Register      Login
Australian Journal of Botany Australian Journal of Botany Society
Southern hemisphere botanical ecosystems
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Female-biased nectar production in the protandrous, hermaphroditic shrub Salvia hierosolymitana (Lamiaceae)

Yehoram Leshem A D E , Tamar Keasar B and Avi Shmida C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat-Ram, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.

B Department of Biology, University of Haifa – Oranim, Tivon 36006, Israel.

C Centre of Rationality and Department of Evolution, Systematics, and Ecology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat-Ram, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.

D Present address: Department of Plant Biology, UC Davis, CA 95616, USA.

E Corresponding author. Email: yleshem@ucdavis.edu

Australian Journal of Botany 59(1) 18-25 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT10176
Submitted: 13 July 2010  Accepted: 22 November 2010   Published: 10 February 2011

Abstract

Flowering progresses upward along vertical inflorescences in the protandrous dichogamous shrub Salvia hierosolymitana (Boiss.). Flowers’ gender nectar production rates and their vertical distribution were recorded in two populations (northern and central Israel) over 3 years. Female-phase flowers produced significantly more nectar than male-phase flowers and were more abundant at the inflorescences’ base. Thus, nectar availability gradually decreases along inflorescences. Female-biased nectar production can benefit plants by increasing pollinator visits to female-phase flowers, enhancing pollination success when pollen is scarce. In congruence with this hypothesis, the following observations suggest that pollen in S. hierosolymitana may be in short supply: (1) freshly dehisced anthers contained 40% of sterile pollen; (2) pollen counts on female-phase stigmas were low (mean ± s.e. 11.6 ± 1.56); and (3) counts of germinated pollen tubes at the pistils’ base were even lower (5.02 ± 0.54). The nectar gradient along the inflorescence may also be adaptively beneficial in other aspects. Foraging insects that follow this gradient are expected to move from female-phase flowers near the inflorescences’ base, to male-phase flowers closer to the top. Thus, reducing the risk of geitonogamy and promoting outcrossing while moving from male-phase flowers of one individual to female-phase flowers of another.


References

Aizen MA, Raffaele E (1996) Nectar production and pollination in Alstroemeria aurea: responses to level and pattern of flowering shoot defoliation. Oikos 76, 312–322.
Nectar production and pollination in Alstroemeria aurea: responses to level and pattern of flowering shoot defoliation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Andersson M (1994) ‘Sexual selection.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ)

Ashman TL, Knight TM, Steet JA, Amarasekare P, Burd M, Campbell DR, Dudash MR, Johnston MO, Mazer SJ, Mitchell RJ, Morgan MT, Wilson WG (2004) Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 85, 2408–2421.
Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bell G (1985) On the function of flowers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Biological Sciences 224, 223–265.
On the function of flowers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bertsch A (1987) Flowers as food sources and the cost of outcrossing. Ecological Studies 61, 277–293.

Best LS, Bierzychudek P (1982) Pollinator foraging on Foxglove (Digitalis purpurea): a test of a new model. Evolution 36, 70–79.
Pollinator foraging on Foxglove (Digitalis purpurea): a test of a new model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Burd M (1994) Bateman’s principle and plant reproduction – the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Botanical Review 60, 83–139.
Bateman’s principle and plant reproduction – the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Carlson JE (2007) Male-biased nectar production in a protandrous herb matches predictions of sexual selection theory. American Journal of Botany 94, 674–682.
Male-biased nectar production in a protandrous herb matches predictions of sexual selection theory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Carlson JE, Harms KE (2006) The evolution of gender-biased nectar production in hermaphroditic plants. Botanical Review 72, 179–205.
The evolution of gender-biased nectar production in hermaphroditic plants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Charlesworth D, Schemske DW, Sork VL (1987) The evolution of plant reproductive characters: sexual vs. natural selection. In ‘Evolution of sex’. (Ed. SC Stearns) pp. 317–335. (Birkhauser: Basel, Switzerland)

Charnov EL (1979) Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 76, 2480–2484.
Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cngslyrsg%3D%3D&md5=6b3d842d5d259a937a63a85811e0bf19CAS | 16592656PubMed |

Charnov EL (1982) ‘The theory of sex allocation.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ)

Clebsch B, Barner CD (2003) ‘The new book of Salvias.’ (Timber Press: Portland, OR)

Conner JK, Davis R, Rush S (1995) The effect of wild radish floral morphology on pollination efficiency by four taxa of pollinators. Oecologia 104, 234–245.
The effect of wild radish floral morphology on pollination efficiency by four taxa of pollinators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

de Jong T, Thuijsman F, Shmida A (2008) Optimal sex allocation in plants and the evolution of monoecy. Evolutionary Ecology Research 10, 1082–1109.

