Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Making Better Fertiliser Decisions for Cropping Systems in Australia: an overview

Simon D. Speirs A E , Doug J. Reuter B , Ken I. Peverill C and Ross F. Brennan D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (NSW Department of Primary Industries and Charles Sturt University), Private Bag 4008, Narellan, NSW 2567, Australia.

B Reuter & Associates, 1 Ettrick Avenue, Medindie, SA 5081, Australia.

C K I P Consultancy Services, 4 Collier Court, Wheelers Hill, Vic. 3150, Australia.

D Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia, 444 Albany Highway, Albany, WA 6330, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: simon.speirs@dpi.nsw.gov.au

Crop and Pasture Science 64(5) 417-423 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP13034
Submitted: 22 January 2013  Accepted: 4 June 2013   Published: 22 August 2013

Abstract

Australian grain production depends on applied fertiliser, particularly nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), and to a lesser extent potassium (K) and sulfur (S). Despite this dependence, soil testing is used sparingly as a tool to underpin fertiliser decisions. Some grain producers typically conduct soil tests at least once every 3 years on a selection of individual fields, but it is broadly understood that many grain producers use soil testing rarely or not at all. The choice by many grain producers not to support fertiliser decisions by soil testing relates to several factors. One key factor has been a perception that soil test interpretation criteria, previously published separately before collation by K. I. Peverill, L. A. Sparrow, and D. J. Reuter, may be biased or unreliable. The current paper provides an overview of research findings, presented in this special edition of Crop & Pasture Science, describing a national approach to the collation of all available and statistically valid N, P, K, and S response trials for cereal, oilseed, and pulse crops in Australia. It provides an overview of the process adopted to make this single national dataset available to both the grains and fertiliser industries. The process to build adoption has formed an integral component of the approach, as calibration data derived from the national database are being used to underpin soil test interpretation as part of fertiliser recommendations made through Fertcare to grain producers in Australia.

Additional keywords: cereal, grain production, legume, nitrogen, oilseed, phosphorus, potassium, relative yield, response calibration, soil test criteria, sulfur.


References

ABARES (2012) Agricultural Commodity Statistics 2012. December Quarter 2012. CC By 3.0. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences, Canberra, ACT.

ABS (2012) 7106.0—Australian Farming in Brief, 2012. Released at 19/09/2012. Australian Bureau of Statistics. www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/7106.0Main+Features22012#.

Anderson GC, Peverill KI, Brennan RF (2013) Soil sulfur—crop response calibration relationships and criteria for field crops grown in Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 523–530.

Bell MJ, Moody PW, Anderson GC, Strong W (2013a) Soil phosphorus—crop response calibration relationships and criteria for oilseeds, grain legumes and summer cereal crops grown in Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 499–513.

Bell MJ, Strong W, Elliott D, Walker C (2013b) Soil nitrogen—crop response calibration relationships and criteria for winter cereal crops grown in Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 442–460.

Bell R, Reuter DJ, Scott BJ, Sparrow L, Strong W, the late Chen W (2013c) Soil phosphorus—crop response calibration relationships and criteria for winter cereal crops grown in Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 480–498.

Brennan RF, Bell MJ (2013) Soil potassium—crop response calibration relationships and criteria for field crops grown in Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 514–522.

Colwell JD (1977) ‘National Soil Fertility Project. Vol. 1. Objectives and procedures.’ (CSIRO Division of Soils: Adelaide, S. Aust.)

Conyers MK, Bell MJ, Wilhelm NS, Bell R, Norton RM, Walker C (2013) Making Better Fertiliser Decisions for Cropping Systems in Australia (BFDC): Knowledge gaps and lessons learnt. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 539–547.

Dowling CW, Speirs SD (2013) An extension perspective—increasing the adoption of more reliable soil test interpretation. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 531–538.

Dyson CB, Conyers MK (2013) Methodology for online biometric analysis of soil test–crop response datasets. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 435–441.

Edwards J, Umbers A, Wentworth S (2012) GRDC Farm Practices Survey Report 2012. Grains Research and Development Corporation, Canberra, ACT.

Gourley CJ, Melland AR, Waller RA, Awty IM, Smith AP, Peverill KI, Hannah MC (2007) ‘Making Better fertiliser decisions for grazed pastures in Australia.’ (Department of Primary Industries, Victoria: Melbourne)

Holford ICR, Doyle AD (1992) Yield responses and nitrogen fertilizer requirements of wheat in relation to soil nitrate levels at various depths. Australian Journal of Soil Research 30, 683–694.
Yield responses and nitrogen fertilizer requirements of wheat in relation to soil nitrate levels at various depths.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK3sXjvVWjtg%3D%3D&md5=7939ff38468b73404624db901824e1cdCAS |

Isbell RE (1996) ‘The Australian Soil Classification.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Moody PW, Speirs SD, Scott BJ, Mason SD (2013) Soil phosphorus tests I: What soil phosphorus pools and processes do they measure? Crop & Pasture Science 64, 461–468.

NLWRA 2001 ‘Nutrient balance in regional farming systems and soil nutrient status.’ National Land and Water Resources Audit, Vol. 1, pp. 79–120. (National Heritage Trust, Australia)

Peverill KI, Sparrow LA, Reuter DJ (1999) ‘Soil analysis: an interpretation manual.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Rayment GE, Lyons DJ (2011) ‘Soil chemical methods—Australasia.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Speirs SD, Scott BJ, Moody PW, Mason SD (2013) Soil phosphorus tests II: A comparison of soil test–crop response relationships for different soil tests and wheat. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 469–479.

Taylor AC, Storrier RR, Gilmour AR (1974) Nitrogen needs of wheat. 1. Grain yield in relation to soil nitrogen and other factors. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 14, 241–248.
Nitrogen needs of wheat. 1. Grain yield in relation to soil nitrogen and other factors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Taylor AC, Storrier RR, Gilmour AR (1978) Nitrogen needs of wheat. 2. Grain yield response to nitrogenous fertilizer. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 18, 118–128.
Nitrogen needs of wheat. 2. Grain yield response to nitrogenous fertilizer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaE1cXhtlGms7c%3D&md5=708409c8e103268fcdcfebed40ba398bCAS |

Watmuff G, Reuter DJ, Speirs SD (2013) Methodologies for assembling and interrogating N, P, K, and S soil test calibrations for Australian cereal, oilseed and pulse crops. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 424–434.

Weaver DM, Wong MTF (2011) Scope to improve phosphorus (P) management and balance efficiency of crop and pasture soils with contrasting P status and buffering indices. Plant and Soil 349, 37–54.
Scope to improve phosphorus (P) management and balance efficiency of crop and pasture soils with contrasting P status and buffering indices.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhsFKntb3J&md5=0af08abd0e4a0888edab12d792af574cCAS |