Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Pasture cropping with C4 grasses in a barley–lupin rotation can increase production

R. A. Lawes A D , P. R. Ward B and D. Ferris C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences and Sustainable Agricultural Flagship, Wembley, WA 6913, Australia.

B CSIRO Plant Industry and Sustainable Agricultural Flagship, Wembley, WA 6913, Australia.

C Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia, Grains Industry, Northam, WA 6401, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: roger.lawes@csiro.au

Crop and Pasture Science 65(10) 1002-1015 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP13442
Submitted: 16 December 2013  Accepted: 5 May 2014   Published: 7 October 2014

Abstract

In southern Australia, intercropping, pasture cropping and overcropping have evolved as techniques to address environmental problems such as dryland salinity and wind erosion and to utilise soil water outside the conventional winter-dominant growing season. We paired three winter-dormant pastures, including two subtropical C4 perennial species (Rhodes grass, Chloris gayana; Gatton panic, Megathyrsus maximus) and the summer-active perennial C3 legume siratro (Macroptilium atropurpureum), with a conventional barley (Hordeum vulgare)–lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) rotation to explore the extent to which different summer-active species reduced crop yields. We also examined whether the competition for resources could be altered by supplying increased nitrogen to the crop and changing the row spacing of the pasture.

Under high-input conditions, pasture reduced cereal crop yields by up to 26% and lupin yields by up to 29%. Under low-input conditions, pasture cropping did not significantly reduce crop yield, and frequently increased crop yields. With low inputs, barley yield increases in 2011 ranged from 23% to 31%. In lupins under low-input conditions, yield increases ranged from 91% to 106% in 2010 and from –6% to +39% in 2012. The impact of the crop on the pasture was less pronounced, where the timing of pasture growth was delayed by the crop, but absolute levels of production were not influenced by the crop. Row spacing altered the temporal dynamic of pasture production; initially, the pasture produced less than the narrow spaced equivalent, but after 2 years, production exceeded that in the narrow row. Across all pasture species in 2009 and 2012, winter pasture production reduced crop yield by 0.32 and 0.4 t grain/ha pasture biomass produced, implying that moderate yield losses occurred because pasture production was also moderate. In the other two years, winter pasture production did not affect crop yield, suggesting that the pasture was able to utilise resources surplus to crop requirements. In this environment, with this combination of crops and summer-active pastures, higher levels of inputs did not enhance crop yield in a pasture-cropping system. We suggest that grain yield losses are lower in the low-input system and this implies that, at some level, competition between the species was reduced in a nitrogen-limited environment and the extent of the competition depended on season.

Additional keywords: plant competition, pasture-cropping, over-cropping, barley, lupin, C4 grass, Mediterranean environment.


References

Angus JF, Gault RR, Good AJ, Hart AB, Jones TD, Peoples MB (2000) Lucerne removal before the cropping phase. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 877–890.
Lucerne removal before the cropping phase.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chen C, Westcott M, Neill K, Wichman D, Knox M (2004) Row configuration and nitrogen application for barley–pea intercropping in Montana. Agronomy Journal 96, 1730–1738.
Row configuration and nitrogen application for barley–pea intercropping in Montana.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Craig PR, Coventry D, Hocking-Edwards J (2013) Productivity advantage of crop–perennial pasture intercropping in southeastern Australia. Agronomy Journal 105, 1588–1596.
Productivity advantage of crop–perennial pasture intercropping in southeastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dalal RC (1974) Effects on intercropping maize with pigeon peas on grain yield and nutrient uptake. Experimental Agriculture 10, 219–222.
Effects on intercropping maize with pigeon peas on grain yield and nutrient uptake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaE2cXls1ynur8%3D&md5=756c7f1497b3a3993785c4db3a0027baCAS |

Dear BS, Ewing MA (2008) The search for new pasture plants to achieve more sustainable production systems in southern Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 387–396.
The search for new pasture plants to achieve more sustainable production systems in southern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Finlayson JD, Lawes RA, Metcalf T, Robertson MJ, Ferris D, Ewing MA (2012) A bio-economic evaluation of the profitability of adopting subtropical grasses and pasture-cropping on crop–livestock farms. Agricultural Systems 106, 102–112.
A bio-economic evaluation of the profitability of adopting subtropical grasses and pasture-cropping on crop–livestock farms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Harris RH, Hirth JR, Crawford MH, Bellotti WD, Peoples MB, Norng S (2007) Companion crop performance in the absence and presence of agronomic manipulation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 690–701.
Companion crop performance in the absence and presence of agronomic manipulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Harris RH, Crawford MH, Bellotti WD, Peoples MB, Norng S (2008) Companion crop performance in relation to annual biomass production, resource supply, and subsoil drying. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 1–12.
Companion crop performance in relation to annual biomass production, resource supply, and subsoil drying.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Humphries AW, Latta RA, Auricht GC, Bellotti WD (2004) Over-cropping lucerne with wheat: effect of lucerne winter activity on total plant production and water use of the mixture, and wheat yield and quality. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 839–848.
Over-cropping lucerne with wheat: effect of lucerne winter activity on total plant production and water use of the mixture, and wheat yield and quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Isbell RF (2002) ‘The Australian Soil Classification.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Millar GD, Badgery WB (2009) Pasture cropping: a new approach to integrate crop and livestock farming systems. Animal Production Science 49, 777–787.
Pasture cropping: a new approach to integrate crop and livestock farming systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Moore G, Sanford P, Wiley T (2006) Perennial pastures for Western Australia. Bulletin No. 4690. Department of Agriculture and Food, Perth, W. Aust.

Roper MM, Ward PR, Keulen AF (2013) Under no-tillage and stubble retention, soil water content and crop growth are poorly related to soil water repellency. Soil & Tillage Research 126, 143–150.
Under no-tillage and stubble retention, soil water content and crop growth are poorly related to soil water repellency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schoknecht N (2002) Soils Groups of Western Australia – a simple guide to the main soils of Western Australia. 3rd edn. Resource Management Technical Report 246, Agriculture Western Australia, Perth, W. Aust.

Smith ME, Francis CA (1986) Breeding for multiple cropping systems. In ‘Multiple cropping systems’. (Ed. CA Francis) pp. 219–249. (Macmillan: New York)

Smith IN, McIntosh P, Ansell TJ, Reason CJC, McInnes K (2000) Southwest Western Australian winter rainfall and its association with Indian Ocean climate variability. International Journal of Climatology 20, 1913–1930.
Southwest Western Australian winter rainfall and its association with Indian Ocean climate variability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ward PR (2006) Predicting the impact of perennial phases on average leakage from farming systems in south-western Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 269–280.
Predicting the impact of perennial phases on average leakage from farming systems in south-western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ward PR, Lawes RA, Ferris D (2014) Soil-water dynamics in a pasture-cropping system. Crop & Pasture Science 65, 1016–1021.