Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Journal of Botany Australian Journal of Botany Society
Southern hemisphere botanical ecosystems
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Early impacts of harvesting and burning disturbances on vegetation communities in the Warra silvicultural systems trial, Tasmania, Australia

Mark G. Neyland A C and S. Jean Jarman A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Forestry Tasmania, 79 Melville Street, Hobart, Tas. 7000, Australia.

B Tasmanian Herbarium, Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, Hobart, Tas. 7000, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: mark.neyland@forestrytas.com.au

Australian Journal of Botany 59(8) 701-712 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT11081
Submitted: 10 March 2011  Accepted: 9 October 2011   Published: 21 November 2011

Abstract

Impacts on the understorey vegetation of a range of silvicultural alternatives to clearfelling in lowland Eucalyptus obliqua wet forest were studied over a decade in the Warra silvicultural systems trial in southern Tasmania. The treatments were clearfell with understorey islands, patchfell, stripfell, dispersed retention, aggregated retention, and single-tree/small-group selection. High intensity burning, low intensity burning and no burning were variously applied as part of these treatments. Three understorey types were studied, including one wet sclerophyll community and two rainforest communities. Wherever burning occurred across the research trial, the regenerating vegetation was floristically wet sclerophyll with an incipient composition consistent with that of the pre-harvest wet sclerophyll community. Sites previously occupied by rainforest understoreys retained occasional rainforest elements, but the regeneration was overwhelmingly sclerophyll in nature. There were no consistent differences in the floristic composition of the regenerating vegetation, after burning or harvesting disturbance, that could be attributed to the silvicultural system. However, field observations and the results of a related, subsequent study suggest that, in designing silvicultural trials similar to the present one, close attention should be paid to the size of quadrats in relation to the level at which disturbance impacts are operating. The response of the vegetation at edges created by the treatments, and in the undisturbed forest beyond, supports the finding that edge effects on the vascular flora extend for less than 10 m into the undisturbed forest.


References

Alcorn PJ, Dingle JK, Hickey JE (2001) Age and stand structure in a multi-aged wet eucalypt forest at the Warra silvicultural systems trial. Tasforests 13, 245–259.

Arnott JT, Beese WJ (1997) Alternatives to clearcutting in BC coastal montane forests. Forestry Chronicle 73, 670–678.

Aubry KB, Halpern CB, Peterson CE (2009) Variable-retention harvests in the Pacific Northwest: a review of short-term findings from the DEMO study. Forest Ecology and Management 258, 398–408.
Variable-retention harvests in the Pacific Northwest: a review of short-term findings from the DEMO study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Baker SC, Grove SJ, Forster L, Bonham KJ, Bashford D (2009) Short-term responses of ground-active beetles to alternative silvicultural systems in the Warra silvicultural systems trial, Tasmania, Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 258, 444–459.
Short-term responses of ground-active beetles to alternative silvicultural systems in the Warra silvicultural systems trial, Tasmania, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brown MJ, Elliott HJ, Hickey JE (2001) An overview of the Warra long-term ecological research site. Tasforests 13, 1–8.

Buchanan AM (2005) (Ed.) ‘A census of the vascular plants of Tasmania and index to The Students Flora of Tasmania.’ 4th edn. Tasmanian Herbarium Occasional Publication No. 7. (Tasmanian Herbarium, Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery: Hobart)

Commonwealth of Australia and State of Tasmania (1997) Tasmanian Regional Forest Agreement between the Commonwealth of Australia and the State of Tasmania, Hobart.

Commonwealth of Australia and State of Tasmania (2005) Supplementary Tasmanian Regional Forest Agreement, Hobart

Craig A, Macdonald SE (2009) Threshold effects of variable retention harvesting on understory plant communities in the boreal mixed wood forest. Forest Ecology and Management 258, 2619–2627.
Threshold effects of variable retention harvesting on understory plant communities in the boreal mixed wood forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dickinson KJM, Kirkpatrick JB (1987) The short-term effects of clearfelling and slash-burning on the richness, diversity and relative abundance of higher plant species in two types of eucalypt forest on dolerite in Tasmania. Australian Journal of Botany 35, 601–616.
The short-term effects of clearfelling and slash-burning on the richness, diversity and relative abundance of higher plant species in two types of eucalypt forest on dolerite in Tasmania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Duncan F, Johnson K (1995) ‘Forest botany manual, nature conservation region 10B.’ (Forestry Tasmania: Hobart)

Elliott HJ, Felton KC, Jarman SJ, Stone MG (2008) ‘A history of innovation: eighty-five years of research and development at Forestry Tasmania.’ (Forestry Tasmania: Hobart)

Ford R, Williams K, Bishop I, Webb T (2005a) ‘Social acceptability of forest management systems: project overview.’ (University of Melbourne: Melbourne)

Ford R, Williams K, Bishop ID, Webb T (2005b) Information effects on social acceptance of alternatives to clearfelling. In: ‘Burning issues in forestry: conference proceedings: the 22nd biennial conference of the Institute of Foresters of Australia, 10th–14th April 2005’, Mount Gambier, South Australia, p. 84.

Ford R, Williams KJH, Bishop ID, Hickey JE (2009) Public judgements of the social acceptability of silvicultural alternatives in Tasmanian wet eucalypt forests. Australian Forestry 72, 157–171.

Forest Practices Board (2000) ‘Forest practices code.’ (Forest Practices Board: Hobart)

Forestry Tasmania (1998) ‘Lowland wet eucalypt forests.’ Native forest silviculture Technical Bulletin No. 8. (Forestry Tasmania: Hobart)

Forestry Tasmania (2005) ‘High intensity prescribed burning.’ (Forestry Tasmania: Hobart)

Forestry Tasmania (2007a) ‘Eucalypt seed and sowing.’ Native forest silviculture Technical Bulletin No. 1. (Forestry Tasmania: Hobart)

Forestry Tasmania (2007b) Sustainable forest management report 2005–2006. Forestry Tasmania, Hobart.

Forestry Tasmania (2009) ‘A new silviculture for Tasmania’s public forests: a review of the variable retention program.’ (Forestry Tasmania: Hobart)

Franklin JF, Berg DR, Thornburgh DA, Tappeiner JC (1997) Alternative silvicultural approaches to timber harvesting: variable retention harvest systems. In ‘Creating a forestry for the 21st century: the science of ecosystem management’. (Eds KA Kohm, JF Franklin) pp. 111–139. (Island Press: Washington, DC)

Franklin JF, Norris LA, Berg DR, Smith GR (1999) The history of DEMO: an experiment in regeneration harvest of northwestern forest ecosystems. Northwest Science 73, 3–11.

Fries C, Johansson O, Pettersson B, Simonsson P (1997) Silvicultural models to maintain and restore natural stand structures in Swedish boreal forests. Forest Ecology and Management 94, 89–103.
Silvicultural models to maintain and restore natural stand structures in Swedish boreal forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gilbert JM (1959) Forest succession in the Florentine Valley, Tasmania. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 93, 129–151.

Halpern CB, Evans GC, Nelson C, McKenzie D, Ligourie D, Hibbs D, Halaj M (1999) Response of forest vegetation to varying levels and patterns of green-tree retention: an overview of a long-term experiment. Northwest Science 73, 27–44.

Halpern CB, McKenzie D, Evans SA, Maguire DA (2005) Initial responses of forest understories to varying levels and patterns of green-tree retention. Ecological Applications 15, 175–195.
Initial responses of forest understories to varying levels and patterns of green-tree retention.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hickey JE (1994) A floristic comparison of vascular species in Tasmanian old growth mixed forest with regeneration resulting from logging and wildfire. Australian Journal of Botany 42, 383–404.
A floristic comparison of vascular species in Tasmanian old growth mixed forest with regeneration resulting from logging and wildfire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hickey JE, Wilkinson GR (1999) The development and current implementation of silvicultural practices in native forests in Tasmania. Australian Forestry 62, 245–254.

Hickey JE, Blakesley AJ, Turner B (1982) Seedfall and germination of Nothofagus cunninghamii (Hook.) Oerst., Eucryphia lucida (Labill.) Baill. and Atherosperma moschatum Labill. Implications for regeneration practice. Australian Forest Research 13, 21–28.

Hickey JE, Neyland MG, Edwards LG, Dingle JK (1999a) Testing alternative silvicultural systems for wet eucalypt forests in Tasmania. In ‘Practising Forestry Today – Proceedings of the Institute of Foresters of Australia Conference’. Hobart. (Eds RC Ellis, PJ Smethurst) pp. 136–141. (Institute of Foresters of Australia Inc.: Canberra)

Hickey JE, Su W, Rowe P, Brown MJ, Edwards LG (1999b) Fire history of the tall wet eucalypt forests of the Warra ecological research site, Tasmania. Australian Forestry 62, 66–71.

Hickey JE, Neyland MG, Bassett OD (2001) Rationale and design for the Warra silvicultural systems trial in wet Eucalyptus obliqua forests in Tasmania. Tasforests 13, 155–182.

Hickey JE, Neyland MG, Grove SJ, Edwards LG (2006) From little things big things grow: the Warra silvicultural systems trial in Tasmanian wet Eucalyptus obliqua forest. Allgemeine Forst und Jagdzeitung 177, 113–119.

Hindrum L (2009) The effects of mechanical disturbance and burn intensity on the floristic composition of two-year aggregated retention coupes in southern Tasmania. Honours Thesis, University of Tasmania, Hobart.

Jarman SJ, Kantvilas G (2001a) Bryophytes and lichens at the Warra LTER Site. 1. An inventory of species in Eucalyptus obliqua wet sclerophyll forest. Tasforests 13, 193–216.

Jarman SJ, Kantvilas G (2001b) Bryophytes and lichens at the Warra LTER Site. II. Understorey habitats in Eucalyptus obliqua wet sclerophyll forest. Tasforests 13, 217–243.

Jarman SJ, Brown MJ, Kantvilas G (1984) ‘Rainforest in Tasmania.’ (National Parks and Wildlife Service: Hobart)

Kantvilas G, Jarman SJ (2004) Lichens and bryophytes on Eucalyptus obliqua in Tasmania: management implications in production forests. Biological Conservation 117, 359–373.
Lichens and bryophytes on Eucalyptus obliqua in Tasmania: management implications in production forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kantvilas G, Jarman SJ (2006) Recovery of lichens after logging: preliminary results from Tasmania’s wet forests. Lichenologist (London, England) 38, 383–394.
Recovery of lichens after logging: preliminary results from Tasmania’s wet forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kantvilas G, Jarman J, Minchin P (2008) Lichens and bryophytes: little plants, big message. In ‘Old Forest New Management. Proceedings of a conference held in Hobart, Tasmania, 17–21 February 2008’, p. 54, (Forestry Tasmania: Hobart)

Kirkpatrick JB, Peacock RJ, Cullen PJ, Neyland MG (1988) ‘The wet eucalypt forests of Tasmania.’ (Tasmanian Conservation Trust Inc.: Hobart)

Laffan MD (2001) Geology and soils of the Warra LTER site: a preliminary description. Tasforests 13, 23–30.

Lefort P, Grove S (2009) Early responses of birds to clearfelling and its alternatives in lowland wet eucalypt forest in Tasmania, Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 258, 460–471.
Early responses of birds to clearfelling and its alternatives in lowland wet eucalypt forest in Tasmania, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lindenmayer DB, McCarthy MA (2002) Congruence between natural and human forest disturbance: a case study from Australian montane ash forests. Forest Ecology and Management 155, 319–335.
Congruence between natural and human forest disturbance: a case study from Australian montane ash forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Martinez Pastur G, Lencinas MV, Peri PL, Moretto A, Cellini JM, Mormeneo I, Vukasovic R (2007) Harvesting adaptation to biodiversity conservation in sawmill industry: technology innovation and monitoring program. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation 2, 58–70.

McCune B, Mefford MJ (2006) ‘Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 5.31.’ (MjM Software: Gleneden Beach, OR)

Mitchell K (1993) ‘Safety of forest harvesting under alternative silvicultural systems in a mountain ash forest.’ VSP Technical Report No. 21. (Conservation and Natural Resources: Melbourne,Victoria).

Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H (1974) ‘Aims and methods of vegetation ecology.’ (John Wiley and Sons Inc.: New York)

Nelson CR, Halpern CB (2005) Edge-related responses of understorey plants to aggregated retention harvest in the Pacific northwest. Ecological Applications 15, 196–209.
Edge-related responses of understorey plants to aggregated retention harvest in the Pacific northwest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Neyland MG (2001) Vegetation of the Warra silvicultural systems trial. Tasforests 13, 183–192.

Neyland M, Hickey J, Beadle C, Bauhus J, Davidson N, Edwards L (2009a) An examination of stocking and early growth in the Warra silvicultural systems trial confirms the importance of a burnt seedbed for vigorous regeneration in Eucalyptus obliqua forest. Forest Ecology and Management 258, 481–494.
An examination of stocking and early growth in the Warra silvicultural systems trial confirms the importance of a burnt seedbed for vigorous regeneration in Eucalyptus obliqua forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Neyland MG, Hickey JE, Edwards LG (2009b) Safety and productivity at the Warra silvicultural systems trial. Tasforests 18, 1–16.

Neyland M, Hickey J, Read S (in press) A synthesis of outcomes from the Warra silvicultural systems trial: safety, productivity, economics, ecology, silviculture and social acceptability. Australian Forestry

Nyvold U, Dawson JK, Hickey JE (2005) An assessment of timber values from alternative silvicultural systems tested in wet Eucalyptus obliqua forests in Tasmania. Tasforests 16, 19–34.

Ough K (2001) Regeneration of wet forest flora a decade after clearfelling or wildfire. Is there a difference? Australian Journal of Botany 49, 645–664.
Regeneration of wet forest flora a decade after clearfelling or wildfire. Is there a difference?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ough K, Murphy A (1996) The effect of clearfelling logging on tree-ferns in Victoria. Australian Forestry 59, 178–188.

Smith DM, Larson BC, Kelty MJ, Ashton PMS (1997) ‘The practice of silviculture: applied forest ecology.’ (John Wiley and Sons: New York)

Statistical Graphics Corporation (1994–1996) ‘Statgraphics Plus 2.1.’ (Statistical Graphics Corporation: Rockville, MD)

Tabor J, McElhinny C, Hickey J, Wood J (2007) Colonisation of clearfelled coupe edges by rainforest tree species from mature mixed forest edges, Tasmania, Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 240, 13–23.
Colonisation of clearfelled coupe edges by rainforest tree species from mature mixed forest edges, Tasmania, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Westphalen G (2003) The ecology of edges in Tasmanian wet forests managed for wood production. PhD Thesis, University of Tasmania, Hobart.

Whiteley SB (1999) Calculating the sustainable yield of Tasmania’s State forests. Tasforests 11, 23–34.