Assessing specific agronomic responses of wheat cultivars in a winter rainfall environment
W. K. Anderson A B , A. J. van Burgel B , D. L. Sharma C F , B. J. Shackley D , C. M. Zaicou-Kunesch E , M. S. Miyan C and M. Amjad CA School of Plant Biology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
B Department of Agriculture and Food, 444 Albany Highway, Albany, WA 6330, Australia.
C Department of Agriculture and Food, Lot 12, York Road, Northam, WA 6401, Australia.
D Department of Agriculture and Food, 10 Dore Street, Katanning, WA 6317, Australia.
E Department of Agriculture and Food, 20 Gregory Street, Geraldton, WA 6530, Australia.
F Corresponding author. Email: darshan.sharma@agric.wa.gov.au
Crop and Pasture Science 62(2) 115-124 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP10142
Submitted: 27 April 2010 Accepted: 17 January 2011 Published: 17 February 2011
Abstract
When new wheat cultivars are released for commercial production it is desirable to assist farmers to maximise the yield advantage by providing information about their responses to agronomic practices such as seeding rate and nitrogen (N) fertiliser. Over 3 years in 22 field experiments in the Mediterranean-type environment of Western Australia the response to seed rate and applied N fertiliser of current and recently released wheat cultivars was measured in factorial experiments under rain-fed conditions. A cross-site analysis showed that the environment × cultivar (location and year) or management (seed rate and N rate) interactions were relatively minor, explaining only 5% or less of the yield variation, in contrast to 89% accounted for by the environment. The analyses of individual experiments revealed that cultivars interacted more often with seeding rate (12 sites) than with applied N fertiliser rates (4 sites). Further, despite a frequent occurrence, the cultivar × seed rate interaction had only a marginal practical significance because the cultivar rankings at a site varied with season and the differences in optimum plant population were greater between sites and seasons than between cultivars at a site. The number of sites with positive and significant cultivar × N rate interaction was insufficient to generalise about the validity of the responses. The lack of any large differences between cultivars for their response to either seed rate or N rate implies the presence of a high inherent ability for compensation among yield components, thereby enabling the cultivars to exhibit an apparently high similarity for response to input levels. As such, it was not possible to generalise across environments in making clear suggestions for farmers to follow in respect of managing new cultivars differently from each other. It was concluded that despite the apparent desirability of providing information about differences between new and existing cultivars in their responses to seed and N rates at the time of release, they are more likely to be found where the differences between the cultivars are large, the testing sites are chosen so as to reduce the yield variance, and the yield level achieved in the experiments is above 2 t/ha.
References
Abeledo LG, Calderini DF, Slafer GA (2008) Nitrogen economy in old and modern malting barleys. Field Crops Research 106, 171–178.| Nitrogen economy in old and modern malting barleys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Allard RW, Bradshaw AD (1964) Implications of genotype-environment interactions in applied plant breeding. Crop Science 4, 503–508.
| Implications of genotype-environment interactions in applied plant breeding.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Anderson WK (2010) Closing the gap between actual and potential yield of rainfed wheat. The impacts of environment, management and cultivar. Field Crops Research 116, 14–22.
| Closing the gap between actual and potential yield of rainfed wheat. The impacts of environment, management and cultivar.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Anderson WK, Barclay J (1991) Evidence for differences between three wheat cultivars in yield response to plant population. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42, 701–713.
| Evidence for differences between three wheat cultivars in yield response to plant population.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Anderson WK, Hoyle FC (1999) Nitrogen efficiency of wheat genotypes in a Mediterranean environment. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 39, 957–965.
| Nitrogen efficiency of wheat genotypes in a Mediterranean environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Anderson WK, Seymour M, D’Antuono MF (1991) Evidence for differences between cultivars in responsiveness of wheat to applied nitrogen. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42, 363–377.
| Evidence for differences between cultivars in responsiveness of wheat to applied nitrogen.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Anderson WK, Sharma DL, Shackley BJ, D’Antuono MF (2004) Rainfall, sowing time, soil type and cultivar influence optimum plant populations for wheat in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 921–930.
| Rainfall, sowing time, soil type and cultivar influence optimum plant populations for wheat in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bell MA, Fischer RA, Byerlee D, Sayre K (1995) Genetic and agronomic contributions to yield gains: a case study for wheat. Field Crops Research 44, 55–65.
| Genetic and agronomic contributions to yield gains: a case study for wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Blackman JA, Bingham J, Davidson JL (1978) Response of semi-dwarf and conventional winter wheat varieties to the application of nitrogen fertilizer. The Journal of Agricultural Science 90, 543–550.
| Response of semi-dwarf and conventional winter wheat varieties to the application of nitrogen fertilizer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaE1cXksF2is7k%3D&md5=4a0238f28629fcbe7fde692fd8585e32CAS |
Blumenthal M (2009) Variety management. Ground Cover (Grains Research and Development Corporation), Issue 81. Available at: www.grdc.com.au/director/events/groundcover?item_id=8094072D90BC27EAC9CD3279E3A37ED4&article_id=15E46EEDFB96DED967360E258AEFF68D
Cooper M, Woodruff DR, Phillips IG, Basford KE, Gilmour AR (2001) Genotype-by-management interactions for grain yield and grain protein concentration of wheat. Field Crops Research 69, 47–67.
| Genotype-by-management interactions for grain yield and grain protein concentration of wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Del Cima R, D’Antuono MF, Anderson WK (2004) The effects of soil type and seasonal rainfall on the optimum seed rate for wheat in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 585–594.
| The effects of soil type and seasonal rainfall on the optimum seed rate for wheat in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Finlay KW, Wilkinson GN (1963) The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 742–754.
| The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gardener CJ, Rathjen AJ (1975) The differential response of barley cultivars to nitrogen application in a Mediterranean-type environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 219–230.
| The differential response of barley cultivars to nitrogen application in a Mediterranean-type environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Geleta B, Atak M, Baenziger PS, Nelson LA, Baltensperger DD, Eskridge KM, Shipman MJ, Shelton DR (2002) Seeding rate and genotype effect on agronomic performance and end-use quality of winter wheat. Crop Science 42, 827–832.
| Seeding rate and genotype effect on agronomic performance and end-use quality of winter wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Genstat (2008) ‘Genstat statistical package for Windows. Release 12.1.’ (VSN International: Hemel Hempstead, UK) Available at: www.genstat.com
Kindred DR, Gooding MJ (2004) Heterotic and seed rate effects on nitrogen efficiencies in wheat. The Journal of Agricultural Science 142, 639–657.
| Heterotic and seed rate effects on nitrogen efficiencies in wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXjvFOitbk%3D&md5=399ee8ba8eb10c52de7bcc98b1c99874CAS |
Ladha JK, Pathak H, Krupnik TJ, Six J, van Kessel C (2005) Efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen in cereal production: retrospects and prospects. Advances in Agronomy 87, 85–156.
| Efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen in cereal production: retrospects and prospects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXitlahsLg%3D&md5=dd1fbe5ceb5d96048e4a4f4b55d7c5d4CAS |
Lloveras J, Manent J, Viudas J, Lopez A, Santiveri P (2004) Seeding rate influence on yield and yield components of irrigated winter wheat in a Mediterranean climate. Agronomy Journal 96, 1258–1265.
| Seeding rate influence on yield and yield components of irrigated winter wheat in a Mediterranean climate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ma BL, Yan , Dwyer LM, Fergeau-Reid J, Voldeng HD, Nass H (2004) Graphic analysis of G, E, nitrogen fertilizer, and their interactions on spring wheat yield. Agronomy Journal 96, 169–180.
Otteson BN, Mergoum M, Ransom JK (2007) Seeding rate and nitrogen management effects on spring wheat yield and yield components. Agronomy Journal 99, 1615–1621.
| Seeding rate and nitrogen management effects on spring wheat yield and yield components.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhsVGrtbfN&md5=339803752911d517aae92711dd530495CAS |
Ransom JK, Endres GJ, Schatz BG (2007) Sustainable improvement of wheat yield potential: the role of crop management. The Journal of Agricultural Science 145, 55–61.
| Sustainable improvement of wheat yield potential: the role of crop management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ryan J, Abdel Monem M, Amri A (2009) Nitrogen fertilizer response of some local and improved barley varieties in semi-arid conditions in Morocco. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 11, 227–236.
Schoknecht N (2002) Soil groups of Western Australia. Resource Management Technical Report 246, Department of Agriculture Western Australia, South Perth. Available at: www.agric.wa.gov.au
Sharma DL, D’Antuono MF, Anderson WK, Shackley BJ, Zaicou-Kunesch CM, Amjad M (2008) Variability of optimum sowing time for wheat yield in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 958–970.
| Variability of optimum sowing time for wheat yield in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stephen RC, Saville DJ, Drewitt EG (2005) Effects of wheat seed rate and fertilizer nitrogen application practices on populations, grain yield components and grain yields of wheat (Triticum aestivum). New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 33, 125–138.
| Effects of wheat seed rate and fertilizer nitrogen application practices on populations, grain yield components and grain yields of wheat (Triticum aestivum).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
