Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Expression and inheritance of perenniality and other qualitative traits in hybrids between mungbean cultivars and Australian wild accessions

Thuan D. Nguyen A B , R. J. Lawn C D and L. M. Bielig A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia.

B Legumes Research and Development Centre, Food Crops Research Institute, Hanoi, Vietnam.

C Tropical Crop Science Unit, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia; and CSIRO Plant Industry, Australian Tropical Sciences and Innovation Precinct, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Emails: robert.lawn@jcu.edu.au; bob.lawn@csiro.au.

Crop and Pasture Science 63(7) 619-634 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP12263
Submitted: 18 July 2012  Accepted: 19 September 2012   Published: 11 October 2012

Abstract

The expression and inheritance of several qualitative traits was examined in four cultivated × wild hybrid populations involving each of two mungbean (Vigna radiata ssp. radiata) cultivars, cvv. Berken and Kiloga, and each of two Australian accessions of the wild subspecies (V. radiata ssp. sublobata). One of the wild accessions, ACC 1, was representative of a prostrate, fine-stemmed, gracile type and the other, ACC 87, was representative of a more robust perennial form endemic in north-eastern Australia. For each of the four cultivated × wild populations, trait expression was observed in plants from the parent, F1, F2, and the two F1–parental backcross generations, when grown under favourable conditions in large pots on benches in the field at CSIRO Davies Laboratory, Townsville, Australia. Models of inheritance were inferred based on the segregation patterns in the different generations of the cultivated v. wild phenotypes. For most traits, the model of inheritance depended more on the wild than the cultivated parent, with more traits in the crosses involving ACC 1 being digenic than in those involving ACC 87. For all the observed morphological and seed traits, the wild phenotype was dominant, consistent with the cultivated phenotype having arisen through mutations that inhibited expression of the wild type. In contrast, the apparent resistance of the wild parents to field strains of powdery mildew disease was recessive to the strong susceptibility of the two cultivars. The segregation patterns for presence or absence of tuberous roots were remarkably similar in the two crosses involving the perennial accession ACC 87, and were consistent with the formation of tuberous roots being conditioned by two complementary, dominant genes. The fact that an apparently complex trait like perenniality might be conditioned by so few genes suggested that perenniality may also be an ancestral wild trait, disruption of which has led to the now more common, annual form. Linkage analyses suggested that perenniality was associated with the wild-type seed traits, black speckled testa and pigmented hilum, which previous molecular studies have indicated are both located on mungbean linkage group 2.

Additional keywords: adaptation, morphology, phenology, tuberous roots, Vigna radiata ssp. sublobata.


References

Allard RW (1999) ‘Principles of plant breeding.’ (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: London)

Bell LW, Wade LJ, Ewing MA (2010) Perennial wheat: a review of environmental and agronomic prospects for development in Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 61, 679–690.
Perennial wheat: a review of environmental and agronomic prospects for development in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bushby HVA, Lawn RJ (1992) Accumulation and partitioning of nitrogen and dry matter by contrasting genotypes of mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 1609–1628.
Accumulation and partitioning of nitrogen and dry matter by contrasting genotypes of mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK3sXjvVWitA%3D%3D&md5=7691a0218ad6614a503751284d1b76d7CAS |

Carpenter JA, Fehr WR (1986) Genetic variability for desirable agronomic traits in populations containing Glycine soja germplasm. Crop Science 26, 681–686.
Genetic variability for desirable agronomic traits in populations containing Glycine soja germplasm.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chippendale GM (1971) Checklist of Northern Territory plants. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 96, 207–267.

Cook GD, Dias L (2006) It was no accident: deliberate plant introductions by Australian government agencies during the 20th century. Australian Journal of Botany 54, 601–662.
It was no accident: deliberate plant introductions by Australian government agencies during the 20th century.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cox TS, Bender M, Picone C, Van Tassel DL, Holland JB, Brummer EC, Zoeller BE, Paterson AH, Jackson W (2002) Breeding perennial grain crops. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 21, 59–91.
Breeding perennial grain crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cox TS, Glover JD, Van Tassel DL, Cox CM, Dehaan LR (2006) Prospects for developing perennial grain crops. Bioscience 56, 649–659.
Prospects for developing perennial grain crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Damayanti F, Lawn RJ, Bielig LM (2010) Expression of qualitative and quantitative traits in hybrids between domesticated and wild accessions of the tropical tuberous legume Vigna vexillata (L.) A. Rich. Crop & Pasture Science 61, 798–811.
Expression of qualitative and quantitative traits in hybrids between domesticated and wild accessions of the tropical tuberous legume Vigna vexillata (L.) A. Rich.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Flanders DW, Khoury MJ (1996) Analysis of case-parental control studies: Method for study of associations between disease and genetic markers. American Journal of Epidemiology 144, 696–703.
Analysis of case-parental control studies: Method for study of associations between disease and genetic markers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK28vitVeltQ%3D%3D&md5=c75d9d91731f8dbb9b72f4a53aec1c25CAS |

