Influence of row spacing on water use and yield of rain-fed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in a no-till system with stubble retention
S. G. L. Kleemann A B and G. S. Gill AA School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: samuel.kleemann@adelaide.edu.au
Crop and Pasture Science 61(11) 892-898 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP10124
Submitted: 9 April 2010 Accepted: 16 August 2010 Published: 4 November 2010
Abstract
A 3-year field study was undertaken to investigate the effect of row spacing on vegetative growth, grain yield and water-use efficiency of wheat. All 3 years of the study experienced 21–51% below-average rainfall for the growing season. Widening row spacing led to reduced biomass and tillers on per plant basis which could be related to the reduction in light interception by the wheat canopy in the wide rows which in turn could have reduced assimilate production. Reduction in vegetative growth in 54-cm rows translated into a significant reduction in grain yield which was strongly associated (r2 = 0.71) with the loss of spike density. The pattern of crop water use (evapotranspiration, ET) during the growing season was very similar for the three row-spacing treatments. However, there was some evidence for slightly lower ET (~5%) in 54-cm rows in two growing seasons. More importantly, there was no evidence for increased ET during the post-anthesis phase in wide rows as has been speculated by some researchers. Over the 3 years of the study, grain yield declined by 5–8% as row spacing increased from 18 to 36 cm and by a further 12–20% as row spacing increased from 36 to 54 cm. There was a consistent decline in water-use efficiency for grain (WUEG) with increasing row spacing over the 3 years. WUEG declined by 6–11% as crop spacing increased from 18 to 36 cm and declined further by 12–15% as row spacing increased to 54 cm. Lower light interception at wider row spacing could have reduced assimilate production by wheat as well as increased soil evaporation due to lower shading of the soil surface in more open canopies. Growers adopting wider row spacing on these relatively heavy textured soils are likely to experience some reduction in grain yield and WUEG. However, some growers may be prepared to accept a small yield penalty from intermediate row spacing as a trade-off for increased stubble retention and soil health.
References
Amjad M, Anderson WK (2006) Managing yield reductions from wide row spacing in wheat. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1313–1321.| Managing yield reductions from wide row spacing in wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Auld GF, Kemp DR, Medd RW (1983) The influence of spatial arrangement on grain yield of wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 34, 99–108.
| The influence of spatial arrangement on grain yield of wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Belford RK, Riethmuller GP (1992) Narrow row spacings have little effect on yield of wheat in the eastern wheatbelt. Western Australian Department of Agriculture, Technical Report No. 51, Perth.
Burch RN (1986) Effects of changing row spacing on wheat yields. Final report: Wheat Industry Research Council Project No. 498/0051, and Western Australian State Wheat Research Committee Project No. 355/0067, Western Australian Department of Agriculture, Perth.
Burk L, Dalgliesh N (2008) Part 1 – Characterisation for drained upper limit (DUL) and bulk density (BD). In GRDC publication ‘Estimating plant available water capacity’. pp. 7–12. (Grains Research and Development Corporation: Canberra)
Chen C, Neill K, Wichman D, Westcott M (2008) Hard red spring wheat response to row spacing, seeding rate, and nitrogen. Agronomy Journal 100, 1296–1302.
| Hard red spring wheat response to row spacing, seeding rate, and nitrogen.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Doyle AD, Fischer RA (1979) Dry matter accumulation and water use relationships in wheat crops. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 815–829.
| Dry matter accumulation and water use relationships in wheat crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Eberbach P, Pala M (2005) Crop row spacing and its influence on the partitioning of evapotranspiration by winter-grown wheat in Northern Syria. Plant and Soil 268, 195–208.
| Crop row spacing and its influence on the partitioning of evapotranspiration by winter-grown wheat in Northern Syria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXks1ers7c%3D&md5=e777e159d93195f45a55e04c61980ddfCAS |
Felton WL, Haigh BM, Harden S (2004) Comparing weed competition in chickpea, fababean, canola and wheat. In ‘Proceedings of the 14th Australian Weeds Conference’. pp. 304–307. (Weed Society of New South Wales: Wagga Wagga, NSW)
Felton WL, Marcellos H, Murison RD (1996) The effect of row spacing and seeding rate on chickpea yield in northern New South Wales. In ‘Proceedings of the 8th Australian Weeds Conference’. pp. 251–253. (Weed Society of Queensland: Toowoomba, Qld)
Fettell NA, Bamforth IS (1986) Row spacing for winter cereals in central western New South Wales. In ‘Recent advances in weed and crop residue management’. (Eds JE Pratley, P Cornish) pp. 34–35. (Riverina-Murray Institute of Higher Education: Wagga Wagga, NSW)
French RJ, Schultz JE (1984) Water use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean-type environment. 1. The relation between yield, water use and climate. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 35, 743–764.
| Water use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean-type environment. 1. The relation between yield, water use and climate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
French B, Wahlsten L (2003) Influence of row spacing on water stress and water use in lupins. In ‘Crop updates, Technical Information for Agribusiness’. pp. 22–23. (Department of Agriculture: WA, Perth)
Genstat (2003) ‘Genstat statistical package for windows.’ (Lawes Agricultural Trust: Hemel Hempstead, UK)
Isbell R (1996) ‘Australian soil classification.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)
Johnson JW, Hargrove WL, Moss RB (1988) Optimizing row spacing and seeding rate for soft red winter wheat. Agronomy Journal 80, 164–166.
| Optimizing row spacing and seeding rate for soft red winter wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Joseph KDSM, Alley MM, Brann DE, Gravelle WD (1985) Row spacing and seeding rate effects on yield and yield components of red winter wheat. Agronomy Journal 77, 211–214.
| Row spacing and seeding rate effects on yield and yield components of red winter wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Lafond GP (1994) Effects of row spacing, seeding rate and nitrogen on yield of barley and wheat under zero-till management. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 74, 703–711.
Lafond GP, Derksen DA (1996) Row spacing and seeding rate effects in wheat and barley under a conventional fallow management system. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 76, 791–793.
Martin P, Scott B, Edwards J, Haskins B, Smith J (2009) Row spacing in cereal and broadleaf crops. In ‘GRDC WUE Initiative Newsletter, Issue 1’. pp. 14–17. (CSIRO Plant Industry: Canberra)
McLeod JG, Campbell CA, Gan Y, Dyck FB, Vera CL (1996) Seeding depth, rate and row spacing for winter wheat grown on stubble and chemical fallow in the semiarid prairies. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 76, 207–214.
O’Leary GJ, Incerti M (1993) A field comparison of three neutron moisture meters. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 33, 59–69.
| A field comparison of three neutron moisture meters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK3sXmsVyqs7s%3D&md5=5f206d161f43352b51fac3acf13ec7a3CAS |
Peltzer SC, Hashem A, Osten VA, Gupta ML, Diggle AJ, Riethmuller GP, Douglas A, Moore JM, Koetz EA (2009) Weed management in wide-row cropping systems: a review of current practices and risks for Australian farming systems. Crop & Pasture Science 60, 395–406.
| Weed management in wide-row cropping systems: a review of current practices and risks for Australian farming systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Riethmuller GP, Amjad M (1996) Machinery for no-tillage sowing into wheat and lupin stubble. Western Australian Department of Agriculture. Farmnote No. 70/96, Perth.
Shackley BJ (2000) Crop management. In ‘The wheat book – principles and practice’. (Eds WK Anderson, JR Garlinge) pp. 140–145. (Western Australian Department of Agriculture: Perth)
Tompkins DK, Fowler DB, Wright AT (1991b) Water use by no-till winter wheat influence of seed rate and row spacing. Agronomy Journal 83, 766–769.
| Water use by no-till winter wheat influence of seed rate and row spacing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tompkins DK, Hultgreen GE, Wright AT, Fowler DB (1991a) Seed rate and row spacing of no-till winter wheat. Agronomy Journal 83, 684–689.
| Seed rate and row spacing of no-till winter wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
van Herwaarden AF, Farquhar GD, Angus JF, Richards RA, Howe GN (1998) ‘Haying-off’, the negative grain yield response of dryland wheat to nitrogen fertilizer 1. Biomass, grain yield, and water use. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 1067–1081.
| ‘Haying-off’, the negative grain yield response of dryland wheat to nitrogen fertilizer 1. Biomass, grain yield, and water use.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Whiteley GM, Dexter AR (1982) Root development and growth of oilseed, wheat and pea crops on tilled and non-tilled soil. Soil & Tillage Research 2, 379–393.
| Root development and growth of oilseed, wheat and pea crops on tilled and non-tilled soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Winter SR, Welch AD (1987) Tall and semidwarf wheat response to dryland planting systems. Agronomy Journal 79, 641–645.
| Tall and semidwarf wheat response to dryland planting systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Yunusa IAM, Belford RK, Tennant D, Sedgley RH (1993) Row spacing fails to modify soil evaporation and grain yield in spring wheat in a dry Mediterranean environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44, 661–671.
| Row spacing fails to modify soil evaporation and grain yield in spring wheat in a dry Mediterranean environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.
| A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
