Effect of defoliation by grazing or shoot removal on the root growth of field-grown wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
J. A. Kirkegaard A C , J. M. Lilley A , J. R. Hunt A , S. J. Sprague A , N. K. Ytting B , I. S. Rasmussen B and J. M. Graham AA CSIRO Agriculture Flagship, CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
B Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Højbakkegård Allé 13, 2630 Taastrup, Denmark.
C Corresponding author. Email: John.Kirkegaard@csiro.au
Crop and Pasture Science 66(4) 249-259 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP14241
Submitted: 22 August 2014 Accepted: 31 October 2014 Published: 31 March 2015
Abstract
Dual-purpose crops for grazing and grain production can be highly profitable, provided grazing does not cause significant loss of grain yield. In many plants, defoliation causes a transient reduction in the allocation of resources to stem and root growth and remobilisation of soluble resources to re-establish leaf area rapidly. In Australia, the usual autumn and winter period of defoliation for grazed crops, May–July, coincides with a phase of near-linear root depth penetration in ungrazed crops, and the crop recovery period after grazing occurs during stem elongation, when grain number and yield potential are determined. However, few studies have investigated the potential impact of crop defoliation through grazing on root growth of wheat in the field. We investigated the effect of defoliation by grazing or shoot removal on the root growth of wheat crops in four field experiments in south-eastern Australia in which the timing, frequency and intensity of defoliation varied. Despite significant impacts of defoliation on aboveground biomass (50–90% reduction) and grain yield (10–43% reduction) in all experiments, we found little evidence of effects on the rate of root penetration or final rooting depth. A notable exception was observed in one experiment when defoliation commenced very early (four-leaf stage, Zadoks growth stage Z14) in a repeatedly defoliated crop, reducing rooting depth from 1.65 to 1.35 m. The only other measured impact on roots was in an early-sown winter wheat crop grazed by sheep for 3 months (6 June–3 September), in which root length density was reduced by ~50% in surface layers above 1.0 m depth, but there was no impact on maximum root depth or root length density at 1.0–2.0 m depth. Our results suggest that grazing has little impact on the rooting depth of wheat unless it occurs very early and repeatedly, when plants are allocating significant resources to establish the primary roots. However, there may be some reduction in the density of roots in surface layers during recovery after long-term grazing, presumably associated with reduced proliferation of the nodal root system. We conclude that most significant yield penalties due to grazing relate to impacts on the assimilation of aboveground resources, rather than to reduced water or nutrient acquisition by roots.
Additional keywords: dual-purpose crops, root depth, root length density, root penetration rate, water uptake.
References
Barrett PD, Laidlaw AS, Mayne CS (2005) GrazeGro: a European herbage growth model to predict pasture production in perennial ryegrass swards for decision support. European Journal of Agronomy 23, 37–56.| GrazeGro: a European herbage growth model to predict pasture production in perennial ryegrass swards for decision support.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bell LW, Moore AD, Kirkegaard JA (2014) Evolution in crop–livestock integration systems that improve farm productivity and environmental performance in Australia. European Journal of Agronomy 57, 10–20.
| Evolution in crop–livestock integration systems that improve farm productivity and environmental performance in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Christiansen S, Svejcar T (1988) Grazing effects on shoot and root dynamics and aboveground and below-ground non-structural carbohydrate in Caucasian bluestem. Grass and Forage Science 43, 111–119.
| Grazing effects on shoot and root dynamics and aboveground and below-ground non-structural carbohydrate in Caucasian bluestem.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dove H, Kirkegaard JA (2014) Using dual-purpose crops in sheep-grazing systems: a review. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 94, 1276–1283.
| Using dual-purpose crops in sheep-grazing systems: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXht1ygsLs%3D&md5=e5396dcaf916cf7ee15915a02e4f4f50CAS | 24323974PubMed |
Gao YZ, Giese M, Lin S, Sattelmacher B, Zhao Y, Brueck H (2008) Belowground net primary productivity and biomass allocation of a grassland in Inner Mongolia is affected by grazing intensity. Plant and Soil 307, 41–50.
| Belowground net primary productivity and biomass allocation of a grassland in Inner Mongolia is affected by grazing intensity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXlsV2ktbo%3D&md5=818e0d1f0ab1bc6e24057c7206b4b1a8CAS |
Gregory PJ (2006) ‘Plant roots: Growth, activity and interaction with soils.’ (Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK)
Gregory PJ, Atwell BJ (1991) The fate of carbon in pulse-labelled crops of barley and wheat. Plant and Soil 136, 205–213.
| The fate of carbon in pulse-labelled crops of barley and wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK3MXmtlWiurs%3D&md5=7b97b7685fc3edb36976daad7132df08CAS |
Gregory PJ, McGowan M, Biscoe PV, Hunter B (1978) Water relations of winter wheat: 1. Growth of the root system. The Journal of Agricultural Science 91, 91–102.
