Competitive ability of Australian canola (Brassica napus) genotypes for weed management
Deirdre Lemerle A B D , David J. Luckett A C , Peter Lockley C , Eric Koetz C and Hanwen Wu A C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (an alliance between Charles Sturt University and NSW Department of Primary Industries).
B School of Agricultural and Wine Sciences, Charles Sturt University, PMB 588, Wagga Wagga NSW 2678, Australia.
C Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, NSW Department of Primary Industries, PMB, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: dlemerle@csu.edu.au
Crop and Pasture Science 65(12) 1300-1310 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP14125
Submitted: 23 April 2014 Accepted: 29 July 2014 Published: 5 November 2014
Abstract
Canola (Brassica napus L.) is an important break crop in Australian cropping systems but weeds are a major cost to production and herbicide-resistant weeds are spreading. The potential competitive ability of canola genotypes to both suppress weed growth and maintain grain yield and quality in the presence of weeds has not been determined in Australia. Two experiments examined the range in competitive ability of 16 B. napus genotypes against annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum Gaud.) and volunteer wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) over two contrasting seasons. Weed biomass at flowering was generally reduced 50% more in the presence of the strongly competitive genotypes than the least competitive, and this has significant benefits for lower weed seed production and reduced seedbank replenishment. Suppression of weed growth was negatively correlated with crop biomass. Significant differences in grain yield of canola were recorded between weedy and weed-free plots, depending on crop genotype, presence of weeds and season. Crop yield tolerance (where 0% = no tolerance and 100% = complete tolerance) to ryegrass competition ranged from 0% (e.g. with CB-Argyle) to 30–40% (e.g. with the hybrids 46Y78 and Hyola-50) in the dry season of 2009. Yield tolerance was higher (50–100%) with the lower densities of volunteer wheat and in the 2010 season. The range between genotypes was similar for both conditions. The hybrids and AV-Garnet were higher yielding and more competitive than the triazine-tolerant cultivars. The ranking of genotypes for competitiveness was strongly influenced by seasonal conditions; some genotypes were consistently more competitive than others. Competitive crops are a low-cost tactic for integrated weed management to reduce dependence on herbicides and retard the spread of herbicide-resistant weeds.
Additional keywords: canola competition ideotype, crop tolerance to weeds, herbicide resistance, interference, cultivar weed suppression.
References
Angadi SV, Cutforth HW, McConkey BG, Gan Y (2003) Yield adjustment by canola grown at different plant populations under semiarid conditions. Crop Science 43, 1358–1366.| Yield adjustment by canola grown at different plant populations under semiarid conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Arthur A, Morgan C (1998) Influencing crop canopy development in oilseed rape through genetic variation. GCIRC Bulletin 15, 67–73.
Asaduzzaman M, An M, Pratley JE, Luckett DJ, Lemerle D (2014a) Canola (Brassica napus) germplasm shows variable allelopathic effects against annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). Plant and Soil 380, 47–56.
| Canola (Brassica napus) germplasm shows variable allelopathic effects against annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXis1Gjt7w%3D&md5=b001a2a07dc84dffb45830ea90fe498cCAS |
Asaduzzaman M, Luckett DJ, Cowley RB, An M, Pratley JE, Lemerle D (2014b) Canola cultivar performance in weed-infested field plots confirms allelopathy ranking from in vitro testing. Biocontrol Science and Technology
| Canola cultivar performance in weed-infested field plots confirms allelopathy ranking from in vitro testing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Beckie HJ, Johnson EN, Blackshaw RE, Gan Y (2008) Weed suppression by canola and mustard cultivars. Weed Technology 22, 182–185.
| Weed suppression by canola and mustard cultivars.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bertholdsson NO (2011) Use of multivariate statistics to separate allelopathic and competitive factors influencing weed suppression ability in winter wheat. Weed Research 51, 273–283.
| Use of multivariate statistics to separate allelopathic and competitive factors influencing weed suppression ability in winter wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Blackshaw RE, Anderson RL, Lemerle D (2007) Cultural weed management . In ‘Non-chemical weed management’. (Eds MK Upadhyaya, B Blackshaw) pp. 35–47. (CAB Press)
Broster JC, Koetz EA, Wu H (2011) Herbicide resistance levels in annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum Gaud.) in southern New South Wales. Plant Protection Quarterly 26, 22–28.
Broster JC, Koetz EA, Wu H (2013) Herbicide resistance levels in annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum Gaud.) and wild oats (Avena spp.) in western New South Wales. Plant Protection Quarterly 28, 126–132.
Butler DG, Cullis BR, Gilmour AR, Gogle BJ (2009) ASReml-R reference manual, release 3. Technical Report. Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane, Qld.
Cipollini DF, Bergelson J (2002) Interspecific competition affects growth and herbivore damage of Brassica napus in the field. Plant Ecology 162, 227–231.
| Interspecific competition affects growth and herbivore damage of Brassica napus in the field.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Coleman RK, Gill GS, Rebetzke GJ (2001) Identification of quantitative trait loci for traits conferring weed competitiveness in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 1235–1246.
| Identification of quantitative trait loci for traits conferring weed competitiveness in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XltlOnuw%3D%3D&md5=e047d3058ced95ba5422b0eaa3b6a625CAS |
Diepenbrock W (2000) Yield analysis of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.): a review. Field Crops Research 67, 35–49.
| Yield analysis of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.): a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Donald CM, Hamblin J (1976) The biological yield and harvest index of cereals as agronomic and plant breeding criteria. Advances in Agronomy 28, 361–405.
| The biological yield and harvest index of cereals as agronomic and plant breeding criteria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Goldberg DE (1990) Components of resource allocation in plant communities. In ‘Perspectives in plant competition’. (Eds JB Grace, D Tilman) pp. 27–49. (Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA)
Harker KN, Clayton GW, Blackshaw RE, O’Donovan JT, Stevenson FC (2003) Seeding rate, herbicide timing and competitive hybrids contribute to integrated weed management in canola (Brassica napus). Canadian Journal of Plant Science 83, 433–440.
| Seeding rate, herbicide timing and competitive hybrids contribute to integrated weed management in canola (Brassica napus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harker KN, O’Donovan JT, Blackshaw RE, Johnson EN, Holm FA, Clayton GW (2011) Environmental effects on the relative competitive ability of canola and small-grained cereals in a direct-seeded system. Weed Science 59, 404–415.
| Environmental effects on the relative competitive ability of canola and small-grained cereals in a direct-seeded system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXptFWqt7s%3D&md5=528ce7ace6c1a565c5decd37e70e3d74CAS |
Heap IM (2014) The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds. Available at: www.weedscience.com (accessed 7 April 2014).
Hom N, Becker HC, Möllers C (2007) Non-destructive analysis of rapeseed quality by NIRS of small seed samples and single seeds. Euphytica 153, 27–34.
| Non-destructive analysis of rapeseed quality by NIRS of small seed samples and single seeds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtlWntbvF&md5=d23e3f08eda918a62d738e543273d0d6CAS |
Kleemann S, Gill GS (2009) Population ecology and management of rigid brome (Bromus rigidus) in Australian cropping systems. Weed Science 57, 202–207.
| Population ecology and management of rigid brome (Bromus rigidus) in Australian cropping systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjslSmtro%3D&md5=a6a29a6ae7bac4cc94202851b9dca59cCAS |
Lemerle D, Verbeek B, Coombes N (1995) Losses in grain yield of winter crops from Lolium rigidum competition depend on crop species, cultivar and season. Weed Research 35, 503–509.
| Losses in grain yield of winter crops from Lolium rigidum competition depend on crop species, cultivar and season.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lemerle D, Verbeek B, Cousens RD, Coombes N (1996) The potential for selecting wheat varieties strongly competitive against weeds. Weed Research 36, 505–513.
| The potential for selecting wheat varieties strongly competitive against weeds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lemerle D, Blackshaw RE, Smith AB, Potter TD, Marcroft SJ (2001a) Comparative survey of weeds surviving in triazine-tolerant and conventional canola crops in south-eastern Australia. Plant Protection Quarterly 16, 37–40.
