An early transient water deficit reduces flower number and pod production but increases seed size in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
X.-W. Fang A B C D , N. C. Turner A B , F.-M. Li C and K. H. M. Siddique A BA Centre for Legumes in Mediterranean Agriculture, M080, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
B The UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
C MOE Key Laboratory of Arid and Grassland Ecology, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730000, People’s Republic of China.
D Corresponding author. Email: fangxw@lzu.edu.cn
Crop and Pasture Science 62(6) 481-487 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP10349
Submitted: 29 October 2010 Accepted: 7 April 2011 Published: 7 July 2011
Abstract
Terminal drought is known to decrease flower production, increase flower and pod abortion, and decrease yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), but the effects of early-season drought have not been evaluated. The influence of an early transient water deficit on flower and pod production and abortion, and seed yield and its components was evaluated in two chickpea cultivars, Rupali, a desi type, and Almaz, a kabuli type. Thirty-six-day-old plants were subjected to: (i) a transient water deficit by withholding water for 35 days, and then rewatered (WS), and (ii) kept well watered (WW) throughout. In the WS treatment the soil water content, leaf relative water content and leaf photosynthetic rate decreased after water was withheld and, following rewatering, recovered to the WW level. Despite the WS treatment being imposed at different phenological stages in the two cultivars, WS reduced flower number per plant by ~50% in Rupali and Almaz, respectively, compared with the WW plants. In WW plants, ~15% of flowers aborted in both cultivars, and 42 and 67% of the pods aborted in Rupali and Almaz, respectively, whereas in WS plants, 18 and 23% of flowers aborted and 27 and 67% of pods aborted in Rupali and Almaz, respectively. While seed growth in WS plants of Rupali and Almaz occurred primarily after the plants were rewatered, the duration of seed growth decreased by 17 and 36 days, the maximum rate of seed filling increased by 3 times and 5 times, and seed size increased by 26 and 16%, respectively, compared with the WW plants. Seed yield per plant in WS plants decreased by 31% in Rupali and 38% in Almaz compared with the WW controls. The early transient water deficit decreased flower production, but improved flower and pod development; increased the rate of seed growth and increased final seed size; and had a smaller effect on seed yield compared with chickpea subjected to terminal drought.
Additional keywords: flower abortion, flower production, photosynthesis, pod abortion, pod set, relative water content, seed growth rate, seed yield.
References
Amoabin S, Stern WR, Turner NC (1987) Seed yield of three annual pasture legumes in response to water deficits during flowering and seed development. In ‘Proceedings of the 4th Australian Agronomy Conference’. (Ed. TG Reeves) p. 165. (La Trobe University: Melbourne)Atta S, Maltese S, Cousin R (2004) Protein content and dry weight of seeds from various pea genotypes. Agronomie 24, 257–266.
| Protein content and dry weight of seeds from various pea genotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtVShur3P&md5=0100c420a81b34bbbc709b1ebf3cefd4CAS |
Behboudian MH, Ma Q, Turner NC, Palta JA (2001) Reactions of chickpea to water stress: yield and seed composition. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 81, 1288–1291.
| Reactions of chickpea to water stress: yield and seed composition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXnt1Cntr0%3D&md5=38f6b27fa90fd77b2ef6ec9839999c7eCAS |
Darroch BA, Baker RJ (1990) Grain filling in three spring wheat genotypes: statistical analysis. Crop Science 30, 525–529.
| Grain filling in three spring wheat genotypes: statistical analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Davies SL, Turner NC, Siddique KHM, Plummer JA, Leport L (1999) Seed growth of desi and kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in a short-season Mediterranean-type environment. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 39, 181–188.
| Seed growth of desi and kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in a short-season Mediterranean-type environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fang X, Turner NC, Yan G, Li F, Siddique KHM (2010) Flower numbers, pod production, pollen viability, and pistil function are reduced and flower and pod abortion increased in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under terminal drought. Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 335–345.
| Flower numbers, pod production, pollen viability, and pistil function are reduced and flower and pod abortion increased in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under terminal drought.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXktlGltQ%3D%3D&md5=7dc5e068602252e612bddbf0bc5660aaCAS | 19854801PubMed |
French RJ, Turner NC (1991) Water deficits change dry matter partitioning and seed yield in narrow-leafed lupins (Lupinus angustifolius L.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42, 471–484.
