Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Water and thermal regimes for field pea in Australia and their implications for breeding

V. O. Sadras A E , L. Lake A , K. Chenu B , L. S. McMurray C and A. Leonforte D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A South Australian Research and Development Institute, Waite Campus, GPO Box 391, Adelaide 5001, Australia.

B The University of Queensland, CPS, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, 203 Tor Street, PO Box 102, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.

C South Australian Research and Development Institute, 9 Old North Road, Clare 5453, Australia.

D Victorian Department of Primary Industries, Private Bag 260, Horsham, Vic. 3401, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: victor.sadras@sa.gov.au

Crop and Pasture Science 63(1) 33-44 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP11321
Submitted: 1 December 2011  Accepted: 2 February 2012   Published: 13 March 2012

Abstract

There is a large gap between the refined approaches to characterise genotypes and the common use of location and season as a coarse surrogate for environmental characterisation of breeding trials. As a framework for breeding, the aim of this paper is quantifying the spatial and temporal patterns of thermal and water stress for field pea in Australia. We compiled a dataset for yield of the cv. Kaspa measured in 185 environments, and investigated the associations between yield and seasonal patterns of actual temperature and modelled water stress.

Correlations between yield and temperature indicated two distinct stages. In the first stage, during crop establishment and canopy expansion before flowering, yield was positively associated with minimum temperature. Mean minimum temperature below ~7°C suggests that crops were under suboptimal temperature for both canopy expansion and radiation-use efficiency during a significant part of this early growth period. In the second stage, during critical reproductive phases, grain yield was negatively associated with maximum temperature over 25°C.

Correlations between yield and modelled water supply/demand ratio showed a consistent pattern with three phases: no correlation at early stages of the growth cycle, a progressive increase in the association that peaked as the crop approached the flowering window, and a progressive decline at later reproductive stages. Using long-term weather records (1957–2010) and modelled water stress for 104 locations, we identified three major patterns of water deficit nation wide. Environment type 1 (ET1) represents the most favourable condition, with no stress during most of the pre-flowering phase and gradual development of mild stress after flowering. Type 2 is characterised by increasing water deficit between 400 degree-days before flowering and 200 degree-days after flowering and rainfall that relieves stress late in the season. Type 3 represents the more stressful condition with increasing water deficit between 400 degree-days before flowering and maturity. Across Australia, the frequency of occurrence was 24% for ET1, 32% for ET2 and 43% for ET3, highlighting the dominance of the most stressful condition. Actual yield averaged 2.2 t/ha for ET1, 1.9 t/ha for ET2 and 1.4 t/ha for ET3, and the frequency of each pattern varied substantially among locations. Shifting from a nominal (i.e. location and season) to a quantitative (i.e. stress type) characterisation of environments could help improving breeding efficiency of field pea in Australia.

Additional keywords: environment, flowering, genotype, heat stress, modelling, Pisum sativum, water stress.


References

Araus JL, Slafer GA, Royo C, Serret MD (2008) Breeding for yield potential and stress adaptation in cereals. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 27, 377–412.
Breeding for yield potential and stress adaptation in cereals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Basford KE, Cooper M (1998) Genotype × environment interactions and some considerations of their implications for wheat breeding in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 153–174.
Genotype × environment interactions and some considerations of their implications for wheat breeding in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bernardo R (2001) What if we knew all the genes for a quantitative trait in hybrid crops? Crop Science 41, 1–4.
What if we knew all the genes for a quantitative trait in hybrid crops?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXitlKmt7c%3D&md5=e24fdacd646a58db8c79403248efd666CAS |

Brand J, Armstrong R, Attanoff G (2003) The effect of sowing date and rate on seed coat discolouration due to frost in field peas in the southern Mallee of Victoria. In ‘Proceedings of the 11th Australian Agronomy Conference’. 2–6 February 2003, Geelong, Vic. (Eds MJ Unkovich, G O’Leary) (The Regional Institute Ltd.) www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2003/p/3/brand.htm

Bureau of Meteorology (2011) NRM Enhanced Meteorological Datasets. Available at: www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo

Calviño PA, Sadras VO (1999) Interannual variation in soybean yield: interaction among rainfall, soil depth and crop management. Field Crops Research 63, 237–246.
Interannual variation in soybean yield: interaction among rainfall, soil depth and crop management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cantagallo JE, Chimenti CA, Hall AJ (1997) Number of seeds per unit area in sunflower correlates well with a photothermal quotient. Crop Science 37, 1780–1786.
Number of seeds per unit area in sunflower correlates well with a photothermal quotient.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cattivelli L, Rizza F, Badeck F-W, Mazzucotelli E, Mastrangelo AM, Francia E, Marè C, Tondelli A, Stanca AM (2008) Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: an integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Research 105, 1–14.
Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: an integrated view from breeding to genomics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Caviglia OP, Sadras VO, Andrade FH (2004) Intensification of agriculture in the south-eastern Pampas I. Capture and efficiency in the use of water and radiation in double-cropped wheat–soybean. Field Crops Research 87, 117–129.
Intensification of agriculture in the south-eastern Pampas I. Capture and efficiency in the use of water and radiation in double-cropped wheat–soybean.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ceccarelli S, Grando S, Baum M (2007) Participatory plant breeding in water-limited environments. Experimental Agriculture 43, 411–435.
Participatory plant breeding in water-limited environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chapman SC (2008) Use of crop models to understand genotype by environment interactions for drought in real-world and simulated plant breeding trials. Euphytica 161, 195–208.
Use of crop models to understand genotype by environment interactions for drought in real-world and simulated plant breeding trials.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chapman SC, Cooper M, Butler DG, Henzell RG (2000a) Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. I. Characteristics that confound interpretation of hybrid yield. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 197–207.
Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. I. Characteristics that confound interpretation of hybrid yield.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chapman SC, Cooper M, Hammer GL, Butler DG (2000b) Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. II. Frequencies of different seasonal patterns of drought stress are related to location effects on hybrid yields. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 209–221.
Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. II. Frequencies of different seasonal patterns of drought stress are related to location effects on hybrid yields.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chapman SC, Hammer GL, Butler DG, Cooper M (2000c) Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. III. Temporal sequences and spatial patterns in the target population of environments. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 223–233.
Genotype by environment interactions affecting grain sorghum. III. Temporal sequences and spatial patterns in the target population of environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chen W, Robertson M, Lingling L, Bellotti W, French R, Bell R (2008) Simulation of field pea growth and yield in diverse environments. In ‘Proceedings of 14th Agronomy Conference 2008’. 21–25 September 2008, Adelaide, South Australia. (Ed. MJ Unkovich) (The Regional Institute Ltd.) Available at: www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2008/poster/agronomy-landscape/5824_wenchen.htm

Chenu K, Chapman SC, Tardieu F, McLean G, Welcker C, Hammer GL (2009) Simulating the yield impacts of organ-level quantitative trait loci associated with drought response in maize: a ‘gene-to-phenotype’ modeling approach. Genetics 183, 1507–1523.
Simulating the yield impacts of organ-level quantitative trait loci associated with drought response in maize: a ‘gene-to-phenotype’ modeling approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chenu K, Cooper M, Hammer GL, Mathews KL, Dreccer MF, Chapman SC (2011) Environment characterization as an aid to wheat improvement: interpreting genotype-environment interactions by modelling water-deficit patterns in North-Eastern Australia. Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 1743–1755.
Environment characterization as an aid to wheat improvement: interpreting genotype-environment interactions by modelling water-deficit patterns in North-Eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXjsFyis7w%3D&md5=a12d7c4440e7ad30bd625f133bed4bfdCAS |

Cooper M, Hammer GL (2005) Complex traits and plant breeding – can we understand the complexities of genotype-to-phenotype relationships and use such knowledge to enhance plant breeding outcomes? Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 869–872.
Complex traits and plant breeding – can we understand the complexities of genotype-to-phenotype relationships and use such knowledge to enhance plant breeding outcomes?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cooper M, Woodruff DR, Eisemann RL, Brennan PS, Delacy IH (1995) A selection strategy to accommodate genotype-by-environment interaction for grain-yield of wheat-managed environments for selection among genotypes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 90, 492–502.
A selection strategy to accommodate genotype-by-environment interaction for grain-yield of wheat-managed environments for selection among genotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

de la Vega AJ, Chapman SC (2006) Defining sunflower selection strategies for a highly heterogeneous target population of environments. Crop Science 46, 136–144.
Defining sunflower selection strategies for a highly heterogeneous target population of environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

de la Vega AJ, DeLacy IH, Chapman SC (2007) Progress over 20 years of sunflower breeding in central Argentina. Field Crops Research 100, 61–72.
Progress over 20 years of sunflower breeding in central Argentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Downes RW (1985) Factors affecting germination of sunflower under low temperature conditions. In ‘11th International Sunflower Conference’. ASAGIR/ISA, Mar del Plata, Argentina. pp. 87–92.

Finlay KW, Wilkinson GN (1963) The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 742–754.
The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fischer RA (1985) Number of kernels in wheat crops and the influence of solar radiation and temperature. The Journal of Agricultural Science 105, 447–461.
Number of kernels in wheat crops and the influence of solar radiation and temperature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fischer RA (2009) Farming systems of Australia: exploiting the synergy between genetic improvement and agronomy. In ‘Crop physiology: applications for genetic improvement and agronomy’. (Eds VO Sadras, DF Calderini) pp. 23–54. (Academic Press: San Diego, CA)

Fischer RA, Laing DR (1976) Yield potential in a dwarf spring wheat and response to crop thinning. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge) 87, 113–122.
Yield potential in a dwarf spring wheat and response to crop thinning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Foulkes MJ, Hawkesford MJ, Barraclough PB, Holdsworth MJ, Kerr S, Kightley S, Shewry PR (2009a) Identifying traits to improve the nitrogen economy of wheat: recent advances and future prospects. Field Crops Research 114, 329–342.
Identifying traits to improve the nitrogen economy of wheat: recent advances and future prospects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Foulkes MJ, Reynolds MP, Sylvester-Bradley R (2009b) Genetic improvement of grain crops: yield potential. In ‘Crop physiology: applications for genetic improvement and agronomy’. (Eds VO Sadras, DF Calderini) pp. 355–385. (Academic Press: San Diego, CA)

Gentilli J (1971) The main climatological elements. In ‘Climates of Australia and New Zealand. Vol. 13’. (Ed. J Gentilli) pp. 119–188. (Elsevier: New York)

Guilioni L, Lecoeur J (2010) Carbon acquisition at the crop level in pea. In ‘Physiology of the pea crop’. (Eds N Munier-Jolain, V Biarnès, I Chaillet, J Lecoeur, MH Jeuffroy) pp. 44–60. (CRC Press: Enfield, NH)

Guilioni L, Wery J, Lecoeur J (2003) High temperature and water deficit may reduce seed number in field pea purely by decreasing plant growth rate. Functional Plant Biology 30, 1151–1164.
High temperature and water deficit may reduce seed number in field pea purely by decreasing plant growth rate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hall AJ, Chimenti CA, Vilella F, Freier G (1985) Timing of water stress effects on yield components in sunflower. In ‘Proceedings 11th Sunflower Conference’. 10–13 March 1985, ASAGIR/ISA, Mar del Plata, Argentina. pp. 131–136.

Heinemann AB (2010) Characterization of water stress patterns for rice (short and medium cycle) in Goias State and their consequences for the plant breeding program. Ciencia E Agrotecnologia 34, 29–36.

Heinemann AB, Dingkuhn M, Luquet D, Combres JC, Chapman S (2008) Characterization of drought stress environments for upland rice and maize in central Brazil. Euphytica 162, 395–410.
Characterization of drought stress environments for upland rice and maize in central Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hoffmann CM, Huijbregts T, van Swaaij N, Jansen R (2009) Impact of different environments in Europe on yield and quality of sugar beet genotypes. European Journal of Agronomy 30, 17–26.
Impact of different environments in Europe on yield and quality of sugar beet genotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtlGhurbO&md5=ecd2c8edae9c2f35eb022ff9443f7983CAS |

Jeffrey SJ, Carter JO, Moodie KB, Beswick AR (2001) Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data. Environmental Modelling & Software 16, 309–330.
Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jeuffroy MH, Lecoeur J, Roche R (2010) The seed number. In ‘Physiology of the pea crop’. (Eds N Munier-Jolain, V Biarnès, I Chaillet, J Lecoeur, MH Jeuffroy) pp. 104–131. (CRC Press: Enfield, NH)

Jordan WR, Miller MR (1980) Genetic variability in sorghum root system: implications for drought tolerance. In ‘Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress’. (Eds NC Turner, PJ Kramer) pp. 383–399. (John Wiley and Sons: New York)

Keating BA, Carberry PS, Hammer GL, Probert ME, Robertson MJ, Holzworth D, Huth NI, Hargreaves JNG, Meinke H, Hochman Z, McLean G, Verburg K, Snow V, Dimes JP, Silburn M, Wang E, Brown S, Bristow KL, Asseng S, Chapman S, McCown RL, Freebairn DM, Smith CJ (2003) An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 267–288.
An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lacaze X, Hayes PM, Korol A (2009) Genetics of phenotypic plasticity: QTL analysis in barley, Hordeum vulgare. Heredity 102, 163–173.
Genetics of phenotypic plasticity: QTL analysis in barley, Hordeum vulgare.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXotVCgsg%3D%3D&md5=9fa678f460142bc7b38333c7a20233ffCAS |

Lecoeur J (2010) Vegetative development: the morphogenesis of plant organs. In ‘Physiology of the pea crop’. (Eds N Munier-Jolain, V Biarnès, I Chaillet, J Lecoeur, MH Jeuffroy) pp. 3–43. (CRC Press: Enfield, NH)

Lecoeur J, Guilioni L (2010) Abiotic stresses. In ‘Physiology of the pea crop’. (Eds N Munier-Jolain, V Biarnès, I Chaillet, J Lecoeur, MH Jeuffroy) pp. 136–181. (CRC Press: Enfield, NH)

Magrin GO, Hall AJ, Baldy C, Grondona MO (1993) Spatial and interannual variations in the photothermal quotient: implications for the potential kernel number of wheat crops in Argentina. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 67, 29–41.
Spatial and interannual variations in the photothermal quotient: implications for the potential kernel number of wheat crops in Argentina.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Manschadi AM, Hammer GL, Christopher JT, deVoil P (2008) Genotypic variation in seedling root architectural traits and implications for drought adaptation in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant and Soil 303, 115–129.
Genotypic variation in seedling root architectural traits and implications for drought adaptation in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXht1Shtbg%3D&md5=15ee860ff09c16cc36b3a15121fd015aCAS |

McMurray LS, Davidson JA, Lines MD, Leonforte A, Salam MU (2011) Combining management and breeding advances to improve field pea (Pisum sativum L.) grain yields under changing climatic conditions in south-eastern Australia. Euphytica 180, 69–88.
Combining management and breeding advances to improve field pea (Pisum sativum L.) grain yields under changing climatic conditions in south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Messina C, Hammer G, Dong Z, Podlich D, Cooper M (2009) Modelling crop improvement in a GxExM framework via gene-trait-phenotype relationship. In ‘Crop physiology: applications for genetic improvement and agronomy’. (Eds VO Sadras, DF Calderini) pp. 235–265. (Academic Press: San Diego, CA)

Monteith JL (1993) The exchange of water and carbon by crops in a Mediterranean climate. Irrigation Science 14, 85–91.
The exchange of water and carbon by crops in a Mediterranean climate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Muller B, Pantin F, Genard M, Turc O, Freixes S, Piques M, Gibon Y (2011) Water deficits uncouple growth from photosynthesis, increase C content, and modify the relationships between C and growth in sink organs. Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 1715–1729.
Water deficits uncouple growth from photosynthesis, increase C content, and modify the relationships between C and growth in sink organs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXjsFyjtbc%3D&md5=a4457d543bc0f3cddf80f3d4d7e8c6a3CAS |

Niklas KJ (1994) ‘Plant allometry: the scaling of form and process.’ (University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL)

Peltonen-Sainio P, Jauhiainen L, Sadras VO (2011) Phenotypic plasticity of yield and agronomic traits in cereals and rapeseed at high latitudes. Field Crops Research 124, 261–269.
Phenotypic plasticity of yield and agronomic traits in cereals and rapeseed at high latitudes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

R Development Core Team (2011) ‘R: A language and environment for statistical computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria) Available at: www.R-project.org/

Reymond M, Muller B, Leonardi A, Charcosset A, Tardieu F (2003) Combining quantitative trait loci analysis and an ecophysiological model to analyze the genetic variability of the responses of maize leaf growth to temperature and water deficit. Plant Physiology 131, 664–675.
Combining quantitative trait loci analysis and an ecophysiological model to analyze the genetic variability of the responses of maize leaf growth to temperature and water deficit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXhtlyjs7w%3D&md5=e8cb3e2010910d9d7601ed16ef6d9cdfCAS |

Richards RA, Watt M, Rebetzke GJ (2007) Physiological traits and cereal germplasm for sustainable agricultural systems Euphytica 154, 409–425.
Physiological traits and cereal germplasm for sustainable agricultural systemsCrossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rodriguez D, Sadras VO (2007) The limit to wheat water use efficiency in eastern Australia. I. Gradients in the radiation environment and atmospheric demand. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 287–302.
The limit to wheat water use efficiency in eastern Australia. I. Gradients in the radiation environment and atmospheric demand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sadras VO (2007) Evolutionary aspects of the trade-off between seed size and number in crops. Field Crops Research 100, 125–138.
Evolutionary aspects of the trade-off between seed size and number in crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sadras VO, Denison RF (2009) Do plant parts compete for resources? An evolutionary perspective. New Phytologist 183, 565–574.
Do plant parts compete for resources? An evolutionary perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sadras VO, Rodriguez D (2007) The limit to wheat water use efficiency in eastern Australia. II. Influence of rainfall patterns. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 657–669.
The limit to wheat water use efficiency in eastern Australia. II. Influence of rainfall patterns.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sadras VO, Calderini DF, Connor DJ (2009) Sustainable agriculture and crop physiology. In ‘Crop physiology: applications for genetic improvement and agronomy’. (Eds VO Sadras, DF Calderini) pp. 1–20. (Academic Press: San Diego, CA)

Schwinning S, Ehleringer JR (2001) Water-use trade-offs and optimal adaptations to pulse-driven arid ecosystems. Journal of Ecology 89, 464–480.
Water-use trade-offs and optimal adaptations to pulse-driven arid ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Snape JW, Foulkes MJ, Simmonds J, Leverington M, Fish LJ, Wang Y, Ciavarrella M (2007) Dissecting gene × environmental effects on wheat yields via QTL and physiological analysis. Euphytica 154, 401–408.
Dissecting gene × environmental effects on wheat yields via QTL and physiological analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Turner NC, Asseng S (2005) Productivity, sustainability, and rainfall use efficiency in Australian Mediterranean rainfall agricultural systems. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 1123–1136.
Productivity, sustainability, and rainfall use efficiency in Australian Mediterranean rainfall agricultural systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Varshney RK, Bansal KC, Aggarwal PK, Datta SK, Craufurd PQ (2011) Agricultural biotechnology for crop improvement in a variable climate: hope or hype? Trends in Plant Science 16, 363–371.
Agricultural biotechnology for crop improvement in a variable climate: hope or hype?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXos1yntrY%3D&md5=6f8c513f779eda03968bebe9fd9328cdCAS |

Williamson G (2007) Climate and root distribution in Australian perennial grasses; implications for salinity mitigation. PhD Thesis, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

Yang RC, Blade SF, Crossa J, Stanton D, Bandara MS (2005) Identifying isoyield environments for field pea production. Crop Science 45, 106–113.