Lemerle D, Gill GS, Murphy CE, Walker SR, Cousens RD, Mokhtari S, Peltzer S, Coleman R, Luckett DJ (2001b) Genetic improvement and agronomy for enhanced wheat competitiveness and weed management. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 527–548.
| Genetic improvement and agronomy for enhanced wheat competitiveness and weed management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lemerle D, Verbeek B, Orchard B (2001c) Ranking the ability of wheat cultivars to compete with Lolium rigidum. Weed Research 41, 197–209.
| Ranking the ability of wheat cultivars to compete with Lolium rigidum.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lemerle D, Cousens RD, Gill GS, Peltzer SJ, Moerkerk M, Murphy CE, Collins D, Cullis BR (2004) Reliability of higher seeding rates of wheat for increased competitiveness with weeds. The Journal of Agricultural Science 142, 395–409.
| Reliability of higher seeding rates of wheat for increased competitiveness with weeds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lemerle D, Lockley P, Koetz E, Diffey S (2013) Herbicide efficacy for control of annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum Gaud.) is influenced more by wheat seeding rate than row spacing. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 708–715.
| Herbicide efficacy for control of annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum Gaud.) is influenced more by wheat seeding rate than row spacing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhsF2ltLrM&md5=f8fa83e6bf04aee695dd6ac19fe22bb6CAS |
Lutman PJW, Dixon FL, Risiott R (1994) The response of four spring-sown combinable arable crops to weed competition. Weed Research 34, 137–146.
| The response of four spring-sown combinable arable crops to weed competition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Melander B (1993) Modelling the effects of Elymus repens (L.) Gould competition on yield of cereals, peas and oilseed rape. Weed Research 33, 99–108.
Mohler CL (2001) Enhancing the competitive ability of crops. In ‘Ecological management of agricultural weeds’. (Eds M Liebman, CL Mohler, CP Staver) (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)
Mokhtari S (1998) Environmental and genetic aspects of the ability of wheat cultivars to compete with annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). PhD Thesis, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Peltzer SC, Hashem A, Osten VA, Gupta ML, Diggle AJ, Riethmuller GP, Douglas A, Moore JA, Koetz EA (2009) Weed management in wide-row cropping systems: a review of current practices and risk for Australian farming systems. Crop & Pasture Science 60, 395–406.
| Weed management in wide-row cropping systems: a review of current practices and risk for Australian farming systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
R Core Team (2013) ‘R: A language and environment for statistical computing .’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna)
Sarkar D (2008) ‘Lattice: Multivariate data visualization with R.’ (Springer: New York)
Scott BJ, Martin P, Riethmuller G (2013) ‘Graham Centre Monograph No. 3: Row spacing of winter crops in broad scale agriculture in southern Australia.’ (Eds T Nugent, C Nicholls) (Industry & Investment NSW: Orange, NSW) Available at: http://csu.edu.au/research/grahamcentre/
Thurling N (1991) Application of the ideotype concept in breeding for higher yield in the oilseed brassicas. Field Crops Research 26, 201–219.
| Application of the ideotype concept in breeding for higher yield in the oilseed brassicas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Walker SR, Medd RW, Robinson GR, Cullis BR (2002) Improved management of Avena ludoviciana and Phalaris paradoxa with more densely sown wheat and less herbicide. Weed Research 42, 257–270.
| Improved management of Avena ludoviciana and Phalaris paradoxa with more densely sown wheat and less herbicide.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
