Source–sink balance and manipulating sink–source relations of wheat indicate that the yield potential of wheat is sink-limited in high-rainfall zones
Heping Zhang A D , Neil C. Turner B C and Michael L. Poole A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A CSIRO Plant Industry, Private Bag 5, PO Wembley, WA 6913, Australia.
B Centre for Legumes in Mediterranean Agriculture, M080, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
C The UWA Institute of Agriculture, M082, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: heping.zhang@csiro.au
Crop and Pasture Science 61(10) 852-861 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP10161
Submitted: 10 May 2010 Accepted: 11 August 2010 Published: 14 October 2010
Abstract
Grain yield depends on the number of grains per unit area (sink) and the availability of assimilates (source) to fill these grains. The aim of the current work was to determine whether wheat yield in the high-rainfall zone of south-western Australia is limited in current cultivars by the size of the sink or by the assimilates available for grain filling. Three wheat cultivars (Calingiri, Chara and Wyalkatchem) and two breeding lines (HRZ216 and HRZ203) were grown in four replicates in the field from 2005 to 2007. Dry matter and water soluble carbohydrates (WSC) at anthesis and maturity were measured and used to determine the source and sink balance of the crop. In 2007, three further treatments were applied to manipulate the sink–source relationships: (i) spikelets were removed on main stems to increase the source : sink ratio; (ii) incoming solar radiation was reduced by 40% by shading after anthesis to reduce the availability of assimilates to grains; and (iii) supplemental irrigation was used to maintain the capacity for photosynthesis by an improved water supply during grain filling. The source–sink balance of the crops showed that the potential source was 25% greater than the actual grain yield in average and above-average seasons (2005 and 2007), suggesting that sink size, represented by the number of grain per unit area, was a limiting factor to yield potential. However, the source may have become a limiting factor in a drought season (2006). The grain yield increased with increased number of grains/m2 and kernel weight remained relatively stable even when grain number increased from 7000 to 16 000 per m2. The removal of half of the spikelets on the main stem did not increase kernel mass of the remaining grains and an additional 33 mm of irrigation water did not increase grain yield, but significantly (P < 0.05) increased WSC left in stems and leaf sheaths at maturity. Shading after anthesis did not significantly reduce grain yield of the current cultivars Calingiri and Wyalkatchem, but it reduced grain yield by 23–25% (P < 0.05) in Chara and HRZ203. The source–sink balance over three seasons and three independent experiments in 2007 suggested that the yield of the current wheat cultivars is more sink- than source-limited and that breeding wheat with a larger sink size than in the current cultivars may lift the yield potential of wheat in the high-rainfall zone of south-western Australia.
References
Anderson WK (2010) Closing the gap between actual and potential yield of rainfed wheat. The impacts of environment, management and cultivar. Field Crops Research 116, 14–22.| Closing the gap between actual and potential yield of rainfed wheat. The impacts of environment, management and cultivar.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Austin RB, Bingham J, Blackwell RD, Evans LT, Ford MA, Morgan CL, Taylor M (1980) Genetic improvements in winter wheat yields since 1900 and associated physiological changes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 675–689.
Beed FD, Paveley ND, Sylvester-Bradley R (2007) Predictability of wheat growth and yield in light-limited conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 145, 63–79.
| Predictability of wheat growth and yield in light-limited conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bingham IJ, Blake J, Foulkes MJ, Spink JH (2007) Is barley yield in the UK sink limited? I. Post-anthesis radiation interception, radiation-use efficiency and source–sink balance. Field Crops Research 101, 198–211.
| Is barley yield in the UK sink limited? I. Post-anthesis radiation interception, radiation-use efficiency and source–sink balance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Blum A, Mayer J, Golan G (1988) The effect of grain number per ear (sink size) on source activity and its water-relations in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany 39, 106–114.
| The effect of grain number per ear (sink size) on source activity and its water-relations in wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Borras L, Slafer GA, Otegui ME (2004) Seed dry weight response to source–sink manipulations in wheat, maize and soybean: a quantitative reappraisal. Field Crops Research 86, 131–146.
| Seed dry weight response to source–sink manipulations in wheat, maize and soybean: a quantitative reappraisal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Calderini DF, Reynolds MP (2000) Changes in grain weight as a consequence of de-graining treatments at pre- and post-anthesis in synthetic hexaploid lines of wheat (Triticum durum × T. tauschii). Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27, 183–191.
Calderini DF, Reynolds MP, Slafer GA (2006) Source–sink effects on grain weight of bread wheat, durum wheat, and triticale at different locations. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57, 227–233.
| Source–sink effects on grain weight of bread wheat, durum wheat, and triticale at different locations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fischer RA (1975) Yield potential in a dwarf spring wheat and the effect of shading. Crop Science 15, 607–613.
| Yield potential in a dwarf spring wheat and the effect of shading.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fischer RA (2007) Understanding the physiological basis of yield potential in wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 145, 99–113.
| Understanding the physiological basis of yield potential in wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fischer RA, Aguilar I, Laing DR (1977) Post-anthesis sink size in a high-yielding dwarf wheat: yield response to grain number. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 165–175.
| Post-anthesis sink size in a high-yielding dwarf wheat: yield response to grain number.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fischer RA, HilleRisLambers D (1978) Effect of environment and cultivars on source limitation to grain weight in wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29, 443–458.
| Effect of environment and cultivars on source limitation to grain weight in wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Foulkes MJ, Scott RK, Sylvester-Bradley R (2002) The ability of wheat cultivars to withstand drought in UK conditions: formation of grain yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 138, 153–169.
Foulkes MJ, Shearman VJ, Reynolds MP, Gaju O, Sylvester-Bradley R (2007) Genetic progress in yield potential in wheat: recent advances and future prospects. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 145, 17–29.
| Genetic progress in yield potential in wheat: recent advances and future prospects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhsFOgtLk%3D&md5=f4c7e5fd127f941dbe56957b44c62177CAS |
Gifford RM, Bremner PM, Jones DB (1973) Assessing photosynthetic limitation to grain yield in a field crop. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 24, 297–307.
| Assessing photosynthetic limitation to grain yield in a field crop.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Herzog H (1982) Relation of source and sink during grain filling period in wheat and some aspects of its regulation. Physiologia Plantarum 56, 155–160.
| Relation of source and sink during grain filling period in wheat and some aspects of its regulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL38XmtFartrk%3D&md5=3e60e08bc96519e10fb37636b32d78c1CAS |
Kruk BC, Calderini DF, Slafer GA (1997) Grain weight in wheat cultivars released from 1920 to 1990 as affected by post-anthesis defoliation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 128, 273–281.
| Grain weight in wheat cultivars released from 1920 to 1990 as affected by post-anthesis defoliation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ma Y-Z, MacKown CT, Van Sanford DA (1995) Kernel mass and assimilate accumulation of wheat: cultivar responses to 50% spikelet removal at anthesis. Field Crops Research 42, 93–99.
| Kernel mass and assimilate accumulation of wheat: cultivar responses to 50% spikelet removal at anthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Miralles DJ, Slafer GA (2007) Sink limitations to yield in wheat: how could it be reduced? Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 145, 139–149.
Passioura JB (1983) Roots and drought resistance. Agricultural Water Management 7, 265–280.
| Roots and drought resistance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Perry MW, D’Antuono MF (1989) Yield improvement and associated characteristics of some Australian spring wheat cultivars introduced between 1860 and 1982. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 40, 457–472.
| Yield improvement and associated characteristics of some Australian spring wheat cultivars introduced between 1860 and 1982.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Regan KL, Siddique KHM, Tennant D, Abrecht DG (1997) Grain yield and water use efficiency of early maturing wheat in low rainfall Mediterranean environments. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 48, 595–603.
| Grain yield and water use efficiency of early maturing wheat in low rainfall Mediterranean environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reynolds MP, Calderini DF, Vargas M (2007) Association of source/sink traits with yield, biomass and radiation use efficiency among random sister lines from three wheat crosses in a high-yield environment. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 145, 3–16.
| Association of source/sink traits with yield, biomass and radiation use efficiency among random sister lines from three wheat crosses in a high-yield environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Robertson D, Zhang H, Palta JA, Colmer T, Turner NC (2009) Waterlogging affects the growth, development of tillers, and yield of wheat through a severe, but transient, N deficiency. Crop & Pasture Science 60, 578–586.
| Waterlogging affects the growth, development of tillers, and yield of wheat through a severe, but transient, N deficiency.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXntFequr8%3D&md5=0bcc0a8356b9e77d697d0baf35e12027CAS |
Ruuska SA, Rebetzke G, van Herwaarden AF, Richards RA, Fettell NA, Tabe L, Jenkins CLD (2006) Genotypic variation in water-soluble carbohydrate accumulation in wheat. Functional Plant Biology 33, 799–809.
| Genotypic variation in water-soluble carbohydrate accumulation in wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XptVClsbc%3D&md5=0df9fc8567ce056c3baecb8fe489a65cCAS |
Sayre KD, Rajaram S, Fischer RA (1997) Yield potential progress in short bread wheat populations. Crop Science 37, 36–42.
| Yield potential progress in short bread wheat populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shearman VJ, Sylvester-Bradley R, Scott RK, Foulkes MJ (2005) Physiological processes associated with wheat yield progress in the UK. Crop Science 45, 175–185.
Siddique KHM, Belford RK, Perry MW, Tennant D (1989) Growth, development and light interception of old and modern wheat cultivars in a Mediterranean-type environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 40, 473–487.
| Growth, development and light interception of old and modern wheat cultivars in a Mediterranean-type environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Slafer GA, Caderini DF, Miralles DJ (1996) Yield components and compensation in wheat: opportunities for further increasing yield potential. In ‘Increasing yield potential in wheat: breaking the barriers’. (Eds MP Reynolds, S Rajaram, A McNab) pp. 101–133. (CIMMYT: Mexico)
Slafer GA, Savin R (1994) Source–sink relationships and grain mass at different positions within the spike in wheat. Field Crops Research 37, 39–49.
| Source–sink relationships and grain mass at different positions within the spike in wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
van Herwaarden AF, Angus JF, Richards RA, Farquhar GD (1998) ‘Haying-off’, the negative grain yield response of dryland wheat to nitrogen fertiliser II. Carbohydrate and protein dynamics. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 1083–1093.
| ‘Haying-off’, the negative grain yield response of dryland wheat to nitrogen fertiliser II. Carbohydrate and protein dynamics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yemm EW, Willis AJ (1954) The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. The Biochemical Journal 57, 508–514.
Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.
| A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zaicou C, Curtis B, Dhammu H, Ellis S, Jorgensen D, Miyan S, Penny S, Shackley B, Sharma D (2008) ‘Wheat variety guide 2008 Western Australia.’ (Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia: South Perth)
Zhang H, Turner NC, Poole ML (2004) Yield of wheat and canola in the high rainfall zone of south-western Australia in years with and without a transient perched water table. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 461–470.
| Yield of wheat and canola in the high rainfall zone of south-western Australia in years with and without a transient perched water table.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhang H, Turner NC, Poole ML (2005) Water use of wheat, barley and canola and lucerne in the high rainfall zone of southwestern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 743–752.
| Water use of wheat, barley and canola and lucerne in the high rainfall zone of southwestern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhang H, Turner NC, Poole ML (2007) High ear number is key to high wheat yield in the high rainfall zone of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 21–27.
| High ear number is key to high wheat yield in the high rainfall zone of Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXnslGltbg%3D&md5=d2f9d8e29375837958f85c52e2afe0feCAS |
Zhang H, Turner NC, Poole ML, Simpson N (2006) Crop production in the high rainfall regions of southern Australia – potential, constraints and opportunities. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1035–1049.
| Crop production in the high rainfall regions of southern Australia – potential, constraints and opportunities.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zhang H, Turner NC, Simpson N, Poole ML (2010) Growing-season rainfall, ear number and the water-limited potential yield of wheat in south-western Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 61, 296–303.
| Growing-season rainfall, ear number and the water-limited potential yield of wheat in south-western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