Delph LF, Havens K (1998) Pollen competition in flowering plants. In ‘Sperm competition and sexual selection’. (Eds TR Birkhead, AP Moller) pp. 149–173. (Academic Press: New York)

Grant V (1995) Sexual selection in plants: pros and cons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92, 1247–1250.
Sexual selection in plants: pros and cons.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXktFWksLw%3D&md5=77ccf9baad83b28e94ff5ca8ed9e25bcCAS | 11607513PubMed |

Guitián J, Navarro L (1996) Allocation of reproductive resources within inflorescences of Petrocoptis grandiflora (Caryophyllaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 74, 1482–1486.
Allocation of reproductive resources within inflorescences of Petrocoptis grandiflora (Caryophyllaceae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Heywood VH (1978) ‘Flowering plants of the world, Labiatae (Lamiaceae).’ (Mayflower Books: New York)

Herrera CM, Pérez R, Alonso C (2006) Extreme intraplant variation in nectar sugar composition in an insect-pollinated perennial herb. American Journal of Botany 93, 575–581.
Extreme intraplant variation in nectar sugar composition in an insect-pollinated perennial herb.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kaczorowski RL, Juenger TE, Holtsford TP (2008) Heritability and correlation structure of nectar and floral morphology traits in Nicotiana alata. Evolution 62, 1738–1750.
Heritability and correlation structure of nectar and floral morphology traits in Nicotiana alata.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18410534PubMed |

Keasar T, Sadeh A, Shmida A (2008) Variability in nectar production and yield, and their relation to pollinator visits, in a Mediterranean shrub. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 2, 117–123.
Variability in nectar production and yield, and their relation to pollinator visits, in a Mediterranean shrub.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Khatun S, Flowers TJ (1995) The estimation of pollen viability in rice. Journal of Experimental Botany 46, 151–154.
The estimation of pollen viability in rice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXjslKhsrw%3D&md5=291f84edd7b80919ddace339c1c909afCAS |

Knight TM, Steets JA, Vamosi JC, Mazer SJ, Burd M, Campbell DR, Dudash MR, Johnston MO, Mitchell RJ, Ashman TL (2005) Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: pattern and process. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 36, 467–497.
Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: pattern and process.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Leiss KA, Vrieling K, Klinkhamer PGL (2004) Heritability of nectar production in Echium vulgare. Heredity 92, 446–451.
Heritability of nectar production in Echium vulgare.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c3gvFKrsA%3D%3D&md5=dd582c5a6bfe51affb0284874392024aCAS | 15026780PubMed |

Lyons EE, Waser NM, Price MV, Antovics J, Motten AF (1989) Sources of variation in plant reproductive success and implications for concepts of sexual selection. American Naturalist 134, 409–433.
Sources of variation in plant reproductive success and implications for concepts of sexual selection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Marden JH (1984) Intrapopulation variation in nectar secretion in Impatiens capensis. Oecologia 63, 418–422.
Intrapopulation variation in nectar secretion in Impatiens capensis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McInnis SM, Emery DC, Porter R, Desika R, Hancock JT, Hiscock SJ (2006) The role of stigma peroxidases in flowering plants: insights from further characterization of a stigma-specific peroxidase (SSP) from Senecio squalidus (Asteraceae). Journal of Experimental Botany 57, 1835–1846.
The role of stigma peroxidases in flowering plants: insights from further characterization of a stigma-specific peroxidase (SSP) from Senecio squalidus (Asteraceae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XmsVaqs78%3D&md5=5e170290442471002ddffc16de17fd3eCAS | 16698818PubMed |

Nicolson SW, Thornburg RW (2007) Nectar chemistry. In ’Nectaries and nectar’. (Eds SW Nicolson, M Nepi, E Pacini) pp. 215–263. (Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)

Orth AI, Waddington KD (1997) The movement patterns of carpenter bees Xylocopa micans and bumblebees Bombus pennsylvanicus on Pontederia cordata inflorescences. Journal of Insect Behavior 10, 79–86.
The movement patterns of carpenter bees Xylocopa micans and bumblebees Bombus pennsylvanicus on Pontederia cordata inflorescences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pagnussat GC, Yu HJ, Ngo QA, Rajan SI, Mayalagu S, Johnson CS, Capron A, Xie LF, Ye D, Sundaresan V (2005) Genetic and molecular identification of genes required for female gametophyte development and function in Arabidopsis. Development 132, 603–614.
Genetic and molecular identification of genes required for female gametophyte development and function in Arabidopsis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhvVelu74%3D&md5=db67be63df3d35ca434c934778b75c6eCAS | 15634699PubMed |

Pyke GH (1979) Optimal foraging in bumblebees: rule of movement between flowers within inflorescence. Animal Behaviour 27, 1167–1181.
Optimal foraging in bumblebees: rule of movement between flowers within inflorescence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rodriguez-Riano T, Dafni A (2000) A new procedure to asses pollen viability. Sexual Plant Reproduction 12, 241–244.
A new procedure to asses pollen viability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Skogsmyr I, Lankinen A (2002) Sexual selection: an evolutionary force in plants? Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 77, 537–562.
Sexual selection: an evolutionary force in plants?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12475053PubMed |

Stanton ML, Snow AA, Handel SN (1986) Floral evolution: attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness. Science 232, 1625–1627.
Floral evolution: attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cvjvF2qsA%3D%3D&md5=b5edf0e07ffd512c5e180c72aaea62afCAS | 17812141PubMed |

Stone GN, Gilbert F, Willmer P, Potts S, Semida F, Zalat S (1999) Windows of opportunity and the temporal structuring of foraging activity in a desert solitary bee. Ecological Entomology 24, 208–221.
Windows of opportunity and the temporal structuring of foraging activity in a desert solitary bee.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thomson JD, Thomson BA (1989) Dispersal of Erythronium grandiflorum pollen by bumblebees: implications for gene flow and reproductive success. Evolution 43, 657–661.
Dispersal of Erythronium grandiflorum pollen by bumblebees: implications for gene flow and reproductive success.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thordal-Christensen H, Zhange Z, Wei Y, Collinge DB (1997) Subcellular localization of H2O2 in plants. H2O2 accumulation in papillae and hypersensitive response during the barley-powdery mildew interaction. The Plant Journal 11, 1187–1194.
Subcellular localization of H2O2 in plants. H2O2 accumulation in papillae and hypersensitive response during the barley-powdery mildew interaction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXkslajtLs%3D&md5=b0a01985fca5ae217701d92e27f9474fCAS |

Till-Bottraud I, Joly D, Lachaise D, Snook RR (2005) Pollen and sperm heteromorphism: convergence across kingdoms? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18, 1–18.
Pollen and sperm heteromorphism: convergence across kingdoms?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2FnslCktw%3D%3D&md5=54a406f6785307c0d98234153fc555e6CAS | 15669956PubMed |

Waddington KD, Heinrich B (1979) The foraging movements of bumblebees on vertical ‘inflorescences’: an experimental analysis. Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 134, 113–117.
The foraging movements of bumblebees on vertical ‘inflorescences’: an experimental analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wesselingh RA (2007) Pollen limitation meets resource allocation: towards a comprehensive methodology. New Phytologist 174, 26–37.
Pollen limitation meets resource allocation: towards a comprehensive methodology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17335494PubMed |

Wilson P, Thomson JD, Stanton ML, Rigney LP (1994) Beyond floral Batemania: gender biases in selection for pollination success. American Naturalist 143, 283–296.
Beyond floral Batemania: gender biases in selection for pollination success.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Winsor JA, Peretz S, Stephenson AG (2000) Pollen competition in a natural population of Curcurbita foetidissima (Curcurbitaceae). American Journal of Botany 87, 527–532.
Pollen competition in a natural population of Curcurbita foetidissima (Curcurbitaceae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 10766724PubMed |

Zimmerman M, Pyke GH (1988) Experimental manipulations of Polemonium foliosissimum: effects on subsequent nectar production, seed production and growth. Journal of Ecology 76, 777–789.
Experimental manipulations of Polemonium foliosissimum: effects on subsequent nectar production, seed production and growth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |