Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Australian Journal of Botany Australian Journal of Botany Society
Southern hemisphere botanical ecosystems
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Breeding barriers between Gossypium spp. and species of the Malvaceae family

Stella Kantartzi A C and D. G. Roupakias B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701 AR, USA.

B Laboratory of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece.

C Corresponding author. Email: skantart@uark.edu

Australian Journal of Botany 56(3) 241-245 https://doi.org/10.1071/BT07161
Submitted: 31 August 2007  Accepted: 22 November 2007   Published: 21 May 2008

Abstract

Cotton breeders have long recognised the importance of alien germplasm from the Malvaceae family, especially the cultivated species, as sources of genes for cotton improvement. An understanding of the biological nature of the incompatibility systems that prevent hybridisation and/or seed development is necessary for the successful hybridisation and introgression between cotton and cultivated Malvaceae species (Hibiscus cannabinus and Abelmoschus esculentus). The objectives of the present study were to determine the reasons for reproductive isolation between Malvaceae species. The current study utilised two alien Malvaceae species and established that pollen–pistil incompatibilities are the primary reasons that hybrids with Gossypium hirsutum are not obtained. The alien pollen tubes showed major inhibition of growth in cotton pistils and seldom grew beyond the stigma. Only pollen tubes of A. esculentus grew into the ovary of cotton.


References


Brown MS (1947) A case of spontaneous reduction of chromosome number in somatic tissue of cotton. American Journal of Botany 34, 384–388.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dumas C, Knox RB (1983) Callose and determination of pistil viability and incompatibility. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 67, 1–10.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Franklin-Tong VE (2002) The difficult question of sex: the mating game. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 5, 14–18.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Hadley HH , Openshaw SJ (1980) Interspecific and intergeneric hybridization. In ‘Hybridization of crop plants’. (Eds WR Fehr, HH Hadley) pp. 133–159 (American Society of Agronomy—Crop Science Society of America: Madison, WI)

Heslop-Harrison J, Heslop-Harrison Y (1970) Evaluation of pollen viability by enzymatically induced fluorescence; intracellular hydrolysis of fluorescein diacetate. Stain Technology 45, 115–120.
PubMed |
open url image1

Jalani BS, Moss JP (1980) The site of action of the crossability genes (Kr 1, Kr 2) between Triticum and Secale I. Pollen germination, pollen tube growth, and the number of pollen tubes. Euphytica 29, 571–579.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lacape JM, Nguyen TB, Courtois B, Belot JL, Giband M, Gourlot JP, Gawryziak G, Roques S, Hau B (2005) QTL analysis of cotton fiber quality using multiple Gossypium hirsutum × Gossypium barbadense backcross generations. Crop Science 45, 123–140. open url image1

Lange W, Wojciechowska B (1976) The crossing of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with cultivated rye (Secale cereale L.) I. Crossability, pollen grain germination and pollen tube growth. Euphytica 25, 609–620.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lord EM (2003) Adhesion and guidance in compatible pollination. Journal of Experimental Botany 54, 47–54.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Lord EM, Russell SD (2002) The mechanisms of pollination and fertilization in plants. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 18, 81–105.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Lower RL, Johnson KW (1969) Observations on sterility of induced autotetraploid watermelons. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 94, 367–369. open url image1

Martin FM (1959) Staining and observing pollen tubes by means of fluorescence. Stain Technology 34, 436–437. open url image1

Mavromatis AG, Kantartzi SK, Vlachostergios DN, Xynias IN, Skarakis GN, Roupakias DG (2005) Induction of embryo development and fixation of partial Interspecific lines after pollination of F1 cotton interspecific hybrids (Gossypium barbadense × Gossypium hirsutum) with pollen from Hibiscus cannabinus. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 1101–1109.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Mehetre SS (1993) Distant hybridization in cotton breeding-intergeneric hybridization (an overview). Journal of Cotton Research and Development 7(2), 179–192. open url image1

Sitch LA, Snape JW (1986) The influences of the Hordeum bulbosum and wheat genotype on haploid production in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzüchtg 96, 304–319. open url image1

Snape JW, Chapman V, Moss J, Blanchard CE, Miller TE (1979) The crossabilities of wheat varieties with Hordeum bulbosum. Euphytica 25, 609–620. open url image1

Vyscokij KA (1956) Distant hybridization within family Malvaceae. Hopkovodstvo [Russian] 12, 28–35. open url image1

Wise RR, Sassenrath-Cole GF, Percy R (2000) A comparison of leaf anatomy in field-grown Gossypium hirsutum and G. barbadense. Annals of Botany 86, 731–738.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Zhou SQ, Qian DQ, Cao XY (1991) Induction of parthenogenesis and chromosome behavior in plants of parthenogenetic origin in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Genome 34, 255–260. open url image1

Zhou SQ, Qian DQ, Cao XY (1992) Inheritance of characters and chromosome number in aneusomatic progeny of Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) of parthenogenetic origin. Genome 35, 35–38. open url image1