Preliminary Evaluation of Dual Acidic Potassium Permanganate and Tris(2,2′-bipyridyl)ruthenium(ii) Chemiluminescence Detection for the HPLC Determination of Papaver somniferum Alkaloids
Claire E. Lenehan A , Neil W. Barnett A C , Simon W. Lewis A and Kevin M. Essery BA Centre for Chiral and Molecular Technologies, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong VIC 3217, Australia.
B GlaxoSmithKline, Port Fairy VIC 3284, Australia.
C Author to whom correspondence should be addressed (e-mail: barnie@deakin.edu.au).
Australian Journal of Chemistry 57(10) 1001-1004 https://doi.org/10.1071/CH04084
Submitted: 30 March 2004 Accepted: 15 June 2004 Published: 1 October 2004
Abstract
This paper describes a dual chemiluminescence reagent for the determination of the opiate alkaloids morphine, codeine, oripavine, and thebaine in Papaver somniferum extracts. Detection was achieved using a mixture of acidic potassium permanganate and tris(2,2′-bipyridyl)ruthenium(ii), where the former acted as both the oxidant for the latter and as a chemiluminescence reagent in its own right. The analytes were separated on a C8 column using ion-pairing HPLC. The application of the mixed reagent detection compared favourably with results obtained using standard HPLC methodology. Detection limits for the alkaloids were 10−6, 5 × 10−7, 3 × 10−6, and 2 × 10−6 mol L−1 for morphine, codeine, oripavine, and thebaine, respectively.
[1]
[2]
N. W. Barnett,
S. W. Lewis,
D. J. Tucker,
Fresnius J. Anal. Chem. 1996, 355, 591.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |