The Microflora of Unsuberized Roots of Eucalyptus calophylla R.Br. And Eucalyptus marginata Donn ex Sm. Seedlings Grown in Soil Suppressive and Conducive to Phytophthora cinnamomi Rands. I. Rhizosphere Bacteria, Actinomycetes and Fungi

Abstract

An investigation was made of the microflora associated with unsuberized roots of Eucalyptus marginata and Eucalyptus calophylla raised in different soils. The studies were made for 'conducive' lateritic soil (in which E. marginata is susceptible to infection by Phytophthora cinnamomi but E. Calophylla is resistant); and in 'suppressive' loam soil in which both eucalypt species are unaffected by the pathogen. Lateritic soil in some cases contained natural infection of P. cinnamomi. Rhizospheres of both species contained larger microflora populations (expressed as numbers per g of root) than in the soils. In general, the population of rhizosphere microflora was greater for E. Marginata than E. calophylla seedlings in the uninfected lateritic soil. Qualitative differences were also recorded in populations of bacteria, actinomycetes and fungi, and in particular, fluorescent pseudomonads were more numerous in the rhizosphere of E. marginata seedlings. Eucalypt seedlings raised in loam soil harboured greater microbial populations than in lateritic soil. This could in part be attributed to the higher nutrient and organic matter status of the loam. E. marginata had a greater total rhizosphere population, but actinomycetes were more numerous in the rhizosphere of E. calophylla. Qualitative differences in populations of bacteria, actinomycetes and fungi were also noted. In naturally infected lateritic soil the microflora populations were invariably lower than for the other soils.

When the counts of bacteria and actinomycetes were expressed as numbers per mm² of root surface, E. calophylla had a significantly higher number of propagules per unit area than E. marginata. The loam soil was an exception; there E. marginata had three times as many bacteria per unit area of the root surface as E. calophylla.

It is suggested that the microflora population differences recorded for the two eucalypts in lateritic soil may contribute to the differential susceptibility of species to infection by P. cinnamomi; and that the higher populations of microflora in the loam soil contribute to the suppression of P. Cinnamomi in that soil.