| Water deficits change dry matter partitioning and seed yield in narrow-leafed lupins (Lupinus angustifolius L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kalefetoğlu Macar J, Ekmekçi Y (2009) Alterations in photochemical and physiological activities of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars under drought stress. Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science 195, 335–346.
| Alterations in photochemical and physiological activities of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars under drought stress.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kashiwagi J, Krishnamurthy L, Crouch JH, Serraj R (2006) Variability of root length density and its contributions to seed yield in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under terminal drought stress. Field Crops Research 95, 171–181.
| Variability of root length density and its contributions to seed yield in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under terminal drought stress.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kashiwagi J, Krishnamurthy L, Upadhyaya HD, Krishna H, Chandra S, Vadez V, Serraj R (2005) Genetic variability of drought-avoidance root traits in the mini-core germplasm collection of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica 146, 213–222.
| Genetic variability of drought-avoidance root traits in the mini-core germplasm collection of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kokubun M, Shimada S, Takahashi M (2001) Flower abortion caused by preanthesis water deficit is not attributed to impairment of pollen in soybean. Crop Science 41, 1517–1521.
| Flower abortion caused by preanthesis water deficit is not attributed to impairment of pollen in soybean.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Leport L, Turner NC, Davies SL, Siddique KHM (2006) Variation in pod production and abortion among chickpea cultivars under terminal drought. European Journal of Agronomy 24, 236–246.
| Variation in pod production and abortion among chickpea cultivars under terminal drought.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Leport L, Turner NC, French RJ, Barr MD, Duda R, Davies SL, Tennant D, Siddique KHM (1999) Physiological responses of chickpea genotypes to terminal drought in a Mediterranean-type environment. European Journal of Agronomy 11, 279–291.
| Physiological responses of chickpea genotypes to terminal drought in a Mediterranean-type environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Samarah NH (2005) Effects of drought stress on growth and yield of barley. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 25, 145–149.
| Effects of drought stress on growth and yield of barley.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shrestha R, Turner NC, Siddique KHM, Turner DW (2006a) Physiological and seed yield responses to water deficits among lentil genotypes from diverse origins. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 903–915.
| Physiological and seed yield responses to water deficits among lentil genotypes from diverse origins.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shrestha R, Turner NC, Siddique KHM, Turner DW, Speijers J (2006b) A water deficit during pod development in lentils reduces flower and pod numbers but not seed size. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 427–438.
| A water deficit during pod development in lentils reduces flower and pod numbers but not seed size.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Siddique KHM, Brinsmead RB, Knight R, Knights EJ, Paull JG, Rose IA (2000) Adaptation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and faba bean (Vicia faba L.) to Australia. In ‘Linking Research and Marketing Opportunities for Pulses in the 21st Century’. (Ed. R Knight) pp. 289–303. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht)
Singh KB (1997) Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Field Crops Research 53, 161–170.
| Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Turner NC (1990) Plant water relations and irrigation management. Agricultural Water Management 17, 59–73.
| Plant water relations and irrigation management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Turner NC (2003) Adaptation to drought: lessons from studies with chickpea. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology (Special issue), 11–17.
Turner NC, Abbo S, Berger JD, Chaturvedi SK, French RJ, Ludwig C, Mannur DM, Singh SJ, Yadava HS (2007) Osmotic adjustment in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) results in no yield benefit under terminal drought. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 187–194.
| Osmotic adjustment in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) results in no yield benefit under terminal drought.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtlOlt7s%3D&md5=000d25b4fe2e7aa5bd6f81795e360966CAS | 17088363PubMed |
Yang J, Zhang J, Wang Z, Zhu Q (2001) Activities of starch hydrolytic enzymes and sucrose-phosphate synthase in the stems of rice subjected to water stress during grain filling. Journal of Experimental Botany 52, 2169–2179.
Zaman-Allah M, Jenkinson DM, Vadez V (2011) Chickpea genotypes contrasting for seed yield under terminal drought stress in the field differ for traits related to the control of water use. Functional Plant Biology 38, 270–281.
| Chickpea genotypes contrasting for seed yield under terminal drought stress in the field differ for traits related to the control of water use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |