Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Gaining insight into the risks, returns and value of perfect knowledge for crop sequences by comparing optimal sequences with those proposed by agronomists

Roger Lawes A C and Michael Renton B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO Agriculture Flagship, Private Bag 5, Wembley, WA 6913, Australia.

B University of Western Australia, School of Plant Biology, Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: roger.lawes@csiro.au

Crop and Pasture Science 66(6) 622-633 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP14185
Submitted: 8 July 2014  Accepted: 19 December 2014   Published: 29 May 2015

Abstract

Crop rotation, in which a legume, pasture, fallow or oilseed ‘break crop’ is grown after a cereal crop to manage soil-borne disease and weeds and, on occasions, to fix nitrogen, is one of the oldest techniques in agriculture. Valuing of crop rotations is complicated because the profitability of particular crop species changes with the prevalence of biotic stresses and varies with seasonal factors such as rainfall. With the Land Use Sequence Optimiser (LUSO) and the Agricultural Production Systems Simulator (APSIM) crop model, we generate an optimum land-use strategy for various biotic stresses and land-use options for a semi-arid grain-growing region in Australia. Over a 10-year time horizon, we compare the performance and variability of an optimal sequence with three sequences recommended by local agronomists. The agronomists recommended strategic sequences to manage weeds and disease and to maximise profit. The optimal crop sequence, with perfect knowledge, selected a mixture of grain legume, oilseed, cereal crops and pastures to manage biotic stresses and generate profit. This sequence precisely timed a period of exploitation, when high-profit crops were repeatedly grown and the biotic stresses increase, with a period of rehabilitation, when low-profit break crops are grown to reduce the biotic stresses. The agronomists’ strategic sequences were either slightly more exploitative, grew more crops and allowed the biotic stresses to increase, or were more conservative and grew fewer profitable crops while managing the biotic stresses. Both strategic approaches were less profitable than the optimal crop sequence. The value of knowledge about a particular stress increases as its rate of accumulation in the farming system increases. With high levels of biotic weed stress, perfect knowledge was worth an additional AU$73 ha–1 year–1. In scenarios with lower levels of biotic weed stress, perfect knowledge was worth just $24 ha–1 year–1. Several measures of risk were defined, but there was no trade-off between profit and risk. Variability at the crop or enterprise scale did not necessarily translate into variability in profit when viewed over 10 years. Tools such as LUSO can help to determine the optimal crop sequence for a given series of enterprise options and a given level of biotic stress and explore the variability and risk associated with different enterprise choices.

Additional keywords: break crops, crop sequence, crops, pastures, risk, variability.


References

Angus JF, van Herwaarden AF, Howe GN (1991) Productivity and break-crop effect of winter growing oilseeds. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 31, 669–677.
Productivity and break-crop effect of winter growing oilseeds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Angus J, Kirkegaard J, Peoples M, Ryan M, Ohlander L, Hufton L (2011) A review of break crop benefits of Brassicas. In ‘Proceedings 17th Australian Research Assembly on Brassicas (ARAB)’. Wagga Wagga, NSW. (Australian Oilseeds Federation: Sydney) Available at: www.australianoilseeds.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/8294/S6-P1-Angus.pdf

Brennan RF, Bolland MDA, Ramm RD (2013) Changes in chemical properties of sandy duplex soils in 11 paddocks over 21 years in the low rainfall cropping zone of southwestern Australia. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 44, 1885–1908.
Changes in chemical properties of sandy duplex soils in 11 paddocks over 21 years in the low rainfall cropping zone of southwestern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXosVCht7k%3D&md5=0757180ba0f3a3e20dfeaafb90622fa8CAS |

Browne C, Hunt JR, McBeath TM (2012) Break crops pay in the Victorian Mallee. In ‘Proceedings 16th Australian Agronomy Conference’. Armidale, NSW. pp. 1–6. (Australian Society of Agronomy/The regional Institute: Gosford, NSW) Available at: www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2012/crop-production/7955_brownecj.htm

Cousens R, Moss SR, Cussans GW, Wilson BJ (1987) Modeling weed populations in cereals. Reviews of Weed Science 3, 93–112.

Dalgliesh NP, Foale MA (1998) ‘Soil matters: monitoring soil water and nutrients in dryland farming.’ Technical Manual. (CSIRO/Agricultural Production Systems Research Unit: Toowoomba, Qld)

Denton MD, Coventry DR, Bellotti WD, Howieson JG (2011) Nitrogen fixation in annual Trifolium species in alkaline soils as assessed by the 15N natural abundance method. Crop & Pasture Science 62, 712–720.
Nitrogen fixation in annual Trifolium species in alkaline soils as assessed by the 15N natural abundance method.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Doole GJ, Pannell DJ (2008) Optimisation of a large, constrained simulation model using compressed annealing. Journal of Agricultural Economics 59, 188–206.
Optimisation of a large, constrained simulation model using compressed annealing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Flower KC, Cordingley N, Ward PR, Weeks C (2012) Nitrogen, weed management and economics with cover crops in conservation agriculture in a Mediterranean climate. Field Crops Research 132, 63–75.
Nitrogen, weed management and economics with cover crops in conservation agriculture in a Mediterranean climate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Harries M, Anderson GC, Hüberli D (2015) Crop sequences in Western Australia: what are they and are they sustainable? Findings of a four-year survey. Crop & Pasture Science 66, 634–647.

Hochman Z, Gobbett D, Holzworth D, McClelland T, Van Rees H, Marinoni O, Garcia JN, Horan H (2012) Quantifying yield gaps in rainfed cropping systems: a case study of wheat in Australia. Field Crops Research 136, 85–96.
Quantifying yield gaps in rainfed cropping systems: a case study of wheat in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Holzworth DP, Huth NI, deVoil PG, Zurcher EJ, Herrmann NI, McLean G, Chenu K, van Oosterom E, Snow VO, Murphy C, Moore AD, Brown HE, Whish JPM, Verrall S, Fainges J, Peake AS, Poulton PL, Hochman Z, Thorburn PJ, Gaydon DS, Dalgliesh NP, Rodriguez D, Cox H, Chapman S, Doherty A, Teixeira E, Sharp J, Cichota R, Vogeler I, Li FY, Wang E, Hammer GL, Robertson MJ, Dimes J, Carberry PS, Hargreaves JNG, MacLeod N, McDonald C, Harsdorf J, Wedgwood S, Keating BA (2014) APSIM—Evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation. Environmental Modelling & Software 62, 327–350.
APSIM—Evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hunt JR, Kirkegaard JA (2011) Re-evaluating the contribution of summer fallow rain to wheat yield in southern Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 62, 915–929.
Re-evaluating the contribution of summer fallow rain to wheat yield in southern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Isbell R (2002) ‘The Australian Soil Classification.’ Revised edn (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Kirkegaard JA, Hunt JR (2010) Increasing productivity by matching farming system management and genotype in water-limited environments. Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 4129–4143.
Increasing productivity by matching farming system management and genotype in water-limited environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhtlShtLnL&md5=8cb09264e5128e73bb3de9b88c12bd3bCAS | 20709725PubMed |

Kirkegaard J, Ryan M (2014) Magnitude and mechanisms of persistent crop sequence effects on wheat. Field Crops Research 164, 154–165.
Magnitude and mechanisms of persistent crop sequence effects on wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kirkegaard JA, Hocking PJ, Angus JF, Howe GN, Gardner PA (1997) Comparison of canola, Indian mustard and Linola in two contrasting environments. II. Break-crop and nitrogen effects on subsequent wheat crops. Field Crops Research 52, 179–191.
Comparison of canola, Indian mustard and Linola in two contrasting environments. II. Break-crop and nitrogen effects on subsequent wheat crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kirkegaard JA, Sarwar M, Wong PTW, Mead A, Howe G, Newell M (2000) Field studies on the biofumigation of take-all by Brassica break crops. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 445–456.
Field studies on the biofumigation of take-all by Brassica break crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kirkegaard J, Christen O, Krupinsky J, Layzell D (2008) Break crop benefits in temperate wheat production. Field Crops Research 107, 185–195.
Break crop benefits in temperate wheat production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lawes R, Renton M (2010) The Land Use Sequence Optimiser (LUSO): A theoretical framework for analysing crop sequences in response to nitrogen, disease and weed populations. Crop & Pasture Science 61, 835–843.
The Land Use Sequence Optimiser (LUSO): A theoretical framework for analysing crop sequences in response to nitrogen, disease and weed populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lawes RA, Gupta VVSR, Kirkegaard JA, Roget DK (2013) Evaluating the contribution of take-all control to the break-crop effect in wheat. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 563–572.
Evaluating the contribution of take-all control to the break-crop effect in wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Llewellyn RS, Lindner RK, Pannell DJ, Powles SB (2007) Herbicide resistance and the adoption of integrated weed management by Western Australian grain growers. Agricultural Economics 36, 123–130.
Herbicide resistance and the adoption of integrated weed management by Western Australian grain growers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Monjardino M, Pannell DJ, Powles SB (2004) The economic value of haying and green manuring in the integrated management of annual ryegrass and wild radish in a Western Australian farming system. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 1195–1203.
The economic value of haying and green manuring in the integrated management of annual ryegrass and wild radish in a Western Australian farming system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Monjardino M, McBeath TM, Brennan L (2013) Are farmers in low-rainfall cropping regions under-fertilising with nitrogen? A risk analysis. Agricultural Systems 116, 37–51.
Are farmers in low-rainfall cropping regions under-fertilising with nitrogen? A risk analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pannell DJ, Stewart V, Bennett A, Monjardino M, Schmidt C, Powles SB (2004) RIM: A bioeconomic model for integrated weed management of Lolium rigidum in Western Australia. Agricultural Systems 79, 305–325.
RIM: A bioeconomic model for integrated weed management of Lolium rigidum in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Parsons D, Benjamin L, Clarke J, Ginsburg D, Mayes A, Milne A, Wilkinson D (2009) Weed Manager—a model-based decision support system for weed management in arable crops. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 65, 155–167.
Weed Manager—a model-based decision support system for weed management in arable crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Renton M (2011) How much detail and accuracy is required in plant growth sub-models to address questions about optimal management strategies in agricultural systems? AoB Plants 2011, plr006
How much detail and accuracy is required in plant growth sub-models to address questions about optimal management strategies in agricultural systems?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22476477PubMed |

Robertson MJ, Lawes RA, Bathgate A (2010) Determinants of the proportion of break crops on Western Australian broadacre farms. Crop & Pasture Science 61, 203–213.
Determinants of the proportion of break crops on Western Australian broadacre farms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Russell C, Fillery I (1996) Estimates of lupin below-ground biomass nitrogen, dry matter, and nitrogen turnover to wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 1047–1059.
Estimates of lupin below-ground biomass nitrogen, dry matter, and nitrogen turnover to wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK28XlvFOiu7g%3D&md5=89a5aae2e7eb97784f0089dec363f57fCAS |

Russell CA, Fillery IRP (1999) Turnover of nitrogen from components of lupin stubble to wheat in sandy soil. Soil Research 37, 575–592.
Turnover of nitrogen from components of lupin stubble to wheat in sandy soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Seymour M, Kirkegaard JA, Peoples MB, White PF, French RJ (2012) Break-crop benefits to wheat in Western Australia—insights from over three decades of research. Crop & Pasture Science 63, 1–16.
Break-crop benefits to wheat in Western Australia—insights from over three decades of research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van Rees H, McClelland T, Hochman Z, Carberry P, Hunt J, Huth N, Holzworth D (2014) Leading farmers in South East Australia have closed the exploitable wheat yield gap: prospects for further improvement. Field Crops Research 164, 1–11.
Leading farmers in South East Australia have closed the exploitable wheat yield gap: prospects for further improvement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Whish JPM, Herrman NI, White NA, Moore AD, Kriticos DJ (2014) Integrating pest population models with biophysical crop models to better represent the farming system. Environmental Modelling & Software
Integrating pest population models with biophysical crop models to better represent the farming system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | In press.