Fodder yield and quality in forage sorghum: scope for improvement through diverse male sterile cytoplasms
C. Aruna A D , P. K. Shrotria B , S. K. Pahuja C , A. V. Umakanth A , B. Venkatesh Bhat A , A. Vishala Devender A and J. V. Patil AA Directorate of Sorghum Research, Himayat Sagar Rd, Rajendra Nagar, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500030, India.
B G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand - 263 145, India.
C C.C.S. Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana - 125 002, India.
D Corresponding author. Email: aruna@sorghum.res.in
Crop and Pasture Science 63(12) 1114-1123 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP12215
Submitted: 4 June 2012 Accepted: 18 February 2013 Published: 14 March 2013
Abstract
Cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) has proved to be an effective and efficient genetic tool in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) hybrid breeding programs. The A1 (milo cytoplasm) CMS type has been widely exploited to produce both commercial grain and forage sorghum hybrids. To explore the possibility of using alternative CMS (non-milo cytoplasm) sources, we studied the effect of cytoplasm on forage yield and quality in sorghum. Nine female (CMS) lines (representing three each in A1, A2, and A3 cytoplasms) and five male lines were used to generate 45 hybrids, which were evaluated in three environments. Cytoplasm and its first-order interaction with location and male and female lines showed the presence of a cytoplasmic effect on the majority of fodder yield and quality traits examined. The CMS lines possessing A3 cytoplasm (A3N213 and A3N193) were good combiners for important fodder yield and quality traits. For hydrocyanic acid, the CMS lines possessing A1 cytoplasm were good combiners. Mean performance of hybrids and combining ability analysis of parents revealed that A3 cytoplasm can be used along with the widely used A1 cytoplasm, which helps in the diversification of the male sterile base of forage sorghum hybrids.
Additional keywords: combining ability, digestibility, protein, forage yield, GCA effects, HCN.
References
Ali MA, Niaz S, Abbas A, Sabir W, Jabran K (2009) Genetic diversity and assessment of drought tolerant sorghum landraces based on morpho-physiological traits at different growth stages. Plant Omics 2, 214–227.Atienza SG, Martin A, Pecchioni N, Platani C, Cattivelli L (2008) The nuclear–cytoplasmic interaction controls carotenoid content in wheat. Euphytica 159, 325–331.
| The nuclear–cytoplasmic interaction controls carotenoid content in wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhsVKku7rO&md5=6fdcc5e8d4e930b54beb2149e8d13a09CAS |
Audilakshmi S, Mall AK, Swarnalatha M, Seetharama N (2010) Inheritance of sugar concentration in stalk brix, sucrose content, stalk and juice yield in sorghum. Biomass and Bioenergy 34, 813–820.
| Inheritance of sugar concentration in stalk brix, sucrose content, stalk and juice yield in sorghum.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXlvFWmsbk%3D&md5=78d4e327635481a1f060c0642f337d5dCAS |
Bartlett MS (1937) Some examples of statistical methods of research in agriculture and applied biology. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 4, 137–170.
Chandra-Shekara AC, Prasanna BM, Singh BB, Unnikrishnan KV, Seetharam A (2007) Effect of cytoplasm and cytoplasm–nuclear interaction on combining ability and heterosis for agronomic traits in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) Br.R). Euphytica 153, 15–26.
| Effect of cytoplasm and cytoplasm–nuclear interaction on combining ability and heterosis for agronomic traits in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) Br.R).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Corredor DY, Salazar JM, Hohn KL, Bean S, Bean B, Wang D (2009) Evaluation and characterization of forage sorghum as feed stock for fermentable sugar production. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 158, 164–179.
| Evaluation and characterization of forage sorghum as feed stock for fermentable sugar production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXptVynsLk%3D&md5=8a9e06a95fbe1c0b5d57d83464153a91CAS |
Dhillon MK, Sharma HC, Reddy BVS, Ram Singh , Naresh JS, Zhu K (2005) Relative susceptibility of different male sterile cytoplasms in sorghum to shoot fly, Atherigona soccata. Euphytica 144, 275–283.
| Relative susceptibility of different male sterile cytoplasms in sorghum to shoot fly, Atherigona soccata.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Durga KK, Reddy BVS, Reddy MSS, Ganesh M (2008) Influence of cytoplasm on the occurrence of leaf blight (Exserohilum turcicum (Pass.) in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 42, 97–101.
Gilchrist DG, Lueschen WE, Hittle CN (1967) Revised method for the preparation of standards in the Sodium Picrate assay of HCN. Crop Science 7, 267–268.
| Revised method for the preparation of standards in the Sodium Picrate assay of HCN.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaF2sXksVSrt7k%3D&md5=45ee365092dffaf95e5c96bfac30b0abCAS |
Hallauer AR, Miranda JB (1981) ‘Quantitative genetics in maize breeding.’ (Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA)
Hariprasanna K, Zaman FU, Singh AK (2006) Influence of male sterile cytoplasms on the physio-chemical grain quality traits in hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica 149, 273–280.
| Influence of male sterile cytoplasms on the physio-chemical grain quality traits in hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jackson ML (1973) ‘Soil chemical analysis.’ (Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.: New Delhi)
Kempthorne O (1957) ‘An introduction to genetic statistics.’ (Wiley: New York)
Khan AKF (1992) Yield stability of single, three way and double cross hybrids. Sorghum and Millets Abstract 18, 528
Kibal’nik OP, Elkonin LA (2009) Effect of sterile cytoplasm types on pigment content in leaves of F1 grain sorghum hybrids. Russian Agricultural Sciences 35, 20–23.
| Effect of sterile cytoplasm types on pigment content in leaves of F1 grain sorghum hybrids.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kumar R, Sagar P (2010) Effect of cytoplasm on combining ability and yield attribute in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 70, 247–256.
Mehrez AZ, Orskov ER (1977) A study of artificial fibre bag technique for determining the digestibility of feeds in the rumen. The Journal of Agricultural Science 88, 645–650.
| A study of artificial fibre bag technique for determining the digestibility of feeds in the rumen.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Moran JL, Rooney WL (2003) Effect of cytoplasm on the agronomic performance of grain sorghum hybrids. Crop Science 43, 777–781.
| Effect of cytoplasm on the agronomic performance of grain sorghum hybrids.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pedersen JF, Toy JJ (1997) Forage yield, quality and fertility of sorghum × sudan grass hybrids in A1 and A3 cytoplasm. Crop Science 37, 1973–1975.
| Forage yield, quality and fertility of sorghum × sudan grass hybrids in A1 and A3 cytoplasm.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reddy BVS, Ramesh S, Sanjana Reddy P, Ramaiah B (2007) Combining ability and heterosis as influenced by male-sterility inducing cytoplasms in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Euphytica 154, 153–164.
| Combining ability and heterosis as influenced by male-sterility inducing cytoplasms in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reddy BVS, Ramesh S, Sanjana Reddy P, Ashok Kumar A (2009) Male-sterility inducing cytoplasmic effects on combining ability in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 69, 199–204.
Rodriguez-Herrera R, Williams-Alanis H, Aguirre-Rodriguez J (1993) Comparative performance of isogenic sorghums in A1 and A2 cytoplasms. III Head Smut. Sorghum Newsletter 34, 22
Rodriguez-Herrera R, Williams-Alanis H, Aguirre-Rodriguez J, Torres-Montalvo H (1994) Comparative performance of isogenic sorghum in A1 and A2 cytoplasms. V Foliar diseases. Sorghum Newsletter 35, 80
Sanjana Reddy P, Manohar Rao D, Reddy BVS, Ashok Kumar A, Thakur RP, Rao VP (2011) Evaluation of A1, A2, A3, A4(M), A4(G) and A4(VZM) cytoplasms in iso-nuclear backgrounds for grain mold resistance. Crop Protection 30, 658–662.
| Evaluation of A1, A2, A3, A4(M), A4(G) and A4(VZM) cytoplasms in iso-nuclear backgrounds for grain mold resistance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shivani D, Viraktamath BC, Shobha Rani N (2007) Effect of nucleo-cytoplasmic interactions on the expression of quality characters in rice (Oryza sativa L.) hybrids. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 67, 225–228.
Stack JP, Pedersen JF (2003) Expression of susceptibility to Fusarium Head Blight and grain mold in A1 and A2 cytoplasms of Sorghum bicolor. Plant Disease 87, 172–176.
| Expression of susceptibility to Fusarium Head Blight and grain mold in A1 and A2 cytoplasms of Sorghum bicolor.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tatum LA (1971) The southern corn leaf blight epidemic. Science 171, 1113–1116.
| The southern corn leaf blight epidemic.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cvgs1yluw%3D%3D&md5=720a0b710bcb01a0effbdee21a5034c8CAS |
Walsh DJ, Atkins RE (1973) Performance and within hybrid variability of three way and single crosses of grain sorghum. Crop Science 13, 267–271.
| Performance and within hybrid variability of three way and single crosses of grain sorghum.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wheeler JL, Mulcahy C, Walcott JJ, Rapp GG (1990) Factors affecting the hydrogen cyanide potential of forage sorghum. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 41, 1093–1100.
| Factors affecting the hydrogen cyanide potential of forage sorghum.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK3MXit1Ols7c%3D&md5=c3ea5e7d5f94ea5d28b409ddde7d2d28CAS |
Yadav OP (1994) Effect of cytoplasmic source on the combining ability of agronomic traits in pearl millet. Plant Breeding 113, 242–245.
| Effect of cytoplasmic source on the combining ability of agronomic traits in pearl millet.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |