Growth and yield responses to amendments to the sugarcane monoculture: effects of crop, pasture and bare fallow breaks and soil fumigation on plant and ratoon crops
A. L. Garside A C and M. J. Bell B0 Sugar Yield Decline Joint Venture.
A BSES LTD, c/- CSIRO, PMB Aitkenvale, Townsville, Qld 4814, Australia; and Tropical Crop Science Unit, School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia.
B Queensland Alliance of Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, PO Box 23, Kingaroy, Qld 4610, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: Alan.Garside@jcu.edu.au
Crop and Pasture Science 62(5) 396-412 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP11013
Submitted: 26 January 2011 Accepted: 9 May 2011 Published: 1 June 2011
Abstract
Yield decline has been a major issue limiting productivity improvement in the Australian sugar industry since the early 1970s and is suspected to be largely due to growing sugarcane in a long-term monoculture. In order to address this issue, rotation experiments were established in several sugarcane-growing regions in Queensland, Australia, to ascertain whether breaking the sugarcane monoculture could, at least in part, assist in overcoming yield decline. The rotation experiments involved other crop species, pasture and bare fallow for different periods of time. When cane was replanted, the growth and yield following breaks was compared with that in a sugarcane monoculture system where the soil was unamended or fumigated before replanting. Yield increases were recorded in the plant and first ratoon (R1) crops in all experiments: in response to soil fumigation (average of 42 and 18%, respectively), and breaks (average of 27 and 30%, respectively). The data indicated that the response to breaks, while smaller in the plant crop, may have greater longevity than the response to fumigation. Further, there were indications that the response to breaks could continue into later ratoons (R2 and R3). Break type had little overall effect with the average response in the plant and R1 crops being 35% for breaks in excess of 30 months. Breaks of longer duration produced larger yield responses: 17% (<12 months), 24% (18–30 months) and 28% (>30 months) in the plant crop. However, the average yield increase over a plant and three ratoon crops when one cane crop was missed (6–12 months’ break) and a grain legume or maize break included was ~20%. Yield increases with breaks and fumigation were due to either increased stalk number, increased individual stalk weight or a combination of both. The component accounting for the majority of the variance changed between experiments, with a general trend for individual stalk weight to have more impact under better late season growing conditions and/or conditions that hampered early stalk development, while stalk number was more important under conditions of late season water stress and/or low radiation input. The results demonstrate that the long-term sugarcane monoculture is having an adverse effect on productivity. Further, breaking the sugarcane monoculture and sacrificing one sugarcane crop is likely to have minimal impact on the supply of cane to the mill. The increase in yield during other stages of the cane cycle is likely to compensate for the loss of 1 year of sugarcane, especially as the crop that is sacrificed is the last and almost always lowest-yielding ratoon.
Additional keywords: yield components, break duration, break type, soil biology, biomass accumulation, cumulative yield.
References
Bell AF (1935) Sick soils. Proceedings Queensland Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 6, 9–18.Bell AF (1938) Crop rotation with special reference to the principles of green manuring. Cane Growers Quarterly 1, 138–148.
Bell MJ, Garside AL (2005) Shoot and stalk dynamics and the yield of sugarcane crops in tropical and subtropical Queensland, Australia. Field Crops Research 92, 231–248.
| Shoot and stalk dynamics and the yield of sugarcane crops in tropical and subtropical Queensland, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bell MJ, Garside AL, Moody PW, Pankhurst CE, Halpin NV, Berthelsen JE (2002) Nutrient dynamics and root health in sugarcane soils. Proceedings Australian Society of Sugarcane Technologists 24, 92–98.
Bell MJ, Stirling GR, Pankhurst CE (2007) The impact of management on the health of soils supporting the Australian grain and sugarcane industries. Soil & Tillage Research 97, 256–271.
| The impact of management on the health of soils supporting the Australian grain and sugarcane industries.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bramley RGV, Ellis N, Nable RO, Garside AL (1996) Changes in soil chemical properties under long-term sugarcane monoculture. Australian Journal of Soil Research 34, 967–984.
| Changes in soil chemical properties under long-term sugarcane monoculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK28Xnt1Kgs7Y%3D&md5=6a5a6086546ecbd5fa5bb40545b0c620CAS |
Braunack MV, Garside AL, Bell MJ (2003) The effect of rotational breaks from continuous sugarcane on soil physical properties. Proceedings Australian Society of Sugarcane Technologists 25: (CD-ROM). 13 pp.
BSES (1984) Method 2, Pol – determination in juice (revised April 2001). In ‘The Standard Laboratory Manual for Australian Sugar Mills. Volume 2: analytical methods and tables’. pp. 1–2. (Bureau of Sugar Experiment Stations: Brisbane)
Chinloy T, Hogg BM (1968) Rotation of pangola grass and sugarcane on a Jamaican sugar estate. Proceedings International Society of Sugarcane Technologists 13, 636–642.
Garside AL, Bell MJ (2009) Row spacing and planting density effects on the growth and yield of sugarcane. 1. Response in fumigated and non-fumigated soil. Crop & Pasture Science 60, 532–543.
| Row spacing and planting density effects on the growth and yield of sugarcane. 1. Response in fumigated and non-fumigated soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Garside AL, Bell MJ, Robotham BG, Magarey RC, Stirling GR (2005) Managing yield decline in sugarcane cropping systems. International Sugar Journal 107, 16–26.
Garside AL, Bramley RGV, Bristow KL, Holt JA, Magarey RC, Nable RA, Pankhurst CE, Skjemstad JO (1997b) Comparisons between paired old and new land sites for sugarcane growth and yield and soil chemical, physical and biological properties. Proceedings Australian Society of Sugarcane Technologists 19, 60–66.
Garside AL, Smith MA, Chapman LS, Hurney AP, Magarey RC (1997a) The yield plateau in the Australian sugar industry: 1970–1990. In ‘Intensive sugarcane production: meeting the challenges beyond 2000’. (Eds BA Keating, JR Wilson) pp. 103–124. (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)
Halpin NV, Cameron T, Russo PF (2008) Economic evaluation of precision controlled traffic farming in the Australian sugar industry: a case study of an early adopter. Proceedings Australian Society of Sugarcane Technologists 30, 34–42.
Isbell RF (1996) ‘Australian soil classification.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)
Loeskow N, Cameron T, Callow B (2006) Grower case study on economics of an improved farming system. Proceedings Australian Society of Sugarcane Technologists 28, 96–102.
Magarey RC (1996) Microbial aspects of sugar cane yield decline. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 307–322.
| Microbial aspects of sugar cane yield decline.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Magarey RC, Croft BJ (1996) A review of root disease research in Australia. Proceedings International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 22(2), 505–513.
Maxwell M (1900) ‘Report upon an investigation into the condition of the sugar industry in Queensland.’ (Department of Agriculture Publications: Brisbane)
Moody PW, Bramley RGV, Skjemstad JO, Garside AL, Bell MJ (1999) The effects of fallow and break crops on the quantity and quality of soil organic matter in cane soils. Proceedings Australian Society of Sugarcane Technologists 21, 87–91.
Muchow RC, Robertson MJ, Keating BA (1997) Limits to the Australian sugar industry: climatic and biological factors. In ‘Intensive sugarcane production: meeting the challenges beyond 2000’. (Eds BA Keating, JR Wilson) pp. 37–54. (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)
Nixon DJ (1992) The impact of fallowing and green manuring on soil properties and the productivity of sugarcane in Swaziland. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Reading, UK.
Nixon DJ, Simmonds LP (2004) The impact of fallowing and green manuring on soil conditions and the growth of sugarcane. Experimental Agriculture 40, 127–138.
| The impact of fallowing and green manuring on soil conditions and the growth of sugarcane.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Noble AD, Garside AL (2000) Influence of soybean residue management on nitrogen mineralisation and leaching and soil pH in a wet tropical environment. Proceedings Australian Society of Sugarcane Technologists 22, 139–146.
Pankhurst CE, Blair BL, Magarey RC, Stirling GR, Bell MJ, Garside AL (2005b) Effect of rotation breaks and organic matter amendments on the capacity of soils to develop biological suppression towards soil organisms associated with yield decline in sugarcane. Applied Soil Ecology 28, 271–282.
| Effect of rotation breaks and organic matter amendments on the capacity of soils to develop biological suppression towards soil organisms associated with yield decline in sugarcane.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Pankhurst CE, Blair BL, Magarey RC, Stirling GR, Garside AL (2005a) Effects of biocide and rotation breaks on soil organisms associated with the poor early growth of sugarcane in continuous monoculture. Plant and Soil 268, 255–269.
| Effects of biocide and rotation breaks on soil organisms associated with the poor early growth of sugarcane in continuous monoculture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXks1ersLs%3D&md5=11f1a6adaf9a4e0772467f44b942f934CAS |
Pankhurst CE, Stirling GR, Magarey RC, Blair BL, Holt JA, Bell MJ, Garside AL (2005c) Quantification of the effects of rotation breaks on soil biological properties and their impact on yield decline in sugarcane. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 37, 1121–1130.
| Quantification of the effects of rotation breaks on soil biological properties and their impact on yield decline in sugarcane.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXisFGrur4%3D&md5=2afa49707d98120bf8c741c958d271beCAS |
Pearson CHO (1958) Monoculture in sugarcane: experimental evidence showing that the time taken in growing a green manure crop can be turned to a profit by following cane after cane in a rotation. Proceedings South African Sugar Technologists Association 32, 143–145.
Pramanee P, Boontum A, Lairungreong C, Thumthong P, Sruttaporn C, Thongyai C (1997) Soil properties and sugarcane yield improvement by green manuring. Thai Journal of Agricultural Science 30, 219–232.
Singels A, Smit MA (2009) Sugarcane response to row-spacing induced competition for light. Field Crops Research 113, 149–155.
| Sugarcane response to row-spacing induced competition for light.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Singh A (1963) A critical evaluation of green manuring experiments on sugar cane in north India. Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture 31, 205–212.
SRDC (1995) ‘Research and Development Plan 1995–2000.’ (Sugar Research and Development Corporation: Brisbane)
Stirling GR (2008) The impact of farming systems on soil biology and soil borne diseases: examples from the Australian sugar and vegetable industries – the case for better integration of sugarcane and vegetable production and implications for future research. Australasian Plant Pathology 37, 1–18.
| The impact of farming systems on soil biology and soil borne diseases: examples from the Australian sugar and vegetable industries – the case for better integration of sugarcane and vegetable production and implications for future research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stirling GR, Blair BL, Pattemore JA, Garside AL, Bell MJ (2001) Changes in nematode populations on sugarcane following fallow, fumigation and crop rotation, and implications for the role of nematodes in yield decline. Australasian Plant Pathology 30, 323–335.
| Changes in nematode populations on sugarcane following fallow, fumigation and crop rotation, and implications for the role of nematodes in yield decline.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stirling GR, Wilson EJ, Stirling AM, Pankhurst CE, Moody PW, Bell MJ, Halpin N (2005) Amendments of sugarcane trash induce suppressiveness to plant parasitic nematodes in a sugarcane soil. Australasian Plant Pathology 34, 203–211.
| Amendments of sugarcane trash induce suppressiveness to plant parasitic nematodes in a sugarcane soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Thorburn PJ, Keating BA, Robertson FA, Wood AW (2000) Long-term changes in soil carbon and nitrogen under trash blanketing. Proceedings Australian Society of Sugarcane Technologists 22, 200–225.
Uddin MM, Bokhtiar SM, Islam MJ (1996) Performance of different green manuring crops in supplementing N and increasing yield of a subsequent cane crop. In ‘Sugarcane: research towards efficient and sustainable production’. (Eds JR Wilson, DM Hogarth, JA Campbell, AL Garside) pp. 206–208. (CSIRO Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures: Brisbane)
Wegener MK (1985) The contribution of science to Australian tropical agriculture. IV. The sugar industry. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 51, 29–41.