Grant T, Lawn RJ, Bielig LM (2003) Variation among Australian accessions of Vigna vexillata for traits of agronomic, adaptive or taxonomic interest. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 243–250.
Variation among Australian accessions of Vigna vexillata for traits of agronomic, adaptive or taxonomic interest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hang Vu TT, Lawn RJ, Bielig LM, Xia L, Kilian A (2012) Establishment of diversity array technology for soybean and mungbean. Euphytica 186, 741–754.
Establishment of diversity array technology for soybean and mungbean.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhtFWhsr%2FN&md5=adf3c39d6833e14174b8a4aca9c9dd97CAS |

Hicks DR, Pendleton JW, Bernard RL, Johnston TJ (1969) Response of soybean plant types to planting patterns. Agronomy Journal 61, 290–293.
Response of soybean plant types to planting patterns.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Humphry ME, Magner T, McIntyre CL, Aitken EAB, Liu CJ (2003) Identification of a major locus conferring resistance to powdery mildew (Erysiphe polygoni DC) in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) by QTL analysis. Genome 46, 738–744.
Identification of a major locus conferring resistance to powdery mildew (Erysiphe polygoni DC) in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) by QTL analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXpsFCht7c%3D&md5=90703abc0980ea1fd8070a0f068a50bcCAS |

Humphry ME, Lambrides CJ, Chapman SC, Aitken EAB, Imrie BC, Lawn RJ, McIntyre CL, Liu CJ (2005) Relationships between hard-seededness and seed weight in mungbean (Vigna radiata) assessed by QTL analysis. Plant Breeding 124, 292–298.
Relationships between hard-seededness and seed weight in mungbean (Vigna radiata) assessed by QTL analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXmtFKiu7c%3D&md5=d7d4ba48fa7dfe83d79efd8bed8b6076CAS |

Imrie BC (1998) Mungbean. In ‘The new rural industries: a handbook for farmers and investors’. (Ed. K Hyde) pp. 355–360. (Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation: Canberra, ACT)

James AT, Lawn RJ (1991) Inheritance of selected traits in accessions of Vigna vexillata (L.) A. Rich of Australian and African origin. Australian Journal of Botany 39, 415–429.
Inheritance of selected traits in accessions of Vigna vexillata (L.) A. Rich of Australian and African origin.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

James AJ, Lawn RJ, Williams RW, Lambrides CJ (1999) Cross fertility of Australian accessions of wild mungbean (Vigna radiata ssp. sublobata) with green gram (V. radiata ssp. radiata) and black gram (V. mungo). Australian Journal of Botany 47, 601–610.
Cross fertility of Australian accessions of wild mungbean (Vigna radiata ssp. sublobata) with green gram (V. radiata ssp. radiata) and black gram (V. mungo).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kahn PC, Molnar T, Zhang GG, Funk CR (2011) Investing in perennial crops to feed the world. Issues in Science and Technology Online (Summer 2011). University of Texas, Dallas. Available at: www.issues.org/27.4/kahn.html

Kingston RW (1975) Berken, a new mungbean variety. Queensland Agricultural Journal 101, 659–661.

Lambrides CJ (1996) Breeding for improved seed quality traits in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) using DNA markers. PhD Thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.

Lambrides CJ, Godwin ID (2007) Mungbean. In ‘Genome mapping and molecular breeding in plants, Vol. 3: Pulses, sugar and tuber crops’. (Ed. C Kole) pp. 69–90. (Springer-Verlag: Berlin)

Lambrides CJ, Imrie BC (2000) Susceptibility of mungbean varieties to the bruchid species Callosobruchus maculatus (F.), C. phaseoli (Gyll.), C. chinensis (L.), and Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 85–89.
Susceptibility of mungbean varieties to the bruchid species Callosobruchus maculatus (F.), C. phaseoli (Gyll.), C. chinensis (L.), and Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lambrides CJ, Lawn RJ, Godwin ID, Manners J, Imrie BC (2000) Two genetic linkage maps of mungbean using RFLP and RAPD markers. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 415–425.
Two genetic linkage maps of mungbean using RFLP and RAPD markers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXktFClsr8%3D&md5=560b6edb2e87ccfda9a5989c1d2c40ebCAS |

Lambrides CJ, Godwin ID, Lawn RJ, Imrie BC (2004) Segregation distortion for seed testa colour in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilcek). Journal of Heredity 95, 532–535.
Segregation distortion for seed testa colour in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilcek).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crgs1ensg%3D%3D&md5=8fb12d902337c70b397e630146a53676CAS |

Lawn RJ (1979) Agronomic studies on Vigna spp. in south-eastern Queensland I. Phenological response of cultivars to sowing date. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 855–870.
Agronomic studies on Vigna spp. in south-eastern Queensland I. Phenological response of cultivars to sowing date.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lawn RJ, Cottrell A (1988) Wild mungbean and its relatives in Australia. Biologist 35, 267–273.

Lawn RJ, Holland AE (2003) Variation in the Vigna lanceolata Benth. complex for traits of taxonomic, adaptive or agronomic interest. Australian Journal of Botany 51, 295–308.
Variation in the Vigna lanceolata Benth. complex for traits of taxonomic, adaptive or agronomic interest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lawn RJ, Rebetzke GJ (2006) Variation among Australian accessions of the wild mungbean (Vigna radiata ssp. sublobata) for traits of agronomic, adaptive or taxonomic interest. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 119–132.
Variation among Australian accessions of the wild mungbean (Vigna radiata ssp. sublobata) for traits of agronomic, adaptive or taxonomic interest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lawn RJ, Russell JS (1978) Mungbean: a grain legume for summer rainfall cropping areas of Australia. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 44, 28–41.

Lawn RJ, Watkinson AR (2002) Habitat, morphological diversity and distribution of the genus Vigna Savi in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 1305–1316.
Habitat, morphological diversity and distribution of the genus Vigna Savi in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lawn RJ, Williams RW, Imrie BC (1988) Potential of wild germplasm as a source of tolerance to environmental stresses in mungbean. In ‘Proceedings, Second International Symposium on Mungbean’. (Eds S Shanmugasundaram, BT McLean) pp. 136–145. (Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center: Taiwan)

Nguyen TD (2011) Expression and inheritance of potentially useful traits in wild mungbean (Vigna radiata ssp. sublobata) × cultivated mungbean (V. radiata ssp. radiata) hybrids. MSc Thesis, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, Australia.

Rebetzke GJ, Lawn RJ (2006a) Adaptive responses of wild mungbean (Vigna radiata ssp. sublobata) to photo-thermal environment I. Phenology. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 917–928.
Adaptive responses of wild mungbean (Vigna radiata ssp. sublobata) to photo-thermal environment I. Phenology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rebetzke GJ, Lawn RJ (2006b) Root and shoot attributes of indigenous perennial accessions of the wild mungbean (Vigna radiata ssp. sublobata). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 791–799.
Root and shoot attributes of indigenous perennial accessions of the wild mungbean (Vigna radiata ssp. sublobata).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sangiri C, Kaga A, Tomooka N, Vaughan D, Srinives P (2007) Genetic diversity of the mungbean (Vigna radiata, Leguminosae) genepool on the basis of microsatellite analysis. Australian Journal of Botany 55, 837–847.
Genetic diversity of the mungbean (Vigna radiata, Leguminosae) genepool on the basis of microsatellite analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhsVamurnK&md5=db3b18093aca8fc6679774286e8a91d0CAS |

Singh D, Mehta TR (1953) Inheritance of lobed leaf character in mung (Phaseolus aureus L.). Current Science 22, 248

Sleper DA, Poehlman JM (2006) ‘Breeding field crops.’ (Blackwell Publishing: Iowa)

Smartt J (1976) Comparative evolution of pulse crops. Euphytica 25, 139–143.
Comparative evolution of pulse crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Smartt J (1978) The evolution of pulse crops. Economic Botany 32, 185–198.
The evolution of pulse crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Smartt J (1985) Evolution of grain legumes. III. Pulses in the genus Vigna. Experimental Agriculture 21, 87–100.
Evolution of grain legumes. III. Pulses in the genus Vigna.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sriphadet S, Lambrides CJ, Srinives P (2007) Inheritance of agronomic traits and their interrelationship in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology 10, 249–256.

Stanley TD, Ross EM (1983) ‘Flora of South-eastern Queensland. Vol. 1.’ (Queensland Herbarium: Brisbane, Qld)

Talukdar T, Talukdar D (2003) Inheritance of growth habit and leaf shape in mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek.). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 63, 165–166.

Thomas H, Thomas HM, Ougham H (2000) Annuality, perenniality, and cell death. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 1781–1788.
Annuality, perenniality, and cell death.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXps1Gq&md5=2d7d286101cdc54f1bc8a4d0f8ae18c8CAS |

Verdcourt B (1970) Studies in the Leguminosae–Papilionoideae for the ‘Flora of Tropical East Africa’. IV. Kew Bulletin 24, 504–555.

Young ND, Danesh D, Menancio-Hautea DI, Kumar L (1993) Mapping oligogenic resistance to powdery mildew in mungbean with RFLPs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 87, 243–249.
Mapping oligogenic resistance to powdery mildew in mungbean with RFLPs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXkt1amuw%3D%3D&md5=6990ad765ea02dfda27dd419377f8289CAS |