Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Journal of Botany Australian Journal of Botany Society
Southern hemisphere botanical ecosystems
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Significant population genetic structure detected for a new and highly restricted species of Atriplex (Chenopodiaceae) from Western Australia, and implications for conservation management

Laurence J. Clarke A , Duncan I. Jardine A , Margaret Byrne B , Kelly Shepherd B and Andrew J. Lowe A C D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Australian Centre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity (ACEBB), and School of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.

B Science Division, Department of Environment and Conservation, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Perth, WA 6983, Australia.

C State Herbarium of South Australia, Science Resource Centre, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Hackney Road, SA 5005, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: andrew.lowe@adelaide.edu.au

Australian Journal of Botany 60(1) 32-41 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT11223
Submitted: 31 August 2011  Accepted: 6 December 2011   Published: 22 February 2012

Abstract

Atriplex sp. Yeelirrie Station (L. Trotter & A. Douglas LCH 25025) is a highly restricted, potentially new species of saltbush, known from only two sites ~30 km apart in central Western Australia. Knowledge of genetic structure within the species is required to inform conservation strategies as both populations occur within a palaeovalley that contains significant near-surface uranium mineralisation. We investigate the structure of genetic variation within populations and subpopulations of this taxon using nuclear microsatellites. Internal transcribed spacer sequence data places this new taxon within a clade of polyploid Atriplex species, and the maximum number of alleles per locus suggests it is hexaploid. The two populations possessed similar levels of genetic diversity, but exhibited a surprising level of genetic differentiation given their proximity. Significant isolation by distance over scales of less than 5 km suggests dispersal is highly restricted. In addition, the proportion of variation between the populations (12%) is similar to that among A. nummularia populations sampled at a continent-wide scale (several thousand kilometres), and only marginally less than that between distinct A. nummularia subspecies. Additional work is required to further clarify the exact taxonomic status of the two populations. We propose management recommendations for this potentially new species in light of its highly structured genetic variation.


References

Allendorf FW, Luikart G (2007) ‘Conservation and the genetics of populations.’ (Blackwell Publishing: Malden, MA)

Becker U, Colling G, Dostal P, Jakobsson A, Matthies D (2006) Local adaptation in the monocarpic perennial Carlina vulgaris at different spatial scales across Europe. Oecologia 150, 506–518.
Local adaptation in the monocarpic perennial Carlina vulgaris at different spatial scales across Europe.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Besnard G, Henry P, Wille L, Cooke D, Chapuis E (2007) On the origin of the invasive olives (Olea europaea L., Oleaceae). Heredity 99, 608–619.
On the origin of the invasive olives (Olea europaea L., Oleaceae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtlaltb7J&md5=d7ad8db05fd1f871171b27ce43c1db0fCAS |

Blackwell WH, Powell MJ (1981) A preliminary note on pollination in the Chenopodiaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 68, 524–526.
A preliminary note on pollination in the Chenopodiaceae.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Broadhurst LM, Lowe A, Coates DJ, Cunningham SA, McDonald M, Vesk PA, Yates C (2008) Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximising evolutionary potential. Evolutionary Applications 1, 587–597.

Bruvo R, Michiels NK, D’Souza TG, Schulenburg H (2004) A simple method for the calculation of microsatellite genotype distances irrespective of ploidy level. Molecular Ecology 13, 2101–2106.
A simple method for the calculation of microsatellite genotype distances irrespective of ploidy level.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXlvFeks78%3D&md5=79ba3555f03ce0b90dfa1c5135e1135bCAS |

Butcher PA, McNee SA, Krauss SL (2009) Genetic impacts of habitat loss on the rare ironstone endemic Tetratheca paynterae subsp. paynterae. Conservation Genetics 10, 1735–1746.
Genetic impacts of habitat loss on the rare ironstone endemic Tetratheca paynterae subsp. paynterae.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clark LV, Jasieniuk M (2011) POLYSAT: an R package for polyploid microsatellite analysis. Molecular Ecology Resources 11, 562–566.
POLYSAT: an R package for polyploid microsatellite analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clarke LJ, Mackay DA, Whalen MA (2011) Isolation of microsatellites from Baumea juncea (Cyperaceae). Conservation Genetics Resources 3, 113–115.
Isolation of microsatellites from Baumea juncea (Cyperaceae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Drummond AJ, Ashton B, Buxton S, Cheung M, Cooper A, Heled J, Kearse M, Moir R, Stones-Havas S, Sturrock S, Thierer T, Wilson A (2010) Geneious version 5.3. Available at http://www.geneious.com [Verified 13 December 2012]

Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131, 479–491.

Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791.
Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Frankham R (2005) Genetics and extinction. Biological Conservation 126, 131–140.
Genetics and extinction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Frankham R, Ballou JD, Eldridge MDB, Lacy RC, Ralls K, Dudash MR, Fenster CB (2011) Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression. Conservation Biology 25, 465–475.
Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Galloway LF, Fenster CB (2000) Population differentiation in an annual legume: local adaptation. Evolution 54, 1173–1181.

Gardner MG, Fitch AJ, Bertozzi T, Lowe AJ (2011) Rise of the machines – recommendations for ecologists when using next generation sequencing for microsatellite development. Molecular Ecology Resources 11, 1093–1101.
Rise of the machines – recommendations for ecologists when using next generation sequencing for microsatellite development.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gordon DR, Rice KJ (1998) Patterns of differentiation in wiregrass (Aristida beyrichiana): implications for restoration efforts. Restoration Ecology 6, 166–174.
Patterns of differentiation in wiregrass (Aristida beyrichiana): implications for restoration efforts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology 52, 696–704.
A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002) SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Molecular Ecology Notes 2, 618–620.
SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hardy OJ, Charbonnel N, Fréville H, Heuertz M (2003) Microsatellite allele sizes: a simple test to assess their significance on genetic differentiation. Genetics 163, 1467–1482.

Hedrén M, Nordström S, Bateman RM (2011) Plastid and nuclear DNA marker data support the recognition of four tetraploid marsh orchids (Dactylorhiza majalis s.l., Orchidaceae) in Britain and Ireland, but require their recircumscription. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 104, 107–128.

Hufford KM, Mazer SJ (2003) Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18, 147–155.
Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hutchison DW, Templeton AR (1999) Correlation of pairwise genetic and geographic distance measures: inferring the relative influences of gene flow and drift on the distribution of genetic variability. Evolution 53, 1898–1914.
Correlation of pairwise genetic and geographic distance measures: inferring the relative influences of gene flow and drift on the distribution of genetic variability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kadereit G, Gotzek D, Jacobs S, Freitag H (2005) Origin and age of Australian Chenopodiaceae. Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 5, 59–80.
Origin and age of Australian Chenopodiaceae.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kadereit G, Mavrodiev EV, Zacharias EH, Sukhorukov AP (2010) Molecular phylogeny of Atripliceae (Chenopodioideae, Chenopodiaceae): implications for systematics, biogeography, flower and fruit evolution, and the origin of C4 photosynthesis. American Journal of Botany 97, 1664–1687.
Molecular phylogeny of Atripliceae (Chenopodioideae, Chenopodiaceae): implications for systematics, biogeography, flower and fruit evolution, and the origin of C4 photosynthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Klooster MR, Culley TM (2010) Population genetic structure of the mycoheterotroph Monotropa hypopitys L. (Ericaceae) and differentiation between red and yellow color forms. International Journal of Plant Sciences 171, 167–174.
Population genetic structure of the mycoheterotroph Monotropa hypopitys L. (Ericaceae) and differentiation between red and yellow color forms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 23, 2947–2948.
Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtlaqsL%2FM&md5=bb03951ecc1bc088086dccfa40767fd1CAS |

Leimu R, Fischer M (2008) A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants. PLoS ONE 3, e4010
A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Léotard G, Saltmarsh A, Kjellberg F, McKey D (2008) Mutualism, hybrid inviability and speciation in a tropical ant-plant. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21, 1133–1143.
Mutualism, hybrid inviability and speciation in a tropical ant-plant.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lowe AJ, Harris SA, Ashton P (2004) ‘Ecological genetics: design, analysis and application.’ (Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK) pp. 326

Lowe AJ, Boshier D, Ward M, Bacles CFE, Navarro C (2005) Genetic resource loss following habitat fragmentation and degradation; reconciling predicted theory with empirical evidence. Heredity 95, 255–273.
Genetic resource loss following habitat fragmentation and degradation; reconciling predicted theory with empirical evidence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtVehsLnK&md5=7245bca9ef76d93e963b5555ca52d342CAS |

Lynch M (1990) The similarity index and DNA fingerprinting. Molecular Biology and Evolution 7, 478–484.

McGlaughlin ME, Friar EA (2011) Evolutionary diversification and geographical isolation in Dubautia laxa (Asteraceae), a widespread member of the Hawaiian silversword alliance. Annals of Botany 107, 357–370.
Evolutionary diversification and geographical isolation in Dubautia laxa (Asteraceae), a widespread member of the Hawaiian silversword alliance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXis1egtb4%3D&md5=f703135aecd3b9c769172135a2e7fc93CAS |

Meglécz E, Costedoat C, Dubut V, Gilles A, Malausa T, Pech N, Martin JF (2010) QDD: a user-friendly program to select microsatellite markers and design primers from large sequencing projects. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 26, 403–404.
QDD: a user-friendly program to select microsatellite markers and design primers from large sequencing projects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Meirmans PG, Van Tienderen PH (2004) GENOTYPE and GENODIVE: two programs for the analysis of genetic diversity of asexual organisms. Molecular Ecology Notes 4, 792–794.
GENOTYPE and GENODIVE: two programs for the analysis of genetic diversity of asexual organisms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Millar MA, Byrne M, Coates DJ (2010) The maintenance of disparate levels of clonality, genetic diversity and genetic differentiation in disjunct subspecies of the rare Banksia ionthocarpa. Molecular Ecology 19, 4217–4227.
The maintenance of disparate levels of clonality, genetic diversity and genetic differentiation in disjunct subspecies of the rare Banksia ionthocarpa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXhsVagt77P&md5=5ba0489f658dbcde08acc12c9c210567CAS |

Moody ME, Mueller LD, Soltis DE (1993) Genetic variation and random drift in autotetraploid populations. Genetics 134, 649–657.

Moritz C (2002) Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. Systematic Biology 51, 238–254.
Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nobs MA (1980) Chromosome numbers in Australian species of Atriplex. Carnegie Institute Yearbook 79, 164–169.

Ortíz-Dorda J, Martínez-Mora C, Correal E, Simón B, Cenis JL (2005) Genetic structure of Atriplex halimus populations in the Mediterranean basin. Annals of Botany 95, 827–834.
Genetic structure of Atriplex halimus populations in the Mediterranean basin.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Parr-Smith GA (1982) Biogeography and evolution in the shrubby Australian species of Atriplex (Chenopodiaceae). In ‘Evolution of the flora and fauna of arid Australia’. (Eds WR Barker, PJM Greenslade) pp. 291–299. (Peacock Publications: Frewville, SA)

Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6, 288–295.
GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Posada D (2008) jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25, 1253–1256.
jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXotlKgsb4%3D&md5=50647b07ab16a7d5b4fddb0cb0fb670fCAS |

Robertson A, Rich TCG, Allen AM, Houston L, Roberts C, Bridle JR, Harris SA, Hiscock SJ (2010) Hybridization and polyploidy as drivers of continuing evolution and speciation in Sorbus. Molecular Ecology 19, 1675–1690.
Hybridization and polyploidy as drivers of continuing evolution and speciation in Sorbus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXmtlGju7Y%3D&md5=f6ce49986d10587de93e331091f6a41dCAS |

Sampson JF, Byrne M (2012) Genetic diversity and the origins of polyploid Atriplex nummularia Lindl. (Chenopodiaceae). Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 105, 218–230.
Genetic diversity and the origins of polyploid Atriplex nummularia Lindl. (Chenopodiaceae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sgrò CM, Lowe AJ, Hoffmann AA (2011) Building evolutionary resilience for conserving biodiversity under climate change. Evolutionary Applications 4, 326–337.
Building evolutionary resilience for conserving biodiversity under climate change.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Soltis PS, Soltis DE (2000) The role of genetic and genomic attributes in the success of polyploids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, 7051–7057.
The role of genetic and genomic attributes in the success of polyploids.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXksVKisbY%3D&md5=8ba5fda370cd805bb6084017d8705e7fCAS |

Stutz HC, Pope CL, Sanderson SC (1979) Evolutionary studies of Atriplex: adaptive products from the natural hybrid, 6N A. tridentata × 4N A. canescens. American Journal of Botany 66, 1181–1193.
Evolutionary studies of Atriplex: adaptive products from the natural hybrid, 6N A. tridentata × 4N A. canescens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Swofford DL (2002) ‘PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods).’ (Florida State University: Tallahassee, FL)

Taschereau PM (1988) Taxonomy, morphology and distribution of Atriplex hybrids in the British Isles. Watsonia 17, 247–264.

Vergilino R, Markova S, Ventura M, Manca M, Dufresne F (2011) Reticulate evolution of the Daphnia pulex complex as revealed by nuclear markers. Molecular Ecology 20, 1191–1207.
Reticulate evolution of the Daphnia pulex complex as revealed by nuclear markers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXltFaktL4%3D&md5=0a09b9297ead49240557568fea5ab48dCAS |

Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38, 1358–1370.
Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Western Australian Herbarium (1998) ‘FloraBase – The Western Australian Flora.’ (Department of Environment and Conservation: Perth, WA) Available at http://florabase.dec.wa.gov.au/ [Verified 5 August 2011]