| Water relations of winter wheat: 1. Growth of the root system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harrison MT (2010) Modelling the physiological dynamics of winter wheat after grazing. PhD Thesis, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Harrison MT, Kelman WM, Moore AD, Evans JR (2010) Grazing winter wheat relieves plant water stress and transiently increases photosynthesis. Functional Plant Biology 37, 726–736.
| Grazing winter wheat relieves plant water stress and transiently increases photosynthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXpt1Ckt7Y%3D&md5=61004caeabd446ae6436579df0a66aeaCAS |
Harrison MT, Evans JR, Dove H, Moore AD (2011) Dual-purpose cereals: can the relative influences of management and environment on crop recovery and grain yield be dissected? Crop & Pasture Science 62, 930–946.
| Dual-purpose cereals: can the relative influences of management and environment on crop recovery and grain yield be dissected?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harrison MT, Evans JR, Moore AD (2012) Using a mathematical framework to examine physiological changes in winter wheat after livestock grazing: 2. Model validation and effects of grazing management. Field Crops Research 136, 127–137.
| Using a mathematical framework to examine physiological changes in winter wheat after livestock grazing: 2. Model validation and effects of grazing management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Isbell RF (2002) ‘The Australian Soil Classification.’ Revised edn (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)
Kirkegaard JA, Lilley JM (2007) Root penetration rate—a benchmark to identify soil and plant limitations to rooting depth in wheat. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 590–602.
| Root penetration rate—a benchmark to identify soil and plant limitations to rooting depth in wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirkegaard JA, Lilley JM, Howe GN, Graham JN (2007) Impact of subsoil water use on wheat yield. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 303–315.
| Impact of subsoil water use on wheat yield.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Klepper B, Belford RK, Rickman RW (1984) Root and shoot development in winter wheat. Agronomy Journal 76, 117–122.
| Root and shoot development in winter wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Matches AG (1992) Plant response to grazing: a review. Journal of Production Agriculture 5, 1–7.
| Plant response to grazing: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McCormick JI, Virgona JM, Kirkegaard JA (2012) Growth and yield of dual-purpose canola (Brassica napus) under drier inland seasonal conditions of south-eastern Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 63, 635–646.
| Growth and yield of dual-purpose canola (Brassica napus) under drier inland seasonal conditions of south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McCormick JI, Virgona JM, Kirkegaard JA (2013) Regrowth of spring canola (Brassica napus) after defoliation. Plant and Soil 372, 655–668.
| Regrowth of spring canola (Brassica napus) after defoliation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXovFCltr0%3D&md5=c3160c18c185e369e4b71d416b097127CAS |
Richards JH (1993) Physiology of plants recovering from defoliation. In ‘Proceedings of the XVII International Grassland Congress’. Palmerston North, New Zealand. pp. 85–94. (International Grasslands Congress)
Sadras VO, Lawson C (2011) Genetic gain in yield and associated changes in phenotype, trait plasticity and competitive ability of South Australian wheats released between 1958 and 2007. Crop & Pasture Science 62, 533–549.
Smucker AJM, McBurney SL, Srivastava AK (1982) Quantitative separation of roots from compacted soil profiles by the hydropneumatic elutriation systems. Agronomy Journal 74, 500–503.
| Quantitative separation of roots from compacted soil profiles by the hydropneumatic elutriation systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thorup-Kristensen K, Cortasa MS, Loges R (2009) Winter wheat roots grow twice as deep as spring wheat roots, is this important for N uptake and N leaching losses? Plant and Soil 322, 101–114.
| Winter wheat roots grow twice as deep as spring wheat roots, is this important for N uptake and N leaching losses?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtVWisrbK&md5=0d66098028db29bdf04d66e237229aa9CAS |
Virgona JM, Gummer FAJ, Angus JF (2006) Effects of grazing on wheat growth, yield, development, water use, and nitrogen use. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 1307–1319.
| Effects of grazing on wheat growth, yield, development, water use, and nitrogen use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wasson AP, Rebetzke GJ, Kirkegaard JA, Christopher J, Richards RA, Watt M (2014) Soil coring at multiple field environments can directly quantify variation in deep root traits to select wheat genotypes for breeding. Journal of Experimental Botany 65, 6231–6249.
| Soil coring at multiple field environments can directly quantify variation in deep root traits to select wheat genotypes for breeding.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXitl2gsbY%3D&md5=c8a3f7193e6b41768d35b0d3e1d998a9CAS | 24963000PubMed |
Watt M, Magee L, McCully ME (2008) Types, structure and potential for axial water flow in the deepest roots of field-grown cereals. New Phytologist 178, 135–146.
| Types, structure and potential for axial water flow in the deepest roots of field-grown cereals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18221246PubMed |
Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) Decimal code for growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.
| Decimal code for growth stages of cereals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
