and Food, WA, South Perth, W. Aust.

Ophel-Keller K, McKay A, Hartley D, Herdina , Curran J (2008) Development of a routine DNA-based testing service for soilborne diseases in Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology 37, 243–253.
Development of a routine DNA-based testing service for soilborne diseases in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXktVChtro%3D&md5=8407230895afd239b93c023ab4da8e79CAS |

Pannell DJ, Stewart V, Bennett A, Monjardino M, Schmidt C, Powles SB (2004) RIM: a bioeconomic model for integrated weed management of Lolium rigidum in Western Australia. Agricultural Systems 79, 305–325.
RIM: a bioeconomic model for integrated weed management of Lolium rigidum in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Robertson MJ, Lawes RA, Bathgate A, Byrne F, White P, Sands R (2010) Determinants of the proportion of break crops on Western Australian broadacre farms. Crop & Pasture Science 61, 203–213.
Determinants of the proportion of break crops on Western Australian broadacre farms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rowland IC, Mason MG, Hamblin J (1988) Effect of lupins and wheat on the yield of subsequent wheat crops grown at several rates of applied nitrogen. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 28, 91–97.
Effect of lupins and wheat on the yield of subsequent wheat crops grown at several rates of applied nitrogen.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schoknecht N (2002) ‘Soil Groups of Western Australia. A simple guide to the main soils of Western Australia.’ 3rd edn (Department of Agriculture, WA: South Perth, W. Aust.)

Seymour M, Kirkegaard JA, Peoples MB, White PF, French RJ (2012) Break-crop benefits to wheat in Western Australia-insights from over three decades of research. Crop & Pasture Science 63, 1–16.
Break-crop benefits to wheat in Western Australia-insights from over three decades of research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stevenson FC, van Kessel C (1996) A landscape-scale assessment of the nitrogen and non-nitrogen rotation benefits of pea. Soil Science Society of America Journal 60, 1797–1805.
A landscape-scale assessment of the nitrogen and non-nitrogen rotation benefits of pea.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXjsVCisA%3D%3D&md5=f4a614889f540625c60d34bdd31da548CAS |

Tanaka DL, Krupinsky JM, Liebig MA, Merrill SD, Ries RE, Hendrickson JR, Johnson HA, Hanson JD (2002) Dynamic cropping systems: An adaptable approach to crop production in the Great Plains. Agronomy Journal 94, 957–961.
Dynamic cropping systems: An adaptable approach to crop production in the Great Plains.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tanaka DL, Krupinsky JM, Merrill SD, Liebig MA, Hanson JD (2007) Dynamic cropping systems for sustainable crop production in the Northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal 99, 904–911.
Dynamic cropping systems for sustainable crop production in the Northern Great Plains.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van Heerwarden AF, Farquhar GD, Angus JA, Richards RA, Howe GN (1998) ‘Haying-off’, the negative grain yield response of dryland wheat to nitrogen fertilizer. I. Biomass, grain yield, and water use. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 1067–1081.
‘Haying-off’, the negative grain yield response of dryland wheat to nitrogen fertilizer. I. Biomass, grain yield, and water use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |