Evaluating the feasibility of dual-purpose canola in a medium-rainfall zone of south-eastern Australia: a simulation approach
Jeffrey I. McCormick A E , Jim M. Virgona B C , Julianne M. Lilley D and John A. Kirkegaard DA Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, PO Box 85084, Lincoln 7647, Canterbury, New Zealand.
B EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, Pine Gully Road, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia.
C Graminus Consulting P/L, 1 Heron Place, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia.
D CSIRO Agriculture Flagship, CSIRO Plant Industry, PO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
E Corresponding author. Email: jeffrey.mccormick@lincoln.ac.nz
Crop and Pasture Science 66(4) 318-331 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP13421
Submitted: 3 December 2013 Accepted: 27 June 2014 Published: 31 March 2015
Abstract
Canola (Brassica napus L.) has recently been adopted as a dual-purpose crop (graze and grain) in the higher rainfall areas (>550 mm) of eastern Australia, but the feasibility in drier inland areas with a shorter growing season is uncertain. We modified the APSIM-Canola model by using observations from an irrigated grazing experiment, with the aim of using a simulation approach to investigate various aspects of dual-purpose canola production. Sowing opportunities, forage production for grazing and grain production were considered in the simulations, and effects of variables such as sowing date, cultivar type, plant density and nitrogen supply were investigated in simulations for 109 years of climate data from Wagga Wagga, NSW. APSIM-Canola predictions of vegetative growth and grain yield for recent varieties were inadequate when using existing parameters, but were improved by increasing the maximum leaf area parameter to reflect those of modern hybrid types. For grazed crops, APSIM-Canola overestimated the initial rate of regrowth, but accurately simulated biomass at flowering. Simulations of a range of management options to generate different pre-grazing biomass predicted that sowing before 15 May, using vigorous (hybrid) cultivars, high plant density (60–80 plants m–2) and adequate soil nitrogen, maximised biomass production. Assuming a rainfall-based sowing opportunity of 25 mm over 3 days and a minimum pre-grazing biomass of 1000 kg ha–1, grazing was possible in 53% of years, with 50% of those years providing grazing opportunities before 7 June at Wagga Wagga. Depending on stocking rate, crops could be grazed until early to mid-July, providing 400–1000 dry sheep equivalent days ha–1 of grazing, and allow regrowth to achieve a target biomass of 5000 kg ha–1 at flowering, which was required to maximise potential yield. The simulation analysis confirms significant opportunities to achieve valuable livestock grazing from canola crops sown in an early window (before May) without compromising potential yield, and the simulation framework developed can be readily applied to other regions.
Additional keywords: brassicas, farming systems, forage management, grain yield.
References
Ayres Ayres (2002) Forage brassicas – quality crops for livestock production. Agfacts P2.1.13,Christy B, O’Leary G, Riffkin P, Acuna T, Potter T, Clough A (2013) Long-season canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars offer potential to substantially increase grain yield production in south-eastern Australia compared with current spring cultivars. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 901–913.
| Long-season canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars offer potential to substantially increase grain yield production in south-eastern Australia compared with current spring cultivars.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Donnelly JR, Freer M, Salmon EM, Moore AD, Simpson RJ, Dove H, Bolger TP (2002) Evolution of the GRAZPLAN decision support tools and adoption by the grazing industry in temperate Australia. Agricultural Systems 74, 115–139.
| Evolution of the GRAZPLAN decision support tools and adoption by the grazing industry in temperate Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Farré I, Robertson MJ, Walton GH, Asseng S (2002) Simulating phenology and yield response of canola to sowing date in Western Australia using the APSIM model. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 1155–1164.
| Simulating phenology and yield response of canola to sowing date in Western Australia using the APSIM model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Harrison MT, Evans JR, Dove H, Moore AD (2011) Dual-purpose cereals: can the relative influences of management and environment on crop recovery and grain yield be dissected? Crop & Pasture Science 62, 930–946.
| Dual-purpose cereals: can the relative influences of management and environment on crop recovery and grain yield be dissected?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hocking PJ, Stapper M (2001) Effects of sowing time and nitrogen fertiliser on canola and wheat, and nitrogen fertiliser on Indian mustard. I. Dry matter production, grain yield, and yield components. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 623–634.
| Effects of sowing time and nitrogen fertiliser on canola and wheat, and nitrogen fertiliser on Indian mustard. I. Dry matter production, grain yield, and yield components.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Keating BA, Carberry PS, Hammer GL, Probert ME, Robertson MJ, Holzworth D, Huth NI, Hargreaves JNG, Meinke H, Hochman Z, McLean G, Verburg K, Snow V, Dimes JP, Silburn M, Wang E, Brown S, Bristow KL, Asseng S, Chapman S, McCown RL, Freebairn DM, Smith CJ (2003) An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 267–288.
| An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirkegaard JA, Robertson MJ, Hamblin P, Sprague SJ (2006) Effect of blackleg and sclerotinia stem rot on canola yield in the high rainfall zone of southern New South Wales, Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 201–212.
| Effect of blackleg and sclerotinia stem rot on canola yield in the high rainfall zone of southern New South Wales, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirkegaard JA, Sprague SJ, Dove H, Kelman WM, Marcroft SJ, Lieschke A, Howe GN, Graham JM (2008) Dual-purpose canola—a new opportunity in mixed farming systems. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 291–302.
| Dual-purpose canola—a new opportunity in mixed farming systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirkegaard JA, Sprague SJ, Hamblin PJ, Graham JM, Lilley JM (2012a) Refining crop and livestock management for dual-purpose spring canola (Brassica napus). Crop & Pasture Science 63, 429–443.
| Refining crop and livestock management for dual-purpose spring canola (Brassica napus).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kirkegaard JA, Sprague SJ, Lilley JM, McCormick JI, Virgona JM, Morrison MJ (2012b) Physiological response of spring canola (Brassica napus) to defoliation in diverse environments. Field Crops Research 125, 61–68.
| Physiological response of spring canola (Brassica napus) to defoliation in diverse environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lisson SN, Kirkegaard JA, Robertson MJ, Zwart A (2007) What is limiting canola yield in southern New South Wales? A diagnosis of causal factors. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 1435–1445.
| What is limiting canola yield in southern New South Wales? A diagnosis of causal factors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Liu DL, Scott BJ, Pradhan UC, Martin P, Cole C (2003) Frost risk in New South Wales wheat belt. In ‘Solutions for a better environment. Proceedings 11th Australian Agronomy Conference’. Geelong, Vic. (Eds M Unkovich, G O’Leary) (Australian Society of Agronomy/The Regional Institute Ltd: Gosford, NSW) Available at: www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2003/c/16/liu.htm
McCormick JI, Virgona JM, Kirkegaard JA (2012) Growth, recovery and yield of dual-purpose canola (Brassica napus) in the medium-rainfall zone of south-eastern Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 63, 635–646.
| Growth, recovery and yield of dual-purpose canola (Brassica napus) in the medium-rainfall zone of south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
McCormick JI, Virgona JM, Kirkegaard JA (2013) Regrowth of spring canola (Brassica napus) after defoliation. Plant and Soil 372, 655–668.
| Regrowth of spring canola (Brassica napus) after defoliation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXovFCltr0%3D&md5=c3160c18c185e369e4b71d416b097127CAS |
Moore AD, Holzworth DP, Herrmann NI, Huth NI, Robertson MJ (2007) The common modelling protocol: a hierarchical framework for simulation of agricultural and environmental systems. Agricultural Systems 95, 37–48.
| The common modelling protocol: a hierarchical framework for simulation of agricultural and environmental systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Morrison MJ, Stewart DW (2002) Heat stress during flowering in summer Brassica. Crop Science 42, 797–803.
| Heat stress during flowering in summer Brassica.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Robertson MJ, Holland JF (2004) Production risk of canola in the semi-arid subtropics of Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 525–538.
| Production risk of canola in the semi-arid subtropics of Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Robertson MJ, Kirkegaard JA (2005) Water-use efficiency of dryland canola in an equi-seasonal rainfall environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 1373–1386.
| Water-use efficiency of dryland canola in an equi-seasonal rainfall environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Robertson MJ, Holland JF, Kirkegaard JA, Smith CJ (1999) Simulating growth and development of canola in Australia. In ‘10th International Rapeseed Congress’. Canberra, ACT. (Ed. N Wratten) (The Regional Institute Ltd: Gosford, NSW) Available at: www.regional.org.au/au/gcirc/2/143.htm
Robertson MJ, Holland JF, Cawley S, Potter TD, Burton W, Walton GH, Thomas G (2002) Growth and yield differences between triazine-tolerant and non-triazine-tolerant cultivars of canola. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 643–651.
| Growth and yield differences between triazine-tolerant and non-triazine-tolerant cultivars of canola.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Virgona JM, Gummer FAJ, Angus JF (2006) Effects of grazing on wheat growth, yield, development, water use, and nitrogen use. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 1307–1319.
| Effects of grazing on wheat growth, yield, development, water use, and nitrogen use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
